| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 13.10.17 22:24l 832 Lines 25706 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB12255
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V12 255
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<CX2SA
Sent: 171013/2021Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:22919 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB12255
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Falconsat3 ASTARS Network Concept (Jack Chomley)
2. U7ZHO sound modem data to APRS-IS (vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxxx
3. FW: FalconSAT-3 Update (Robert Bruninga)
4. Re: FW: FalconSAT-3 Update (Jim White)
5. Ku Satelilte Band? (Robert Bruninga)
6. Re: [OZAPRS] FalconSat-3 sig level to decode (Ken Swaggart)
7. Re: 9100 CAT tuning doppler (Erich Eichmann)
8. Falconsat-3 Success (vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
9. Re: [OZAPRS] Falconsat-3 Success (vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
10. TS2000 Birdie 436.795 (radiomb)
11. Fw: TS2000 Birdie 436.795 (radiomb)
12. TS2000 Birdie 436.795 (radiomb)
13. Re: TS2000 Birdie 436.795 (Dimitry Borzenko)
14. Re: TS2000 Birdie 436.795 (Alan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:11:48 +1000
From: Jack Chomley <vk4jrc@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Falconsat3 ASTARS Network Concept
Message-ID: <7852FA60-B6A4-4F22-9D9E-16E3EFF62EFA@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
If only another Oscar 16 was launched......
73,
Jack VK4JRC
Club. www.cqara.org.au
> On 13 Oct 2017, at 11:59 am, Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry Bob,
>
> With all due respect, but I could not disagree more with your
> statement: "Falconsat3
> brings back a great satellite capability for emergency response traffic
> into and out of remote disaster areas. Its file store and forward BBS using
> the PACSAT protocol is ideal for getting multiline messages, and pictures
> and data out of an area."
>
> Here is why:
>
> 1. Its foot print and availability is severely limited by its inclination
> of 35 degrees. Most of the northern hemisphere has a few minutes and
> low horizon activity during a very short window.
> 2. Any satellite that is not available 24/7 (e.g. geostationary) is not
> useful for emergency operations. Having it around for a few minutes a day
> does not cut it. There is a reason why folks use HF and VHF radios (and not
> amateur radio satellites)
> 3. The equipment, software and user training is not there. Just look at the
> "fun" people having getting the TX side going.
> 4. You can count on one hand the folks that are currently having RX and TX
> ability to get a few packets through not even thinking about images etc.
> 5. Emergency response requires KISS equipment and training on the amateur
> radio side.
>
> On the other hand, it is a fun satellite to play with and like most APRS
> satellites a niche to explore and enjoyable from a hobby perspective.
>
> Again, these comments are within the spirit of our common interests
> and acknowledging all the great work you are doing and have done.
>
> 73, Stefan VE4NSA
>
>
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Falconsat3 brings back a great satellite capability for emergency response
>> traffic into and out of remote disaster areas.
>>
>>
>>
>> Its file store and forward BBS using the PACSAT protocol is ideal for
>> getting multiline messages, and pictures and data out of an area. Amateur
>> radio Sateliltes sort of abandoned this concept with the rise of the
>> internet. And then the short, real-time contact capability of APRS better
>> matched the shorter attention span of the evolving users.
>>
>>
>>
>> But now we have both in Falconsat3. But we also now have the Internet and
>> can integrate a worldwide collection of satstations capturing all the
>> downlink PACSAT BBS packets and building a WEB portal on the ground that
>> always mirrors the traffic on the bird. Imagine that a remote operator can
>> post a photo or file that can be read on a Falconsat WEB portal by FEMA or
>> emergency operators back here anytime, anywhere.
>>
>>
>>
>> The concept is suggested on this page: http://aprs.org/PFS3.html
>>
>>
>>
>> All we need is someone to write the internet server that collects the BBS
>> packets from all the ground stations like the APRS-IS already does for
>> APRS, but this new PACSAT-IS would be just for PACSAT BBS traffic.
>>
>>
>>
>> Then someone to collect the data and write the WEB Portal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Then people to put up satgates (hopefully using omni antennas) and with
>> enough stations, all packets could be collected.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyway, I created the above web page to kind of serve as a target for this
>> exciting new Amateur Radio capability.
>>
>>
>>
>> So even stations that are using OMNI antennas now and only decoding a few
>> packets per pass, we need to understand how well this works for high
>> elevation passes. Even this sparse data is good data.
>>
>>
>>
>> Remember, with a standard TNC all you are seeing are the few UI packets in
>> the downlink. I think if you set KISS mode, you will be flooded with all
>> the streaming BBS data too. This continuous stream at 9600 can make it
>> easy to see the effect of an antenna in very short time.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob, WB4APR
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:18:14 +1000
From: <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "'Australian APRS Users'"
<ozaprs@xxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] U7ZHO sound modem data to APRS-IS
Message-ID: <005901d343fb$d1720840$745618c0$@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
How are you guys and gals getting FalconSat-3 data to the APRS-IS ?
I have UI-VIEW looking at soundmodem as a KISS port but I have not seen data
passed.
Maybe I will turn debug on in UI-VIEW and see what gives
Andrew
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:32:33 -0400
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] FW: FalconSAT-3 Update
Message-ID: <0948503684230a636f90007e089f8f92@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Searching for a Falconsat email a few days ago, my email found this one
from TEN YEARS ago!
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard M. Hambly [W2GPS] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:31 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Smith [Naval Academy] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:24 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Latimer, Ellis H [Boeing.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 8:36 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence Timothy J Lt Col [AirForce Academy] Thursday, March 29,
2007 9:14 PM
Subject: FalconSAT-3 Update
All-
SpaceQuest was able to send us the "raw count" telemetry from their
software and we were able to translate it into the following:
Battery Voltage = 10.1 V (expected 8.0-10.6V)
UHF Transmitter Power = 7.584W draw, 1 W output (expected values)
Total power being produced from the 4 solar panels = 12.7 W
Power Distribution Board Power = 3.36V (needed to enable payloads, 3.3V
required)
Core Temperature: 6.9 C
ADCS: +Y direction was facing the sun as they took this data
We were able to check 54 data channels, and all indications are that the
satellite is in a healthy state.
We are still talking to SpaceQuest to sort out why our software was "hung
up" at initialization, have developed some new theories and will do
extensive testing on our Qual Model tomorrow here at USAFA.
Thanks for all of the positive emails, I emailed the cadets today (they
are on Spring Break) and told them to rest up since they will be put to
work when they return as we start commissioning :)
V/R,
Tim
Timothy J. Lawrence, Lt Col, USAF, PhD
Director, ...Department of Astronautics
United States Air Force Academy USAFA, Colorado 80840
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:57:51 -0600
From: Jim White <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FW: FalconSAT-3 Update
Message-ID:
<4846c9f6-87f7-7b41-abea-9d16016732c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Amazing how once on the www things live forever.
This exchange was right after launch when we were having trouble getting
the initial software booted up and running.? Turns out the flash stored
boot loader and initial housekeeping software had become corrupted just
before launch.? While we don't know for sure we suspected that happened
when we were doing last minute battery charging and through operator
error 'browned out' the processor repeatedly.
SpaceQuest (who built the avionics) was able to provide this snapshot
using their boot loaded / command software suite. Subsequent to this
they were able to provide a modified set of firmware we uploaded and as
you can see from the dates FS3 has been operated for over 10 years.?
Check the current uptime telemetry line. The first number is the days it
has been operating without interruption.
Jim
On 10/13/2017 7:32 AM, Robert Bruninga wrote:
> Searching for a Falconsat email a few days ago, my email found this one
> from TEN YEARS ago!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard M. Hambly [W2GPS] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:31 AM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Billy Smith [Naval Academy] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:24 AM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Latimer, Ellis H [Boeing.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 8:36 AM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Timothy J Lt Col [AirForce Academy] Thursday, March 29,
> 2007 9:14 PM
> Subject: FalconSAT-3 Update
>
> All-
>
> SpaceQuest was able to send us the "raw count" telemetry from their
> software and we were able to translate it into the following:
>
> Battery Voltage = 10.1 V (expected 8.0-10.6V)
> UHF Transmitter Power = 7.584W draw, 1 W output (expected values)
> Total power being produced from the 4 solar panels = 12.7 W
> Power Distribution Board Power = 3.36V (needed to enable payloads, 3.3V
> required)
> Core Temperature: 6.9 C
> ADCS: +Y direction was facing the sun as they took this data
>
> We were able to check 54 data channels, and all indications are that the
> satellite is in a healthy state.
>
> We are still talking to SpaceQuest to sort out why our software was "hung
> up" at initialization, have developed some new theories and will do
> extensive testing on our Qual Model tomorrow here at USAFA.
>
> Thanks for all of the positive emails, I emailed the cadets today (they
> are on Spring Break) and told them to rest up since they will be put to
> work when they return as we start commissioning :)
>
> V/R,
> Tim
>
> Timothy J. Lawrence, Lt Col, USAF, PhD
> Director, ...Department of Astronautics
> United States Air Force Academy USAFA, Colorado 80840
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:00:34 -0400
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Ku Satelilte Band?
Message-ID: <af9b54cf61030546c14573a514b86ade@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I have an old 1m dish and get wall-to-wall signals on a spectrum analyzer
scanning the Geo arc.
Is there anything at all that anyone can do with any signals of interest
without having special decoder rings for each one?
Experiments?
Bob
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:32:21 -0700
From: "Ken Swaggart" <k.swaggart@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, "'Australian APRS Users'"
<ozaprs@xxxx.xxx.xx>
Cc: 'Peter' <vk4khp@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>, 'AMSAT -BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] [OZAPRS] FalconSat-3 sig level to decode
Message-ID: <012f01d34438$76bc5df0$643519d0$@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Looks like everything is working correctly. I see your packets are making it
to the APRS-IS:
http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/raw.cgi?call=PFS3-11&start=12&length=12&time=1
Congratulations!!
73,
Ken, W7KKE
-----Original Message-----
From: vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx [mailto:vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 04:03
To: 'Australian APRS Users' <ozaprs@xxxx.xxx.xx>; 'Ken Swaggart'
<k.swaggart@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT -BB' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>; 'Peter' <vk4khp@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: RE: [OZAPRS] [amsat-bb] FalconSat-3 sig level to decode
I have Direwolf decoding FalconSat-3
+ Diamond x200
+ LDF4-50
+ Airspy Mini
+ VB Audio Cable
+ Direwolf 9600
But I don?t see these making it to the APRS-IS
Reading config file direwolf.conf
Available audio input devices for receive (*=selected):
0: CABLE Output (VB-Audio Virtual
1: Microphone (Realtek High Defini
Available audio output devices for transmit (*=selected):
0: Speakers (Realtek High Definiti
1: CABLE Input (VB-Audio Virtual C
Channel 0: 9600 baud, K9NG/G3RUH, +, 44100 sample rate x 2.
The ratio of audio samples per sec (44100) to data rate in baud (9600) is
4.6 This is on the low side for best performance. Can you use a higher
sample rate?
Note: PTT not configured for channel 0. (Ignore this if using VOX.) Ready to
accept AGW client application 0 on port 8000 ...
Ready to accept KISS client application on port 8001 ...
Now connected to IGate server rotate.aprs.net (205.233.35.46) Check server
status here http://205.233.35.46:14501
[ig] # aprsc 2.1.4-g408ed49
[ig] # logresp VK4TEC-5 verified, server NINTH
Connected to AGW client application 0 ...
Ready to accept AGW client application 1 on port 8000 ...
PFS3-11 audio level = 1(+2/-2) [NONE] ____||||:
[0.6] PFS3-11>PBLIST:PB: Empty.<0x0d>
Unknown APRS Data Type Indicator "P", Original Balloon (think Ham b
PFS3-12 audio level = 2(+2/-2) [NONE] :|||||||:
[0.4] PFS3-12>BBSTAT:Open ABCD:<0x20>
Unknown APRS Data Type Indicator "O", JEEP
PFS3-11 audio level = 2(+2/-2) [NONE] |||||||__
[0.3] PFS3-11>STATUS:B: 8559818<0x0d>
Unknown APRS Data Type Indicator "B", Original Balloon (think Ham b
PFS3-1 audio level = 2(+2/-2) [NONE] __:|::___
[0.3] PFS3-1>TLMC-1:CL:0
Unknown APRS Data Type Indicator "C", Ambulance
Error getting message header from AGW client application 0.
Tried to read 36 bytes but got only 0.
Closing connection.
audio level = 3(+3/-3) [NONE] _____|___
[0.5] (Not
AX.25)J<0x15><0xc8><0xae><0x18><0xc9>8<0x89>O<0x98><0xd3><0x9b><0x16><0x98><0x
ae><0x8b>i<0xa7><0x85><0x1e><0x0b>i<0x02><0xbc>m<0x86>u<0x08>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:28:54 +0200
From: Erich Eichmann <erich.eichmann@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: Todd <superiortrading@xxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 9100 CAT tuning doppler
Message-ID: <6bb95ee3-67a8-19f9-b2e5-6aafd50e3c0f@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Todd,
in the upper section of? menu "Mode" choose "Doppler Correction at
....Uplink and Downlink". In the lower section of the menu usually
choose? "Display in Frequency Window ....Doppler Shift".? The option
"Frequency at Satellite" is very helpful if you want to agree a
frequency for a QSO.? Then the chosen frequency is valid for both
operators. So, they will immediately hear each other regardless of the
different Doppler shifts at both locations.
73s, Erich, DK1TB
Am 12.10.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Todd:
> Maybe somebody can help me out. I am switching out computers and
> installed SatPC32 on the other machine. It's been a while since being
> on the satellites and forgot some operating functions with the SW.
> When SatPC32 is correcting for doppler does both Uplink/downlink
> frequencies change on the radio? Or just uplink? I have "At Satellite
> doppler" enabled. I noticed the only one changing was the uplink. Any
> help?
> Thanks,
> Todd
> AL7PX
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:57:22 +1000
From: <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "'Australian APRS Users'"
<ozaprs@xxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Falconsat-3 Success
Message-ID: <000201d343e8$258ede30$70ac9a90$@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello
Diamond X300
LDF4-50
AirSpyMini
SDR#
VB Audio Cable
HS U7ZHO soundmodem
UI-VIEW
Hand doppler corrected
1:Fm PFS3-11 To STATUS <UI R Pid=F0 Len=11> [15:49:54R] [AA] [----++-]
B: 8520721
1:Fm PFS3-11 To PBLIST <UI R Pid=F0 Len=11> [15:50:41R] [AA] [+--++++]
PB: Empty.
1:Fm PCTRL-8 To PCTRL-8 <UI R Pid=F0 Len=33> [15:50:48R] [AA] [+--++++]
CTRL: mode=9 torq0 elog=1 alog=0
1:Fm PCTRL-8 To PCTRL-8 <UI R Pid=F0 Len=33> [15:51:54R] [NN] [-----+-]
CTRL: mode=9 torq0 elog=1 alog=0
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:00:31 +1000
From: <vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Australian APRS Users'" <ozaprs@xxxx.xxx.xx>, "'AMSAT'"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] [OZAPRS] Falconsat-3 Success
Message-ID: <002b01d343f9$597c4370$0c74ca50$@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
And again
1:Fm PCTRL-8 To PCTRL-8 <UI R Pid=F0 Len=33> [17:29:26R] [AA] [+++++--]
CTRL: mode=9 torq0 elog=1 alog=0
1:Fm PFS3-11 To PBLIST <UI R Pid=F0 Len=11> [17:29:26R] [AA] [++++---]
PB: Empty.
1:Fm PFS3-1 To TIME-1 <UI R Pid=F0 Len=64> [17:29:31R] [AA] [+++++++]
PHT: uptime is 714/02:22:29. Time is Fri Oct 13 07:30:58 2017
1:Fm PFS3-1 To LSTAT <UI R Pid=F0 Len=46> [17:29:31R] [AA] [+++++++]
I P:0x13A8 o:0 l:26062 f:26092, d:1 st:6 e:9e
1:Fm PFS3-11 To PBLIST <UI R Pid=F0 Len=11> [17:29:32R] [AA] [-+++---]
PB: Empty.
From: OZAPRS [mailto:ozaprs-bounces@xxxx.xxx.xxx On Behalf Of
vk4tec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Sent: Friday, 13 October 2017 3:57 PM
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>; 'Australian APRS Users' <ozaprs@xxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: [OZAPRS] Falconsat-3 Success
Hello
Diamond X300
LDF4-50
AirSpyMini
SDR#
VB Audio Cable
HS U7ZHO soundmodem
UI-VIEW
Hand doppler corrected
1:Fm PFS3-11 To STATUS <UI R Pid=F0 Len=11> [15:49:54R] [AA] [----++-]
B: 8520721
1:Fm PFS3-11 To PBLIST <UI R Pid=F0 Len=11> [15:50:41R] [AA] [+--++++]
PB: Empty.
1:Fm PCTRL-8 To PCTRL-8 <UI R Pid=F0 Len=33> [15:50:48R] [AA] [+--++++]
CTRL: mode=9 torq0 elog=1 alog=0
1:Fm PCTRL-8 To PCTRL-8 <UI R Pid=F0 Len=33> [15:51:54R] [NN] [-----+-]
CTRL: mode=9 torq0 elog=1 alog=0
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:02:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: radiomb <radiomb@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] TS2000 Birdie 436.795
Message-ID: <1513301779.1335588.1507917754188@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
?? I am a newbie to satellites. I have only?worked the FM birds?using
handie talkies and arrow antenna. I wanted to start working in doors with my
TS-2000. On SO-50 downlink 436.795 it has a bad birdie that wipes
everything. Full squelch will not stop it. I have disconnected the antenna
and still there. On other radios it is?not there, so cannot be RFI. Has
anyone ever heard of TS-2000s that have this? Any ideas of something that
can be done to fix? Even sending it in to Kenwood Service. Cannot work SO-50
with it this way.? TNX 73? Mike K4MIA
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: radiomb <radiomb@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fw: TS2000 Birdie 436.795
Message-ID: <1233928122.1394569.1507921925513@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
??Guess if this is a real birdie (internal beat frequency) ?I am up the
creek. If?in the radio design cannot be changed. I heard Kenwood might be
releasing a new?satellite rig at Dayton next year. Any rumors out there? So
think I answered my question and the TS-2000 cannot be used for SO-50? TNX
AGN 73? Mike K4MIA
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:18:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: radiomb <radiomb@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] TS2000 Birdie 436.795
Message-ID: <1183796446.1389847.1507922304854@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
?
??Guess if this is a real birdie (internal beat frequency) ?I am up the
creek, Since?in the radio design cannot be changed. I heard Kenwood might be
releasing a new?satellite rig at Dayton next year. Any rumors out there? So
think I answered my question and the TS-2000 cannot be used for SO-50? TNX
AGN 73? Mike K4MIA
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 23:02:52 +0300
From: "Dimitry Borzenko" <dibor@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] TS2000 Birdie 436.795
Message-ID: <008001d3445e$42d8dec0$c88a9c40$@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
TS2000 fist version has this problem.
I'm also have a problem with SO-50 on some orbits.
This a problem cannot be fixed ?
Regards.
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of radiomb
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:18 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] TS2000 Birdie 436.795
Guess if this is a real birdie (internal beat frequency) I am up the
creek, Since in the radio design cannot be changed. I heard Kenwood might be
releasing a new satellite rig at Dayton next year. Any rumors out there? So
think I answered my question and the TS-2000 cannot be used for SO-50 TNX
AGN 73 Mike K4MIA _______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:12:51 -0500
From: "Alan" <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "'radiomb'" <radiomb@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] TS2000 Birdie 436.795
Message-ID: <000201d3445f$a5b830d0$f1289270$@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mike,
I don't have a TS-2k, but it does have a separate RX input. At least one
person mentioned using it with a separate RX converter on SO-50 which gets
around the internal birdie. Probably not a cost effective solution unless
you happen to have one laying around.
As for a new Kenwood, I have been asking them that for years, literally.
The answer in the past has always been that it is under active
consideration. Real Soon Now.
73s,
Alan
WA4SCA
<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of
<radiomb
<Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 14:18 PM
<To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: [amsat-bb] TS2000 Birdie 436.795
<
<
< Guess if this is a real birdie (internal beat frequency) I am up the
creek,
<Since in the radio design cannot be changed. I heard Kenwood might be
<releasing a new satellite rig at Dayton next year. Any rumors out there? So
<think I answered my question and the TS-2000 cannot be used for SO-50 TNX
<AGN 73 Mike K4MIA
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-
<NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
<program!
<Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 12, Issue 255
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
