OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
G8MNY  > TECH     01.08.17 09:09l 132 Lines 5665 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 51788_GB7CIP
Read: GUEST
Subj: Testing Auto ATUs
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<GB7CIP
Sent: 170801/0748Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:51788 [Caterham Surrey GBR]
From: G8MNY@GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
To  : TECH@WW

By G8MNY                                    (Updated Mar 17)
(8 Bit ASCII graphics use code page 437 or 850, Terminal Font)

If an auto ATU (matcher) misbehaves, here is my way to test it.

KIT NEEDED
                                         --------
 ÚÄÄÄ¿  ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿   ÚÄÄÄÄ¿    ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ /ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿\ ÚÄÄÄÄÄ¿
 ³HF ÃÄÄ´1st SWRÃÄÄÄ´AUTOÃÄÄÄÄ´2nd SWRÃÄÄ´MANUALÃÄÄ´DUMMY³
 ³RIG³  ³ BRIDGE³   ³ATU ³    ³ BRIDGE³  ³ ATU  ³  ³LOAD ³
 ÀÄÄÄÙ  ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ   ÀÄÄÄÄÙ    ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ  ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ  ÀÄÄÄÄÄÙ
                   ÚÄÄÄÄÄ¿     \________________________/
                   ³SCOPE³       VECTRONICS ATU VC300LP
                   ÀÄÄÄÄÄÙ 

With this set up test the performance & enables calibration to be done to ATU.

1/ With Manual ATU in through mode, measure the settled Rig seen 1st SWR bridge
   Is it the same or better than 2nd SWR bridge. What is the power loss?
   Repeat for all bands.

2/ Now do 1/ with manual ATU adjusted to give an SWR of 1.5:1 on 2nd SWR bridge
   Does the Auto ATU settle & does the 1st SWR bridge always give a lower SWR?

3/ Now do 1/ with manual ATU adjusted to give an SWR of 3:1 on 2nd SWR bridge.
   Does the Auto ATU settle & does the 1st SWR bridge always give a lower SWR?

4/ Now do 1/ with manual ATU adjusted to give an SWR of 6:1 on 2nd SWR bridge.
   Does the Auto ATU settle & does the 1st SWR bridge always give lower SWR?
   N.B. Many Auto ATUs can't do this!

TYPICAL SWR CIRCUIT
    --------- HEAD UNIT -------
XMTR o)ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄ(o LOAD
      ÃÄÄÄÄ=======  C1³/\  ³
      ³ T1 CCCCCCC   ===   ³
      ³    ³  ³  ³  /'³    ³
      ³    ³  ÀÄÄ)ÄÄÂÄÁÄ´ÃÄ´
      ³    ÃÄ68ÄÄ´  ³   n3 ³
      ³   _³_   _³_ ÀÄ2k2ÄÄ´
      ³ D1\_/   \_/D2      ³    R     AUTO TUNE
      ³    ³     ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ)ÄÄÄÄÄÄ>   DECISION
      ³    ÃÄÄÄÄÄ)ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ)ÄÄÄÄÄÄ>   CIRCUIT
      ³ 1n===   ===1n      ³    F
      ÀÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄ

HOW BRIDGE WORKS
A short length of thick wire goes through the screened ferrite transformer T1
making a 1 turn primary, & the lead joins the XTMR & LOAD sockets together. A
pick off voltage attenuator is formed with trimmer C1 & the 2 150pF caps. This
RF voltage is fed to T1 secondary centre tap. Load current is transformed by T1
into a voltage across the 5W non-inductive 68ê.

When the load is exactly 50ê the diode D2 sees no RF as the voltage sample &
the current sample are in opposition & cancel dependent on the calibration of
the trimmer C1.

The 2k2 is needed to complete the DC meter circuit & will affect the lowest
frequency calibration, as will the inductance value of T1.


BRIDGE CALIBRATION
As there are no meters, C1 is calibrated to give zero Reflected volts on a
scope connected to D2, once an 1st SWR bridge sees a 1:1. Fine Tweeking of
Manual ATU will achieve this as long as the Auto ATU does not go hunting again.

Doing this adjustment means the Auto ATU will now aim for a "1:1 as seen by the
Rig" so giving a better matching result. (if it was out of adjustment.)

On one Auto ATU I tested, it always gave a poor SWR, there was not enough C1
range on the trimmer, so I added a small Tx grade C across it. QED.


CONTINIOUS HUNTING
This can be a result of load out of the 3:1 range limit of most Auto ATU, or a
faulty Binary step value in the L or C values. (poor relay contact?). Or too
fine a target control loop gain (less than 1 step change).


INSIDE ATU
                 64       32     16     8    4    2   1
Rig__SWR______()))))))_())))))_()))))_())))_()))_())_()_____Aerial
    BRIDGE   ³        ³       ³      ³     ³    ³   ³  ³
      ³³     ³___\____³___\___³___\__³__\__³__\_³_\_³_\³
  ÚÄÄÄÁÁÄÄ¿  ³__________________  _____________________³
  ³  CPU  ³                  Rig\ Ant
  ³CONTROL³   ___________________³______________________
  ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ   \     \     \     \     \     \     \     \
             ³128  ³64   ³32   ³16   ³8    ³4    ³2    ³1
            ===   ===   ===   ===   ===   ===   ===   ===
   ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄ

Here the 16 relays under CPU control, gives 65536 matching options, by
selecting 1 of 128 binary step values of L, & 1 of 256 binary step values of C,
& whether the C is needed on Rig side for Low Z aerials <50R, or Ant side for
High Z aerials >50R.
                 _                                     _
                 /|                                    /|
Rig _________())))________ Ant         Rig ________())))____________ Ant
      ³_       /                                     /         ³_
      ³/|                                                      ³/| 
 50ê ===                <50ê             50ê                  ===  >50ê
     /³                                                       /³ 
    ÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ                 ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄ
   High Z              Low Z              Low Z                High Z
 Rig sees a           Ant sees           Rig sees            Ant sees a
Parallel LC          Series LC          Series LC           Parallel LC


MANUAL ATU COMPARISON
Most have 3 variables in T configuration, 2 caps & switched or roller coster L.

With time & care these can always give very fine adjustment down to 1:1, & with
aerial loads worse than 10:1. Assuming 0.5deg shaft control, that can look more
like 360x 360x 360 (46m options).

They also gives much better out of band filtering, with the Hi Q resonant
circuit.


See also my Tech buls on "A Homebrew HF SWR Bridge", "PEP Meter modification",
"QRP SWR Bridge", "Meter Damping & Speed Up" & "Palstar AT1500CV ATU", "HF ATU
& SWR Bridge VC300LP/QT-1"


Why Don't U send an interesting bul?

73 de John, G8MNY @ GB7CIP


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 26.12.2024 19:51:05lGo back Go up