| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 20.03.15 21:00l 631 Lines 22334 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB1091
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V10 91
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IR1UAW<IK1NHL<CX2SA
Sent: 150320/1845Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:17383 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB1091
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (Glenn Miller - AA5PK)
2. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (Clint Bradford)
3. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (John Geiger)
4. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (Paul Stoetzer)
5. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (John Geiger)
6. SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG (Bryan Green)
7. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (Kevin M)
8. Re: SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG (Kevin M)
9. Re: SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG (Glenn Miller - AA5PK)
10. Re: SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG (Paul Stoetzer)
11. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (Douglas Phelps)
12. lost amateur satellite.txt in Sat32PC (Scott Smith)
13. Re: lost amateur satellite.txt in Sat32PC (PE0SAT | Amateur Radio)
14. Re: Modern Equipment Matrix (Alan)
15. Astronaut issues challenge for UK students to ?make that
call? (M5AKA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:53:28 -0500
From: "Glenn Miller - AA5PK" <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Clint Bradford" <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, "AMSAT BB"
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID: <B9872361C32C44A19370EA5EED6CC31C@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=original
The IC-W2A is also full duplex. Mine's 25 years old and works great with an
Arrow.
-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Bradford
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 8:13 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
For portable work on the FM birds, there are some wonderful, long-discontinued
full-duplex HTs that many are using, like the early models of the Icom
IC-W32a,
Kenwood TH-D7 and TH-D79, and Yaesu?s FT-470/FT-51/FT-530 models.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 02:55:21 +0000 (GMT)
From: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>
To: Glenn Miller - AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID: <40a28880-d892-41be-955d-093090330a45@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
?>> ... Dude, you forgot about the IC-W2A ...
As we age ... (grin). I'll edit that page tonight - thanks!
Clint Bradford, K6LCS
909-241-7666
?
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:28:34 -0500
From: John Geiger <af5cc@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Glenn Miller - AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID:
<CAHZ3kP_uiG5Y2x3GuBFx4jJXrgduhcKa6tpWDk=UwewE7jZf1g@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The Icom W31AT is also full duplex, an earlier version of the W32A.
Others that I think might be full duplex, but can't be sure would include:
Alinco DJG5T, DJ560, DJ580, DJ582
Icom W21AT, Ic32AT
Kenwood TH75, TH77, TH78
Probably several Standard Models, I am not familiar with those
The Kenwood TH79 is probably one of the best looking HTs ever made, right
up there with the Standard C156A
73 John AF5CC
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Glenn Miller - AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> The IC-W2A is also full duplex. Mine's 25 years old and works great with
> an Arrow.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Clint Bradford
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 8:13 PM
> To: AMSAT BB
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
>
> For portable work on the FM birds, there are some wonderful,
> long-discontinued
> full-duplex HTs that many are using, like the early models of the Icom
> IC-W32a,
> Kenwood TH-D7 and TH-D79, and Yaesu?s FT-470/FT-51/FT-530 models.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:58:24 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: Jeff Davis <stuckbit@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOqY2uF_jAueRScxjWRmZLR3i-akNCNWO5hVVG+iqn_scA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The only two full duplex base satellite radios in current production are:
Kenwood TS-2000 (note the birdie in the middle of SO-50's downlink)
Icom IC-9100
Lots of people use combinations of radios - such as FT-817s, FT-857s,
FT-897s, FT-991s, FT-100s, IC-706MkIIGs, etc with another radio as a
receiver, like another FT-817 or a FUNcube Dongle Pro+ and a
laptop/tablet.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Jeff Davis <stuckbit@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Has anyone assembled a reasonably modern (currently available) table of
> equipment suitable for sat work?
>
> Dual-band, full-duplex - handhelds, mobiles, base equipment.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jeff, KE9V
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:26:44 -0500
From: John Geiger <af5cc@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID:
<CAHZ3kP8eX5vZSOL1XAO8Y_zXdJEn=EEhow5kN9xSYzQzzyt7jQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I believe that some of the Flexradios will do full duplex as well.
73 John AF5CC
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> The only two full duplex base satellite radios in current production are:
>
> Kenwood TS-2000 (note the birdie in the middle of SO-50's downlink)
> Icom IC-9100
>
> Lots of people use combinations of radios - such as FT-817s, FT-857s,
> FT-897s, FT-991s, FT-100s, IC-706MkIIGs, etc with another radio as a
> receiver, like another FT-817 or a FUNcube Dongle Pro+ and a
> laptop/tablet.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Jeff Davis <stuckbit@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > Has anyone assembled a reasonably modern (currently available) table of
> > equipment suitable for sat work?
> >
> > Dual-band, full-duplex - handhelds, mobiles, base equipment.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Jeff, KE9V
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:07:24 -0700
From: Bryan Green <bryan@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG
Message-ID: <5B0735DE-2D72-4AD2-A07F-6DD21E0C53A2@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Last couple of passes of SO-50 for me I have noticed that Yuri UT1FG calls
and many answer but he never calls back.
KA7FVV reports that on FO-29 he is quite active, as I would expect.
Perhaps Yuri has some equipment issue on SO-50?
-- bag
KL7CN/W6 CM98
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:15:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kevin M <n4ufo@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID:
<1339620153.1625370.1426853714690.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
"The Icom W31AT is also full duplex, an earlier version of the W32A."
Yes, but the controls are arranged differently and a fatal flaw.... On my
W32A, it is easy to turn the knobs to adjust for doppler. On the W31A the
knobs are volume and squelch. In order to change frequencies you have to
push buttons on the face plate. Very cumbersome and I wouldn't recommend it
for portable sats. It's easy to see why they upgraded to the W32A model.
As for W32A's... I went through two of them and still have problems with
desense on SO-50. There is info on the web about 5 digit serial numbers
being okay... not true. The actual difference is whether or not the rig has
the ability to be opened up to receive on 800 MHz. There is a sequence of
button pushes (a soft mod) that will do it. If you can get the 800 Mhz band
to appear then it's much more likely to do full duplex on Mode V/U without
desense from third harmonics
That said, I use my W32A with an Arrow on SO-50 half duplex because it's no
worse in regards to desense than all my attempts with two Baofengs. Despite
the mantra 'just buy two cheap HTs and run full duplex', I found that
concept far easier said than done. I am looking forward to the future 2m
downlink birds as my setup with the W32A will be excellent for that. In the
meantime, if anybody wants the grid I am operating from with it on SO-50,
they will just have to put up with my half duplex. =^D
73 all, N4UFO
------------------------------------------------------------------"Control
is the need of the fearful mind. Trust is the need of the courageous heart."
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:28:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kevin M <n4ufo@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG
Message-ID:
<1739589118.1538141.1426854503382.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
"Perhaps Yuri has some equipment issue on SO-50?"?Yuri always has difficulty
hearing on SO-50... He's running an Elk antenna, and I'm fairly sure it's at
a fixed elevation. Between that, no preamp and feedline loss, I am surprised
he can hear SO-50 at all! When I had up a 7 element fixed elevation yagi and
about 60 feet of feedline, I could work FO-29 pretty well, but could barely
hear SO-50... I could copy the downlink better sitting in my shack chair
holding an HT with a CJU mounted on top of it than with my former mounted
antennas.
Looking forward to the new birds!!!? A good reminder... donate to help fund
Fox 1C's launch! =^D
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/6pz92/tw/f3qmG9
------------------------------------------------------------------"Control
is the need of the fearful mind. Trust is the need of the courageous heart."
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:33:21 -0500
From: "Glenn Miller - AA5PK" <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Kevin M" <n4ufo@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG
Message-ID: <BFBDAF83AFE84C4298C44CE4D177C2FF@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
I suspect that, since his antenna is fixed, Yuri loses SO-50 during its
polarity shifts.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin M via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 7:28 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG
"Perhaps Yuri has some equipment issue on SO-50?" Yuri always has difficulty
hearing on SO-50... He's running an Elk antenna,
and I'm fairly sure it's at a fixed elevation. Between that, no preamp and
feedline loss, I am surprised he can hear SO-50 at
all! When I had up a 7 element fixed elevation yagi and about 60 feet of
feedline, I could work FO-29 pretty well, but could
barely hear SO-50... I could copy the downlink better sitting in my shack
chair holding an HT with a CJU mounted on top of it
than with my former mounted antennas.
Looking forward to the new birds!!! A good reminder... donate to help fund
Fox 1C's launch! =^D
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/6pz92/tw/f3qmG9
------------------------------------------------------------------"Control
is the need of the fearful mind. Trust is the need
of the courageous heart."
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:12:17 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: Kevin M <n4ufo@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SO-50 and Yuri UT1FG
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOqmU8r=XRKxvAHWVS2nywrVHpVJdc+KXVx-9HH-D8ygGw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
He seems to do well between about 5 and 25 degrees of elevation on
SO-50, but not when the satellite is to his stern due to an
obstruction on the ship in that direction. I imagine the polarity
fades are bad. Plus he is not full-duplex.
The good thing is that he has a very clear horizon and probably not
much RF noise to contend with.
The pileups are getting tough for me here in Washington, DC. I was
able to clean up when he was out in the Atlantic, but now I'm at a big
disadvantage.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Kevin M via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> "Perhaps Yuri has some equipment issue on SO-50?" Yuri always has
difficulty hearing on SO-50... He's running an Elk antenna, and I'm fairly
sure it's at a fixed elevation. Between that, no preamp and feedline loss, I
am surprised he can hear SO-50 at all! When I had up a 7 element fixed
elevation yagi and about 60 feet of feedline, I could work FO-29 pretty
well, but could barely hear SO-50... I could copy the downlink better
sitting in my shack chair holding an HT with a CJU mounted on top of it than
with my former mounted antennas.
> Looking forward to the new birds!!! A good reminder... donate to help
fund Fox 1C's launch! =^D
> https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/6pz92/tw/f3qmG9
> ------------------------------------------------------------------"Control
is the need of the fearful mind. Trust is the need of the courageous heart."
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:30:35 -0700
From: Douglas Phelps <dphelps1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: John Geiger <af5cc@xxxxxxx.xxx>, Glenn Miller - AA5PK
<aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID:
<1426861835.9446.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Kenwood TM-733A is still available on the used market and is full duplex
with seperate antenna connectors. I have nade SAT contacts from my car with
this radio and can hear myself on the SAT, I still have a couple of these
radios still working after 30 years.
>________________________________
> From: John Geiger <af5cc@xxxxxxx.xxx>
>To: Glenn Miller - AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>Cc: Clint Bradford <clintbradford@xxx.xxx>; AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
>Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
>
>
>The Icom W31AT is also full duplex, an earlier version of the W32A.
>
>Others that I think might be full duplex, but can't be sure would include:
>
>Alinco DJG5T, DJ560, DJ580, DJ582
>Icom W21AT, Ic32AT
>Kenwood TH75, TH77, TH78
>Probably several Standard Models, I am not familiar with those
>
>The Kenwood TH79 is probably one of the best looking HTs ever made, right
>up there with the Standard C156A
>
>73 John AF5CC
>
>On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Glenn Miller - AA5PK <aa5pk@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>wrote:
>
>> The IC-W2A is also full duplex. Mine's 25 years old and works great with
>> an Arrow.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Clint Bradford
>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 8:13 PM
>> To: AMSAT BB
>> Subject: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
>>
>> For portable work on the FM birds, there are some wonderful,
>> long-discontinued
>> full-duplex HTs that many are using, like the early models of the Icom
>> IC-W32a,
>> Kenwood TH-D7 and TH-D79, and Yaesu?s FT-470/FT-51/FT-530 models.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:04:53 -0600
From: "Scott Smith" <ve6itv@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "Amsat" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] lost amateur satellite.txt in Sat32PC
Message-ID: <947642D31BF04F9EBF8BB9B1B016286E@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi, this morning I was updating my satellite base , all downloaded well,
geo.txt, noaa.tx,nasa.all etc and when I updated the amateur.txt I lost all
the satellites in this section. how does one restore in this part of the
satellite base?. Any help appreciated.
73 de Scott VE6ITV
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:27:29 +0100
From: PE0SAT | Amateur Radio <pe0sat@xxxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lost amateur satellite.txt in Sat32PC
Message-ID: <2821259338bcd53eaacf48680e29cc57@xxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Hi Scott,
When selecting the group you want to use, make sure the correct TLE
file is selected
on the left part of the screen.
This behavior can happen when you for example add or remove a TLE file.
73 Jan PE0SAT
On 20-03-2015 18:04, Scott Smith wrote:
> Hi, this morning I was updating my satellite base , all downloaded
> well, geo.txt, noaa.tx,nasa.all etc and when I updated the amateur.txt
> I lost all the satellites in this section. how does one restore in
> this part of the satellite base?. Any help appreciated.
> 73 de Scott VE6ITV
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
With regards PE0SAT
Internet web-page http://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/
DK3WN SatBlog http://www.dk3wn.info/p/
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:30:28 -0500
From: Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Modern Equipment Matrix
Message-ID: <000701d06333$92615a80$b7240f80$@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Another mobile FM rig to look for is the TM-V7A. They are full duplex, and
work well for FM ops. They did have a problem with the display, which began
to fail within a couple of years. If you see one and the display is
legible, it has almost certainly been repaired by Kenwood.
73s,
Alan
WA4SCA
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:40:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Astronaut issues challenge for UK students to
?make that call?
Message-ID:
<721128375.2121573.1426876822353.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Astronaut issues challenge for UK students to ?make that call?
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/03/20/astronaut-issues-challenge-for-uk-students-to-m
ake-that-call/
FUNcube-1 Solar eclipse update
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/03/20/funcube-1-solar-eclipse-update/
----
73 Trevor M5AKA
AMSAT-UK http://amsat-uk.org/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/amsatuk
Twitter https://twitter.com/AMSAT_UK
----
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 10, Issue 91
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
