OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   18.03.19 21:43l 1022 Lines 33670 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14104
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 104
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 190318/1938Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:2200 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14104
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Attaching the coax to antenna boom (Frank Karnauskas)
   2. Re: Attaching the coax to antenna boom (EC4TR Luis)
   3. Re: Looking for older AMSAT Journal article (Bob Hammond)
   4. Re: Attaching the coax to antenna boom (Bill Booth)
   5. Re: FoxTelem Version 1.07 released (Burns Fisher)
   6. Re: Shoppinglist (Making a T notch filter) (GEO Badger)
   7. Logging on LoTW (Bob Keating)
   8. Re: Logging on LoTW (Gabriel Zeifman)
   9. Re: Logging on LoTW (jbr13@??.?????????.????
  10. Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2019-03-18 19:00	UTC
      (aj9n@???.????


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 22:25:02 -0700
From: "Frank Karnauskas" <n1uw@???????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom
Message-ID: <000001d4dd4a$f11aa280$d34fe780$@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

This is quite curious.

Page 1 of the WA5VJB paper says, "Run the coax back down the antenna
and along the boom keeping the radius small..."  His hand-drawn
illustration shows the feedline going down the boom then making a hard
turn at the boom-to-cross arm plate.

The M2 instruction sheets for the 2MCP8A and 436CP16 antennas both
state (in bold type), "Do not route feedline to boom to mast plate  as
exiting antenna here will adversely affect circular field."

Mr. Britain's paper is obviously focused on mounting the cross bar
somewhere along the boom of a somewhat long antenna.  The M2
instructions are for mounting short antennas from the back of the boom
to the cross bar. Not the same situation.  But, for a newbie like me,
the definitive conclusion to this discussion is...I am still confused.

I was hoping to hang my M2 LEO antennas Monday morning but now not
until after I call the M2 support line for their read on this.

73,
Frank

FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW
ARRL MINNESOTA AFFILIATED CLUB COORDINATOR
AMSAT NEWS SERVICE ROTATING EDITOR
1402 SUMMIT SHORES DR.
BURNSVILLE, MN 55306
N1UW@???????.???
612-644-9174


-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 2:29 PM
To: radiomb; amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom

Yes, you can, just pay attention to how far your coax turn is from
your driven element. There are a couple spots to avoid.

It is pretty well explained in Kent Britain's (wa5vjb) paper here:
http://www.kk0sd.net/metalboom/metalboom.htm

73,
Gary kk0sd


-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of radiomb
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 4:04 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom

   Building my new ground station and another question. I have always
only elevated my antenna 90 degrees. I loose about 20 25 seconds while
the azimuth rotator turns 180 degrees to track the rest of the pass. I
have just let the coax hang off the back of the antennas in a big
loop. I am afraid it will get hung up going 180 degrees. Question, Can
I attach the coax to the antenna boom and run it back until it gets to
the cross boom or will that throw off the radiation pattern?
Thanks 73
  Mike K4MIA


_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect
the official views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:16:12 +0100
From: EC4TR Luis <ec4tr.luis@?????.???>
To: N1UW@???????.???
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom
Message-ID:
<CALcq4TErwDUU0kzPwB16DSjdFK2_AxoUU=T9Dp1kpguHY0dOAQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi all
I?m in the same situation, this summer I?ll mont my pair of M2 with
separate feedlines for V and U, I?m going to use a good 7mm coax cable
routing across de boom, because routing to the back itcomplicates my
assembly a lot and adds extra weight to the back.
I hope it does not distort my radiation pattern too much
73 Luis
EC4TR

El lun., 18 mar. 2019 a las 6:27, Frank Karnauskas (<n1uw@???????.???>)
escribi?:

> This is quite curious.
>
> Page 1 of the WA5VJB paper says, "Run the coax back down the antenna
> and along the boom keeping the radius small..."  His hand-drawn
> illustration shows the feedline going down the boom then making a hard
> turn at the boom-to-cross arm plate.
>
> The M2 instruction sheets for the 2MCP8A and 436CP16 antennas both
> state (in bold type), "Do not route feedline to boom to mast plate  as
> exiting antenna here will adversely affect circular field."
>
> Mr. Britain's paper is obviously focused on mounting the cross bar
> somewhere along the boom of a somewhat long antenna.  The M2
> instructions are for mounting short antennas from the back of the boom
> to the cross bar. Not the same situation.  But, for a newbie like me,
> the definitive conclusion to this discussion is...I am still confused.
>
> I was hoping to hang my M2 LEO antennas Monday morning but now not
> until after I call the M2 support line for their read on this.
>
> 73,
> Frank
>
> FRANK W. KARNAUSKAS, N1UW
> ARRL MINNESOTA AFFILIATED CLUB COORDINATOR
> AMSAT NEWS SERVICE ROTATING EDITOR
> 1402 SUMMIT SHORES DR.
> BURNSVILLE, MN 55306
> N1UW@???????.???
> 612-644-9174
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Gary
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 2:29 PM
> To: radiomb; amsat-bb@?????.???
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom
>
> Yes, you can, just pay attention to how far your coax turn is from
> your driven element. There are a couple spots to avoid.
>
> It is pretty well explained in Kent Britain's (wa5vjb) paper here:
> http://www.kk0sd.net/metalboom/metalboom.htm
>
> 73,
> Gary kk0sd
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of radiomb
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 4:04 PM
> To: amsat-bb@?????.???
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom
>
>    Building my new ground station and another question. I have always
> only elevated my antenna 90 degrees. I loose about 20 25 seconds while
> the azimuth rotator turns 180 degrees to track the rest of the pass. I
> have just let the coax hang off the back of the antennas in a big
> loop. I am afraid it will get hung up going 180 degrees. Question, Can
> I attach the coax to the antenna boom and run it back until it gets to
> the cross boom or will that throw off the radiation pattern?
> Thanks 73
>   Mike K4MIA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect
> the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


--
https://www.qrz.com/db/ec4tr
https://www.facebook.com/ECfourTR
https://twitter.com/EC4TR?lang=es
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced !


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 03:57:25 -0700
From: Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???>
To: "E.Mike McCardel" <mccardelm@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Looking for older AMSAT Journal article
Message-ID:
<CAKoB7Or5rvKhwQV-N=06vwv+-ZCnouui8V5kvhMH8=0xf=Vu8A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Mike, and all others,

Thanks for the original article I was after as well as the Minimalist
Preamp Revisited article.....that I was unaware of.

73,

Bob
W7OTJ

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 3:00 PM E.Mike McCardel <mccardelm@?????.???> wrote:

> Is it one of these?
>
> https://www.amsat.org/articles/wa8sme/preamp.pdf
>
>
>
http://www.oh1sa.net/data/satellite/WRAPS/PreAmp/Preamp%202/Minimalist%20Pream
p%20Revisited%20with%20PIX.pdf
>
> EMike McCardel, AA8EM
> Senior Editor AMSAT News Service
> Past AMSAT-NA VP Educational Relations
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2019, at 9:08 AM, Bob Hammond <propgrinder@?????.???> wrote:
>
> I need a copy of an article on Mark Spencer's minimalist preamp in the
> Nov/Dec 2012 Journal.
>
> Anyone have a copy?
>
> 73,
>
> Bob
> W7OTJ
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:35:49 -0400
From: Bill Booth <ve3nxk@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Attaching the coax to antenna boom
Message-ID: <5C8F90A5.3090801@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 2019-03-18 4:16 AM, EC4TR Luis wrote:
> I?m in the same situation, this summer I?ll mont my pair of M2 with

Well I have both my M2 antennas mounted as the paper says.  You have to
place them
in an X formation and route the coax as shown.  They have worked well for me
probably 10 years now.

--
Bill Booth VE3NXK
Sundridge ON, Canada
79.23.37 W x 45.46.18 N
FN05ns

Visit my weather WebCam at http://www.almaguin.com/wxcurrent/weather.html

Organ and Tissue Donation - The Gift of Life
Talk to your family.  Your decision can make a difference.


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:44:39 -0400
From: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
Cc: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FoxTelem Version 1.07 released
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxWuJzE39Nx8Wut8vAn-BLo8JE_=OZoqd5PUTyeAYwo_pg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Just a note to say that the 1.07y FoxTelem release is fully compatible with
Fox-in-a-Box.  I will be shipping it on FIAB SD cards bought from the AMSAT
store as of serial number 27 (any ordered after today).  In fact some
earlier cards have a prerelease 1.07 version (1.07v), which has a lot of
the features of 1.07y, but still some bugs.

The free SD card download is not yet updated, but keep an eye on the
readme.txt file in  http://burnsfisher.com/AMSAT/FoxInABox/.  I will also
(eventually) write some specific instructions for upgrading for people who
already have an FIAB.  Of course if you are comfortable with Linux, there
is nothing unusual required to upgrade except that the FIAB has its own
startup script.  You don't need to use the one that comes in the Linux
package.

73,
Burns, WB1FJ

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:05 PM Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???> wrote:

> I'm officially releasing version 1.07 of FoxTelem.  A test version has been
> out for a while, but it had several issues, including a lower decode rate
> than 1.06.  That prevented release for a while.  Those issues (and
> something like 65 other defects) are now all fixed and this decoder
> performs better than 1.06.  Feel free to test them side by side and report
> back if that is not the case for you.  We are always interested in any
> comparative results.
>
> In addition to defects in FoxTelem 1.06 and earlier versions of 1.07, this
> also introduces Doppler calculation with automatic adjustment of the
> decoder frequency.  This is especially useful for decoding beacons and has
> been helpful in testing for Fox-1A / AO-85 and Fox-1Cliff / AO-95 which are
> both in SAFE mode.   Decoding from Doppler takes a bit of configuration to
> get right.  Have a read of the new sections in the manual or ask for help
> if you want to give it a try.  There are pros and cons vs "Find Signal" for
> sure.
>
> Version 1.07 changes the core SDR within FoxTelem to use a Numerically
> Controlled Oscillator (NCO) rather than an FFT Filter for the conversion to
> base-band.  This produces better decodes and will allow the support of
> wider bandwidth SDRs in the future.  The old decoder is available still if
> needed from the settings screen. Read the manual for details.
>
> Version 1.07 also introduces two new BPSK decoders in advance of the Fox-1E
> launch.  (I have no inside information about when that will be, but I have
> the decoder ready :)  I also wrote some notes on the comparison between the
> two decoders, which you can read if you are interested in BPSK decoding
> performance, or just wonder what I do with my time in the evenings:
> http://www.g0kla.com/workbench/2019-03-09.php
>
> The releases are here:
> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/windows/foxtelem_1.07y_windows.zip
> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/linux/foxtelem_1.07y_linux.tar.gz
> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/mac/foxtelem_1.07y_mac.tar.gz
>
> KEY CHANGES in 1.07
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> * Ability to add a new spacecraft from the menu.  You can also remove them.
> * Doppler calculation and tracking as an option instead of "Find Signal"
> * A better SDR based on a Numerically Controlled Oscillator, ready for
> wider SDRs
> * Two new PSK decoders - Costas Loop and Dotproduct
> * RTL dongle implemented for testing, though more work to do
> * Stops downloading keps when position calc is off
> * Allows toggling of high speed / DUV display when in auto mode
> * Fixed plotting issues for Earth plots
> * Fixes several crashes and bugs
> * Fixes copy paste issues with tables
> * Respects left/right audio preference when processing wav files
> * Implements formats for later spacecraft - Fox-1E and HuskySat
> * Linux and Mac launch script updated to locate the JVM (especially on
> Mac).  Please report if when this works/does not work
> * MEMS gyro calibration updated
> * Fixed a bug where AO-85 data from the server could not be stepped through
>
> And many other bug fixes. Full list of changes here:
> https://github.com/ac2cz/FoxTelem/milestone/12?closed=1
>
> Let me know any feedback.
>
> 73
> Chris
> G0KLA / AC2CZ
>
> --
> Chris E. Thompson
> chrisethompson@?????.???
> g0kla@????.???
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: GEO Badger <w3ab@?????.???>
To: Hans BX2ABT <hans.bx2abt@???.?????.???>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Shoppinglist (Making a T notch filter)
Message-ID: <1191236503.7328775.1552928807375@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

How about rolling your own?

https://qrznow.com/145-mhz-low-loss-bandpass-helical-filter/

https://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/Intermod/No_Tune_Filter.pdf

Or DCI?
http://dci.ca/
___
Sent from my two way wrist watch
73 de W3AB/GEOOn Mar 15, 2019, at 07:39, Hans BX2ABT
<hans.bx2abt@???.?????.???> wrote:

Hello all,

Unfortunately it's not one transmitter, but four of them (I thought 5,
but I just checked. Powers range from 1 - 10 kW), producing a lot of
spurious signals and raising the noise floor by about 10 dB when
pointing the beam into that direction. I don't think stubs will be broad
enough to cover 89 to 106 MHz, but I never worked with them, so I'm
guessing here. I don't have any problems with FM stations leaking onto
70 cm, just the air band, NOAA frequencies and 2 meters. My Airspy mini
also picks up lots of spurious signals? below 50 MHz, often hard enough
to ID.

I found this filter from Par Electronics
(http://www.parelectronics.com/fm-broadcast.php), but it doesn't
indicate if you can tx through it. Otherwise I will have to use it in
the shack and remove it when I want to tx on 2m, with the risk of
forgetting it and blowing it up. Will a sequencer be a solution then?

73 de Hans

BX2ABT


On 03/15/2019 09:42 PM, Robert Bruninga wrote:

And you can make it without all the connectors at the T if you want.
Though it takes some close and inventive soldering of the "T". Since the
FM band is 88 to 108 that (I think) is far enough from 145 to add minimum
loss. But at UHF, one needs to carefully check to make sure that the FM
frequency is not also a multiple of the FM frequency.

Tell us the FM broadcast frequency and we can take a quick look.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Wendy and Terry
Osborne
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:50 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???? Hans BX2ABT <hans.bx2abt@???.?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Shoppinglist

Hi Hans,

If you have a plenty of RG213 and suitable connectors, you could try
making a Coax stub filter.
You need a cable length that is an odd multiple of a quarter wave length
long at the FM Tx frequency and an even multiple of a quarter wave at the
frequency that you want (2M /70CMs).
A single RG213 stub would have about 25dB of rejection and would pass 100
Watts OK.
You just need a coax T connector and some matching connectors.
To trim the stub, use a set of garden secateurs.
If you have a Bao feng or similar radio you could use that on the FM band
attached to your T and trim the stub for minimum signal on the unwanted Tx
frequency.v dir="auto">I haven't run the calculations for how long the stub
should be but if it's
useful I could do so.

73,
Terry Osborne ZL2BAC


-----Original Message-----
From: Hans BX2ABT
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 12:33 AM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Shoppinglist

My sis-in-law will be visiting from the States soon and I usually make her
bring some stuff for me so I can save on freight costs. She will
definitely bring an Arrow Antenna so I can start some portable operations.
A Sony voice recorder is also on my list, as well as some coax cable
(RG-400 is what I'm thinking of. Really expensive here).
Don't have a budget for much more, but since I have a clear line-of-sight
to some 10 kW FM transmitters from my QTH I thought I should at least get
a good FM-band notch filter.

Any recommendations on where to buy this in the US? I haven't found
anything when I googled, not even a lot of 2/70 band pass filters, or low
pass filters to prevent desensing on 70 cm. My own creations have a too
high insertion loss, so this time I really want something a bit more
professional and something that can handle at least 100 Watts of power.
Any recommendations are welcome. Cheers. --Hans BX2ABT



Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to
all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to
all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb






Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:33:50 -0700
From: "Bob Keating" <bkeating1954@?????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Logging on LoTW
Message-ID: <007301d4ddb0$c06823e0$41386ba0$@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

I logged 26 QSOs from CM94 last weekend as N6REK/P on LoTW but have received
only 4 QSLs. I thought CM94 is a relatively rare grid, plus I was hoping to
get credit for KI7UNJs rove. Should I just be logging as N6REK even though I
am operating a location other that my home QTH? I would like to get a good
solid answer as I will be heading off to Utah next month and hope to get
some QSLs from some new grids. Thanks.

73,

Bob N6REK



------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:56:58 -0800
From: Gabriel Zeifman <gabrielzeifman@?????.???>
To: Bob Keating <bkeating1954@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Logging on LoTW
Message-ID:
<CAEGYLCuuUvw_dLYp3RE1eAvuV8LCV_h+apkq-CXG3sMB+gkoeQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I think the most obvious answer is that people aren?t logging the /P. When
I operate CONUS I often affix the call area to distinguish that I?m outside
of Alaska so AL6D/W4 etc, but I usually upload with both AL6D (USA DXCC)
and AL6D/W4 to prevent this issue (and I see many QSLs for both).

73,
Gabe
AL6D/VE6NJH


On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:37 AM Bob Keating <bkeating1954@?????.???> wrote:

> I logged 26 QSOs from CM94 last weekend as N6REK/P on LoTW but have
> received
> only 4 QSLs. I thought CM94 is a relatively rare grid, plus I was hoping to
> get credit for KI7UNJs rove. Should I just be logging as N6REK even though
> I
> am operating a location other that my home QTH? I would like to get a good
> solid answer as I will be heading off to Utah next month and hope to get
> some QSLs from some new grids. Thanks.
>
> 73,
>
> Bob N6REK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:28:51 -0400
From: jbr13@??.?????????.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Logging on LoTW
Message-ID: <a933c78a0676e1a82169ae4692078b39@??.?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Bob,  I had that problem once years ago, when I ran QRP for a bunch of
contacts.  It all depends on how the other stations puts you in their
log.  If they put your call in without the /P, then LOTW will not
recognize it as a match.   I ended up uploading the same contact under
my N3YUG, and N3YUG/QRP accounts.

Jason




On 03-18-2019 1:33 PM, Bob Keating wrote:
> I logged 26 QSOs from CM94 last weekend as N6REK/P on LoTW but have
> received
> only 4 QSLs. I thought CM94 is a relatively rare grid, plus I was
> hoping to
> get credit for KI7UNJs rove. Should I just be logging as N6REK even
> though I
> am operating a location other that my home QTH? I would like to get a
> good
> solid answer as I will be heading off to Utah next month and hope to
> get
> some QSLs from some new grids. Thanks.
>
> 73,
>
> Bob N6REK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: aj9n@???.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2019-03-18
19:00	UTC
Message-ID: <1374651798.6935679.1552937244140@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2019-03-18 19:00 UTC



Quick list of scheduled contacts and events:

?

North Point School for Boys, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, telebridge via IK1SLD ?

The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be OR4ISS

The scheduled astronaut is David St-Jacques KG5FYI

Contact is go for: Wed 2019-03-20 20:16:09 UTC 86 deg

?

Watch for live stream starting about 10-15 minutes before AOS at:
www.ariotti.com

?

Exp. 59 on orbit (***)

Welcome aboard!? (***)

Christina Koch

Aleksey Ovchinin

Nick Hague KG5TMV

?

?

?

ARISS Contact Applications (United States)

The ARISS-US program?s education proposal window should go open in the
spring of 2019.

The ARISS webpage is at http://www.ariss.org/??

Note that there are links to other ARISS websites from this site.

?

ARISS Contact Applications (Europe, Africa and the Middle East)

?

Schools and Youth organizations in Europe, Africa and the Middle East
interested in setting up an ARISS radio contact with an astronaut on board
the International Space Station are invited to submit an application from
September to October and from February to April.

Please refer to details and the application form at
www.ariss-eu.org/school-contacts.? Applications should be addressed by email
to:? school.selection.manager@????????.???

?

ARISS Contact Applications (Canada, Central and South America, Asia and
Australia and Russia)

?

Organizations outside the United States can apply for an ARISS contact by
filling out an application.? Please direct questions to the appropriate
regional representative listed below. If your country is not specifically
listed, send your questions to the nearest ARISS Region listed. If you are
unsure which address to use, please send your question to the ARISS-Canada
representative; they will forward your question to the appropriate
coordinator.

?

For the application, go to:? http://www.ariss.org/ariss-application.html.

ARISS-Canada and the Americas, except USA: Steve McFarlane, VE3TBD email to:
ve3tbd@?????.???

ARISS-Japan, Asia, Pacific and Australia: Satoshi Yasuda, 7M3TJZ email to:
ariss@???????.???? Japan Amateur Radio League (JARL) http://www.jarl.org/
?(***)

ARISS-Russia: Soyuz Radioljubitelei Rossii (SRR) http://www.jarl.org/

?

?

******************************************************************************

ARISS is always glad to receive listener reports for the above contacts.?
ARISS thanks everyone in advance for their assistance.? Feel free to send
your reports to aj9n@?????.??? or aj9n@???.???.

?

Listen for the ISS on the downlink of 145.8? MHz.

?

******************************************************************************
*

?

All ARISS contacts are made via the Kenwood radio unless otherwise noted.

?

******************************************************************************
*


Several?of you have sent me emails asking about the RAC ARISS website and
not being able?to get in.? That has now been changed to?
http://www.ariss.org/

Note that there are links to other ARISS websites from this?site.

****************************************************************************
Looking?for something new to do?? How about receiving DATV from the ISS???
If interested, then please go to the ARISS-EU website for complete?
details.? Look for the buttons indicating Ham?Video.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
http://www.ariss-eu.org/? ?

?

If you need some assistance, ARISS mentor Kerry N6IZW, might be able to
provide some insight.? Contact Kerry at kbanke@?????????.???
****************************************************************************
ARISS congratulations the following mentors who have now mentored over 100
schools:?


Satoshi 7M3TJZ with 135

Francesco IK?WGF with 132

Gaston ON4WF with 123

Sergey RV3DR with 112


****************************************************************************
The?webpages listed below were all reviewed for accuracy.? Out of date
webpages?were removed, and new ones have been added.? If there are additional
ARISS?websites I need to know about, please let me know.

Note, all times?are approximate.? It is recommended that you do your own
orbital prediction?or start listening about 10 minutes before the listed
time.
All dates and?times listed follow International Standard ISO 8601 date and
time format?YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS


The complete schedule page has been updated as of?2019-03-18 19:00 UTC.? (***)

Here you will find a listing of all scheduled?school contacts, and
questions, other ISS related websites, IRLP and?Echolink websites, and
instructions for any contact that may be streamed?live.??


http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf

http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.txt

Total number?of ARISS ISS to earth school events is 1293.
Each school counts as 1?event.
Total number of ARISS ISS to earth school contacts is 1236.
Each contact may have multiple schools sharing the same time slot.
Total number of ARISS supported terrestrial contacts is?47.

A complete year by year breakdown of the contacts may be found in the
file.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf

Please?feel free to contact me if more detailed statistics are needed.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The?following US states and entities have never had an ARISS contact:
South Dakota, Wyoming, American?Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas Islands, and
the Virgin Islands.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

QSL?information may be found at:??
http://www.ariss.org/qsl-cards.html?

ISS callsigns:? DP?ISS, IR?ISS, NA1SS, OR4ISS,?RS?ISS

****************************************************************************
The successful school list has been updated as of 2019-03-05 16:00 UTC.

http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/Successful_ARISS_schools.rtf

Frequency? chart for packet, voice, and crossband repeater modes showing
Doppler? correction? as of 2005-07-29 04:00 UTC
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/ISS_frequencies_and_Doppler_correction
.rtf

Listing?of ARISS related magazine articles as of 2006-07-10 03:30 UTC.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/ARISS_magazine_articles.rtf

Check out the Zoho reports of the ARISS?contacts

https://reports.zoho.com/ZDBDataSheetView.cc?DBID=412218000000020415
****************************************************************************


Exp. 58 on orbit

Oleg Konenenko

David St-Jacques KG5FYI

Anne McClain

?

Exp. 59 on orbit (***)

Welcome aboard!? (***)

Christina Koch

Aleksey Ovchinin

Nick Hague KG5TMV


****************************************************************************

73,
Charlie?Sufana AJ9N
One of the ARISS operation team mentors

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?





------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 104
*****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 11.05.2024 13:48:26lGo back Go up