| |
UT1HZM > ROUTE 03.12.20 17:04l 35 Lines 1418 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 3255_UT1HZM
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Change HR
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<DB0RES<PI8CDR<LU4ECL<JE7YGF<JH4XSY<N3HYM<KC9VYU<
W9GM<F1OYP<F3KT<F3KT<UT1HZM
Sent: 201203/1523Z 3255@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.20
Hello all
I0OJJ:
>
> As of today, in Italy there are ONLY 33 PBBS (390 in the world) and
> since i0ojj is unique in Italy and into the world, no error may be
> done on forwarding mail msgs to my callsign.
> As per above Region field doesn't matter due the fact that we are
> 4 PBBSin my Region ... so no error may arise using only my callsign
> without any other suffux :)
Can't agree.
Gus, look for a case when there are SP messages for any@I0OJJ
in some other BBS that don't have _direct_ fwd with BBS I0OJJ.
Its simply will go to nothing! Because you don't have (don't defined) your full
H-route address, at least to route that message to the some of BBS'es in your
region (meaning you should potentially have fwd with one of them),
that should indicate by region code in your H-address!
So, not defining region code - destroy all nature of H-routing.
In that case only way - to setup direct fwd with each-every bbs in same Country,
with no exceptions, but its even much more non-sense and stupidity!
Same non-sense, when in last years some of sysops like to setup AXUDP NET/ROM link with almost
everyone each other! Then what sense in inter-nodes routing at all?!?!
Or when instead of proper axudp nodes maintenance and management they run new one more BBS/CHAT/DXC/etc
services, when we already have less number of users than number of that services already
running in the network, hi! :-)
73, Sergej.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
