| |
G4APL > PACKET 08.01.19 12:43l 38 Lines 1239 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 56980G4APL
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Should it happen this way (2)
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IK6ZDE<VE2PKT<OK2PEN<GB7CIP<GB7CIP<GB7CIP
Sent: 190108/1036Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO $:56980G4APL
T:From: Paul Lewis <g4apl@gb7cip.ampr.org>
T:Newsgroups: ampr.packet.general
T:Message-Id: <q11tu7$e6$1@gb7cip.ampr.org>
gm4upx%gb7jed.#71.gbr.euro@gb7cip.ampr.org wrote:
> From: GM4UPX@GB7JED.#71.GBR.EURO
> To : PACKET@WW
>
> Node A has a broadcast interval of 15 minutes
> Node B has a broadcast interval of 15 minutes
> Node C has a broadcast interval of 30 minutes
> They all broadcast at different times because the
> broadcast is 15 minutes, or 30 minutes from the node
> startup time.
> Also a beacon, if set, broadcasts at the set interval
> Some nodes have a 5 second delay between packets
> Regards,
> Ian..
I power on my six TNC's at one or two minute Intervals
so that the cw idents do no key up all the transmitters
at the same time.
Also the Beacons broadcasts are set for each interface
are different minutes past the hour.
Again for the same re reason.
Node Broadcasts are only active on two interfaces at a
time...
Ask yourself "doyou have so many new nodes coming online"
that you need to run node broadcasts every 15 minutes?
73 de Paul going back into his shell in this topic.
--
amprnet g4apl@gb7cip.ampr.org ax25 g4apl@gb7cip.#32.gbr.euro
amprnet http://gb7cip.ampr.org Inet http://www.theskywaves.net
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
