| |
PA2SNK > PACKET 09.06.20 22:02l 67 Lines 2918 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 4738_PA2SNK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re:FX.25
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<I3XTY<I0OJJ<LU4ECL<PI8SNK
Sent: 200609/1932Z 54105@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
>From pa2snk%pi8snk.#frl.nld.euro@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue Jun 9 22:01:00 2020
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0n) with SMTP
id AA115244 ; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 22:01:00 +0200
Message-Id: <4738_PA2SNK@lu4ecl.bbs>
>From: pa2snk@pi8snk.#frl.nld.euro
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (lu4ecl @ 181.170.92.65) -> Sending message
From: PA2SNK@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO
To : PACKET@WW
# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to PA2SNK SNEEK
# On : 9-6-2020 21:31:44
# UTC: 9-6-2020 19:31:44
>R:200609/1430Z 54094@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
>R:200609/1422Z @:PI8CDR.#DRE.NLD.EURO #:9033 [Westerbork] $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1422z @:DB0RES.#NRW.DEU.EU $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1322z @:ON0AR.#AN.BEL.EU $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1422z @:F1OYP.FAQI.FRA.EU $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1422z @:IZ3LSV.IVEN.ITA.EU $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1521z @:I3XTY.TV.IVEN.ITA.EU $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1420z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:15224 $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1418Z @:EA2RCF.EAVI.ESP.EU #:61675 [Vitoria] $:41141_KE0GB
>R:200609/1418Z 19037@LU9DCE.TOR.BA.ARG.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.20
>R:200609/1418Z 28966@LU9HGS.CP.COR.ARG.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.18
>R:200609/1418Z 49954@LU1HVK.2594.CBA.ARG.SA LinBPQ6.0.19
>R:200609/1417Z 31484@N7HPX.#BOI.ID.USA.NOAM BPQK6.0.20
>R:200609/1417Z 58936@N3DWB.#EPA.PA.USA.NOAM BPQK6.0.16
>R:200609/1417Z 41141@KE0GB.#SECO.CO.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.20
>
>>From kf7psm%ke0gb.#seco.co.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue Jun 9 16:20:30 2020
>Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0n) with SMTP
> id AA115224 ; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 16:20:30 +0200
>Message-Id: <41141_KE0GB@ea2rcf.bbs>
>>From: kf7psm@ke0gb.#seco.co.usa.noam
>X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (ea2rcf @ 94.177.237.192) -> Sending message
>
>Is anyone using FX.25? Would it be possible to upgrade a current tnc's
>firmware to support this fec protocol or is it only possible using
>a pc? It would be interesting to have some firmware for a tnc that
>used standard ax.25 but then upon detection of so many retry's it
>changed over to fx.25. Anyway just pondering what's possible I feel
>this protocol may be useful on long backhaul links, if any still
>exist today!
>73 de KF7PSM
It is implented in direwolf.
there are some test going on on a couple of CB nodes over here.
Dont know the exact status of it and dont know if there is any other
software around supporting it..
I do know that Xrouter32 has support for Eax25 think its not the same..
о о
о о
ооо ооо
оооо оооо
оооооо оооооо
оо ооооо оо
о ооо о
ооооооо ооооооо
оооооооо оооооооо
PA2SNK te Sneek/Snits (Friesland)
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
