| |
VA2OM > PACKET 11.06.20 16:42l 39 Lines 1475 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 76312_VA2OM
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: FX.25
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<I3XTY<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<N7HPX<W9GM<VA2OM
Sent: 200611/1434z @:VA2OM.#TRV.QC.CAN.NOAM [Portable] #:76307 $:76312_VA2OM
>From va2om%va2om.#trv.qc.can.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Thu Jun 11 16:39:27 2020
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0n) with SMTP
id AA115375 ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:39:27 +0200
Message-Id: <76312_VA2OM@gb7cip.bbs>
>From: va2om@va2om.#trv.qc.can.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (gb7cip @ 82.70.39.222) -> Sending message
On 2020-06-09 3:32 p.m., pa2snk%pi8snk.#frl.nld.euro@va2om.ampr.org wrote:
Never heard of FX25, but there is some infos abiout EAX25:
EAX25" (Extended AX25) instead of "AX25", and are initiated by a new
frame type "SABME"
(Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended).
>>
>> Is anyone using FX.25? Would it be possible to upgrade a current tnc's
>> firmware to support this fec protocol or is it only possible using
>> a pc? It would be interesting to have some firmware for a tnc that
>> used standard ax.25 but then upon detection of so many retry's it
>> changed over to fx.25. Anyway just pondering what's possible I feel
>> this protocol may be useful on long backhaul links, if any still
>> exist today!
>> 73 de KF7PSM
>
> It is implented in direwolf.
> there are some test going on on a couple of CB nodes over here.
> Dont know the exact status of it and dont know if there is any other
> software around supporting it..
> I do know that Xrouter32 has support for Eax25 think its not the same..
--
------------------------------------------
NNTP and Telnet BBS avaiable at va2om.ampr.org
73 de Jean
----------------------
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
