| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 18.08.17 01:27l 965 Lines 29092 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB12208
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V12 208
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<SR1BSZ<OK0NBR<OK0PBR<OK2PEN<CX2SA
Sent: 170817/2323Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:17030 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB12208
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: EVA (Paul Stoetzer)
2. Re: EVA (vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx
3. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Simon Brown)
4. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Andrew Rich)
5. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Simon Brown)
6. Re: EVA (Greg D)
7. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Jim Jerzycke)
8. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Andrew Rich)
9. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Simon Brown)
10. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Alan)
11. Re: Best SDR for satellite reception (Jim Jerzycke)
12. Re: EVA (Ted)
13. Re: EVA (David Swanson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:48:35 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOrdvjbzDMyBKS8S-Ri_z7ftxhd2WLRrvqcVymbVKUEvMw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Relaying certain information from Twitter might be appropriate at times,
but please cite the source of the information when you do so.
I would have worded the original post like this:
"M0GIW reports ISS EVA activity was heard on 143.625 MHz and 130.167 MHz
FM. https://twitter.com/M0GIW/status/898186526877724677"
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I think maybe you need to take a break from the internet for a while. You
> could also stop and think before hitting that send button. Ask yourself
> questions like "am I adding any value to the conversation?". Only you can
> prevent a whole group of people from having to hit the delete button.
>
> 73,
>
> Mike Diehl
> AI6GS
>
> > On Aug 17, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Nothing I just relayed from another station in twitter
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 18 Aug 2017, at 3:33 am, Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> Curious... Where was this monitored? If I tell gpredict to go back to
> >> 13:59 UTC today (about 3.5 hrs ago), the ISS appears to be over the
> >> middle of the Atlantic Ocean, headed for the U.K. If you were
> >> monitoring in Australia, that's not possible.
> >>
> >> What did I do wrong?
> >>
> >> Greg KO6TH
> >>
> >>
> >> Andrew Rich wrote:
> >>> Heard stron carrier and voice in Russian on 143.625 and 130.167 Mhz FM
> at 1359 UTC
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> >>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:49:35 +1000
From: <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
To: "'Paul Stoetzer'" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>, "'Mike Diehl'"
<diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Message-ID: <633901d31789$92a54760$b7efd620$@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sorry does not meet ur needs
From: prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Paul
Stoetzer
Sent: Friday, 18 August 2017 4:49 AM
To: Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Relaying certain information from Twitter might be appropriate at times, but
please cite the source of the information when you do so.
I would have worded the original post like this:
"M0GIW reports ISS EVA activity was heard on 143.625 MHz and 130.167 MHz FM.
https://twitter.com/M0GIW/status/898186526877724677"
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx
<mailto:diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx> > wrote:
Andrew,
I think maybe you need to take a break from the internet for a while. You
could also stop and think before hitting that send button. Ask yourself
questions like "am I adding any value to the conversation?". Only you can
prevent a whole group of people from having to hit the delete button.
73,
Mike Diehl
AI6GS
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
<mailto:vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx> > wrote:
>
> Nothing I just relayed from another station in twitter
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 18 Aug 2017, at 3:33 am, Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx
<mailto:ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> > wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Curious... Where was this monitored? If I tell gpredict to go back to
>> 13:59 UTC today (about 3.5 hrs ago), the ISS appears to be over the
>> middle of the Atlantic Ocean, headed for the U.K. If you were
>> monitoring in Australia, that's not possible.
>>
>> What did I do wrong?
>>
>> Greg KO6TH
>>
>>
>> Andrew Rich wrote:
>>> Heard stron carrier and voice in Russian on 143.625 and 130.167 Mhz FM
at 1359 UTC
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> . AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> . AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> . AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:12:01 +0100
From: "Simon Brown" <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Andrew Rich'" <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
Message-ID: <031f01d3178c$b4728260$1d578720$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Andrew,
The Airspy Mini is a very good SDR, you have not made a mistake. At 1,296MHz
you'll probably need a LNA.
Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Andrew Rich
...
I have selected the airspy mini based on the fact
It's 12 bits
It's got tracking filters
It works with sdr sharp, hdsdr, gnuradio, gqrx
Has anyone bought out a satellite specific SDR ?
The funcube dongle is probably the best ?
I have a hack rf as well as rtl sdr and sdr play
Andrew
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:26:04 +1000
From: Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
To: Simon Brown <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
Message-ID: <BF0319AD-D002-418E-8634-BDD3E1C110EC@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I don't know what it is about the mini maybe it's the tracking filters but
it works well
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 Aug 2017, at 5:12 am, Simon Brown <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> The Airspy Mini is a very good SDR, you have not made a mistake. At 1,296MHz
> you'll probably need a LNA.
>
> Simon Brown, G4ELI
> www.sdr-radio.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Andrew Rich
>
> ...
>
> I have selected the airspy mini based on the fact
>
> It's 12 bits
> It's got tracking filters
> It works with sdr sharp, hdsdr, gnuradio, gqrx
>
> Has anyone bought out a satellite specific SDR ?
>
> The funcube dongle is probably the best ?
>
> I have a hack rf as well as rtl sdr and sdr play
>
> Andrew
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:27:51 +0100
From: "Simon Brown" <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Andrew Rich'" <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
Message-ID: <032901d3178e$ea9aba40$bfd02ec0$@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Well,
It's sensitive, has a good dynamic range (fewer problems from pages, FM
Stereo transmitters) etc.
Simon Brown, G4ELI
www.sdr-radio.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Rich [mailto:vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx
Sent: 17 August 2017 20:26
To: Simon Brown <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
I don't know what it is about the mini maybe it's the tracking filters but
it works well
Andrew
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 Aug 2017, at 5:12 am, Simon Brown <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> The Airspy Mini is a very good SDR, you have not made a mistake. At
> 1,296MHz you'll probably need a LNA.
>
> Simon Brown, G4ELI
> www.sdr-radio.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Andrew
> Rich
>
> ...
>
> I have selected the airspy mini based on the fact
>
> It's 12 bits
> It's got tracking filters
> It works with sdr sharp, hdsdr, gnuradio, gqrx
>
> Has anyone bought out a satellite specific SDR ?
>
> The funcube dongle is probably the best ?
>
> I have a hack rf as well as rtl sdr and sdr play
>
> Andrew
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 13:11:04 -0700
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Message-ID: <f9a0dd21-981c-c0de-62d6-a7e52c5d277c@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Paul's version would have been perfect, but just being aware that the
EVA was occurring, and the frequencies involved, was interesting and
valuable. I'm not on Twitter, so didn't see the original. Thank you
for the heads-up, so to speak.
Andrew, I expect your choice of interface (iPhone, with its limitations)
may have something to do with the expressed frustration. Paul's
version, citing the source and context, is far more valuable and less
work for me, but I know it was more work on his part. I don't know how
that work would map to the iPhone's interface - copying links, more
typing, etc. - or if it is even possible. I know on my Android phone,
it would have been a bit of work, but trivial to do on my PC (which BTW,
I am using now...). Perhaps that's just the nature of the 'BB; this
isn't Twitter, so we need to adapt to what works best here.
So, a friendly suggestion: If you would provide a bit more context in
your shorter postings, using complete words and sentences, it would make
for less head-scratching on the part of your audience, and help all
involved. Nobody else is inside your head or know what you're up to.
You have a lot to offer, but sometimes it's just too much work on our
part to decode what you are talking about or requesting help on. Please
help us help you.
Greg KO6TH
Paul Stoetzer wrote:
> Relaying certain information from Twitter might be appropriate at times,
> but please cite the source of the information when you do so.
>
> I would have worded the original post like this:
>
> "M0GIW reports ISS EVA activity was heard on 143.625 MHz and 130.167 MHz
> FM. https://twitter.com/M0GIW/status/898186526877724677"
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> I think maybe you need to take a break from the internet for a while. You
>> could also stop and think before hitting that send button. Ask yourself
>> questions like "am I adding any value to the conversation?". Only you can
>> prevent a whole group of people from having to hit the delete button.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Mike Diehl
>> AI6GS
>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Nothing I just relayed from another station in twitter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 18 Aug 2017, at 3:33 am, Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> Curious... Where was this monitored? If I tell gpredict to go back to
>>>> 13:59 UTC today (about 3.5 hrs ago), the ISS appears to be over the
>>>> middle of the Atlantic Ocean, headed for the U.K. If you were
>>>> monitoring in Australia, that's not possible.
>>>>
>>>> What did I do wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Greg KO6TH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Rich wrote:
>>>>> Heard stron carrier and voice in Russian on 143.625 and 130.167 Mhz FM
>> at 1359 UTC
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>> of AMSAT-NA.
>>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>>>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:29:20 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
Message-ID: <56c76d38-7fdc-40aa-b901-71759129602b@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I have the "full size" Airspy, and it works very well. I've gone through
half a dozen USB dongles, both Fun Cube dongles, the HackRF, and both
SDRPlay units, and I like the Airspy the best.
73, Jim KQ6EA
On 08/17/2017 07:27 PM, Simon Brown wrote:
> Well,
>
> It's sensitive, has a good dynamic range (fewer problems from pages, FM
> Stereo transmitters) etc.
>
> Simon Brown, G4ELI
> www.sdr-radio.com
>
> -----Original Message--a@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> I have the "full size" Airspy, and it works very well. I've gone through
half a dozen USB dongles, both Fun Cube dongles, the HackRF, and both
SDRPlay units, and I like the Airspy the best.
>
>
> 73, Jim KQ6EA
>
>
>> On 08/17/2017 07:27 PM, Simon Brown wrote:
>> Well,
>>
>> It's sensitive, has a good dynamic range (fewer problems from pages, FM
>> Stereo transmitters) etc.
>>
>> Simon Brown, G4ELI
>> www.sdr-radio.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Rich [mailto:vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx
>> Sent: 17 August 2017 20:26
>> To: Simon Brown <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>> Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
>>
>> I don't know what it is about the mini maybe it's the tracking filters but
>> it works well
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 18 Aug 2017, at 5:12 am, Simon Brown <simon@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew,
>>>
>>> The Airspy Mini is a very good SDR, you have not made a mistake. At
>>> 1,296MHz you'll probably need a LNA.
>>>
>>> Simon Brown, G4ELI
>>> www.sdr-radio.com
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Andrew
>>> Rich
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I have selected the airspy mini based on the fact
>>>
>>> It's 12 bits
>>> It's got tracking filters
>>> It works with sdr sharp, hdsdr, gnuradio, gqrx
>>>
>>> Has anxxxx.xx.xxx>; 'Jim Jerzycke'
<<kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
<Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
<
<10MHz bandwidth, not needed for Satellites ? .
<
<Simon Brown, G4ELI
<www.sdr-radio.com
<
<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of
<Andrew Rich
<Sent: 17 August 2017 21:32
<To: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
<Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
<
<What does the big brother airspy do over the mini ?
<
<Andrew
<
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-
<NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
<program!
<Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:54:50 +0000
From: Jim Jerzycke <kq6ea@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Best SDR for satellite reception
Message-ID: <1e499c72-e544-3a5f-61b7-5420c00b0b8f@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I'm not really sure other than the ext 10MHz inputis open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:01:03 -0700
From: "Ted" <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>, "'Paul Stoetzer'" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>,
"'Mike Diehl'" <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Message-ID: <003d01d317ac$b3c3be40$1b4b3ac0$@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Andrew, you are pretty much clueless, right?
73, K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of
vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 11:50 AM
To: 'Paul Stoetzer'; 'Mike Diehl'
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Sorry does not meet ur needs
From: prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Paul
Stoetzer
Sent: Friday, 18 August 2017 4:49 AM
To: Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Relaying certain information from Twitter might be appropriate at times, but
please cite the source of the information when you do so.
I would have worded the original post like this:
"M0GIW reports ISS EVA activity was heard on 143.625 MHz and 130.167 MHz FM.
https://twitter.com/M0GIW/status/898186526877724677"
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx
<mailto:diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx> > wrote:
Andrew,
I think maybe you need to take a break from the internet for a while. You
could also stop and think before hitting that send button. Ask yourself
questions like "am I adding any value to the conversation?". Only you can
prevent a whole group of people from having to hit the delete button.
73,
Mike Diehl
AI6GS
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
<mailto:vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx> > wrote:
>
> Nothing I just relayed from another station in twitter
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 18 Aug 2017, at 3:33 am, Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx
<mailto:ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> > wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Curious... Where was this monitored? If I tell gpredict to go back
>> to
>> 13:59 UTC today (about 3.5 hrs ago), the ISS appears to be over the
>> middle of the Atlantic Ocean, headed for the U.K. If you were
>> monitoring in Australia, that's not possible.
>>
>> What did I do wrong?
>>
>> Greg KO6TH
>>
>>
>> Andrew Rich wrote:
>>> Heard stron carrier and voice ipersons worldwide without
requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and
do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:16:07 -0500
From: David Swanson <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "<,amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxxxxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
Message-ID:
<CANq+eyVVduEM9qaf+qiPNttqRUbsekqHnCiteSgyGy25_g29og@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I'm going with spectrum disorder of some form.... either that or a glorious
troll worthy of all of our adoration.
List Mods: Please help? Thanks.
-Dave, KG5CCI
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Ted <k7trkradio@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Andrew, you are pretty much clueless, right?
>
> 73, K7TRK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of
> vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 11:50 AM
> To: 'Paul Stoetzer'; 'Mike Diehl'
> Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
>
> Sorry does not meet ur needs
>
>
>
> From: prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Paul
> Stoetzer
> Sent: Friday, 18 August 2017 4:49 AM
> To: Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>; amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EVA
>
>
>
> Relaying certain information from Twitter might be appropriate at times,
> but
> please cite the source of the information when you do so.
>
> I would have worded the original post like this:
>
>
>
> "M0GIW reports ISS EVA activity was heard on 143.625 MHz and 130.167 MHz
> FM.
> https://twitter.com/M0GIW/status/898186526877724677"
>
>
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx
> <mailto:diehl.mike.a@xxxxx.xxx> > wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I think maybe you need to take a break from the internet for a while. You
> could also stop and think before hitting that send button. Ask yourself
> questions like "am I adding any value to the conversation?". Only you can
> prevent a whole group of people from having to hit the delete button.
>
> 73,
>
> Mike Diehl
> AI6GS
>
>
> > On Aug 17, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx
> <mailto:vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx> > wrote:
> >
> > Nothing I just relayed from another station in twitter
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 18 Aug 2017, at 3:33 am, Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx
> <mailto:ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> Curious... Where was this monitored? If I tell gpredict to go back
> >> to
> >> 13:59 UTC today (about 3.5 hrs ago), the ISS appears to be over the
> >> middle of the Atlantic Ocean, headed for the U.K. If you were
> >> monitoring in Australia, that's not possible.
> >>
> >> What did I do wrong?
> >>
> >> Greg KO6TH
> >>
> >>
> >> Andrew Rich wrote:
> >>> Heard stron carrier and voice in Russian on 143.625 and 130.167 Mhz
> >>> FM at 1359 UTC
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> . AMSAT-NA
> >>> makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
> >>> without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of
> the
> author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >>> Subscription settings:
> >>> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> . AMSAT-NA
> > makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
> > without requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the
> author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> . AMSAT-NA makes
> this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide without
> requiring membership. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author,
> and
> do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to
> all
> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 12, Issue 208
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
