| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 16.04.15 23:03l 677 Lines 21979 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB10112
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V10 112
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 150416/2057Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:18927 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB10112
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. IC-9100 and SatPC32 (David L Warnberg)
2. 70cm high-pass filter designs (Daniel Est?vez)
3. Re: 70cm high-pass filter designs (Glen Zook)
4. AO-73 offline? (Paul Stoetzer)
5. Re: AO-73 offline? (alancresswell@xxxx.xx.xxx
6. Progress at Rocket lab (Wendy and Terry Osborne)
7. Re: AO-73 offline? (Jerry Buxton)
8. Re: Progress at Rocket lab (Bill)
9. FUNcube-1 Update (Graham Shirville)
10. Re: FUNcube-1 Update (Wouter Weggelaar)
11. Re: IC-9100 and SatPC32 (David L Warnberg)
12. Ic-910 and SO-50 (Arthur Payne)
13. Re: Ic-910 and SO-50 (David L Warnberg)
14. Re: Ic-910 and SO-50 (Erich Eichmann)
15. Re: 70cm high-pass filter designs (Daniel Est?vez)
16. "GB4MBC" - Special Event Station - Cancelled (GW1FKY@xxx.xxxx
17. Re: 70cm high-pass filter designs (Glen Zook)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:48:40 -0400
From: "David L Warnberg" <dwarnberg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] IC-9100 and SatPC32
Message-ID: <004a01d077bd$90fc9120$b2f5b360$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
I've tried HRD, works fine with FM sats but does not handle linier inverting
sats, so figured I'd give SatPC32 a shot.. for whatever reason I cannot get
it to control my IC-9100. I purchased the CT-17 have it set on a virtual
com port 6 but still nothing..
Can anyone give me some direction on this? I apologize id this is repeated
information but I cannot find where to search the archives for the BB or any
other place to find information on this software.
If this works as expected I will gladly pay for SatPC32 but not going to
spend the cash if I can't get it to work.
Thanks
David
KK4QOE
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:07:50 +0200
From: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: 'Amsat BB' <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 70cm high-pass filter designs
Message-ID: <552EE136.6030307@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi all,
My portable satellite station consists of a Funcube Dongle Pro+ for RX
and a FT-817ND for TX. I use a diplexer in front of the dongle to avoid
desensing, but still some of the 2m signal is getting in and causing
desensing when working V/U birds. It seems to me that a 70cm high-pass
filter in the receive chain would help.
Can anyone point me to some easy to build reference designs for this
kind of filters? Power handling is not an issue, since this will only be
used for RX. I'm mainly looking to something that I could build from
things in my junk box, using air core inductors and ceramic caps (if
this a sensible thing to do).
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:27:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Glen Zook <gzook@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>, 'Amsat BB'
<AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 70cm high-pass filter designs
Message-ID:
<1574855051.4795531.1429136858722.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
A 2-meter low pass filter might help even more since the 3rd harmonic of
that signal falls into the 70 cm band.?Glen, K9STH?AMSAT 239/LM463
Website: http://k9sth.net
From: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: 'Amsat BB' <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 5:07 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] 70cm high-pass filter designs
Hi all,
My portable satellite station consists of a Funcube Dongle Pro+ for RX
and a FT-817ND for TX. I use a diplexer in front of the dongle to avoid
desensing, but still some of the 2m signal is getting in and causing
desensing when working V/U birds. It seems to me that a 70cm high-pass
filter in the receive chain would help.
Can anyone point me to some easy to build reference designs for this
kind of filters? Power handling is not an issue, since this will only be
used for RX. I'm mainly looking to something that I could build from
things in my junk box, using air core inductors and ceramic caps (if
this a sensible thing to do).
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:41:06 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-73 offline?
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOoubVjFQv-7HmR=KqeoTPE7RY-fR3u2vEsyYBBdvkubQw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
No signals heard from AO-73 at 02:35 UTC over North America. According
to the Data Warehouse, no packets have been received since 20:17:55.
The last packet shows values that are way out of whack.
http://warehouse.funcube.org.uk/
73,
Paul, N8HM
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:05:51 -0000
From: <alancresswell@xxxx.xx.xx>
To: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-73 offline?
Message-ID: <70EAEEBCC5C8491BBE48A91CF4BD17BE@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
No signals over ZL on the 2052 UT or the 2228 UT Passes.
Alan
ZL2BX
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stoetzer
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:41 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-73 offline?
No signals heard from AO-73 at 02:35 UTC over North America. According
to the Data Warehouse, no packets have been received since 20:17:55.
The last packet shows values that are way out of whack.
http://warehouse.funcube.org.uk/
73,
Paul, N8HM
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:34:30 +1200
From: Wendy and Terry Osborne <osbornes@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Progress at Rocket lab
Message-ID: <B3A7B06B860348FB98C36A893F86A06A@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Folks,
Rocketlab are now test firing their Rutherford engine for the Electron
Launcher
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/small-business/67717283/Rocket-Lab-unveils-ele
ctric-rocket-engine
73,
Terry ZL2BAC
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:20:48 -0500
From: Jerry Buxton <amsat@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-73 offline?
Message-ID: <552F38A0.3050005@xxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Wow. Nothing, at ~04:15 UTC with a high pass over Texas...
Jerry Buxton, N?JY
On 4/15/2015 22:05, alancresswell@xxxx.xx.xx wrote:
> No signals over ZL on the 2052 UT or the 2228 UT Passes.
> Alan
> ZL2BX
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:06:40 -0700
From: Bill <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Progress at Rocket lab
Message-ID: <552F4360.5070004@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Hi Terry,
Great news!! I'm thinking KiwiSat...Bill - N6GHz
On 4/15/2015 7:34 PM, Wendy and Terry Osborne wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Rocketlab are now test firing their Rutherford engine for the Electron
Launcher
>
>
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/small-business/67717283/Rocket-Lab-unveils-ele
ctric-rocket-engine
>
> 73,
>
> Terry ZL2BAC
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
High Sierra Microwave
Camino, CA 95709
(530) 409-9782
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:19:07 +0100
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, <funcube@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 Update
Message-ID: <969165365C7D4F22A8DD64EDA83E6A32@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi all,
It appears that FUNcube-1 stopped transmitting last evening.
The FUNcube operations team are presently reviewing the latest available
telemetry and will be commanding the spacecraft later today, but maybe not
until this evening?s passes over Europe.
73
Graham
G3VZV
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:12:14 +0200
From: Wouter Weggelaar <wouterweg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Graham Shirville <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, funcube@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 Update
Message-ID:
<CAKXf1rF0dm8BZ29ZgFNQQiBAwuMhjG0phbZVPYSzWu5BBAq1mw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi All,
The team is still investigating the situation, but we have concluded from
earlier telemetry analysis that it was safe to switch back to nominal
operations.
During the 09:30 UTC pass over The Netherlands, I have commanded it back to
nominal mode with full automatic mode switching.
At this time, there is no reason to believe this event was dangerous to the
spacecraft, all systems were nominal and the battery is nearly full.
Please enjoy FUNcube-1!
Wouter PA3WEG
FUNcube command team
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Graham Shirville <
g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It appears that FUNcube-1 stopped transmitting last evening.
>
> The FUNcube operations team are presently reviewing the latest available
> telemetry and will be commanding the spacecraft later today, but maybe not
> until this evening?s passes over Europe.
>
> 73
>
> Graham
> G3VZV
>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:19:01 -0400
From: "David L Warnberg" <dwarnberg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] IC-9100 and SatPC32
Message-ID: <007701d0783f$89091150$9b1b33f0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
All I want to thank all the quick and helpful responses.. I did go back to
the USB connection and with all your help found where I was missing settings
(they were hiding from me).. After getting the settings correct everything
is working fine..
Time to go play..
Thanks Again everyone
David
KK4QOE
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of David L
Warnberg
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 4:49 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] IC-9100 and SatPC32
I've tried HRD, works fine with FM sats but does not handle linier inverting
sats, so figured I'd give SatPC32 a shot.. for whatever reason I cannot get
it to control my IC-9100. I purchased the CT-17 have it set on a virtual
com port 6 but still nothing..
Can anyone give me some direction on this? I apologize id this is repeated
information but I cannot find where to search the archives for the BB or any
other place to find information on this software.
If this works as expected I will gladly pay for SatPC32 but not going to
spend the cash if I can't get it to work.
Thanks
David
KK4QOE
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:45:36 -0400
From: Arthur Payne <tuscandude@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Ic-910 and SO-50
Message-ID:
<CAAdE_rkx20euBV7GBdWA8bXP_dxhFGJMLB7BDn-inyAJo=7oUA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Tom I am trying to get my lc-910 to work with satPc32 to work SO-50 an
ideas I have it tracking (I lengthened the delay) but I don't seem to be
able to access the bird.
Art VE3GNF adpayne@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:40:50 -0400
From: "David L Warnberg" <dwarnberg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Arthur Payne'" <tuscandude@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Ic-910 and SO-50
Message-ID: <00b801d0785b$b7b601e0$272205a0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Art,
Just an idea, do you have tone on (67.0 Hertz PL tone on the uplink)
also if the bird is not active it needs a PL tone of 74.4 to arm the timer..
Hope this helps.
David
KK4QOE
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Arthur Payne
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:46 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Ic-910 and SO-50
Tom I am trying to get my lc-910 to work with satPc32 to work SO-50 an ideas
I have it tracking (I lengthened the delay) but I don't seem to be able to
access the bird.
Art VE3GNF adpayne@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:14:11 +0200
From: Erich Eichmann <erich.eichmann@xxxxxxxx.xx>
To: Arthur Payne <tuscandude@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Ic-910 and SO-50
Message-ID: <552FEDE3.4050308@xxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Hi Art,
SO-50 requires a 74.4 Hz sub tone on the uplink signal to be activated
and a 67.0 Hz sub tone to be worked.
SatPC32 can set both tone frequencies. Click the "T" control (in the
uppler left part of the main window) to "T2" to select the 74.4 Hz tone
and switch the radio to TX for a few seconds to activate the sat. Then
click the control to "T1" to set the 67.0 Hz tone. It the sat is active
use only T1. With satellites that don't require a sub tone the functions
are disabled.
73s, Erich, DK1TB
Am 16.04.2015 um 16:45 schrieb Arthur Payne:
> Tom I am trying to get my lc-910 to work with satPc32 to work SO-50 an
> ideas I have it tracking (I lengthened the delay) but I don't seem to be
> able to access the bird.
>
> Art VE3GNF adpayne@xxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:41:48 +0200
From: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: 'Amsat BB' <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 70cm high-pass filter designs
Message-ID: <552FF45C.4000601@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Many thanks to everybody for all the suggestions. I'll have a look at
the filter designs.
There are some people that have suggested that the problem might be the
3rd harmonic from the 2m TX, instead of being overload by the 2m signal
somewhere in the receiver. I'm also suspicious that this could be the
case, but I did yesterday some tests that seem to indicate that the
level of the 3rd harmonic is fine.
I tested with different antennas for TX and RX, with about 2 or 3 meter
separation between them (my normal antenna is an arrow type antenna,
with on coax for the 2m yagi and other coax for the 70cm yagi). Fist I
connected the dongle to the 70cm port on the diplexer (and the antenna
to the common port). With this setup I got a bit of desense as usual.
Then, I connected the dongle to the 2m port on the diplexer. With this
setup the desense is very big.
This makes me think that the problem is with the 2m frequency and not
the 3rd harmonic, because the distance between the antennas and the 2m
port of the diplexer should be more than enough to kill any 3rd harmonic.
However, it's possible that I am seeing two different effects with this:
the 3rd harmonic when the dongle is on the 70cm port and overload from
the 2m signal when the dongle is on the 2m port.
What do you guys think?
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
El 16/04/15 a las 00:07, Daniel Est?vez escribi?:
> Hi all,
>
> My portable satellite station consists of a Funcube Dongle Pro+ for RX
> and a FT-817ND for TX. I use a diplexer in front of the dongle to avoid
> desensing, but still some of the 2m signal is getting in and causing
> desensing when working V/U birds. It seems to me that a 70cm high-pass
> filter in the receive chain would help.
>
> Can anyone point me to some easy to build reference designs for this
> kind of filters? Power handling is not an issue, since this will only be
> used for RX. I'm mainly looking to something that I could build from
> things in my junk box, using air core inductors and ceramic caps (if
> this a sensible thing to do).
>
> 73,
>
> Dani EA4GPZ.
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:42:37 -0400
From: GW1FKY@xxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] "GB4MBC" - Special Event Station - Cancelled
Message-ID: <120253.3c0fa62.42616aad@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
With respect to the planned activation of the Special Event Station -
"GB4MBC" on HF and satellite during
24th -27th April 2015 -Location: " Flatholm Island" EU124.
Due to circumstances beyond our control ,"Barry Amateur Radio Society "
South Wales, regrets that the
visit and activation has been cancelled.
Apologies to all, including those that post out any news on events - I
will however try for contacts from our mainland station with its Marconi
special call GB0MDI -Locator IO81JJ
Ken Eaton
GW1FKY
Amsat-UK
Amsat -NA
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Glen Zook <gzook@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>, 'Amsat BB'
<AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 70cm high-pass filter designs
Message-ID:
<157445242.5690943.1429217729565.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Don't discount the strength of the 3rd harmonic. ?It doesn't take much to
cause problems. ?Remember, a 3/2ths wave-length antenna radiates as well as
1/2 wave-length antenna and your 2-meter antenna will radiate fine on the 70
cm band. ?Also, with "normal" coaxial cable, you are going to get radiation
from the line. ?Commercial two-way installations use at least
double-shielded cable for things like duplexers and cavities to basically
eliminate interference (as much as possible).
Having both a high-pass filter for 70 cm and a low pass filter for 2-meters
should reduce the problem even more.?Glen, K9STH?AMSAT 239/LM463
Website: http://k9sth.net
From: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: 'Amsat BB' <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] 70cm high-pass filter designs
Many thanks to everybody for all the suggestions. I'll have a look at
the filter designs.
There are some people that have suggested that the problem might be the
3rd harmonic from the 2m TX, instead of being overload by the 2m signal
somewhere in the receiver. I'm also suspicious that this could be the
case, but I did yesterday some tests that seem to indicate that the
level of the 3rd harmonic is fine.
I tested with different antennas for TX and RX, with about 2 or 3 meter
separation between them (my normal antenna is an arrow type antenna,
with on coax for the 2m yagi and other coax for the 70cm yagi). Fist I
connected the dongle to the 70cm port on the diplexer (and the antenna
to the common port). With this setup I got a bit of desense as usual.
Then, I connected the dongle to the 2m port on the diplexer. With this
setup the desense is very big.
This makes me think that the problem is with the 2m frequency and not
the 3rd harmonic, because the distance between the antennas and the 2m
port of the diplexer should be more than enough to kill any 3rd harmonic.
However, it's possible that I am seeing two different effects with this:
the 3rd harmonic when the dongle is on the 70cm port and overload from
the 2m signal when the dongle is on the 2m port.
What do you guys think?
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 10, Issue 112
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
