OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   05.05.19 00:23l 1113 Lines 40274 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14182
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 182
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 190504/2218Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:4978 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14182
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Anyone on CAS-4B?! (Lapo Pieri)
   2. Re: Pass Past/Future (Roy Dean)
   3. Re: ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs (Dave .)
   4. AO-92 mode (Bob Keating)
   5. Re: AO-92 mode (Andrew Glasbrenner)
   6. Re: Pass Past/Future (Pedro Converso)
   7. Re: ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs (KE6BLR Robert)
   8. Re: ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs (John Brier)
   9. Re: ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs (John Brier)
  10. Re: ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs (KE6BLR Robert)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 09:58:39 +0200
From: Lapo Pieri <ik5nax@???????????.??>
To: AMSAT-BB@?????.???? Yono Adisoemarta <yono_adisoemarta@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Anyone on CAS-4B?!
Message-ID: <20190504075839.GA1582@??????>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 06:56 Sat 04 May 19  , Yono Adisoemarta wrote:
> CAS-4A/4B are empty over here in Southeast Asia.
> Need more usage.

I agree! I've a qso on 4A yesterday night, just one...

73, Lapo IK5NAX


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 09:05:25 -0400
From: Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass Past/Future
Message-ID:
<CADGPg2sHQczS=y4R8DgxpW9wBb6OPn50yEH_0G2aX99VNGdaSQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Pedro,

This is great, muchas gracias!    One question, however - are the "past
passes" historical values "locked in time", or are they "back calculated"
from current keps?

--Roy
K3RLD



> ------------------------------
> Hello, Upon suggestions, a small calendar had been added over Date Label on
> http://amsat.org.ar/pass Hoping useful to allow retrieve past and future
> satellite passes. 73, lu7abf, Pedro


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 09:58:58 -0400
From: "Dave ." <kdcarlso@?????.???>
To: "Devin L. Ganger" <devin@????????.???>
Cc: "AMSAT-BB@?????.???? <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs
Message-ID:
<CAG5zY2rgYLF8h-NBL9wv5v_-pi82UgqZPMYs5y-mUNOiJpfqWQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I bought a set of egg beaters recently and they seem ok for anything higher
than 20 degrees. I'm looking to build a moxon variation
http://www.oocities.org/w9bci/VHFUHFSatelite.pdf at some point when I have
some free time.

Dave
N2OA

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:19 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> Greetings, programs!
>
> I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his
> Technician license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of
> eggbeater antennas. I've found a few papers online, but does anyone have a
> good reference to a detailed design?
>
> Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant coverage of
> eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.
>
> Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're deploying
> a pair for satellite operations, do you simply attach them through a
> duplexer? I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for using
> with dual Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I picked up my
> TH-D72A. It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.
>
> Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.
>
>
> --
> Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)
> email: devin@????????.???<????????????@????????.???>
> web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>
> cell: +1 425.239.2575
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 07:34:36 -0700
From: Bob Keating <bkeating1954@?????.???>
To: AMSAT-BB@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92 mode
Message-ID: <3444A563-7F71-4F1C-B2B4-61BC24DC316F@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=us-ascii

Will AO-92 be in V/U mode tomorrow? Thanks.
73,
Bob N6REK

Sent from my iPhone


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 11:00:23 -0400
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@??????????.???>
To: "'Bob Keating'" <bkeating1954@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92 mode
Message-ID: <057601d5028a$19cf5c20$4d6e1460$@??????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Sunday is generally L/v, usually starting on the first east coast pass early
Sunday UTC/late Saturday EDT.

73, Drew KO4MA
AMSAT VP Operations

-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Bob Keating via
AMSAT-BB
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2019 10:35 AM
To: AMSAT-BB@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92 mode

Will AO-92 be in V/U mode tomorrow? Thanks.
73,
Bob N6REK

Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 13:11:39 -0300
From: Pedro Converso <pconver@?????.???>
To: Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Pass Past/Future
Message-ID:
<CANTZqK=Fn6Ec=_AsHFMmychgUbnmXY1hQdC128qDRJZnBo7qqw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Roy,

THANKS! for nice & rewarding comment on new calendar facility on
http://amsat.org.ar/pass

The past & future passes where a date can be selected are calculated
on the fly using as you wisely said from current keps. However if a
much further/previous date (over three months) is selected calculation
will have a minor difference with actual, given keps changes over
time.

Have a good time and enjoy the birds.

73, lu7abf, Pedro

On 5/4/19, Roy Dean via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> Pedro,
>
> This is great, muchas gracias!    One question, however - are the "past
> passes" historical values "locked in time", or are they "back calculated"
> from current keps?
>
> --Roy
> K3RLD
>
>
>
>> ------------------------------
>> Hello, Upon suggestions, a small calendar had been added over Date Label
>> on
>> http://amsat.org.ar/pass Hoping useful to allow retrieve past and future
>> satellite passes. 73, lu7abf, Pedro
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 12:58:40 -0700
From: KE6BLR Robert <ke6blr.robert@?????.???>
To: "Bob Liddy (K8BL)" <k8bl@?????????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs
Message-ID:
<CABaTVVb2kZMCVTfwnja7iz7FjGrygfiveFyEdNcb-XS50iGuqw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

>>> 7 DEGREES RX via EggBeater <<<

N6DAN-1 gets APRS packets on 145.825 MHz as low as 7 degrees via the EBB144.

See Tweet of report:
https://twitter.com/MachaleRobert/status/1124763800865873920

I asked him to leave the EBB on the N6DAN-1 iGate for the entire month of
May to get performance metrics. He also has a directional antenna for
N6DAN-2.

For the pSat, you can monitor the TX and RX angles here:

http://www.spaceCommunicator.club/igates/

73s

Robert


On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:03 PM Bob Liddy (K8BL) via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

>  I got a good chuckle out of KG5CCI's link to the MFJ Dummy
>   Loads.
> Quite a few years back, I picked up a pair of the M2 Eggbeaters at a
> Hamfest for $150. I put them up with some 9913 and found that they were
> very close to being Dummy Loads in the sky. That was probably why the guy
> was selling them so cheap. They were sold again a couple years ago at
> Dayton for the same price. Lesson learned.
> I always thought the concept was very good, but the results were very
> disappointing. That was before the excellent performing SATs we have up
> there now. Maybe they would have moderate success now, but I wouldn't get
> my hopes up.
> My suggestion would be to get/build a couple small Yagis and put them on a
> mast several feet apart with the 70cm above and the 2M below with one
> vertical and one horizontal polarized. Tilt them up 15-20 degrees and a
> cheap TV Rotor is all you need. The tilting can  be done by fashioning a
> mast-to-boom plate drilled for the desired  angle for each antenna. Or, you
> could merely bend the mast that small  amount. This should give you
> reasonable success until you decide you  have the experience to get more
> sophisticated and will not have spent  a bunch of money initially.
> GL/73,     Bob  K8BL        (AMSAT #6593 since 1979)
>
>     On Friday, May 3, 2019, 5:00:48 PM EDT, David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>  Hi Sean!
>
> I don't recall seeing any name calling here until your post, I genuinely
> want to make sure the author of this thread who has sent numerous emails to
> this list explaining how to operate gets the best tips in regards to their
> planned build. I'm actually in the process of building the setup I
> recommended and will plan on doing a demo for folks sometime here soon,
> stay tuned!
>
> -Dave, KG5CCI
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sean Waite <waisean@?????.???> wrote:
>
> > Ah, yes, rather than maybe educate someone let's just berate them and
> > functionally call them an idiot.
> >
> > Eggbeaters have a bad rap because they don't necessarily hear well. You
> > may be making it into the bird but not hearing yourself, so you keep
> tuning
> > around and calling trying to find yourself only to be deaf-ly QRMing
> other
> > stations. I have no experience with them, but that's what I've heard.
> >
> > 73,
> > Sean WA1TE
> >
> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:49 PM David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
> > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> >
> >> Instead of building eggbeaters, pick up a few of these:
> >>
> >> http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-261
> >>
> >> You'll also need a pair of these:
> >>
> >> https://www.amazon.com/Coaxial-Cable-Female-SO239-PL259/dp/B00KQHH7VC
> >>
> >> Hook those into your baofengs and you'll be just as effective on the
> >> Satellites as you would with some homemade 'beaters.
> >>
> >> Good luck! 73!
> >>
> >> -Dave, KG5CCI
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:19 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <
> >> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Greetings, programs!
> >> >
> >> > I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his
> >> > Technician license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of
> >> > eggbeater antennas. I've found a few papers online, but does anyone
> >> have a
> >> > good reference to a detailed design?
> >> >
> >> > Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant
> coverage
> >> of
> >> > eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.
> >> >
> >> > Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're
> >> deploying
> >> > a pair for satellite operations, do you simply attach them through a
> >> > duplexer? I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for
> using
> >> > with dual Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I picked
> >> up my
> >> > TH-D72A. It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)
> >> > email: devin@????????.???<????????????@????????.???>
> >> > web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>
> >> > cell: +1 425.239.2575
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> >> Opinions
> >> > expressed
> >> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> >> > AMSAT-NA.
> >> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> >> program!
> >> > Subscription settings:
> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> >> Opinions expressed
> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> >> AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> >> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 16:09:14 -0400
From: John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???>
To: KE6BLR Robert <ke6blr.robert@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs
Message-ID:
<CALn0fKPtwdAY_5Df=4An89_ByZwd=nhu9iQJ5OjsV_JXJZ2L-g@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Not disputing the utility of egg beaters, but fwiw the ISS is the most
powerful ham transponder we have. The Ericsson is speced at 4 or 5 watts.

73, John Brier KG4AKV

On Sat, May 4, 2019, 16:02 KE6BLR Robert via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:

> >>> 7 DEGREES RX via EggBeater <<<
>
> N6DAN-1 gets APRS packets on 145.825 MHz as low as 7 degrees via the
> EBB144.
>
> See Tweet of report:
> https://twitter.com/MachaleRobert/status/1124763800865873920
>
> I asked him to leave the EBB on the N6DAN-1 iGate for the entire month of
> May to get performance metrics. He also has a directional antenna for
> N6DAN-2.
>
> For the pSat, you can monitor the TX and RX angles here:
>
> http://www.spaceCommunicator.club/igates/
>
> 73s
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:03 PM Bob Liddy (K8BL) via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> >  I got a good chuckle out of KG5CCI's link to the MFJ Dummy
> >   Loads.
> > Quite a few years back, I picked up a pair of the M2 Eggbeaters at a
> > Hamfest for $150. I put them up with some 9913 and found that they were
> > very close to being Dummy Loads in the sky. That was probably why the guy
> > was selling them so cheap. They were sold again a couple years ago at
> > Dayton for the same price. Lesson learned.
> > I always thought the concept was very good, but the results were very
> > disappointing. That was before the excellent performing SATs we have up
> > there now. Maybe they would have moderate success now, but I wouldn't get
> > my hopes up.
> > My suggestion would be to get/build a couple small Yagis and put them on
> a
> > mast several feet apart with the 70cm above and the 2M below with one
> > vertical and one horizontal polarized. Tilt them up 15-20 degrees and a
> > cheap TV Rotor is all you need. The tilting can  be done by fashioning a
> > mast-to-boom plate drilled for the desired  angle for each antenna. Or,
> you
> > could merely bend the mast that small  amount. This should give you
> > reasonable success until you decide you  have the experience to get more
> > sophisticated and will not have spent  a bunch of money initially.
> > GL/73,     Bob  K8BL        (AMSAT #6593 since 1979)
> >
> >     On Friday, May 3, 2019, 5:00:48 PM EDT, David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
> > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> >
> >  Hi Sean!
> >
> > I don't recall seeing any name calling here until your post, I genuinely
> > want to make sure the author of this thread who has sent numerous emails
> to
> > this list explaining how to operate gets the best tips in regards to
> their
> > planned build. I'm actually in the process of building the setup I
> > recommended and will plan on doing a demo for folks sometime here soon,
> > stay tuned!
> >
> > -Dave, KG5CCI
> >
> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sean Waite <waisean@?????.???> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, yes, rather than maybe educate someone let's just berate them and
> > > functionally call them an idiot.
> > >
> > > Eggbeaters have a bad rap because they don't necessarily hear well. You
> > > may be making it into the bird but not hearing yourself, so you keep
> > tuning
> > > around and calling trying to find yourself only to be deaf-ly QRMing
> > other
> > > stations. I have no experience with them, but that's what I've heard.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Sean WA1TE
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:49 PM David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
> > > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Instead of building eggbeaters, pick up a few of these:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-261
> > >>
> > >> You'll also need a pair of these:
> > >>
> > >> https://www.amazon.com/Coaxial-Cable-Female-SO239-PL259/dp/B00KQHH7VC
> > >>
> > >> Hook those into your baofengs and you'll be just as effective on the
> > >> Satellites as you would with some homemade 'beaters.
> > >>
> > >> Good luck! 73!
> > >>
> > >> -Dave, KG5CCI
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:19 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <
> > >> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Greetings, programs!
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his
> > >> > Technician license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of
> > >> > eggbeater antennas. I've found a few papers online, but does anyone
> > >> have a
> > >> > good reference to a detailed design?
> > >> >
> > >> > Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant
> > coverage
> > >> of
> > >> > eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.
> > >> >
> > >> > Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're
> > >> deploying
> > >> > a pair for satellite operations, do you simply attach them through a
> > >> > duplexer? I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for
> > using
> > >> > with dual Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I
> picked
> > >> up my
> > >> > TH-D72A. It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)
> > >> > email: devin@????????.???<????????????@????????.???>
> > >> > web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>
> > >> > cell: +1 425.239.2575
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
> available
> > >> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > >> Opinions
> > >> > expressed
> > >> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views
> > of
> > >> > AMSAT-NA.
> > >> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > >> program!
> > >> > Subscription settings:
> > https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > >> Opinions expressed
> > >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > >> AMSAT-NA.
> > >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > >> Subscription settings:
> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 16:10:47 -0400
From: John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???>
To: KE6BLR Robert <ke6blr.robert@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs
Message-ID:
<CALn0fKOAq-2=1AgFuT+QHzZCRsO20TCDBeHpP+859g-g=hN8Sw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Forgive me, I see those are PSAT packets. Dunno what its power is.

73, John Brier KG4AKV

On Sat, May 4, 2019, 16:09 John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???> wrote:

> Not disputing the utility of egg beaters, but fwiw the ISS is the most
> powerful ham transponder we have. The Ericsson is speced at 4 or 5 watts.
>
> 73, John Brier KG4AKV
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019, 16:02 KE6BLR Robert via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> wrote:
>
>> >>> 7 DEGREES RX via EggBeater <<<
>>
>> N6DAN-1 gets APRS packets on 145.825 MHz as low as 7 degrees via the
>> EBB144.
>>
>> See Tweet of report:
>> https://twitter.com/MachaleRobert/status/1124763800865873920
>>
>> I asked him to leave the EBB on the N6DAN-1 iGate for the entire month of
>> May to get performance metrics. He also has a directional antenna for
>> N6DAN-2.
>>
>> For the pSat, you can monitor the TX and RX angles here:
>>
>> http://www.spaceCommunicator.club/igates/
>>
>> 73s
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:03 PM Bob Liddy (K8BL) via AMSAT-BB <
>> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>
>> >  I got a good chuckle out of KG5CCI's link to the MFJ Dummy
>> >   Loads.
>> > Quite a few years back, I picked up a pair of the M2 Eggbeaters at a
>> > Hamfest for $150. I put them up with some 9913 and found that they were
>> > very close to being Dummy Loads in the sky. That was probably why the
>> guy
>> > was selling them so cheap. They were sold again a couple years ago at
>> > Dayton for the same price. Lesson learned.
>> > I always thought the concept was very good, but the results were very
>> > disappointing. That was before the excellent performing SATs we have up
>> > there now. Maybe they would have moderate success now, but I wouldn't
>> get
>> > my hopes up.
>> > My suggestion would be to get/build a couple small Yagis and put them
>> on a
>> > mast several feet apart with the 70cm above and the 2M below with one
>> > vertical and one horizontal polarized. Tilt them up 15-20 degrees and a
>> > cheap TV Rotor is all you need. The tilting can  be done by fashioning a
>> > mast-to-boom plate drilled for the desired  angle for each antenna. Or,
>> you
>> > could merely bend the mast that small  amount. This should give you
>> > reasonable success until you decide you  have the experience to get more
>> > sophisticated and will not have spent  a bunch of money initially.
>> > GL/73,     Bob  K8BL        (AMSAT #6593 since 1979)
>> >
>> >     On Friday, May 3, 2019, 5:00:48 PM EDT, David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
>> > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>> >
>> >  Hi Sean!
>> >
>> > I don't recall seeing any name calling here until your post, I genuinely
>> > want to make sure the author of this thread who has sent numerous
>> emails to
>> > this list explaining how to operate gets the best tips in regards to
>> their
>> > planned build. I'm actually in the process of building the setup I
>> > recommended and will plan on doing a demo for folks sometime here soon,
>> > stay tuned!
>> >
>> > -Dave, KG5CCI
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sean Waite <waisean@?????.???> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Ah, yes, rather than maybe educate someone let's just berate them and
>> > > functionally call them an idiot.
>> > >
>> > > Eggbeaters have a bad rap because they don't necessarily hear well.
>> You
>> > > may be making it into the bird but not hearing yourself, so you keep
>> > tuning
>> > > around and calling trying to find yourself only to be deaf-ly QRMing
>> > other
>> > > stations. I have no experience with them, but that's what I've heard.
>> > >
>> > > 73,
>> > > Sean WA1TE
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:49 PM David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
>> > > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Instead of building eggbeaters, pick up a few of these:
>> > >>
>> > >> http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-261
>> > >>
>> > >> You'll also need a pair of these:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> https://www.amazon.com/Coaxial-Cable-Female-SO239-PL259/dp/B00KQHH7VC
>> > >>
>> > >> Hook those into your baofengs and you'll be just as effective on the
>> > >> Satellites as you would with some homemade 'beaters.
>> > >>
>> > >> Good luck! 73!
>> > >>
>> > >> -Dave, KG5CCI
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:19 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <
>> > >> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Greetings, programs!
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his
>> > >> > Technician license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of
>> > >> > eggbeater antennas. I've found a few papers online, but does anyone
>> > >> have a
>> > >> > good reference to a detailed design?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant
>> > coverage
>> > >> of
>> > >> > eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're
>> > >> deploying
>> > >> > a pair for satellite operations, do you simply attach them through
>> a
>> > >> > duplexer? I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for
>> > using
>> > >> > with dual Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I
>> picked
>> > >> up my
>> > >> > TH-D72A. It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)
>> > >> > email: devin@????????.???<????????????@????????.???>
>> > >> > web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>
>> > >> > cell: +1 425.239.2575
>> > >> >
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>> available
>> > >> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> > >> Opinions
>> > >> > expressed
>> > >> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>> views
>> > of
>> > >> > AMSAT-NA.
>> > >> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> > >> program!
>> > >> > Subscription settings:
>> > https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> > >> >
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>> available
>> > >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> > >> Opinions expressed
>> > >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>> views of
>> > >> AMSAT-NA.
>> > >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> > program!
>> > >> Subscription settings:
>> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions
>> > expressed
>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> > AMSAT-NA.
>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions
>> > expressed
>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> > AMSAT-NA.
>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>


------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 15:10:51 -0700
From: KE6BLR Robert <ke6blr.robert@?????.???>
To: John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ARRL Antenna book, eggbeater antenna designs
Message-ID:
<CABaTVVYc52j=qCwU-PRar2fVywZX3vmjg765gVvwS_gkZhyg4A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I'll add the TX/RX angles for the ISS so we can compare those too.

73s

Robert
KE6BLR


On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 1:11 PM John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???> wrote:

> Forgive me, I see those are PSAT packets. Dunno what its power is.
>
> 73, John Brier KG4AKV
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019, 16:09 John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> Not disputing the utility of egg beaters, but fwiw the ISS is the most
>> powerful ham transponder we have. The Ericsson is speced at 4 or 5 watts.
>>
>> 73, John Brier KG4AKV
>>
>> On Sat, May 4, 2019, 16:02 KE6BLR Robert via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> >>> 7 DEGREES RX via EggBeater <<<
>>>
>>> N6DAN-1 gets APRS packets on 145.825 MHz as low as 7 degrees via the
>>> EBB144.
>>>
>>> See Tweet of report:
>>> https://twitter.com/MachaleRobert/status/1124763800865873920
>>>
>>> I asked him to leave the EBB on the N6DAN-1 iGate for the entire month of
>>> May to get performance metrics. He also has a directional antenna for
>>> N6DAN-2.
>>>
>>> For the pSat, you can monitor the TX and RX angles here:
>>>
>>> http://www.spaceCommunicator.club/igates/
>>>
>>> 73s
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:03 PM Bob Liddy (K8BL) via AMSAT-BB <
>>> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>>
>>> >  I got a good chuckle out of KG5CCI's link to the MFJ Dummy
>>> >   Loads.
>>> > Quite a few years back, I picked up a pair of the M2 Eggbeaters at a
>>> > Hamfest for $150. I put them up with some 9913 and found that they were
>>> > very close to being Dummy Loads in the sky. That was probably why the
>>> guy
>>> > was selling them so cheap. They were sold again a couple years ago at
>>> > Dayton for the same price. Lesson learned.
>>> > I always thought the concept was very good, but the results were very
>>> > disappointing. That was before the excellent performing SATs we have up
>>> > there now. Maybe they would have moderate success now, but I wouldn't
>>> get
>>> > my hopes up.
>>> > My suggestion would be to get/build a couple small Yagis and put them
>>> on a
>>> > mast several feet apart with the 70cm above and the 2M below with one
>>> > vertical and one horizontal polarized. Tilt them up 15-20 degrees and a
>>> > cheap TV Rotor is all you need. The tilting can  be done by fashioning
>>> a
>>> > mast-to-boom plate drilled for the desired  angle for each antenna.
>>> Or, you
>>> > could merely bend the mast that small  amount. This should give you
>>> > reasonable success until you decide you  have the experience to get
>>> more
>>> > sophisticated and will not have spent  a bunch of money initially.
>>> > GL/73,     Bob  K8BL        (AMSAT #6593 since 1979)
>>> >
>>> >     On Friday, May 3, 2019, 5:00:48 PM EDT, David Swanson via AMSAT-BB
>>> <
>>> > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >  Hi Sean!
>>> >
>>> > I don't recall seeing any name calling here until your post, I
>>> genuinely
>>> > want to make sure the author of this thread who has sent numerous
>>> emails to
>>> > this list explaining how to operate gets the best tips in regards to
>>> their
>>> > planned build. I'm actually in the process of building the setup I
>>> > recommended and will plan on doing a demo for folks sometime here soon,
>>> > stay tuned!
>>> >
>>> > -Dave, KG5CCI
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sean Waite <waisean@?????.???> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Ah, yes, rather than maybe educate someone let's just berate them and
>>> > > functionally call them an idiot.
>>> > >
>>> > > Eggbeaters have a bad rap because they don't necessarily hear well.
>>> You
>>> > > may be making it into the bird but not hearing yourself, so you keep
>>> > tuning
>>> > > around and calling trying to find yourself only to be deaf-ly QRMing
>>> > other
>>> > > stations. I have no experience with them, but that's what I've heard.
>>> > >
>>> > > 73,
>>> > > Sean WA1TE
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:49 PM David Swanson via AMSAT-BB <
>>> > > amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Instead of building eggbeaters, pick up a few of these:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-261
>>> > >>
>>> > >> You'll also need a pair of these:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> https://www.amazon.com/Coaxial-Cable-Female-SO239-PL259/dp/B00KQHH7VC
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hook those into your baofengs and you'll be just as effective on the
>>> > >> Satellites as you would with some homemade 'beaters.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Good luck! 73!
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -Dave, KG5CCI
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:19 PM Devin L. Ganger via AMSAT-BB <
>>> > >> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Greetings, programs!
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I'm looking to work with my son (who will be studying to get his
>>> > >> > Technician license later this month) on building a UHF/VHF pair of
>>> > >> > eggbeater antennas. I've found a few papers online, but does
>>> anyone
>>> > >> have a
>>> > >> > good reference to a detailed design?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Does the ARRL Antenna book latest edition have any significant
>>> > coverage
>>> > >> of
>>> > >> > eggbeaters at all? I have an older version that has nothing.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Also, most of the designs I see are for a single band. If you're
>>> > >> deploying
>>> > >> > a pair for satellite operations, do you simply attach them
>>> through a
>>> > >> > duplexer? I have a Diamond MX-72N that I picked up a while ago for
>>> > using
>>> > >> > with dual Baofengs, but it's been sitting in my drawer since I
>>> picked
>>> > >> up my
>>> > >> > TH-D72A. It has a 1.6~150MHz lead and a 350~460MHz lead.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Thanks in advance for any pointers you might have.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> > Devin L. Ganger (WA7DLG)
>>> > >> > email: devin@????????.???<????????????@????????.???>
>>> > >> > web: Devin on Earth<http://www.devinonearth.com/>
>>> > >> > cell: +1 425.239.2575
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>>> > >> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>>> available
>>> > >> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> > >> Opinions
>>> > >> > expressed
>>> > >> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>> views
>>> > of
>>> > >> > AMSAT-NA.
>>> > >> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> > >> program!
>>> > >> > Subscription settings:
>>> > https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>>> available
>>> > >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> > >> Opinions expressed
>>> > >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>> views of
>>> > >> AMSAT-NA.
>>> > >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> > program!
>>> > >> Subscription settings:
>>> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions
>>> > expressed
>>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of
>>> > AMSAT-NA.
>>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions
>>> > expressed
>>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of
>>> > AMSAT-NA.
>>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 182
*****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 11.05.2024 14:09:58lGo back Go up