| |
I0OJJ > PACKET 24.12.20 01:00l 70 Lines 2897 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 2ZUI_I0OJJ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: about the Authors
Path: IW8PGT<LU4ECL<ZL2BAU<LU3DVN<LU4DRH<W4GON<W9GM<W9ECG<N9LCF<VE2JOS<
VE2PKT<I0OJJ
Sent: 201223/2236z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] $:2ZUI_I0OJJ
>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Wed Dec 23 23:36:34 2020
Received: from ir0rm-7.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.5F) with SMTP
id AA139770 ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 23:36:34 +0100
>From: Gustavo Ponza <i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org>
Organization: SICD Rome
Message-ID: <e157cd30-bf7b-85a8-ce09-f2a760437688@i0ojj.ampr.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> For the other stupidities, after 20 years, I'm tired to explain
>> always the same things to a people who don't understand and
>> don't want to understand :(
> About 5 years ago, I called for developers to gather and discuss a global
> standard for BBS code/protocols/etc. The only one who replied at that time
> was Maiko who was too busy to get involved. More recently he emailed me
> and wished we actually did all discuss this.
This is a generalized problem existing since the packet advent.
Maiko is one exception since he accepts to ear the instances of
of hamradio people.
But the above difficulties existed and exists today also among
all of us :(
> Having had voice conversations via landline with W0RLI before he became SK
> (for those who don't know, Hank was one of the founding fathers of the
> BBS world) he'd be rolling in his grave if he saw half of some of these
> threads and the only @?? we'd need would be his old @LLL group since he'd
> probably rewrite them all to there :) Hank was funny like that. The remaining
> village elders will remember.
>
> Also back in the day, forwarding via axip/axudp/telnet was a shameful thing to
> do. Sometimes you could get budlisted for doing such depending on how much of
> a radio purist a particular sysop was - or in Hank case you made it to his
> "Hall of Shame" the infamous @LLL so you either forwarded 100% via RF or
> you did not forward at all. Some of us were also fortunate enough to have
> a BBS on a satgate or used Pactor that we could reach or relay to so that
> we could get global mail out - again 100% via RF. One positive from this was
> that you could always feel safe that your country's regulations were being
> followed.
Given that W0RLI was a great scientist on the matter he had his
maniacal ideas about the use of radio waves to transit packet.
Then, he was one that doesn't accept any message conversation
with no one; I and others experienced this fact.
As per my experience the budlisting existed a lot also when we
connected at 1k2 bds, and specially for me, the internet means
was a very big liberation.
For our Country regulation (dated 2003) the radio amateurs can
connect the *public networks* on emergencies or in the normal
completion of amateur radio activities, so no problems at all,
here :)
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
