| |
G4APL > PACKET 16.07.17 16:38l 61 Lines 2814 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 64673G4APL
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: G7VJA Asis junk mail
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<F1OYP<ON0AR<GB7CIP<GB7CIP<GB7CIP
Sent: 170716/1436Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO $:64673G4APL
T:From: Paul Lewis <g4apl@gb7cip.ampr.org>
T:Newsgroups: ampr.packet.general
T:Message-Id: <okftfs$6i6$1@gb7cip.ampr.org>
pe1biv%pe1biv.#ymd.nld.euro@gb7cip.ampr.org wrote:
> Hi Ken and all,
> At the moment I haven't yet seen the junk mail, but want to react to the
> idea of JNOS not working properly.
> Yes, there obviously is at least one issue with JNOS 2.0 as we have seen
> with the forwarding issues between I0OJJ and N1URO (I hope the cancelled
> this forwarding route), but for the rest I'd say it works absolutely
> fine in the BBS system......
> I've been doing this for over 20 years now!
> Yes, I still run JNOS 1.11f from which JNOS 2.0 is a rewrite.
>
> But, no BBS bulletins should be taken out of the BBS forwarding system
> and forwarded via SMTP and then be re-introduced in the BBS system as it
> screws up the BID system as the H-address lines are either left out of
> the forwarded bulletins, or are transferred to the message body (smtp
> headers on).
>
> It's fine to take BBS bulletins out of the BBS system, or introduce
> messages into the BBS system from JNOS which were forwarded via SMTP as
> these will have a P(ersonal) status and basically only would include
> personal messages. If used to address a message to a bulletin area, like
> all@ww, it only will be readable for people with Sysop status.
>
> I'm not fully aquainted with NNTP as I first didn't have a powerful enough
> PC system to run NNTP in my JNOS, and the last 15 years it has been on a
> wish-list that was piled over again and again, but at least introducing
> bulletins originated from NNTP direct to a BBS system connected JNOS
> system also will be totally fine. However, if also forwarded out via the
> NNTP system and then also introduced into the BBS system from an other
> system I'm pretty sure will result in multiple copies with different
> BIDs going round in the BBS system.
>
> Just some things JNOS operators should keep in mind and simply prevent
> from happening.
> Just like BBS operators will need to stay on the ball and prevent some
> issues... We've seen plenty of doubles that were not introduced from a
> JNOS system. Many were from new OpenBCM systems, but again not all.
>
>
> Rgs, 73, Angela
>
>
Hello Angela
Just for information, I am still running my unique nntp (inn/inn2) set-up
using the 1999 codewith X and T interface records that use to handle
AX25BBS<>JNOSNNTP<>AX25BBS<>TNOSNNTP<>AX25BBS
forwarding across 'our' UK and IP System over Radio 2m/70cm links back
in the early 2000's.
Thanks to the support of the ukip sysop software authors support assisting
me with the code back in those days.
73 de Paul @ gb7cip
--
amprnet g4apl@gb7cip.ampr.org ax25 g4apl@gb7cip.#32.gbr.euro
amprnet http://gb7cip.ampr.org Inet http://www.theskywaves.net
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
