| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 11.01.19 20:30l 887 Lines 27780 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB1413
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 13
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 190111/1819Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:62652 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB1413
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Protecting SDR (saguaroastro)
2. DSLWP-B UHF Plan (???)
3. Re: Protecting SDR (Ryan Noguchi)
4. Re: Q: An easy way to turn paper logs to a logging program?
(Ryan Noguchi)
5. Pass recording (Bob Hammond)
6. Re: Pass recording (Burns Fisher)
7. Re: Protecting SDR (Rolf Krogstad)
8. Re: Protecting SDR (Paul Stoetzer)
9. Re: Pass recording (Ryan Noguchi)
10. Re: Pass recording (Robert Bragg)
11. Re: Pass recording (Burns Fisher)
12. Re: Pass recording (Robert Bragg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:30:15 -0700
From: saguaroastro <saguaroastro@???.???>
To: Kevin Zari <kk4yel@?????.???>, amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Protecting SDR
Message-ID:
<20190111163018.GHJI4162.fed1rmfepo203.cox.net@?????????????.???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Kevin,
I've be looking at this. MFJ-1708. There are several versions. So look the
up on Hro to compare
73Rick Tejera (K7TEJ)Saguaro Astronomy ClubWww.saguaroastro.orgThunderbird
Astronomy ClubWww.w7tbc.org
-------- Original message --------From: Kevin Zari <kk4yel@?????.???> Date:
1/11/19 06:40 (GMT-07:00) To: amsat-bb@?????.??? Subject: [amsat-bb]
Protecting SDR
For those of you with an SDR dongle, for example the Funcube Pro +,? how do
you protect it from not being damaged by TX energy? I?m thinking of hooking
mine up to the 70cm antenna in my M2 LEO pack while I TX on the 2m antenna
and was afraid I?d overload the SDR. I see folks using them for their RX on
linear birds, so I?m just wondering how you have them hooked up.?
Thanks in advance for your advice.?
-Kevin (KK4YEL)
-----
The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of
doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 00:43:35 +0800 (CST)
From: ??? <wmc_jx@???.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] DSLWP-B UHF Plan
Message-ID: <104e1f47.13449.1683dcc248c.Coremail.wmc_jx@???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Hi OMs,
Here is the DSLWP-B UHF plan for the following days:
UTC 13 Jan 2019 12:15 to 13 Jan 2019 14:15 (500 bps GMSK & JT4G on 435.4
MHz, 500 bps GMSK on 436.4 MHz)
UTC 19 Jan 2019 17:25 to 19 Jan 2019 19:25 (500 bps GMSK & JT4G on 435.4
MHz, 500 bps GMSK on 436.4 MHz)
SSDV album: http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/pics-b.html
Online JT4G telemetry forwarder:
http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/jt4g_forwarder.html
JT4G telemetry display:
http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/jt4g.html
GMSK telemetry: http://lilacsat.hit.edu.cn/dashboard/pages_en/telemetry-b.html
VY TNX & 73!
Wei BG2BHC
--
WEI Mingchuan
Research Center of Satellite Technology
Harbin Institute of Technology
mobile: +86-189-4501-5242
e-mail: wmc_jx@???.???? bg2bhc@?????.???
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:12:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ryan Noguchi <ai6do@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Protecting SDR
Message-ID: <177049094.17072932.1547226753501@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Is a transmit/receive switch necessary, or would a simple duplexer suffice?
Something like the MFJ-916B offers 55dB or better isolation, and fairly low
loss (0.2dB). It's a lot cheaper and more convenient to set up.?
My SDRPlay RSP1A arrived yesterday and I got it and my FT-857D working with
CAT control using SatPC32 last night. I haven't worked a pass with it yet,
though; maybe this weekend. The RSP1A is rated for 0dBm continuous, 10dBm
momentary.?The antenna is a dual-band Elk in the attic on a TV rotator, so
there is no benefit of interantenna isolation.?If I assume the duplexer's
spec value of 55dB isolation, that would attenuate even 250W input down to
less than 0dBm, correct? Patrick WD9EWK had commented on the subject of SDR
protection in a QRZ.com posting, and has used a duplexer instead of a T/R
switch with his SDRPlay
SDR:?https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/kenwood-ts-2000-in-full-duplex-m
ode-on-single-coax-line.605225/#post-4613865
Would love to know if my math is wrong, if the RSP1A's spec isn't
trustworthy, and/or if there are any other considerations that make a
transmit/receive switch better (or necessary) than just a duplexer, before I
let the magic smoke escape.?
Thanks and 73, Ryan AI6DO
On Friday, January 11, 2019, 8:31:34 AM PST, saguaroastro
<saguaroastro@???.???> wrote:
Kevin,
I've be looking at this. MFJ-1708. There are several versions. So look the
up on Hro to compare
73Rick Tejera (K7TEJ)Saguaro Astronomy ClubWww.saguaroastro.orgThunderbird
Astronomy ClubWww.w7tbc.org
-------- Original message --------From: Kevin Zari <kk4yel@?????.???> Date:
1/11/19? 06:40? (GMT-07:00) To: amsat-bb@?????.??? Subject: [amsat-bb]
Protecting SDR
For those of you with an SDR dongle, for example the Funcube Pro +,? how do
you protect it from not being damaged by TX energy? I?m thinking of hooking
mine up to the 70cm antenna in my M2 LEO pack while I TX on the 2m antenna
and was afraid I?d overload the SDR. I see folks using them for their RX on
linear birds, so I?m just wondering how you have them hooked up.?
Thanks in advance for your advice.?
-Kevin (KK4YEL)
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ryan Noguchi <ai6do@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Q: An easy way to turn paper logs to a logging
program?
Message-ID: <1029279105.17103786.1547227767687@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I use Excel to log my satellite contacts and convert them to ADIF format
for upload to LoTW, eQSL, QRZ.com, ClubLog, etc. Using Excel provides a lot
of flexibility for copy/paste, search/replace, etc. Once you OCR those logs,
or if you have to enter them manually, it will likely be less work to get
them into Excel than into some other logging application.?
I use those online services and backups thereof in ADIF format as my
"logbook" for all my QSOs, and the Excel workbook as my "logbook" for
satellite work. I got the original version of this Excel workbook on the web
a few years ago, not sure where. Let me know if you'd like me to send you
the template. QSO data is entered in one worksheet, and that data is used by
another worksheet to format an ADIF output that can be copied/pasted into
Notepad to create an ADIF-formatted text file. I use yet another worksheet
to tabulate statistics of the QSOs I've had on the various satellites and
modes.?
73, Ryan AI6DO
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019, 6:18:17 PM PST, Eric - Gmail
<ericrosenberg.dc@?????.???> wrote:
I'd like to convert my paper satellite logs (dating back to the 1980's,
from AO-10 on) to as yet undermined logging program.? I'd need to create
an ADIF file regardless of the final destination (including LoTW and/or
Clublog)
Is there any way to do this other than inputting every QSO one at a
time?
I thought about scanning them and then using an OCR program to put them
into a spreadsheet, but that seems to be equally -- or more -- labor
intensive.
Any suggestions are appreciated!
73,
Eric W3DQ
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:43:43 -0800
From: Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Pass recording
Message-ID:
<CAKoB7OrEKy8vHvTVGP=ii5bwwbD-q04c8Es-U6GobKZCE_oKQQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
What method of recording do you all use for QSOs?
I'm setting up my fixed base station and know from my handheld/Arrow days
that I cannot operate, talk, and write all at the same time with any
accuracy.
Bob
W7OTJ
DN17
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:49:06 -0500
From: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
To: Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass recording
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxUmPDcQsNPQLi7v5BG_0fsxeaF5KuNqWaRDXDx5Dqtaiw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I use a Sony ICD-PX370 with line-in connected to a splitter on the earphone
jack. It does a really good job of recording, the batteries last a long
time (not rechargeable though), and you can download the file and listen
elsewhere.
One source:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XFTWCBJ/ref=oh_aui_search_asin_title?ie=U
TF8&psc=1
73
Burns WB1FJ
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:44 PM Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???> wrote:
> What method of recording do you all use for QSOs?
> I'm setting up my fixed base station and know from my handheld/Arrow days
> that I cannot operate, talk, and write all at the same time with any
> accuracy.
>
> Bob
> W7OTJ
> DN17
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:54:28 -0600
From: Rolf Krogstad <rolf.krogstad@?????.???>
To: Ryan Noguchi <ai6do@?????.???>
Cc: "<AMSAT-BB@?????.???>" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Protecting SDR
Message-ID:
<CAJJyj=ZFDi2gqTBA96THPhfsR=MYyyMLhWoWfL2tsQY+S+atTw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I use a diplexer, such as the MFJ-916B or equivalent, and it provides
enough isolation of the 2 meter signal to prevent problems.
Rolf NR0T
EN34
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 11:14 AM Ryan Noguchi via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???
wrote:
> Is a transmit/receive switch necessary, or would a simple duplexer
> suffice? Something like the MFJ-916B offers 55dB or better isolation, and
> fairly low loss (0.2dB). It's a lot cheaper and more convenient to set up.
>
> My SDRPlay RSP1A arrived yesterday and I got it and my FT-857D working
> with CAT control using SatPC32 last night. I haven't worked a pass with it
> yet, though; maybe this weekend. The RSP1A is rated for 0dBm continuous,
> 10dBm momentary. The antenna is a dual-band Elk in the attic on a TV
> rotator, so there is no benefit of interantenna isolation. If I assume the
> duplexer's spec value of 55dB isolation, that would attenuate even 250W
> input down to less than 0dBm, correct? Patrick WD9EWK had commented on the
> subject of SDR protection in a QRZ.com posting, and has used a duplexer
> instead of a T/R switch with his SDRPlay SDR:
>
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/kenwood-ts-2000-in-full-duplex-mode-o
n-single-coax-line.605225/#post-4613865
>
> Would love to know if my math is wrong, if the RSP1A's spec isn't
> trustworthy, and/or if there are any other considerations that make a
> transmit/receive switch better (or necessary) than just a duplexer, before
> I let the magic smoke escape.
>
> Thanks and 73, Ryan AI6DO
>
> On Friday, January 11, 2019, 8:31:34 AM PST, saguaroastro <
> saguaroastro@???.???> wrote:
>
> Kevin,
> I've be looking at this. MFJ-1708. There are several versions. So look the
> up on Hro to compare
>
>
> 73Rick Tejera (K7TEJ)Saguaro Astronomy ClubWww.saguaroastro.orgThunderbird
> Astronomy ClubWww.w7tbc.org
>
> -------- Original message --------From: Kevin Zari <kk4yel@?????.???>
> Date: 1/11/19 06:40 (GMT-07:00) To: amsat-bb@?????.??? Subject:
> [amsat-bb] Protecting SDR
> For those of you with an SDR dongle, for example the Funcube Pro +, how
> do you protect it from not being damaged by TX energy? I?m thinking of
> hooking mine up to the 70cm antenna in my M2 LEO pack while I TX on the 2m
> antenna and was afraid I?d overload the SDR. I see folks using them for
> their RX on linear birds, so I?m just wondering how you have them hooked
> up.
> Thanks in advance for your advice.
>
> -Kevin (KK4YEL)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:03:17 -0500
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: Rolf Krogstad <rolf.krogstad@?????.???>
Cc: "<AMSAT-BB@?????.???>" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Protecting SDR
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOpXh9q7+VVpodWhZ_j_JV0q-YszVjcLuy=pNooFUX1bQw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I've used my AirSpy Mini and FCD+ without any protection on the input
without any damage, but your mileage may vary!
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:55 PM Rolf Krogstad <rolf.krogstad@?????.???>
wrote:
>
> I use a diplexer, such as the MFJ-916B or equivalent, and it provides
> enough isolation of the 2 meter signal to prevent problems.
>
> Rolf NR0T
> EN34
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 11:14 AM Ryan Noguchi via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???
> wrote:
>
> > Is a transmit/receive switch necessary, or would a simple duplexer
> > suffice? Something like the MFJ-916B offers 55dB or better isolation, and
> > fairly low loss (0.2dB). It's a lot cheaper and more convenient to set up.
> >
> > My SDRPlay RSP1A arrived yesterday and I got it and my FT-857D working
> > with CAT control using SatPC32 last night. I haven't worked a pass with it
> > yet, though; maybe this weekend. The RSP1A is rated for 0dBm continuous,
> > 10dBm momentary. The antenna is a dual-band Elk in the attic on a TV
> > rotator, so there is no benefit of interantenna isolation. If I assume the
> > duplexer's spec value of 55dB isolation, that would attenuate even 250W
> > input down to less than 0dBm, correct? Patrick WD9EWK had commented on the
> > subject of SDR protection in a QRZ.com posting, and has used a duplexer
> > instead of a T/R switch with his SDRPlay SDR:
> >
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/kenwood-ts-2000-in-full-duplex-mode-o
n-single-coax-line.605225/#post-4613865
> >
> > Would love to know if my math is wrong, if the RSP1A's spec isn't
> > trustworthy, and/or if there are any other considerations that make a
> > transmit/receive switch better (or necessary) than just a duplexer, before
> > I let the magic smoke escape.
> >
> > Thanks and 73, Ryan AI6DO
> >
> > On Friday, January 11, 2019, 8:31:34 AM PST, saguaroastro <
> > saguaroastro@???.???> wrote:
> >
> > Kevin,
> > I've be looking at this. MFJ-1708. There are several versions. So look the
> > up on Hro to compare
> >
> >
> > 73Rick Tejera (K7TEJ)Saguaro Astronomy ClubWww.saguaroastro.orgThunderbird
> > Astronomy ClubWww.w7tbc.org
> >
> > -------- Original message --------From: Kevin Zari <kk4yel@?????.???>
> > Date: 1/11/19 06:40 (GMT-07:00) To: amsat-bb@?????.??? Subject:
> > [amsat-bb] Protecting SDR
> > For those of you with an SDR dongle, for example the Funcube Pro +, how
> > do you protect it from not being damaged by TX energy? I?m thinking of
> > hooking mine up to the 70cm antenna in my M2 LEO pack while I TX on the 2m
> > antenna and was afraid I?d overload the SDR. I see folks using them for
> > their RX on linear birds, so I?m just wondering how you have them hooked
> > up.
> > Thanks in advance for your advice.
> >
> > -Kevin (KK4YEL)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:03:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ryan Noguchi <ai6do@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass recording
Message-ID: <1699705836.17100947.1547229811166@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I currently operate almost completely pedestrian-portable, and record by
hand when receiving, not while transmitting. I also record ambient sound as
a backup. When operating the linears portable or when operating AO-92 in L/v
mode, I use the TH-D74A as a receiver, and use its built-in recording
capability to capture the downlink audio.?
I'm currently setting up a fixed station too, with computer VFO control (and
hopefully, in the near future, automated rotor control) and expect the
cognitive load will be significantly reduced compared to operating
pedestrian-portable with everything (pointing, polarization, and tuning)
done manually. You may find it feasible to log by hand in real time when
operating your fixed station, even if you've only automated a subset of
those functions.?
73, Ryan AI6DO
On Friday, January 11, 2019, 9:45:22 AM PST, Bob Hammond
<propgrinder@?????.???> wrote:
What method of recording do you all use for QSOs?
I'm setting up my fixed base station and know from my handheld/Arrow days
that I cannot operate, talk, and write all at the same time with any
accuracy.
Bob
W7OTJ
DN17
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:03:21 -0500
From: Robert Bragg <airrj1@?????.???>
To: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass recording
Message-ID:
<CAJ9ASBE06-WweJVOWAXF4M=iiw=3ME+RzPtOzAFAtt+bv2+wDw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I second the Sony ICD-PX370. Got mine locally at Bust Buy and I have had
very good luck with it. The good thing is that you cannot hear any audio
in the earphones unless the unit is recording. The limits the chances of
not getting the pass recorded. The only failure point that I have found is
that if you are recording and you hit the 'pause' button, you can still
hear audio without recording. So watch out for that. I have made hundreds
of passes in the last year and never lost any audio yet.
Good Luck.
R.J.
WY7AA
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:50 PM Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??> wrote:
> I use a Sony ICD-PX370 with line-in connected to a splitter on the earphone
> jack. It does a really good job of recording, the batteries last a long
> time (not rechargeable though), and you can download the file and listen
> elsewhere.
>
> One source:
>
>
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XFTWCBJ/ref=oh_aui_search_asin_title?ie=U
TF8&psc=1
>
> 73
>
> Burns WB1FJ
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:44 PM Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???>
> wrote:
>
> > What method of recording do you all use for QSOs?
> > I'm setting up my fixed base station and know from my handheld/Arrow days
> > that I cannot operate, talk, and write all at the same time with any
> > accuracy.
> >
> > Bob
> > W7OTJ
> > DN17
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:05:07 -0500
From: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
To: Robert Bragg <airrj1@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass recording
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxXr-LQboQJQz2_BF-cxKBPQU=a+sY6Z3JOeKa7pg7hVhg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Oh, so you listen to the pass through the recorder? That's a better idea
than mine of using a splitter.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:03 PM Robert Bragg <airrj1@?????.???> wrote:
> I second the Sony ICD-PX370. Got mine locally at Bust Buy and I have had
> very good luck with it. The good thing is that you cannot hear any audio
> in the earphones unless the unit is recording. The limits the chances of
> not getting the pass recorded. The only failure point that I have found is
> that if you are recording and you hit the 'pause' button, you can still
> hear audio without recording. So watch out for that. I have made hundreds
> of passes in the last year and never lost any audio yet.
>
> Good Luck.
> R.J.
> WY7AA
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:50 PM Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??> wrote:
>
>> I use a Sony ICD-PX370 with line-in connected to a splitter on the
>> earphone
>> jack. It does a really good job of recording, the batteries last a long
>> time (not rechargeable though), and you can download the file and listen
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> One source:
>>
>>
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XFTWCBJ/ref=oh_aui_search_asin_title?ie=U
TF8&psc=1
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Burns WB1FJ
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:44 PM Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > What method of recording do you all use for QSOs?
>> > I'm setting up my fixed base station and know from my handheld/Arrow
>> days
>> > that I cannot operate, talk, and write all at the same time with any
>> > accuracy.
>> >
>> > Bob
>> > W7OTJ
>> > DN17
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions
>> > expressed
>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> > AMSAT-NA.
>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:12:14 -0500
From: Robert Bragg <airrj1@?????.???>
To: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass recording
Message-ID:
<CAJ9ASBFoatTbuVZ2=tYQwFk_b0oceWJjgFMjsk2Z2f9vxtftew@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Yes, I am all portable operation with a D72A, and I feed that into the
recorder and then listen through the recorder with earbuds. And if someone
wants to listen, I have a splitter for an extra set of earbuds.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:05 PM Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??> wrote:
> Oh, so you listen to the pass through the recorder? That's a better idea
> than mine of using a splitter.
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:03 PM Robert Bragg <airrj1@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> I second the Sony ICD-PX370. Got mine locally at Bust Buy and I have had
>> very good luck with it. The good thing is that you cannot hear any audio
>> in the earphones unless the unit is recording. The limits the chances of
>> not getting the pass recorded. The only failure point that I have found is
>> that if you are recording and you hit the 'pause' button, you can still
>> hear audio without recording. So watch out for that. I have made hundreds
>> of passes in the last year and never lost any audio yet.
>>
>> Good Luck.
>> R.J.
>> WY7AA
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:50 PM Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??> wrote:
>>
>>> I use a Sony ICD-PX370 with line-in connected to a splitter on the
>>> earphone
>>> jack. It does a really good job of recording, the batteries last a long
>>> time (not rechargeable though), and you can download the file and listen
>>> elsewhere.
>>>
>>> One source:
>>>
>>>
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XFTWCBJ/ref=oh_aui_search_asin_title?ie=U
TF8&psc=1
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> Burns WB1FJ
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:44 PM Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > What method of recording do you all use for QSOs?
>>> > I'm setting up my fixed base station and know from my handheld/Arrow
>>> days
>>> > that I cannot operate, talk, and write all at the same time with any
>>> > accuracy.
>>> >
>>> > Bob
>>> > W7OTJ
>>> > DN17
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions
>>> > expressed
>>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of
>>> > AMSAT-NA.
>>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 13
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
