| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 26.08.16 17:30l 856 Lines 28289 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB11272
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V11 272
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 160826/1615Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:51947 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB11272
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. AMSAT Area Coordinators (Bruce)
2. Re: CY9C satellite passes next 24 hours (Bob)
3. Re: CY9C Dupes (jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xxx
4. Re: CY9C Dupes (EC4TR Luis)
5. CY9C satellite update August 26 (Clayton Coleman)
6. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26 (Mark Johns)
7. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26
(Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
8. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26 (Paul Stoetzer)
9. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26 (Jeff)
10. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26 (Clayton W5PFG)
11. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26 (Jeff)
12. Re: CY9C satellite update August 26 (Paul Stoetzer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:10 -0500
From: Bruce <kk5do@xxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AMSAT Area Coordinators
Message-ID: <e514e3ad-7b5c-c2c1-f53d-acb0e327df98@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Are you an AMSAT Area Coordinator? Are you looking for an AMSAT Area
Coordinator? Would you like to become an AMSAT Area Coordinator?
If you answered yes any of these questions, then we are ready to help
you. I have just placed (with the list maintained by Patrick, WD9EWK)
the current list of AMSAT Area Coordinators on the amsat.org webpage.
You can peruse it at your leisure and if you find someone close to you
that you would like to get some help from, you can drop that Area
Coordinator an email at his callsign @ amsat.org
If you see a need for a correction or addition, please drop an email to
Patrick, WD9EWK, at his amsat.org email address.
Oh, where can you actually find the list? http://www.amsat.org then
click on AMSAT in the menu bar and you will see Area Coordinators.
73...bruce
--
Bruce Paige, KK5DO
AMSAT Director Contests and Awards
AMSAT Board Alternate 2015-2016
ARRL Awards Field Checker (WAS, 5BWAS, VUCC), VE
Houston AMSAT Net - Wed 0100z on Echolink - Conference *AMSAT*
Also live streaming MP3 at http://www.amsatnet.com
Podcast at http://www.amsatnet.com/podcast.xml or iTunes
Latest satellite news on the ARRL Audio News
http://www.arrl.org
AMSAT on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/amsat
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:19:20 -0400
From: Bob <WB4SON@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite passes next 24 hours
Message-ID:
<CAPonRZ-77SrY1=0jiLkBE-69CD1G9qJaUw4Jp6Xbf5Y=DA9bBg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks for that table Clayton.
I was able to work CY9C at 21:08 on AO7. They had a great signal and fine
operator on the mic.
73, Bob, WB4SON
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> CY9C satellite passes for next 24 hours. They make work others as
> available.
> Asterisks * indicates a prioritized pass for best geographical coverage.
>
> All dates/times are UTC
>
> 25.08.2016 AO-85 16:51-17:02
> 25.08.2016 AO-07 17:15-17:34
> 25.08.2016 AO-85 18:32-18:42
> 25.08.2016 AO-07 19:06-19:27
> 25.08.2016 XW-2C 20:28-20:37 *
> 25.08.2016 AO-07 21:04-21:19 *
> 25.08.2016 XW-2C 22:02-22:11
> 25.08.2016 XW-2F 22:16-22:25
> 25.08.2016 XW-2A 23:38-23:44 *
> 26.08.2016 FO-29 01:46-01:52 *
> 26.08.2016 SO-50 03:10-03:21
> 26.08.2016 FO-29 03:28-03:45 *
> 26.08.2016 SO-50 04:50-05:02 *
> 26.08.2016 FO-29 05:13-05:30
> 26.08.2016 SO-50 06:33-06:42 *
> 26.08.2016 FO-29 06:59-07:11 *
>
> 73
> Clayton
> W5PFG
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:54:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xx
To: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C Dupes
Message-ID:
<764084381.230559739.1472162086905.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hoi Paul,
Last weekend i heard the same "selfishness" on this site off the ocean. I
special event station was activating a lighthouse with a special /p call,
but he couldn't come thru on SO-50/AO-85. Some stupid stations didn't even
listen, just calling and calling cq, while others are trying to finish a
contact. And they just need to make a contact on EVERY pass with the same
stations, * times/day, rather then having a new square/station/dxcc/special
event in the log. Why? To have 1000 contacts in the logbook, but only with 5
or so different stations? I don't understand what's the fun for them,on
doing something like that.
So don't worry, it happens also on EU passes,hi.
Best 73's
Jerry,ON4CJQ
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
Aan: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Verzonden: Donderdag 25 augustus 2016 18:36:45
Onderwerp: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C Dupes
At some point, naming names is required:
K4FEG is now on his third QSO for the pass, and fifth overall on FO-29.
Such selfishness is a poor reflection on a person's character.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> One well-known satellite operator has now been heard working them four
> times over two FO-29 passes. This is not necessary and reduces the
> opportunity for others to work them, especially those on the fringe of
> coverage.
>
> DXpedition operators frown upon excessive dupes. Let's try to refrain
> from working them more than once!
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:03:17 +0200
From: EC4TR Luis <ec4tr.luis@xxxxx.xxx>
To: jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xx
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C Dupes
Message-ID:
<CALcq4TFfNp51FFFEdon-JqOGn6f3=EDN+56qbEKeZA8+ZwDpJQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I know that there's any consolation, but here in Europe is exactly the same.
73 Luis
EC4TR
2016-08-25 23:54 GMT+02:00 <jerry.tuyls@xxxxxxx.xx>:
> Hoi Paul,
>
> Last weekend i heard the same "selfishness" on this site off the ocean. I
> special event station was activating a lighthouse with a special /p call,
> but he couldn't come thru on SO-50/AO-85. Some stupid stations didn't even
> listen, just calling and calling cq, while others are trying to finish a
> contact. And they just need to make a contact on EVERY pass with the same
> stations, * times/day, rather then having a new square/station/dxcc/special
> event in the log. Why? To have 1000 contacts in the logbook, but only with
> 5 or so different stations? I don't understand what's the fun for them,on
> doing something like that.
>
> So don't worry, it happens also on EU passes,hi.
>
> Best 73's
>
> Jerry,ON4CJQ
>
>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
> Aan: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Verzonden: Donderdag 25 augustus 2016 18:36:45
> Onderwerp: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C Dupes
>
> At some point, naming names is required:
>
> K4FEG is now on his third QSO for the pass, and fifth overall on FO-29.
>
> Such selfishness is a poor reflection on a person's character.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > One well-known satellite operator has now been heard working them four
> > times over two FO-29 passes. This is not necessary and reduces the
> > opportunity for others to work them, especially those on the fringe of
> > coverage.
> >
> > DXpedition operators frown upon excessive dupes. Let's try to refrain
> > from working them more than once!
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Paul, N8HM
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:10:05 -0500
From: Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID:
<CAPovOwfb==00CBRXK99C4aezNkcgEnTXMr-iAdwH-EYE_T_dXA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Some of you may have noticed on @xxxxxxx Twitter feed that bad weather
forced them offline in the middle of the night between 0200-0700 UTC
today. It has been raining heavily with strong wind gusts. When
weather clears, they expect to get back online and operate.
I would recommend if you aren't in the log yet, listen on all
available passes with mutual footprint. Their six digit gridsquare is
FN97wf.
73
Clayton
W5PFG
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mark Johns <mjohns166@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID: <488726276.230211.1472221422549@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Clayton,
Do you know if satellite QSOs are reflected in the 2m ClubLog results? If
so, it's easy to see if your station is in the log and know that those
"insurance" contacts are unnecessary. (As of yesterday, my satellite QSO was
not shown in ClubLog. But I know it takes awhile, especially if weather has
everything shut down.)
--
Mark D. Johns, K?MDJ
Decorah, Iowa USA EN43
-----------------------------------------------
"Heaven goes by favor; if it went by merit,
you would stay out and your dog would go in."
---Mark Twain
----- Original Message -----
From: Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 9:10 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Some of you may have noticed on @xxxxxxx Twitter feed that bad weather
forced them offline in the middle of the night between 0200-0700 UTC
today. It has been raining heavily with strong wind gusts. When
weather clears, they expect to get back online and operate.
I would recommend if you aren't in the log yet, listen on all
available passes with mutual footprint. Their six digit gridsquare is
FN97wf.
73
Clayton
W5PFG
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:33:15 +0000
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID:
<CAN6TEUdAiEP938zz2P_-3eKsdpMwGDZ=mBx+KwrY=wRj6T0dxg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi Mark!
I was searching for call signs of satellite operators who have
worked CY9C, going back to the first two stations that worked
them (2E0SQL, KB1PVH) as reported via Twitter. I don't see those
calls in the log. For some satellite operators, I only saw HF QSOs
listed in the log (i.e., N8HM shows up for 30m CW). I did not expect
anything for my call, since as of now (1430 UTC) the log was only
updated through 1447 UTC yesterday, and I worked them on AO-7
at 2106 UTC yesterday.
I'm not worrying about the log search. Seems like satellite QSOs
don't show up in these log searches, at least not right away, since
the log records need to have the additional fields inserted to
indicate a satellite QSO. As Clayton said, if you still need a
CY9C in your satellite log, it's time to start looking at any passes
that cover both you and them. Don't just rely on seeing AMSAT-BB
posts or Twitter to plan your passes.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
Twitter: @xxxxxx
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Mark Johns via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> wrote:
> Clayton,
>
> Do you know if satellite QSOs are reflected in the 2m ClubLog results? If
> so, it's easy to see if your station is in the log and know that those
> "insurance" contacts are unnecessary. (As of yesterday, my satellite QSO
> was not shown in ClubLog. But I know it takes awhile, especially if weather
> has everything shut down.)
>
> --
> Mark D. Johns, K?MDJ
> Decorah, Iowa USA EN43
> -----------------------------------------------
> "Heaven goes by favor; if it went by merit,
> you would stay out and your dog would go in."
> ---Mark Twain
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:19:50 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOpKNO9UpmpDdFiqMVvxv9d08RzvYCkU8R1NfgASVKb_Rg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
WW2DX just tweeted that he will be on the 1530Z pass of FO-29 from CY9C.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
<amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hi Mark!
>
> I was searching for call signs of satellite operators who have
> worked CY9C, going back to the first two stations that worked
> them (2E0SQL, KB1PVH) as reported via Twitter. I don't see those
> calls in the log. For some satellite operators, I only saw HF QSOs
> listed in the log (i.e., N8HM shows up for 30m CW). I did not expect
> anything for my call, since as of now (1430 UTC) the log was only
> updated through 1447 UTC yesterday, and I worked them on AO-7
> at 2106 UTC yesterday.
>
> I'm not worrying about the log search. Seems like satellite QSOs
> don't show up in these log searches, at least not right away, since
> the log records need to have the additional fields inserted to
> indicate a satellite QSO. As Clayton said, if you still need a
> CY9C in your satellite log, it's time to start looking at any passes
> that cover both you and them. Don't just rely on seeing AMSAT-BB
> posts or Twitter to plan your passes.
>
> 73!
>
>
>
>
>
> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
> http://www.wd9ewk.net/
> Twitter: @xxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Mark Johns via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>> wrote:
>
>> Clayton,
>>
>> Do you know if satellite QSOs are reflected in the 2m ClubLog results? If
>> so, it's easy to see if your station is in the log and know that those
>> "insurance" contacts are unnecessary. (As of yesterday, my satellite QSO
>> was not shown in ClubLog. But I know it takes awhile, especially if weather
>> has everything shut down.)
>>
>> --
>> Mark D. Johns, K?MDJ
>> Decorah, Iowa USA EN43
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> "Heaven goes by favor; if it went by merit,
>> you would stay out and your dog would go in."
>> ---Mark Twain
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:17:39 -0400
From: "Jeff" <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID: <635077970F51427287155B28FA569741@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
The Sat contacts might need to be re-entered depending on the logging
software used. My NJ radio club SJDXA was the QSL manager for among others
K1N. The log entries for Navassa weren't properly put in the log till after
the DXPedition was over. I offered to enter them , but N2OO took care of it,
all 27 of them. So it might be awhile before they show up in club log....
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:33 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Hi Mark!
I was searching for call signs of satellite operators who have
worked CY9C, going back to the first two stations that worked
them (2E0SQL, KB1PVH) as reported via Twitter. I don't see those
calls in the log. For some satellite operators, I only saw HF QSOs
listed in the log (i.e., N8HM shows up for 30m CW). I did not expect
anything for my call, since as of now (1430 UTC) the log was only
updated through 1447 UTC yesterday, and I worked them on AO-7
at 2106 UTC yesterday.
I'm not worrying about the log search. Seems like satellite QSOs
don't show up in these log searches, at least not right away, since
the log records need to have the additional fields inserted to
indicate a satellite QSO. As Clayton said, if you still need a
CY9C in your satellite log, it's time to start looking at any passes
that cover both you and them. Don't just rely on seeing AMSAT-BB
posts or Twitter to plan your passes.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
Twitter: @xxxxxx
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Mark Johns via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> wrote:
> Clayton,
>
> Do you know if satellite QSOs are reflected in the 2m ClubLog results? If
> so, it's easy to see if your station is in the log and know that those
> "insurance" contacts are unnecessary. (As of yesterday, my satellite QSO
> was not shown in ClubLog. But I know it takes awhile, especially if
> weather
> has everything shut down.)
>
> --
> Mark D. Johns, K?MDJ
> Decorah, Iowa USA EN43
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:23:53 -0500
From: Clayton W5PFG <w5pfg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID: <6354e193-7b2b-00b6-6517-ec46f72cf064@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I have spoken to WW2DX who is aware of the need for west coast USA
coverage. He will attempt to work the 1715 UTC pass.
73
Clayton
W5PFG
On 8/26/2016 10:19, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
> WW2DX just tweeted that he will be on the 1530Z pass of FO-29 from CY9C.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:08:07 -0400
From: "Jeff" <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID: <341CBF3BFA5D42ACB4FF05794D52A476@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=response
Hmmm, I just checked clublog for K1N and the 2m entries never made it to
clublog. 2M doesn't even show up as a possible contact. They all made it to
LoTW though, and I also got a card. So I'm not sure on what's happening here
with the log, I would still bet the logging software might not be sat
contact friendly. I know I'm good on FO-29 as I'm on one of Clayton's
recordings... :-)
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:17 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
The Sat contacts might need to be re-entered depending on the logging
software used. My NJ radio club SJDXA was the QSL manager for among others
K1N. The log entries for Navassa weren't properly put in the log till after
the DXPedition was over. I offered to enter them , but N2OO took care of it,
all 27 of them. So it might be awhile before they show up in club log....
73 Jeff kb2m
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:33 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Hi Mark!
I was searching for call signs of satellite operators who have
worked CY9C, going back to the first two stations that worked
them (2E0SQL, KB1PVH) as reported via Twitter. I don't see those
calls in the log. For some satellite operators, I only saw HF QSOs
listed in the log (i.e., N8HM shows up for 30m CW). I did not expect
anything for my call, since as of now (1430 UTC) the log was only
updated through 1447 UTC yesterday, and I worked them on AO-7
at 2106 UTC yesterday.
I'm not worrying about the log search. Seems like satellite QSOs
don't show up in these log searches, at least not right away, since
the log records need to have the additional fields inserted to
indicate a satellite QSO. As Clayton said, if you still need a
CY9C in your satellite log, it's time to start looking at any passes
that cover both you and them. Don't just rely on seeing AMSAT-BB
posts or Twitter to plan your passes.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
Twitter: @xxxxxx
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Mark Johns via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> wrote:
> Clayton,
>
> Do you know if satellite QSOs are reflected in the 2m ClubLog results? If
> so, it's easy to see if your station is in the log and know that those
> "insurance" contacts are unnecessary. (As of yesterday, my satellite QSO
> was not shown in ClubLog. But I know it takes awhile, especially if
> weather
> has everything shut down.)
>
> --
> Mark D. Johns, K?MDJ
> Decorah, Iowa USA EN43
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:13:07 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: Jeff <kb2m@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOrZdE+tatHrJAiTC=0PsCCCJ=1P51fUHYA-XpmX7RFuVA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
They are in Club Log as K1N/SAT.
But, yes, there aren't any expedition logging packages that I'm aware
of that are satellite friendly.
By the way, a recent DXKeeper upgrade cemented it's status as the best
logging software for satellite QSOs. Nothing comes close for entering
QSOs or tracking satellite award progress,
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Jeff <kb2m@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hmmm, I just checked clublog for K1N and the 2m entries never made it to
> clublog. 2M doesn't even show up as a possible contact. They all made it to
> LoTW though, and I also got a card. So I'm not sure on what's happening here
> with the log, I would still bet the logging software might not be sat
> contact friendly. I know I'm good on FO-29 as I'm on one of Clayton's
> recordings... :-)
>
> 73 Jeff kb2m
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Jeff
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:17 AM
>
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
>
> The Sat contacts might need to be re-entered depending on the logging
> software used. My NJ radio club SJDXA was the QSL manager for among others
> K1N. The log entries for Navassa weren't properly put in the log till after
> the DXPedition was over. I offered to enter them , but N2OO took care of it,
> all 27 of them. So it might be awhile before they show up in club log....
>
> 73 Jeff kb2m
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:33 AM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] CY9C satellite update August 26
>
> Hi Mark!
>
> I was searching for call signs of satellite operators who have
> worked CY9C, going back to the first two stations that worked
> them (2E0SQL, KB1PVH) as reported via Twitter. I don't see those
> calls in the log. For some satellite operators, I only saw HF QSOs
> listed in the log (i.e., N8HM shows up for 30m CW). I did not expect
> anything for my call, since as of now (1430 UTC) the log was only
> updated through 1447 UTC yesterday, and I worked them on AO-7
> at 2106 UTC yesterday.
>
> I'm not worrying about the log search. Seems like satellite QSOs
> don't show up in these log searches, at least not right away, since
> the log records need to have the additional fields inserted to
> indicate a satellite QSO. As Clayton said, if you still need a
> CY9C in your satellite log, it's time to start looking at any passes
> that cover both you and them. Don't just rely on seeing AMSAT-BB
> posts or Twitter to plan your passes.
>
> 73!
>
>
>
>
>
> Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
> http://www.wd9ewk.net/
> Twitter: @xxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Mark Johns via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>>
>> wrote:
>
>
>> Clayton,
>>
>> Do you know if satellite QSOs are reflected in the 2m ClubLog results? If
>> so, it's easy to see if your station is in the log and know that those
>> "insurance" contacts are unnecessary. (As of yesterday, my satellite QSO
>> was not shown in ClubLog. But I know it takes awhile, especially if
>> weather
>> has everything shut down.)
>>
>> --
>> Mark D. Johns, K?MDJ
>> Decorah, Iowa USA EN43
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 11, Issue 272
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
