| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 11.12.18 00:26l 877 Lines 32040 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB13413
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V13 413
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 181210/2212Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:59889 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB13413
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: AO-95 (Jean Marc Momple)
2. Re: AO-95 (Greg)
3. Skeds - KL7, DE ID ME NV RI SD VT (M Thomas)
4. Re: AO-95 (E.Mike McCardel)
5. Re: AO-95 (Mike Sprenger)
6. ESEO (Daniel Est?vez)
7. Re: ESEO (Mike Rupprecht)
8. Re: Tracking objects from the SSO-A launch (Nico Janssen)
9. Re: ESEO (Ross Biggar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:47:40 +0400
From: Jean Marc Momple <jean.marc.momple@?????.???>
To: Don KB2YSI <kb2ysi@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-95
Message-ID: <7EA9DA57-CAE4-4167-BFCE-9B7DFE718A0A@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Don,
I wish to join you to thanks Jerry and the team, to have worked so hard for
Fox-1C over several years, and I am sure that they are more disappointed
than anyone else about the present issue.
Building a bird is not an easy job and it seems that some believe it is kind
of commodity, not really in spite many launches and each one is a challenge/
new adventure which is possible only due to the dedication and commitment of
a few, space is not the nearby shopping mall and still a still a very risky
business. Just look at the % of Cubesat failures.
Hopefully the bird will be recovered, if not it will be a learning as well
explained. Grievance is just not relevant.
I will continue to send the TLM for the bird as many times as possible per
the request to help them with an eventual recovery and suggest that all do so.
I also say also a big THANK YOU to the team behind AO-95, whether the
mission is successful or not, the important matter is their hard work and
learning from same.
73
Jean Marc (3B8DU)
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Don KB2YSI <kb2ysi@?????.???> wrote:
>
> Thanks to Drew and Jerry for the additional information, even though the
> situation is not what anyone wanted hear.
>
> I will echo John's statement. For those who have worked so hard on this
> bird, along with those before it and those to come, THANK YOU! Without
> people with the knowledge and skills to get a satellite into orbit, we
> would not have anything to enjoy.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:03 AM Jerry Buxton <n0jy@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> On 12/9/2018 18:17, Fred Castello wrote:
>>> I am just curious why we are not discussing the apparent failure of the
>> receiver of AO-95. Do we know anything more about the issue?
>>> Thanks all,
>>> Fred ? KF4FC
>>>
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> I'm not sure if you were referring to We the amsat-bb list members? I
>> have to say that I figured there would be much more chatter here than I
>> have seen so far, anyway.
>>
>> If by We you mean We the AMSAT Engineering team, of course we have been
>> discussing the problem, possible causes, and working on leads ever since
>> the anomaly became known. Certainly many of us are unhappy at not
>> succeeding in making everybody else happy, but that is not the reason
>> for my silence in terms of sharing with the public. Right now, with no
>> readily apparent reason or reasons for the behavior, there is nothing
>> else to report.
>>
>> The situation has gone from a commissioning to being challenge, which is
>> actually fun and we're on it. We are looking at data from a number of
>> sources, as well as our past experiences with the other Fox-1 satellites
>> during their journey from the BOM to orbit. Ideas such as the one Drew
>> mentioned about employing a mega-QRO station to see if it can be heard
>> by the bird have been on the table for several days but I don't plan to
>> report or discuss every thought we have in working this unless and until
>> it is something of merit or actionable. As you probably know, our
>> resources are limited and it's all volunteered time. Most if not all of
>> our remaining Fox-1 engineers are also involved in the GOLF-TEE project
>> so I have asked them to give that first priority with their available
>> volunteer time in order to keep the schedule. AO-95 is in orbit now and
>> we can vary the amount of attention on her as resources allow in order
>> to achieve both goals. If the results of our investigation point to a
>> possibility of recovery be it partial, full, or some workaround method,
>> we would all like to see her working as much as the rest of you and that
>> is a driver for this investigation. But perhaps the most important
>> driver is that there are lessons to be learned for the betterment of
>> future missions. I expect us to continue to look for the cause or
>> causes until we have results or reach a dead end because of the
>> inability to take the lid off and look inside AO-95.
>>
>> The main point of the ANS is to let everyone know that commissioning
>> won't be happening, certainly not in the period that everyone has grown
>> accustomed to if at all, so that members and users can get on with
>> enjoying their activities on all of the other satellites. Many had been
>> waiting in anticipation and wondering why talk of AO-95 commissioning
>> seemed so quiet, so once we were sure that it didn't appear to be an
>> intermittent thing we shared the news. And as I said in the ANS, I will
>> certainly be keeping everyone posted when we have something new to
>> report so in the meantime please carry on and enjoy the birds!
>>
>> Jerry Buxton, N?JY
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
>
> --
> 73,
> Don KB2YSI
> https://www.hamqth.com/kb2ysi
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:02:45 -0500
From: Greg <almetco@???????.???>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-95
Message-ID: <8E3B3709-2D72-4A2D-868B-04D4002465EB@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
My appreciation as well to the Fox-1C team as well. There is a reason these
are called ?amateur? satellites and everyone should know the risks and
challenges of these endeavors. We all hope for the best at time of launch
but in the harsh environment of the launch, release and orbit, things
happen. We should appreciate that we have the success of all the current
amateur satellites in orbit. I for one can barely make a paper airplane fly
let alone design, build and launch such a sophisticated piece of
communications equipment. Kudos to all involved.
Thanks AMSAT and crew.
Greg
N3MVF
On Dec 10, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Jean Marc Momple <jean.marc.momple@?????.???>
wrote:
Don,
I wish to join you to thanks Jerry and the team, to have worked so hard for
Fox-1C over several years, and I am sure that they are more disappointed
than anyone else about the present issue.
Building a bird is not an easy job and it seems that some believe it is kind
of commodity, not really in spite many launches and each one is a challenge/
new adventure which is possible only due to the dedication and commitment of
a few, space is not the nearby shopping mall and still a still a very risky
business. Just look at the % of Cubesat failures.
Hopefully the bird will be recovered, if not it will be a learning as well
explained. Grievance is just not relevant.
I will continue to send the TLM for the bird as many times as possible per
the request to help them with an eventual recovery and suggest that all do so.
I also say also a big THANK YOU to the team behind AO-95, whether the
mission is successful or not, the important matter is their hard work and
learning from same.
73
Jean Marc (3B8DU)
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Don KB2YSI <kb2ysi@?????.???> wrote:
>
> Thanks to Drew and Jerry for the additional information, even though the
> situation is not what anyone wanted hear.
>
> I will echo John's statement. For those who have worked so hard on this
> bird, along with those before it and those to come, THANK YOU! Without
> people with the knowledge and skills to get a satellite into orbit, we
> would not have anything to enjoy.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:03 AM Jerry Buxton <n0jy@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> On 12/9/2018 18:17, Fred Castello wrote:
>>> I am just curious why we are not discussing the apparent failure of the
>> receiver of AO-95. Do we know anything more about the issue?
>>> Thanks all,
>>> Fred ? KF4FC
>>>
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> I'm not sure if you were referring to We the amsat-bb list members? I
>> have to say that I figured there would be much more chatter here than I
>> have seen so far, anyway.
>>
>> If by We you mean We the AMSAT Engineering team, of course we have been
>> discussing the problem, possible causes, and working on leads ever since
>> the anomaly became known. Certainly many of us are unhappy at not
>> succeeding in making everybody else happy, but that is not the reason
>> for my silence in terms of sharing with the public. Right now, with no
>> readily apparent reason or reasons for the behavior, there is nothing
>> else to report.
>>
>> The situation has gone from a commissioning to being challenge, which is
>> actually fun and we're on it. We are looking at data from a number of
>> sources, as well as our past experiences with the other Fox-1 satellites
>> during their journey from the BOM to orbit. Ideas such as the one Drew
>> mentioned about employing a mega-QRO station to see if it can be heard
>> by the bird have been on the table for several days but I don't plan to
>> report or discuss every thought we have in working this unless and until
>> it is something of merit or actionable. As you probably know, our
>> resources are limited and it's all volunteered time. Most if not all of
>> our remaining Fox-1 engineers are also involved in the GOLF-TEE project
>> so I have asked them to give that first priority with their available
>> volunteer time in order to keep the schedule. AO-95 is in orbit now and
>> we can vary the amount of attention on her as resources allow in order
>> to achieve both goals. If the results of our investigation point to a
>> possibility of recovery be it partial, full, or some workaround method,
>> we would all like to see her working as much as the rest of you and that
>> is a driver for this investigation. But perhaps the most important
>> driver is that there are lessons to be learned for the betterment of
>> future missions. I expect us to continue to look for the cause or
>> causes until we have results or reach a dead end because of the
>> inability to take the lid off and look inside AO-95.
>>
>> The main point of the ANS is to let everyone know that commissioning
>> won't be happening, certainly not in the period that everyone has grown
>> accustomed to if at all, so that members and users can get on with
>> enjoying their activities on all of the other satellites. Many had been
>> waiting in anticipation and wondering why talk of AO-95 commissioning
>> seemed so quiet, so once we were sure that it didn't appear to be an
>> intermittent thing we shared the news. And as I said in the ANS, I will
>> certainly be keeping everyone posted when we have something new to
>> report so in the meantime please carry on and enjoy the birds!
>>
>> Jerry Buxton, N?JY
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
>
> --
> 73,
> Don KB2YSI
> https://www.hamqth.com/kb2ysi
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:21:11 -0600
From: M Thomas <markn9um@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Skeds - KL7, DE ID ME NV RI SD VT
Message-ID:
<CAD4E2bykH4vE99Zqfy_vEsNSLZPu_sB0BW6cbC4aQ2CQcZQbPQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hello
I am looking for skeds for the following states, please. Thanks to Gabe, I
crossed off KH6 last night.
FM or linear
Thanks!!!
Mark
N9UM
EN52
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:39:12 -0500
From: "E.Mike McCardel" <mccardelm@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-95
Message-ID: <BE7DB9B2-DDB0-4251-999F-1891A99A214F@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
For information on how to subscribe to ANS visit:
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/ans
EMike McCardel, AA8EM
Senior Editor AMSAT News Service
Past AMSAT-NA VP Educational Relations
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 11:36 AM, Zach Metzinger <zmetzing@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> On 12/10/18 10:25 AM, Chris Bouck wrote:
>> Where are you getting the information on this spacecraft?
>
> Are you receiving the "ANS-xxx AMSAT News Service Weekly Bulletins", sent
to this list? That's the best source of information on AO-95, and future
missions.
>
> On to Fox-1E and beyond!
>
> --- Zach
> N0ZGO
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:29:51 -0500
From: Mike Sprenger <mikesprenger@?????.???>
To: johnbrier@?????.???
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Fred Castello
<fredcastello@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-95
Message-ID:
<CAB4zG_LS-DZFp5psGp0Zj3nMpwCXjDy+jhqUamiaJMz1iLDOvA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
John,
I'm like you, grateful for a long series of great effort - Its a real
crescendo of work just to launch and commission one of these satellites
when everything goes per plan and works just right.
This time is a little different, we're probably going to learn more from
AO-95, I'm taking this as I need to start collecting telemetry to support
the need for more data to understand the status to see if more information
may be revealed yielding better results in the future.
As long as the satellite is up there making power and transmitting the
possibility exists we may use its transponder some day, takes no
imagination to point out AO-7 as that example.
*I'm offering my hearty Thank You* for a whole program of satellites
(AO-73,85,91,92, 95 ARISS et al), and hope that the entire Mission Team
thats been working on all of these satellites has a great Holiday season
with Family and Friends. I hope to see you in Orlando soon.
73
Mike
W4UOO
On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:44 PM John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???> wrote:
> Very sorry to all the engineers and others who worked on/with AO-95.
>
> Thanks for your service to the community.
>
> 73, John Brier KG4AKV
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2018, 19:48 Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@??????????.???
> wrote:
>
> > Fred,
> >
> > Perhaps because there is little useful to be done or said at this point.
> > We don?t know, and may never know for sure what the exact failure is.
> Many
> > of those involved are also in some state of grieving right now after the
> > years of effort put into this little satellite. Space is hard, and we do
> > the best we can.
> >
> > Rest assured that we will continue to monitor the satellite for any
> > changes, and when the will to work the problem is a little stronger we
> will
> > seek out some mega-erp EME stations to try to wiggle the RSSI to further
> > diagnose the problem. Continued submission of telemetry is very important
> > to this end.
> >
> > 73, Drew, KO4MA
> > AMSAT VP Operations
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 9, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Fred Castello <fredcastello@?????.???>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am just curious why we are not discussing the apparent failure of the
> > receiver of AO-95. Do we know anything more about the issue?
> > > Thanks all,
> > > Fred ? KF4FC
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
Thanks,
Mike Sprenger
(37.9167N 81.1244W is the Summit)
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 21:57:46 +0100
From: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] ESEO
Message-ID: <55a8c8aa-524a-f9bc-5186-fb4e823c9aca@????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
El 10/12/18 a las 04:31, Ross Biggar escribi?:
> Can someone please tell me what is happening with ESEO, has it been tested
and is it ready for operation yet?
Hi Ross,
I haven't heard much official information about the status of the
satellite and the progress of the mission. I think the FUNcube payload
is not active yet.
Now that we have a working decoder for ESEO
(https://destevez.net/2018/12/decoding-eseo/), we can watch the
telemetry to investigate about the satellite status.
Mike DK3WN captured some telemetry packets a couple of days ago:
http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=91603
A telemetry parser for these is not ready yet, but the documentation is
available here:
https://www.esa.int/Education/ESEO/Be_the_first_to_catch_a_signal_from_ESEO
>From a quick look by hand at the packets, it seems the spacecraft is in
safe mode and several systems are powered down.
PS: We still have to figure out some small details / check our
understanding about the telemetry format, so it would be good if you can
send us some more telemetry packets in hex as Mike did, so that we can
check our ideas.
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:22:38 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@??????????????.??>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ESEO
Message-ID: <000001d490ce$7a45e250$6ed1a6f0$@??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
All,
... telemetry parser is in progress - but it's a very complex telemetry - so
give me some time, please ;-)
73 Mike
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? Im Auftrag von Daniel
Est?vez
Gesendet: 10 December 2018 21:58
An: amsat-bb@?????.???
Betreff: [amsat-bb] ESEO
El 10/12/18 a las 04:31, Ross Biggar escribi?:
> Can someone please tell me what is happening with ESEO, has it been tested
and is it ready for operation yet?
Hi Ross,
I haven't heard much official information about the status of the satellite
and the progress of the mission. I think the FUNcube payload is not active
yet.
Now that we have a working decoder for ESEO
(https://destevez.net/2018/12/decoding-eseo/), we can watch the telemetry to
investigate about the satellite status.
Mike DK3WN captured some telemetry packets a couple of days ago:
http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=91603
A telemetry parser for these is not ready yet, but the documentation is
available here:
https://www.esa.int/Education/ESEO/Be_the_first_to_catch_a_signal_from_ESEO
>From a quick look by hand at the packets, it seems the spacecraft is in
safe mode and several systems are powered down.
PS: We still have to figure out some small details / check our understanding
about the telemetry format, so it would be good if you can send us some more
telemetry packets in hex as Mike did, so that we can check our ideas.
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:02:24 +0100
From: Nico Janssen <hamsat@??????.??>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Ray Hoad
<ray.hoad@????????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Tracking objects from the SSO-A launch
Message-ID: <87a7fac8-db56-a989-76a9-c7d5666c99e7@??????.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Still no TLE set for Suomi 100 is published by Space-Track.org.
Therefore I determined these TLEs myself from doppler measurements:
Suomi 100
1 60002U 18601B?? 18344.10953523? .00000010? 00000-0? 70016-5 0 05
2 60002? 97.7672? 53.2430 0010803 228.0410 133.0649 14.95134223 04
73,
Nico PA0DLO
On 09-12-18 14:36, Nico Janssen wrote:
>
> Further suggestions: for Suomi100 use object 43788, for CSIM use
> object 43793,
> for MinXSS 2 use object 43758, and for SnugLite use object 43786.
>
> Still no TLE set for Jordan-OSCAR 97 (ex JY1Sat) from SpaceTrack.org.
> Therefore I determined these TLEs myself from doppler measurements:
>
> Jordan-OSCAR 97
> 1 60001U 18601A?? 18343.03869085? .00000100? 00000-0? 15114-4 0 01
> 2 60001? 97.7674? 52.0912 0012867 257.7608 103.0072 14.95132150 01
>
> 73,
> Nico PA0DLO
>
> On 08-12-18 15:25, Nico Janssen wrote:
>>
>> With updated TLE sets the best fit for JY1Sat is now object 43788 and
>> for
>> AO-95 (ex Fox 1Cliff) it is now 43770 (separation with 43771 is only
>> 1 s).
>> But these fits are not perfect. Apparently their TLEs have not yet
>> been published.
>>
>> 73,
>> Nico PA0DLO
>>
>> On 07-12-18 16:39, Nico Janssen wrote:
>>>
>>> With a lot of new TLE sets available, some new suggestions: for JY1Sat
>>> now use object 43788 or 43759 (separation is less than 1 s), for
>>> ITASat 1
>>> now use object 43787, and for MOVE-II now use object 43776.
>>> For RANGE-A use object 43798, and for PWSat 2 now use object 43780.
>>> Either MinXSS 2 or CSIM is object 43793.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Nico PA0DLO
>>>
>>> On 06-12-18 12:34, Nico Janssen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> New suggestions: for AO 95 (ex Fox 1Cliff) now use object 43774,
>>>> for MOVE-II
>>>> now use object 43775, and for PWSat 2 use object 43776.
>>>>
>>>> Again: this may change later on when separations increase and new
>>>> TLE sets
>>>> become available. Currently only 14 TLE sets have been published
>>>> for the
>>>> 64+ objects from this launch.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Nico PA0DLO
>>>>
>>>> On 05-12-18 14:22, Nico Janssen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Another suggestion: for ESEO use object 43763.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> Nico PA0DLO
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04-12-18 23:17, Nico Janssen wrote:
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Separations between the objects from the SSO-A launch are remarkably
>>>>>> small, some no more than 1 or 2 s. And not all TLE sets have been
>>>>>> published yet. So identifying objects is hard for the time being.
>>>>>> But for
>>>>>> tracking purposes I have some suggestions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For JY1Sat use object 43759, for ITASat 1 use object 43760, for
>>>>>> Fox 1Cliff
>>>>>> use object 43767 and for Move 2 use object 43761. These should
>>>>>> work well
>>>>>> for now. But note that these assignments may change later on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>> Nico PA0DLO
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>>>>>> available
>>>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>>>>> Opinions expressed
>>>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>>>>> views of AMSAT-NA.
>>>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>>>>> program!
>>>>>> Subscription settings:
>>>>>> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>>>> Opinions expressed
>>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>>>> views of AMSAT-NA.
>>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>>>> program!
>>>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>>> Opinions expressed
>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>>> views of AMSAT-NA.
>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>>> program!
>>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>> views of AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>> of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 21:50:50 +0000
From: Ross Biggar <ross.biggar@???????.???>
To: Mike Rupprecht <mail@??????????????.??>, "amsat-bb@?????.????
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ESEO
Message-ID:
<BN6PR22MB01152C39FEAED0181DD4EFDDF7A50@?????????????.????????.????.???????.??
?>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks Mike, judging by the look of that signal, I can certainly understand
it will be difficult to decode.
Ross
ZL1WN
________________________________
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> on behalf of Mike Rupprecht
<mail@??????????????.??>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 10:22 AM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ESEO
All,
... telemetry parser is in progress - but it's a very complex telemetry - so
give me some time, please ;-)
73 Mike
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? Im Auftrag von Daniel
Est?vez
Gesendet: 10 December 2018 21:58
An: amsat-bb@?????.???
Betreff: [amsat-bb] ESEO
El 10/12/18 a las 04:31, Ross Biggar escribi?:
> Can someone please tell me what is happening with ESEO, has it been tested
and is it ready for operation yet?
Hi Ross,
I haven't heard much official information about the status of the satellite
and the progress of the mission. I think the FUNcube payload is not active
yet.
Now that we have a working decoder for ESEO
(https://destevez.net/2018/12/decoding-eseo/), we can watch the telemetry to
investigate about the satellite status.
Mike DK3WN captured some telemetry packets a couple of days ago:
http://www.dk3wn.info/p/?p=91603
A telemetry parser for these is not ready yet, but the documentation is
available here:
https://www.esa.int/Education/ESEO/Be_the_first_to_catch_a_signal_from_ESEO
>From a quick look by hand at the packets, it seems the spacecraft is in
safe mode and several systems are powered down.
PS: We still have to figure out some small details / check our understanding
about the telemetry format, so it would be good if you can send us some more
telemetry packets in hex as Mike did, so that we can check our ideas.
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 13, Issue 413
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
