| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 04.02.18 20:27l 769 Lines 24736 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB1353
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V13 53
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 180204/1818Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:34574 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB1353
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: SatPC32 Auxiliary Files (Mike Diehl)
2. AO-92 in L-band 1510utc 4 Feb 2018 for 24 hours (Mark L. Hammond)
3. Re: SatPC32 Auxiliary Files (jim@??????.???
4. AO-92 L Band (Mike Seguin)
5. Re: AO-92 L Band (Paul Stoetzer)
6. Re: AO-92 L Band (Mike Seguin)
7. Re: SatPC32 auxiliary files (JoAnne Maenpaa)
8. El over Az antenna project (Todd W Deckard)
9. AO-92 Uplink Question (Brian)
10. Re: SatPC32 Auxiliary Files (Frank)
11. Re: AO-92 Uplink Question (Paul Stoetzer)
12. Re: SatPC32 auxiliary files (Paul Stoetzer)
13. Re: Question about PL/CTCSS on uplink (Philip Jenkins)
14. FUNcube-1/AO73 operations (Graham Shirville)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 09:22:46 -0500
From: Mike Diehl <diehl.mike.a@?????.???>
To: Les Rayburn <les@????????????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Auxiliary Files
Message-ID: <E3C0D5BB-C52A-43E7-832F-6E116688D7E1@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> if someone would write a completely new piece of software with this
capability.
That someone could be you! GPredict is under the GPL so you could hack away
at it and add whatever feature you wish and a lot of the hard work has
already been done. This is where open source really shines, you can quit
waiting on someone else and fix it yourself. You can find the source code
here https://github.com/csete/gpredict/releases
> I?d rather have AMSAT fund one less satellite and instead funnel those
resources towards the development of a satellite tracking and rig control
software that performs better.
No thanks, I?d rather have more hardware. Why would I want AMSAT to allocate
resources to something I can do manually?
> Maybe we should start a crowd-sourcing project.
This is exactly what open source is, maybe you can take the lead and
organize an AMSAT fork of GPredict that will do exactly what you want.
73,
Mike Diehl
W8LID
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:22:54 -0500
From: "Mark L. Hammond" <marklhammond@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92 in L-band 1510utc 4 Feb 2018 for 24 hours
Message-ID: <6fNu1x00G2NCbDF01fNvyd@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject says it all, per schedule.
Thanks users for your cooperation! Enjoy...hearing folks get in at 1 deg
elevation. Wow...nice!
Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:43:26 -0500
From: jim@??????.??
To: "Mike Diehl" <diehl.mike.a@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Les Rayburn <les@????????????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Auxiliary Files
Message-ID:
<73bad10e457891a79b3398bad40d8179.squirrel@?????????.????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I agree with Les; SatPC32 is a good piece of software but it does have a few
holes that need it to be plugged to make it the flagship software that AMSAT
members should have. And as far as Paul's comments about basically "figure
it out yourself" once again I feel he fancies himself on
occasion as the OO of the FM birds. Don't get me wrong I have seen many
posts he has made that are quite enlightening and helpful but on occasion he
tends to go to the dark side. I mean this is one ham asking the satellite
community for help with a problem they were having and to be put down by one
of the AMSAT members was unnecessary. If the members think it is a goofy
request then just don't respond to it. Geeezzzz... If you cant say something
positive just keep it to yourself. Bedside manner Paul. You have many good
things to help with the community...stick to that.
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Auxiliary Files
From: "Mike Diehl" <diehl.mike.a@?????.???>
Date: Sun, February 4, 2018 9:22 am
To: "Les Rayburn" <les@????????????.???>
Cc: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> if someone would write a completely new piece of software with this
capability.
>
> That someone could be you! GPredict is under the GPL so you could hack
away at it and add whatever feature you wish and a lot of the hard work has
already been done. This is where open source really shines, you can quit
waiting on someone else and fix it yourself. You can find the source code
here https://github.com/csete/gpredict/releases
>
>> I’d rather have AMSAT fund one less satellite and instead funnel
those resources towards the development of a satellite tracking and rig
control software that performs better.
>
> No thanks, I’d rather have more hardware. Why would I want AMSAT to
allocate resources to something I can do manually?
>
>> Maybe we should start a crowd-sourcing project.
>
> This is exactly what open source is, maybe you can take the lead and
organize an AMSAT fork of GPredict that will do exactly what you want.
>
> 73,
> Mike Diehl
> W8LID
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:58:49 -0500
From: Mike Seguin <n1jez@?????????????????.???>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92 L Band
Message-ID:
<9a171168-54d7-1456-e456-b5b8f99ffff3@?????????????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I'm wondering what other ops are seeing for Doppler settings on their
L-Band uplink. Here in VT - last pass - It was pretty consistently +10
kHz on my FT-736R.
I plan to change SATPC32 to use 1267.360 and give that a try. I was
using manual VFO mode on the rig, so I had full range tuning - not steps
- and could adjust for best quieting.
L band system here:
FT-736R - 1.2 GHz module
DL2AM 60 watt amp (power is fully adjustable)
D/S 55 el 1269 loop yagi
G5400 rotors
--
73,
Mike, N1JEZ
"A closed mouth gathers no feet"
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 17:22:04 +0000
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: n1jez@?????????????????.???
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92 L Band
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOpJDtcZSh2xq_makhKtNwX8dcm8bCyDKs-mJDCg7MpNXg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mike,
I have noticed being in best 5-10 kHz high too. I only have an HT with
questionable frequency accuracy, though.
I had to twist my Comet yagi with 2 meter Arrow elements to get in on that
pass and due to the urban noise floor, I lost the downlink, so I wasn?t
sure how well/if I was getting in.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 11:59 Mike Seguin <n1jez@?????????????????.???>
wrote:
> I'm wondering what other ops are seeing for Doppler settings on their
> L-Band uplink. Here in VT - last pass - It was pretty consistently +10
> kHz on my FT-736R.
>
> I plan to change SATPC32 to use 1267.360 and give that a try. I was
> using manual VFO mode on the rig, so I had full range tuning - not steps
> - and could adjust for best quieting.
>
> L band system here:
> FT-736R - 1.2 GHz module
> DL2AM 60 watt amp (power is fully adjustable)
> D/S 55 el 1269 loop yagi
> G5400 rotors
>
> --
>
> 73,
> Mike, N1JEZ
> "A closed mouth gathers no feet"
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:32:38 -0500
From: Mike Seguin <n1jez@?????????????????.???>
To: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92 L Band
Message-ID:
<c2bdc387-e306-18d3-5da9-ee6f6756638b@?????????????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi Paul,
WB8RJY, VE4AMU and I noticed a weak signal on that pass - just in the
noise. Was that you?
Good to know you are seeing the nominal frequency being a bit high as
well. More testing is needed. Both of my passes were 5-6 degrees at
best. I'd like a good 30 degree pass to check tuning and ERP for best
quieting on the uplink.
Mike
On 2/4/2018 12:22 PM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I have noticed being in best 5-10 kHz high too. I only have an HT with
> questionable frequency accuracy, though.
>
> I had to twist my Comet yagi with 2 meter Arrow elements to get in on
> that pass and due to the urban noise floor, I lost the downlink, so I
> wasn?t sure how well/if I was getting in.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 11:59 Mike Seguin <n1jez@?????????????????.???
> <mailto:n1jez@?????????????????.???>> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering what other ops are seeing for Doppler settings on their
> L-Band uplink. Here in VT - last pass - It was pretty consistently +10
> kHz on my FT-736R.
>
> I plan to change SATPC32 to use 1267.360 and give that a try. I was
> using manual VFO mode on the rig, so I had full range tuning - not steps
> - and could adjust for best quieting.
>
> L band system here:
> FT-736R - 1.2 GHz module
> DL2AM 60 watt amp (power is fully adjustable)
> D/S 55 el 1269 loop yagi
> G5400 rotors
>
> --
>
> 73,
> Mike, N1JEZ
> "A closed mouth gathers no feet"
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???>. AMSAT-NA
> makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
73,
Mike, N1JEZ
"A closed mouth gathers no feet"
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:45:50 -0600
From: "JoAnne Maenpaa" <k9jkm@???????.???>
To: "'Amsat BB'" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 auxiliary files
Message-ID: <002101d39ddf$ff12db10$fd389130$@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mike inquired,
> What would be nice if one location had all the files (even Amsat). A
> newbie like me just starting out using SatPC32 has a big learning curve.
> Making these available would be a big help
One thing to try is to have a page with a template of the files you'd need
to update in SatPC32. At least you'll have an idea of which files you need?
Populating the data content depends on the satellite so once that data is
known it can be edited into your local copy of the template ... or the
missing information could be the basis of specific queries.
The AMSAT News Service, the AMSAT web, and AMSAT Journal use templates to
keep track of the things to do ... but, of course, all of the work comes
from making the content to fill out the template. Keep those cards and
letters to the editors coming folks!
But, I digress, if we'd like to try a SatPC32 template could an experienced
user send a trial copy to me at the e-mail at the signature line. Also try
to add a bit of descriptive text to the data elements that are needed to
complete the template. (BTW, I'm not a SatPC32 user.)
I'll post a PDF to our 'Station and Operating Hints' page:
https://www.amsat.org/station-and-operating-hints/
--
73 de JoAnne K9JKM
k9jkm@?????.???
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:37:59 -0600
From: Todd W Deckard <twdeckard@?????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] El over Az antenna project
Message-ID: <AED175D9-F074-4D0B-85B8-A6911D59C549@?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
The new FM sats have inspired me to work on the antenna project ...
... thanks to everyone who suffered my QRM last winter, see you in the air
when it warms up ...
https://youtu.be/VG5L5oP2uNk
Todd
KE0CMD
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:42:12 -0500
From: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92 Uplink Question
Message-ID:
<CAKhJrAT-V4Quid+LLt6GPN1DT57n_VWOHVnNPO4z-FyqRWso0Q@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I was able to hear the past 2 passes of AO-92 this morning.
Per the the past couple of posts, it looks like AO-92 is using the 1.2
uplink freq.
How can I find out when it will be using the 435 uplink freq ?
Thank you
Brian, KG8CO
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 09:56:17 -0800
From: Frank <k6fw1@???????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 Auxiliary Files
Message-ID: <9c0f0a18-4e89-bee2-1161-5847340e5e67@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I agree that there is plenty of room to improve SatPC 32.? Only being
able to track 12 satellites per group is a limitation.? Modifying the
files is not difficult in my opinion, but automated downloads like the
keps would be an improvement.? I remember the days of manual keps
input.? I can't remember the last time SatPC 32 had an update.
I use SatPC 32 to automate my station radio and rotors.? Works very well.
For pass planning and announcement I use HRD Satellite Tracking and
MacDoppler.? These programs have a much better graphical interface.? To
bad the HRD Satellite Tracker does not work well for station
automation.? MacDoppler works well for station integration but my shack
computer is a Windows box.
Does AMSAT own the code to SatPC32 or would a group of programmers need
to start from scratch?
Frank
K6FW
On 2/3/18 10:03 PM, Les Rayburn wrote:
> Actually Paul, I have to disagree with your comments.
>
> It would be best if either SatPC32 was reprogrammed to allow for seamless
and automatic updates when new satellites are launch, or if someone would
write a completely new piece of software with this capability.
>
> SatPC32 may be the best available (I think it is after trying them all)
but it?s hardly a user-friendly piece of software. Amateur satellite
communications offers one of the most cutting edge areas of our hobby, but
the premiere software package available doesn?t begin to compare to things
like WSJT, CWSkimmer, or other software tools that we have available.
>
> I?d rather have AMSAT fund one less satellite and instead funnel those
resources towards the development of a satellite tracking and rig control
software that performs better.
>
> Maybe we should start a crowd-sourcing project.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> 121 Mayfair Park
> Maylene, AL 35114
> EM63nf
>
> Member WTFDA, IRCA, NRC. Former CPC Chairman for NRC & IRCA.
>
> Elad FDM-S2 SDR, AirSpy SDR2, SDRPlay RSP-2 Pro, Sony XDR-F1HD, Dennon
TU-1500RD, Sangean HDT-1, Ray Dees RDS Decoders,
> Korner 9.2 Antenna, FM-6 Antenna, Quantum Phaser, Wellbrook ALA1530 Loop,
Wellbrook Flag, Clifton Labs Active Whip.
>
> ?Nothing but blues and Elvis, and somebody else?s favorite song??
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:01:13 +0000
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92 Uplink Question
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOoT6BRZJAY=A=e0hX8YP9_jkG0ygvuE7PRh+9o6bYGAzw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
See https://www.amsat.org/satellite-schedules/. Unless otherwise noted, the
435 MHz uplink is active.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:49 Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???> wrote:
> I was able to hear the past 2 passes of AO-92 this morning.
>
> Per the the past couple of posts, it looks like AO-92 is using the 1.2
> uplink freq.
>
> How can I find out when it will be using the 435 uplink freq ?
>
> Thank you
>
>
> Brian, KG8CO
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:03:37 +0000
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: JoAnne Maenpaa <k9jkm@???????.???>
Cc: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SatPC32 auxiliary files
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOpJo0vSJOo8hqMgJWvXz3c7GV0Qyq5ZMUqFGRP9Rj7b+w@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I can create a page on the AMSAT website to host updated aux files for all
the satellites if someone wants to share them. Since all my operation is
portable and using manual control, I don?t have all the various files on
hand.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:46 JoAnne Maenpaa <k9jkm@???????.???> wrote:
> Mike inquired,
> > What would be nice if one location had all the files (even Amsat). A
> > newbie like me just starting out using SatPC32 has a big learning curve.
> > Making these available would be a big help
>
> One thing to try is to have a page with a template of the files you'd need
> to update in SatPC32. At least you'll have an idea of which files you need?
>
> Populating the data content depends on the satellite so once that data is
> known it can be edited into your local copy of the template ... or the
> missing information could be the basis of specific queries.
>
> The AMSAT News Service, the AMSAT web, and AMSAT Journal use templates to
> keep track of the things to do ... but, of course, all of the work comes
> from making the content to fill out the template. Keep those cards and
> letters to the editors coming folks!
>
> But, I digress, if we'd like to try a SatPC32 template could an
> experienced user send a trial copy to me at the e-mail at the signature
> line. Also try to add a bit of descriptive text to the data elements that
> are needed to complete the template. (BTW, I'm not a SatPC32 user.)
>
> I'll post a PDF to our 'Station and Operating Hints' page:
> https://www.amsat.org/station-and-operating-hints/
>
> --
> 73 de JoAnne K9JKM
> k9jkm@?????.???
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:49:23 -0500
From: Philip Jenkins <n4hf.philip@?????.???>
To: Stefan Wagener <wageners@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Question about PL/CTCSS on uplink
Message-ID:
<CAGdEbNaZKYCVL+R3m7+849JX2jT==XsKs=BF3qv-G3L5MXD-tw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Thank you, Stefan! You answered the question that I was really trying to
ask...and didn't express very well.
What I meant to ask initially is why unwanted FM signals on the uplink of
a linear bird didn't pose (much of) a problem while unwanted FM signals on
an FM sat did; I understood the latter, but not the former...and now I know!
Thanks to everyone who responded
73 de Philip N4HF
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Stefan Wagener <wageners@?????.???> wrote:
> I guess there might be a very simple answer:
>
> On FM (one channel) satellites without the PL tone, any unwanted signal can
> mess it up for everyone; on linear satellites any unwanted signal (uplink)
> will mess up only a small portion (specific downlink frequency) and the
> rest is still available. Bottom line PL tones on FM sats helps all of us.
> No PL tones on linear sats will not be a significant problem.
>
> My simple mind :-)
>
> 73 Stefan, VE4NSA
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 9:11 PM, R.T.Liddy <k8bl@?????????.???> wrote:
>
> > The FM SATs decode discreet frequencies. The PL Tone goes up as 67 Hz
> > and is detected only at that particular freq.
> >
> > The Linear SATs receive a wide bandpass and the incoming signals are
> > beat against the SAT local oscillator and the resultant freq is the
> > differential. Therefore, the resultant freqs are different based upon
> > that differential. With multiple signals coming up to the SAT on their
> > different freqs within the bandpass, which one would only have exactly
> > 67 Hz? Tune across any HF Band with CW/SSB signals and you'll hear the
> > result of multiple signals/freqs.
> >
> > Bob K8BL
> >
> >
> > > On 2/3/2018 09:45, Philip Jenkins wrote:
> >
> > > > I understand why FM satellites need an PL tone on uplink (to keep out
> >
> > > > land-mobile services, like taxi-cabs, etc), but why is a PL not
> > required
> >
> > > > for the linear sats utilizing the same frequencies? A linear
> > transponder is
> >
> > > > certainly capable of receiving/transmitting an FM signal (albeit not
> >
> > > > successfully demodulating that signal).
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > This question came up at a satellite presentation I did, and I had
> > never
> >
> > > > thought about it. ( Moreover, will radios even transmit a PL on
> SSB/CW
> >
> > > > transmissions?)
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Philip N4HF
> >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:12:47 -0000
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@??????????.???>
To: <funcube@???????????.??.??>, "AMSAT" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Cc: operations@???????.???.??
Subject: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1/AO73 operations
Message-ID: <2BBF67B9343E4693A84EBCB43BE27457@??????????????>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
AO73 is now in continuous educational mode. Please expect the next mode
change to take place on Thursday.
Predictions indicate that AO73 will enter continuous sunlight for a period
of approx six weeks on Tuesday!
73
Graham
G3VZV
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 13, Issue 53
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
