PA2SNK > PACKET 11.01.19 00:37l 44 Lines 1447 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 4456_PA2SNK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: GM4UPX > Number of nodes
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<SR1BSZ<LU4ECL<F4DUR<F3KT<CX2SA<VK2DOT<PI8SNK
Sent: 190110/2200Z 36120@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
From: PA2SNK@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO
To : PACKET@WW
# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to PA2SNK
# On : 10-1-2019 22:59:55
# UTC: 10-1-2019 21:59:55
>BTW The mention of the CB network (*vomit*) isn't doing anything to help the situation but perhaps
>the Dutch are just special *zing*.
The stuff i posted wash just an example from 1998 or something..
Nothing wrong with the CB packet network i have had mutch fun maybe even
more then on HAM packet.
On CB the links where actualy good back in the days especialy before all
the axip / axudp links.
Here i keep the axudp links minimal.
Some of us have 20 or so link partners why ?
Two should be enough when one fails the other can take over.
I have some more links over here but there are som end stations also who
link with me.
About the settings i am open for learning..
Nagging about what is ok and what not is not solving anything.
Lets look at it positive and try to get a better network :)
о о
о о
ооо ооо
оооо оооо
оооооо оооооо
оо ооооо оо
о ооо о
ооооооо ооооооо
оооооооо оооооооо
PA2SNK te Sneek/Snits (Friesland)
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| 
