| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 19.03.18 07:04l 764 Lines 26193 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB13106
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V13 106
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0GOS<ON0AR<OZ5BBS<CX2SA
Sent: 180319/0451Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:38079 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB13106
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: idle comments - Idle SATs (E.Mike McCardel)
2. XW-2 (X) digital telemetry? (Jean Marc Momple)
3. DG0VE (jerry.tuyls@???????.???
4. Re: idle comments - Idle SATs (Jerry Buxton)
5. Antenna Polarization Question (Brian)
6. Re: Antenna Polarization Question (Eduardo PY2RN)
7. Re: Antenna Polarization Question (Eduardo PY2RN)
8. Re: Antenna Polarization Question (Burns Fisher)
9. Re: Antenna Polarization Question (Greg D)
10. Re: Antenna Polarization Question (Burns Fisher)
11. Unofficial AMSAST roundtable on D-Star REF009C - NOW!
(Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
12. Re: AMSAST roundtable on D-Star REF009C - NOW! (Rick Tejera)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 12:28:53 -0400
From: "E.Mike McCardel" <mccardelm@?????.???>
To: skristof@???????.???
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] idle comments - Idle SATs
Message-ID: <5DD1C975-1D7C-4402-BFB5-12C21D02050C@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Maybe we are over reacting. Consider the number of new people who are
getting involved. It might take them some time to gear up. I believe many
newbie FM ops will get into the linears as they gain experience and invest
in equipment. A lot of us are getting old and have time on their hands. It?s
possible others work have family commitments etc. I don?t ever expect every
bird to be occupied all the time. Nor do I ever expect that it will be easy
to break through when they are busy.
I?m sure the novelty of the newness to several new birds is wearing off.
Maybe people have or haven?t found their away ?other birds? or telemetry.
Regardless, events and awards may help. Anyone can sponsor one, have at it.
EMike McCardel, AA8EM
Rotating Editor AMSAT News Service
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 8:26 AM, skristof@???????.??? wrote:
>
> At least part of the problem is that all-mode VHF/UHF equipment is
> expensive. The FM satellites are busy because you can work them with an
> HT. The linear birds are empty because you need to spend a month's (or
> more) wages to get on.
>
> Steve AI9IN
>
> Its not too many satellites, not enough ops!
>
> -------- Original message --------From: Bob- W7LRD <w7lrd@???????.???>
> Date: 3/15/18 6:23 PM (GMT-05:00) To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] idle comments
> Hello from Seattle
>
> I read the bb almost thoroughly throughout the day. A small common
> denominator is subtly appearing. I read, "I was on the bird all alone",
> or something like, "no one to talk to".
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:03:46 +0400
From: Jean Marc Momple <jean.marc.momple@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] XW-2 (X) digital telemetry?
Message-ID: <C5C17B6B-7913-4A1B-A014-87639BEC1C65@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dear All,
I have been trying to capture the digital telemetry from the XW-2(X) series
without success, CW TEM works fine. Sometimes able to decode XW-2A, but not
the others.
Does anyone able to do so, if so I would be grateful if you may share what
you do and what settings you use.
73
Jean Marc (3B8DU)
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:42:01 +0100 (CET)
From: jerry.tuyls@???????.??
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] DG0VE
Message-ID:
<1081689390.190814072.1521380521737.JavaMail.zimbra@???????.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hello all,
It is with sadness to say, that Roberto Zech,DG0VE, has become SK suddenly
last month at age 47.
He made a lot of stuff for VHF and up, specialized in ?wave technics, but
some of us may already know his very nice downconverters for the upcoming
Es'hail 2 sat.
73's
Jerry,ON4CJQ
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 15:20:49 -0500
From: Jerry Buxton <n0jy@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] idle comments - Idle SATs
Message-ID: <fe4e3f9e-2da0-c667-9146-e90af7713f6a@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 3/17/2018 14:54, Alan wrote:
> Back in the AO-10, AO-13, and AO-40 days when passes lasted hours, it was
nice to be able to talk for 20-30 minutes with someone and get to know them.
When the P3 Promised Orbit arrives, we may need to brush up on the art of
conversation by working 20m or the local repeater.
Ah yes, pining for the fjords.? I do appreciate the way that learning to
converse while hearing myself 1/4 second delayed was a harbinger of
easily working modern day online meetings...
Jerry Buxton, N?JY
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:44:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Message-ID: <893762180.2802347.1521402288200@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Should I be using LHCP or RHCP when setting up the 2 meter and 440 yagi's to
work the LEO's.
Thank you
Brian, KG8CO
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
To: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>, "amsat-bb@?????.????
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Message-ID: <1033813143.2761444.1521408800729@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi Brian,?
Both. You are going to need to switch between RHCP and LHCP often during a
sat pass.?The same happens if using linear polarization (V/H) but in this
case the switch between V and H will happen much more often than in CP.
73
Ed
PY2RN
From: Brian via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:21 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Should I be using LHCP or RHCP when setting up the 2 meter and 440 yagi's to
work the LEO's.
Thank you
Brian, KG8CO
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 22:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
To: Jordan Trewitt <jmtrewitt@?????.???>
Cc: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Message-ID: <1883844037.2793099.1521410799123@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Jordan,? most of the amateur radio LEOs SATs today have a linear polarized
antenna attached, it is not possible to know which position it is in the
time of the pass: H, V, moving, spinning... being completely random to the
ground station which polarization the signal will be, for this reason I
believe CP is more efficient but with RH/LH switching capability.
73
Ed
PY2RN
From: Jordan Trewitt <jmtrewitt@?????.???>
To: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
Cc: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>; "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Maybe I'm not understanding it, but why does one need to switch between
both, unless a particular satellite has LHCP or RHCP?JordanKF5COQ
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 16:34 Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
Hi Brian,?
Both. You are going to need to switch between RHCP and LHCP often during a
sat pass.?The same happens if using linear polarization (V/H) but in this
case the switch between V and H will happen much more often than in CP.
73
Ed
PY2RN
? ? ? From: Brian via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
?To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
?Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:21 PM
?Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Should I be using LHCP or RHCP when setting up the 2 meter and 440 yagi's to
work the LEO's.
Thank you
Brian, KG8CO
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:23:51 -0400
From: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
To: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
Cc: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxWiU_0PenMfGCMmWKL1dZveRqhK7vV7BqnGJcr7V_XHag@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Indeed, CP makes sense with a linear tx when you can't tell what the
orientation would be. You give up a few dB to avoid deep fades. But I
just can't figure out why you need to switch from RHP to LHP in such
cases. I've heard a number of people say that it sometimes matters, but I
don't understand the physics!
73,
Burns WB1FJ
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
> Jordan, most of the amateur radio LEOs SATs today have a linear polarized
> antenna attached, it is not possible to know which position it is in the
> time of the pass: H, V, moving, spinning... being completely random to the
> ground station which polarization the signal will be, for this reason I
> believe CP is more efficient but with RH/LH switching capability.
> 73
> Ed
> PY2RN
> From: Jordan Trewitt <jmtrewitt@?????.???>
> To: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
> Cc: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>; "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but why does one need to switch between
> both, unless a particular satellite has LHCP or RHCP?JordanKF5COQ
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 16:34 Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
> Both. You are going to need to switch between RHCP and LHCP often during a
> sat pass. The same happens if using linear polarization (V/H) but in this
> case the switch between V and H will happen much more often than in CP.
> 73
> Ed
> PY2RN
>
> From: Brian via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:21 PM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
>
>
>
> Should I be using LHCP or RHCP when setting up the 2 meter and 440 yagi's
> to work the LEO's.
>
> Thank you
>
> Brian, KG8CO
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:21:01 -0700
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@?????.???>
To: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>, Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
Cc: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Message-ID: <c1475257-87d8-5b9c-368f-3b0be42e9436@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Burns,
I've experienced that too, and from a little research I think it has
more to do with mechanics, and less physics. The thought is that no CP
antenna is perfectly circular, and so has a linear component to the
pattern. That linear component's alignment, or mis-alignment, with the
satellite's antenna causes some fading. Flipping the handedness also
changes the angle of that linear part, so it can help (or hurt) the
reception.
At least, that's the theory. There may also be reflections from
buildings and the planet that will introduce a linear component to the
signal, and perhaps some atmospheric effects as well.
Greg KO6TH
Burns Fisher wrote:
> Indeed, CP makes sense with a linear tx when you can't tell what the
> orientation would be. You give up a few dB to avoid deep fades. But I
> just can't figure out why you need to switch from RHP to LHP in such
> cases. I've heard a number of people say that it sometimes matters, but I
> don't understand the physics!
>
> 73,
>
> Burns WB1FJ
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
>
>> Jordan, most of the amateur radio LEOs SATs today have a linear polarized
>> antenna attached, it is not possible to know which position it is in the
>> time of the pass: H, V, moving, spinning... being completely random to the
>> ground station which polarization the signal will be, for this reason I
>> believe CP is more efficient but with RH/LH switching capability.
>> 73
>> Ed
>> PY2RN
>> From: Jordan Trewitt <jmtrewitt@?????.???>
>> To: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
>> Cc: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>; "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
>>
>> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but why does one need to switch between
>> both, unless a particular satellite has LHCP or RHCP?JordanKF5COQ
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 16:34 Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brian,
>> Both. You are going to need to switch between RHCP and LHCP often during a
>> sat pass. The same happens if using linear polarization (V/H) but in this
>> case the switch between V and H will happen much more often than in CP.
>> 73
>> Ed
>> PY2RN
>>
>> From: Brian via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
>> To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:21 PM
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
>>
>>
>>
>> Should I be using LHCP or RHCP when setting up the 2 meter and 440 yagi's
>> to work the LEO's.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Brian, KG8CO
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:22:48 +0000
From: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
To: Greg D <ko6th.greg@?????.???>
Cc: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxW3Kysni6uKM85sJhEv8JS82ybrO=LX7GFi+VcTRBSfoA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Aha! Most reasonable answer I?ve heard! Thanks!
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:21 PM Greg D <ko6th.greg@?????.???> wrote:
> Hi Burns,
>
> I've experienced that too, and from a little research I think it has
> more to do with mechanics, and less physics. The thought is that no CP
> antenna is perfectly circular, and so has a linear component to the
> pattern. That linear component's alignment, or mis-alignment, with the
> satellite's antenna causes some fading. Flipping the handedness also
> changes the angle of that linear part, so it can help (or hurt) the
> reception.
>
> At least, that's the theory. There may also be reflections from
> buildings and the planet that will introduce a linear component to the
> signal, and perhaps some atmospheric effects as well.
>
> Greg KO6TH
>
>
> Burns Fisher wrote:
> > Indeed, CP makes sense with a linear tx when you can't tell what the
> > orientation would be. You give up a few dB to avoid deep fades. But I
> > just can't figure out why you need to switch from RHP to LHP in such
> > cases. I've heard a number of people say that it sometimes matters, but
> I
> > don't understand the physics!
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Burns WB1FJ
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
> >
> >> Jordan, most of the amateur radio LEOs SATs today have a linear
> polarized
> >> antenna attached, it is not possible to know which position it is in the
> >> time of the pass: H, V, moving, spinning... being completely random to
> the
> >> ground station which polarization the signal will be, for this reason I
> >> believe CP is more efficient but with RH/LH switching capability.
> >> 73
> >> Ed
> >> PY2RN
> >> From: Jordan Trewitt <jmtrewitt@?????.???>
> >> To: Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???>
> >> Cc: Brian <cqkg8co@?????.???>; "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???
> >
> >> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:44 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm not understanding it, but why does one need to switch between
> >> both, unless a particular satellite has LHCP or RHCP?JordanKF5COQ
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 16:34 Eduardo PY2RN <py2rn@????.???> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Brian,
> >> Both. You are going to need to switch between RHCP and LHCP often
> during a
> >> sat pass. The same happens if using linear polarization (V/H) but in
> this
> >> case the switch between V and H will happen much more often than in CP.
> >> 73
> >> Ed
> >> PY2RN
> >>
> >> From: Brian via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> >> To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> >> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:21 PM
> >> Subject: [amsat-bb] Antenna Polarization Question
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Should I be using LHCP or RHCP when setting up the 2 meter and 440
> yagi's
> >> to work the LEO's.
> >>
> >> Thank you
> >>
> >> Brian, KG8CO
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> >> expressed
> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> >> AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> >> expressed
> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> >> AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> >> expressed
> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> >> AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 02:46:40 +0000
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@??????.???>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Unofficial AMSAST roundtable on D-Star REF009C -
NOW!
Message-ID:
<CAN6TEUebmPtDNNKzr5g1dp=OMZMr4o9RB3HFPTXt=GSkfWVo=Q@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi!
After a couple of weeks of no activity, we are trying to get
back to the Sunday evening AMSAT roundtable we had been doing
for a few months. With the shift to daylight time last weekend,
we moved the start time of the roundtable to 7.30pm PDT (10.30pm
EDT, or Monday 0230 UTC). A few of us are on there now, and we
will try this starting time to see how it works.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
Twitter: @?????? or http://twitter.com/WD9EWK
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:47:15 -0700
From: Rick Tejera <saguaroastro@???.???>
To: "amsat-bb@??????.???? <amsat-bb@??????.???>, AMSAT
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AMSAST roundtable on D-Star REF009C - NOW!
Message-ID:
<20180319044715.RAXH4561.fed1rmfepo102.cox.net@?????????????.???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Is this an HF net, echolink or IRLP? Frequencies or nodes?
Rick Tejera K7TEJ
Saguaro Astronomy Club
www.saguaroastro.org
Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club
www.w7tbc.org
From: Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 19:47
To: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] Unofficial AMSAST roundtable on D-Star REF009C - NOW!
Hi!
After a couple of weeks of no activity, we are trying to get
back to the Sunday evening AMSAT roundtable we had been doing
for a few months. With the shift to daylight time last weekend,
we moved the start time of the roundtable to 7.30pm PDT (10.30pm
EDT, or Monday 0230 UTC). A few of us are on there now, and we
will try this starting time to see how it works.
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
Twitter: @?????? or http://twitter.com/WD9EWK
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 13, Issue 106
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
