| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 28.06.18 19:35l 705 Lines 24927 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB13227
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V13 227
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<DB0RES<ON0AR<OZ5BBS<CX2SA
Sent: 180628/1729Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:46923 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB13227
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Field Day (whew) (Matthew Stevens)
2. Re: Channel Master 9521A Rotator interface (Gregory Beat)
3. Re: Field Day (whew) (Devin L. Ganger)
4. IC-9100 for sale (Stefan Wagener)
5. DSLWP-B UHF Test Plan for This Weekend and Updated Live CD (???)
6. Weather sat imaging (skristof@???????.????
7. Re: Weather sat imaging (Mvivona)
8. Re: Weather sat imaging (skristof@???????.????
9. Re: Weather sat imaging (Dino Papas)
10. Re: Weather sat imaging (Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL))
11. ARISS Special News Release (n4csitwo@?????????.????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:56:12 -0400
From: Matthew Stevens <matthew@?????????.???>
To: JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@???????.???>, amsat-bb
<AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)
Message-ID:
<CAN8zKtTxsORtY9JPwaV08yPdz5DSks7=xc9LTUBZSEZsFCY4MA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Agreed, that's the stated intent of the rule from both AMSAT and the
ARRL. And yeah, generally I think it's better to hop off the FM sats,
not tying it up and preventing other people from getting their QSO.
But, as I have done several times, I normally just monitor the FM
passes. If I hear a lot of callsign dropping, CQing, and carriers for
a decent amount of time during the pass, I'll start calling some of
them - especially the weak ones who seem to be likely using an HT to
get their bonus points. If I hear others start actually making
contacts instead of blind calling, then I back off and go back to
monitoring. Is that preventing others from using the sat, and keeping
them from making qsos? I don't think so. Does that comply with the
spirit of the rule, which is to allow more people to make qsos on FM?
I think it does. I know of at least two people from FD 2017 who would
not have gotten their sat bonus if I hadn't done just that.
I would say, just use your judgement. If you're in a position with a
decent enough station and experience to actually operate like I've
described (and heard others do this weekend), then you probably aren't
one of the ops that the rule is intended to address.
Rules aren't going to keep people from doing dumb things. I think the
best way to address the alleged "problem" of FM sats on field day is
not to add more rules, but to spread some operating skill and
knowledge like Sean (Kx9x) did in his QST article for June. There's no
substitute for practice and experience. And once you've got both, you
can make the call yourself on what to do during any given pass, field
day or not.
73
- Matthew nj4y
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:49 AM, JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@???????.???> wrote:
> To me this rule:
>
> ?7.3.7.1 Stations are limited to one (1) completed QSO on any single
channel FM satellite.?
>
> Precludes stations from making more than one QSO on a FM bird.
>
> I suppose that this is subject to interpretation, but to me that the
intent of the rule is to make the FM satellites available to more people by
rationing QSOes to one per bird. Making more than a single QSO and not
scoring them or not entering them into the log does not make the satellite
available to more operators and seems to fly in the face of the rule. I
understand why people do it, and under some circumstances it may be a good
idea, but to me it is against the rule.
>
> Of course someone could ask the ARRL Contest Manager if this practice is
OK, but remember the old adage of not asking questions you don?t really want
to know the answer to. - Duffey KK6MC
>
> James Duffey KK6MC
> Cedar Crest NM
>
>> On Jun 27, 2018, at 05:26, Matthew Stevens <matthew@?????????.???> wrote:
>>
>> Neither rule prevents you from making more than one FM contact. Both
>> rules just prohibit you from SCORING more than one FM contact.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> - Matthew nj4y
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:21 AM, George Henry <ka3hsw@???.???> wrote:
>>> To have an AMSAT rule that directly conflicts with the ARRL one-and-done
>>> rule is ridiculous.
>>>
>>>
>>> George, KA3HSW
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Bruce
>>> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 11:53 AM
>>> To: amsat-bb@?????.???
>>> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)
>>>
>>> In the AMSAT rules we do state, because someone asked about it, you can
be a
>>> net control type station and work every station you want. You would only
be
>>> able to score one contact yourself but had given many out to those
trying to
>>> make the 100 point satellite bonus.
>>>
>>> We still feel by limiting to one FM contact that if you worked someone and
>>> both of you leave the bird, two more stations can work each other thereby
>>> maximazing the number of possible contacts on the satellite during a
single
>>> pass.
>>>
>>> 73...bruce
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:21:41 -0500
From: Gregory Beat <w9gb@??????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Channel Master 9521A Rotator interface
Message-ID: <C8426C82-7CAE-440B-AA71-F581793EF02A@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
David -
For a computer application (HamRadio Deluxe) to have ?remote control? of
another device ... it requires a communication path (using standards like
serial, RS-232 or RS-422, for distance) and an intelligence (u-Processor)
within device to interpret the communications and perform desired actions.
?
The Channel Master 9521(A) TV antenna rotator is a simple 50+ year 3-wire
motor control design, updated in past decade with ?Bling? (7-segment display
and IR control) controller using a u-processor, to appear ?modern? to
non-STEM consumers.
https://support.channelmaster.com/hc/en-us/articles/200382985-Rotator-System-C
M-9521A-CM-9521HD-Documents-
In addition, there is No True BRAKE in these inexpensive designs (reason CDE
created the Ham-series of azimuth rotators in 1957)
The designs are virtually the same as early 1950s TV rotators in post-WW2
America.
Why is that an important?
NO positive feedback between actual direction of outside rotator and inside
control box (subject to mis-alignments).
Adding Position Control to 3-wire Rotators (Radio Shack, Channel Master, NTE)
by Doug Braun, NA1DB (amsat-bb, circa 2001)
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200110/msg00027.html
No schematic diagram provided, BUT YouTube disassemble videos exist.
https://youtu.be/KhvxsMiObTY
Building a PIC rotator controller, NA1DB
http://www.dougbraun.com/pix/rotor_controller/index.html
greg, w9gb
Sent from iPad Air
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:09:11 +0000
From: "Devin L. Ganger" <devin@????????.???>
To: JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@???????.???>, Matthew Stevens
<matthew@?????????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Bruce <kk5do@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)
Message-ID:
<MWHPR01MB26538BFDC133FCEA7DD2EE44CA480@?????????????.????.????????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
7.3.7.1 is a clarification of 7.3.7 which is about *scoring*.
--
Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)
email:?devin@????????.???
web:?Devin on Earth
cell:?+1 425.239.2575
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of
> JamesDuffey
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 6:50 AM
> To: Matthew Stevens <matthew@?????????.???>
> Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>; Bruce <kk5do@?????.???>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)
>
> To me this rule:
>
> ?7.3.7.1 Stations are limited to one (1) completed QSO on any single channel
> FM satellite.?
>
> Precludes stations from making more than one QSO on a FM bird.
>
> I suppose that this is subject to interpretation, but to me that the
intent of
> the rule is to make the FM satellites available to more people by rationing
> QSOes to one per bird. Making more than a single QSO and not scoring them
> or not entering them into the log does not make the satellite available to
> more operators and seems to fly in the face of the rule. I understand why
> people do it, and under some circumstances it may be a good idea, but to me
> it is against the rule.
>
> Of course someone could ask the ARRL Contest Manager if this practice is OK,
> but remember the old adage of not asking questions you don?t really want to
> know the answer to. - Duffey KK6MC
>
> James Duffey KK6MC
> Cedar Crest NM
>
> > On Jun 27, 2018, at 05:26, Matthew Stevens <matthew@?????????.???>
> wrote:
> >
> > Neither rule prevents you from making more than one FM contact. Both
> > rules just prohibit you from SCORING more than one FM contact.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > - Matthew nj4y
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:21 AM, George Henry <ka3hsw@???.???>
> wrote:
> >> To have an AMSAT rule that directly conflicts with the ARRL
> >> one-and-done rule is ridiculous.
> >>
> >>
> >> George, KA3HSW
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of
> Bruce
> >> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 11:53 AM
> >> To: amsat-bb@?????.???
> >> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Field Day (whew)
> >>
> >> In the AMSAT rules we do state, because someone asked about it, you
> >> can be a net control type station and work every station you want.
> >> You would only be able to score one contact yourself but had given
> >> many out to those trying to make the 100 point satellite bonus.
> >>
> >> We still feel by limiting to one FM contact that if you worked
> >> someone and both of you leave the bird, two more stations can work
> >> each other thereby maximazing the number of possible contacts on the
> >> satellite during a single pass.
> >>
> >> 73...bruce
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
> available
> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> >> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
> official views of AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
> available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
> official views of AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 19:42:24 -0500
From: Stefan Wagener <wageners@?????.???>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] IC-9100 for sale
Message-ID:
<CAKu8kHAbNtrroFgrkqAV_06Jm1WEXhNYNH_AWbKYWLGpFEtF1A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Selling my IC-9100. Pristine condition with D-Star, roofing filters, and
1,2GHz!!!
For details see the listing on qrz.com
73, Stefan VE4NSA
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:43:16 +0800 (CST)
From: ??? <wmc_jx@???.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] DSLWP-B UHF Test Plan for This Weekend and Updated
Live CD
Message-ID: <258a86ff.17dc.16443d825ac.Coremail.wmc_jx@???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Hi OMs,
The following tests of DSLWP-B UHF are planned:
30 Jun 00:00 to 30 Jun 02:00
30 Jun 05:00 to 30 Jun 07:00
30 Jun 16:00 to 30 Jun 18:00
1 Jul 07:00 to 1 Jul 09:00
All time in UTC. GMSK on both frequencies and JT4G on 436.4 for this week.
Download link for live cd 20180620:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PYOVeBODC5nyTItDyvl6lDH8c5P4I0jX
VY TNX & 73!
Wei
--
WEI Mingchuan
Research Center of Satellite Technology
Harbin Institute of Technology
mobile: +86-189-4501-5242
e-mail: wmc_jx@???.???? bg2bhc@?????.???
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 06:58:58 -0400
From: skristof@???????.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Weather sat imaging
Message-ID: <935fa82335c2e1448f03a5387f6dcd2e@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To get images from NOAA weather satellites I have been using an RTL-SDR
with SDR# software and the WxtoImg decoding program. This has worked
successfully for a couple of years. I use the VB virtual audio cable to
connect SDR# to WxtoImg.
But about a month ago I had to reinstall SDR# as it wasn't working. I
think it may have been due to an update in Windows 10. So, SDR# is
working fine, but since the reinstall of SDR# I can no longer get
viewable images in WxtoImg. The pictures look they have been through the
shredder. I tried the slant correction and the resync as described in
the Help section, but it didn't fix anything.
It looks like a sync problem, but if the resync doesn't fix it, I'm not
sure what to try next.
I know these aren't amateur radio satellites, but I'm hoping there's at
least a few of you out there who are downloading weather satellite
pictures and can help me out.
All reasonable suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.
Steve AI9IN
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:42:15 -0400
From: Mvivona <Mvivona@?????.???>
To: skristof@???????.???
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Weather sat imaging
Message-ID: <E9523EA6-F373-45E6-AD42-4FA417174810@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Is this on a laptop?
Michael Vivona
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 28, 2018, at 6:58 AM, skristof@???????.??? wrote:
To get images from NOAA weather satellites I have been using an RTL-SDR
with SDR# software and the WxtoImg decoding program. This has worked
successfully for a couple of years. I use the VB virtual audio cable to
connect SDR# to WxtoImg.
But about a month ago I had to reinstall SDR# as it wasn't working. I
think it may have been due to an update in Windows 10. So, SDR# is
working fine, but since the reinstall of SDR# I can no longer get
viewable images in WxtoImg. The pictures look they have been through the
shredder. I tried the slant correction and the resync as described in
the Help section, but it didn't fix anything.
It looks like a sync problem, but if the resync doesn't fix it, I'm not
sure what to try next.
I know these aren't amateur radio satellites, but I'm hoping there's at
least a few of you out there who are downloading weather satellite
pictures and can help me out.
All reasonable suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.
Steve AI9IN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:46:41 -0400
From: skristof@???????.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Weather sat imaging
Message-ID: <367283c8329c90696971fc9194883a7b@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Yes, this is on a laptop. I have successfully received images on this
laptop for a couple of years.
On 2018-06-28 07:42, Mvivona wrote:
> Is this on a laptop?
>
> Michael Vivona
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 6:58 AM, skristof@???????.??? wrote:
>
> To get images from NOAA weather satellites I have been using an RTL-SDR
> with SDR# software and the WxtoImg decoding program. This has worked
> successfully for a couple of years. I use the VB virtual audio cable to
> connect SDR# to WxtoImg.
>
> But about a month ago I had to reinstall SDR# as it wasn't working. I
> think it may have been due to an update in Windows 10. So, SDR# is
> working fine, but since the reinstall of SDR# I can no longer get
> viewable images in WxtoImg. The pictures look they have been through the
> shredder. I tried the slant correction and the resync as described in
> the Help section, but it didn't fix anything.
>
> It looks like a sync problem, but if the resync doesn't fix it, I'm not
> sure what to try next.
>
> I know these aren't amateur radio satellites, but I'm hoping there's at
> least a few of you out there who are downloading weather satellite
> pictures and can help me out.
>
> All reasonable suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.
>
> Steve AI9IN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:59:43 -0400
From: Dino Papas <kl0s@???.???>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Weather sat imaging
Message-ID: <BFB0D479-25DD-47C4-A802-3011599E6C50@???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
As an aside for those of you who use the WX Sat app ?WxtoImg? for decoding
those birds it appears that the web site has gone dark so make sure you keep
a clean copy squirreled away in case something happens to your main app file.
73 - Dino KL0S
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 8:46 AM, skristof@???????.??? wrote:
>
> Yes, this is on a laptop. I have successfully received images on this
> laptop for a couple of years.
>
> On 2018-06-28 07:42, Mvivona wrote:
>
>> Is this on a laptop?
>>
>> Michael Vivona
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2018, at 6:58 AM, skristof@???????.??? wrote:
>>
>> To get images from NOAA weather satellites I have been using an RTL-SDR
>> with SDR# software and the WxtoImg decoding program. This has worked
>> successfully for a couple of years. I use the VB virtual audio cable to
>> connect SDR# to WxtoImg.
>>
>> But about a month ago I had to reinstall SDR# as it wasn't working. I
>> think it may have been due to an update in Windows 10. So, SDR# is
>> working fine, but since the reinstall of SDR# I can no longer get
>> viewable images in WxtoImg. The pictures look they have been through the
>> shredder. I tried the slant correction and the resync as described in
>> the Help section, but it didn't fix anything.
>>
>> It looks like a sync problem, but if the resync doesn't fix it, I'm not
>> sure what to try next.
>>
>> I know these aren't amateur radio satellites, but I'm hoping there's at
>> least a few of you out there who are downloading weather satellite
>> pictures and can help me out.
>>
>> All reasonable suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.
>>
>> Steve AI9IN
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:15:10 +0100
From: "Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL)" <peter@????????.??.??>
To: skristof@???????.???
Cc: Amsat <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Weather sat imaging
Message-ID:
<CAFvUaiqxatGS4AJsUjueP8QkV-T+LEvftTV=Hh8NdoOHTN1RxA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Steve,
Could be a few things, with SDR# running is the audio choppy through the
speakers? you could lower the sample rate of the SDR also to see if that
helps
If the audio isn't choppy then it could be that there are not enough system
resources so your getting dropped packets, I have that issue on an old
desktop I use for wxsat decoding so I have turned off the main waterfall
and spectrum display in SDR# which sorted it for me.
Peter 2M0SQL
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 at 11:59, <skristof@???????.???> wrote:
> To get images from NOAA weather satellites I have been using an RTL-SDR
> with SDR# software and the WxtoImg decoding program. This has worked
> successfully for a couple of years. I use the VB virtual audio cable to
> connect SDR# to WxtoImg.
>
> But about a month ago I had to reinstall SDR# as it wasn't working. I
> think it may have been due to an update in Windows 10. So, SDR# is
> working fine, but since the reinstall of SDR# I can no longer get
> viewable images in WxtoImg. The pictures look they have been through the
> shredder. I tried the slant correction and the resync as described in
> the Help section, but it didn't fix anything.
>
> It looks like a sync problem, but if the resync doesn't fix it, I'm not
> sure what to try next.
>
> I know these aren't amateur radio satellites, but I'm hoping there's at
> least a few of you out there who are downloading weather satellite
> pictures and can help me out.
>
> All reasonable suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.
>
> Steve AI9IN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:19:18 -0400
From: <n4csitwo@?????????.???>
To: <aa4kn@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISS Special News Release
Message-ID: <5FED6433026A434FAC48A8B990F74F58@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
ARISS Special News Release:
ARISS Russia SSTV transmissions are scheduled to start tomorrow June 29,
2018 at 09:00 UTC and end on July 1, 2018 at 18:30 UTC. The images will be
downlinked at 145.80 MHz using the SSTV mode PD-120. Received images can be
viewed and posted at www.spaceflightsoftware.com/ARISS_SSTV/ .
Dave, AA4KN
ARISS PR
aa4kn@?????.???
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 13, Issue 227
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
