| |
I0OJJ > SYSOP 03.11.20 20:00l 140 Lines 4978 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2WLB_I0OJJ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Proper Bulletin Forwarding Areas After the @ Symbol
Path: IW8PGT<HB9CSR<IK6IHL<IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<OK0NAG<OK0NBR<IW0QNL<VE2PKT<I0OJJ
Sent: 201103/1741z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] $:2WLB_I0OJJ
>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue Nov 3 18:41:51 2020
Received: from ir0rm-7.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.5c) with SMTP
id AA135551 ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:41:51 +0100
References: <3QPL_N2NOV@i0ojj.bbs>
>From: Gustavo Ponza <i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org>
Organization: SICD Rome
Message-Id: <135552@i0ojj.ampr.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3QPL_N2NOV@i0ojj.bbs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 11/3/20 3:59 PM, n2nov@n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam wrote:
> R:201103/1503z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU $:3QPL_N2NOV
> R:201103/1459z @:N2NOV.#RICH.NY.USA.NOAM $:3QPL_N2NOV
> As was stated by G8BPQ on the BPQ32 mailing list this morning, the BPQMail
> software does not support the 4-letter convention for continents that was
> the new convention as of 20 years ago. There was a station that wanted a
> message to co to SYSOP@CEAM and it was instead trated like the old code for
> North America (NA) and allowed to propagate to USA stations instead of the
> intended forwarding partner for Central America. I see this all too often
> even with thinhs like NLD (country code for the Netherlands) being forwarded
> out of that country and spread out all over the world. Every sysop needs to
> go over their forwarding rules and match intended bulletin flood areas with
> the proper forwarding partner in that area. Any bulletins that do not match
> USA areas or WW get dropped into my holding folder and deleted appropriately.
> Let's all work together to keep the packet network clean and efficient.
>
> --
> 73 de N2NOV
First of all: thanks God! and thank you John G8BPQ!
I hope that the LinFBB and JNOS2 follow this way too.
The German software continues to follow this way since
1980's... and, at beginning, also F6FBB followed that
rule.
Problems related to forwarding process and H-Addressing,
never understood at all since decades may be treated
apart if that matters are of Sysop's interest, as I hope.
Specially in this time in which we are living, the
Geography is not, or not fully, explained... or never
understood also from aged men :)
Taking as macroscopic example the following; already described
in one of my 2014 messages:
<quote>
the revival/resort of the four letter designator was proposed
by a *draft* document from TAPR dated 31 August 1994.
That *obsolete draft*, was consistently opposed everywhere
starting from European SysOps... and so never approved from
them and nowhere.
First of all and explaining the geography, as per my last msg,
the Continent Oceania is defined from United Nations and
from our geography handbooks as:
009 Oceania
053 Australia and New Zealand
054 Melanesia
057 Micronesia
061 Polynesia
so, what represent that code *AUNZ* as a continent designator
for the Oceania geographic area?
<quote>
Apropos of the false 'CEAM', geographically speaking the American
Continent, named 'Americas' is divided in 'North(ern) America
and South(ern) America in this way:
North America - (Northern America, Caribbean and Central America).
Code NA
South America
Code SA
Now, as already explained by a recent document and in several
packet msgs, the official situation is:
Conclusions:
...<snip>
'Continents' in accordance with 'Composition of the
macro geographical (continental) regions and
component of geographical regions' as excerpted from
the United Nations publication, revised August 31,
2013, are the following. And since, no ISO ALPHA-x
code has been foreseen for Continent's designation
into the above official documentation and others
(United Nations, NATO, EEC, UEO, etc.), as per my own
knowledge, so why don't continue to use a simple *two
letter* code, namely:
Africa - (Eastern Africa, Middle Africa, Northern
Africa, Southern Africa, Western Africa).
Code AF
Americas:
North America - (Northern America, Caribbean and
Central America).
Code NA
South America
Code SA
Asia - (Eastern Asia, South-central Asia, South-
eastern Asia, Western Asia)
Code AS
Europe - (Eastern Europe, Northern Europe, Southern
Europe, Western Europe)
Code EU
Oceania - (Australia and New Zealand, Melanesia,
Micronesia, Polynesia)
Code OC
...<snip>
So, my question is: why use that *false* or *inconsistent*
'four letter' designators and don't use the two letter code
as indicated?
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
