OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
N1URO  > SYSOP    26.08.14 20:38l 42 Lines 2040 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 49430_N1URO
Read: GUEST
Subj: PBBS Software, was: Re: 4 continents addressing???
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IV3SCP<IW0QNL<VE2PKT<N1URO
Sent: 140826/1931Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:49430 [Unionville] $:49430_N1URO
From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
To  : SYSOP@WW

<$0.02>

Sergej, Gus, et al;

This has gotten so off topic perhaps we should stick to the original TAPR documentation which was the original question at hand? This isn't about which PBBS software is better, I would think we all outgrew the 
"my dad is better than your dad" phase in life. Maiko is a longtime and dear friend, and he's done a wonderful job with JNOS... so much to the point he's doing all he can to keep it from sinking into the bitbucket along with the other xNOS softwares. Jean-Paul did a great job with FBB, and I know John is doing what he can with BPQBBS - not to forget Paula with her X-router BBS. I only continue to run MFNOS as a tribute to K2MF, and it's a DOS based system, and works pretty good for a DOS based xNOS; but that is not about 4-continent addressing. We need to get on track or let the thread die :-)

Ok Gus, could you confirm that sending message from
> xNOS BBS prompt like:
> 
> s address@domain.eu
> or
> s address@domain.af
> 
> Subject...
> text bla bla bla
>  /EX
> 
> will go to internet SMTP
> and not to ham BBS forwarding, as .EU / .AF is known as BBS continent ID 
> too?!
> 
That depends how he configures his system. One could configure xNOS to rewrite .eu into SMTP->inet or SMTP->PBBS. As K2MF used to complain about all the variants of xNOS is that the mail system is SMTP based and was never truly designed for PBBS usage. The hacks to make it work, however, are quite genius. I do agree though, if the addressing is "standard" on the internet then as a safe-guard PBBS mail should use a slightly different addressing as an added protection against unwanted and possibly illegal 3rd party communications link.

Can we also please no longer send these to: SYSOP@WW? Maybe use PBBS@WW?

</$0.02>

-- 
73 de Brian - N1URO
ax25: n1uro@n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam
ampr: n1uro@nos.n1uro.ampr.org
smtp: brian@uroweb.net
axMa: n1uro@n1uro.ampr.org
wl2k: sorry, use axMail - see above
--
Message sent using Evolution for Linux
protocol: SMTP


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 23.12.2024 21:09:10lGo back Go up