| |
I0OJJ > PACKET 04.12.19 00:16l 52 Lines 1671 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 40123_I0OJJ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: PY2BIL > Changed subject line
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<IW2OHX<IR1UAW<I0OJJ
Sent: 191203/2314z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:40125 $:40123_I0OJJ
>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Wed Dec 4 00:14:19 2019
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m) with SMTP
id AA40125 ; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:14:19 +0100
Message-Id: <40123@i0ojj.ampr.org>
>From: i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org
X-JNOS-User-Port: Uplink (I0OJJ-4 on port hub) -> Sending message
--------------
> Note: forwarding information should never make it inside the R: line listings.
> I'll guess this may have occurred with forwarding to VE1MPF who seems to be
> on an older version of your BBS software.
That could be the case, but again, Im not sure. I would appreciate if there is
any other suggestion on where to check to find out if it's me then I would be
happy to go after it.
73
NB: has this messages subject line changed now?
--------------
yes, one reason could be the one expressed above by N1URO.
Surely the 'F>' occours 'always' between two bpq systems;
and reasons may be several:
- the no fully *compatibility* among winbpq, linbpq and
pilinbpq
- the very wide versions running from 6.0.14 to 6.0.19
which are very different for features, html support,
etc ...
- only a very few systems are setup with the B1F/B2F
protocols as expected, but they forward in simple
text mode ...
- the worst, for me, is that discussions and tests if
any are confined only on internet mailing list and
in packet radio too ...
I can do my tests thanks to the fact that I own two
distant official amaterur sites and three official
callsigns and so I'm authorized to run non attended
automatic and numeric systems ... :)
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
SICD project Rome Italy
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
