| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 15.06.19 01:40l 989 Lines 30095 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14230
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 230
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0GOS<ON0AR<OZ5BBS<CX2SA
Sent: 190614/2332Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:7960 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14230
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2019-06-13 20.:00 UTC
(aj9n@???.????
2. Re: DopplerPSK - No 1 kHz-autotracking radio
(tjschuessler@???????.????
3. DopplerPSK - No 1 kHz-autotracking radio (Nicholas Mahr KE8AKW)
4. Re: AO-85 is still kicking... (Burns Fisher)
5. Re: Antenna SWR question (Bob Liddy (K8BL))
6. Re: OUTERnet becomes OTHERnet (APRS geo feed) (Matthew J Wolf)
7. Re: Antenna SWR question (skristof@???????.????
8. FO-99(NEXUS Team) will QRV and Transponder on this schedules
(oguro-t@?????.????
9. space junk article _EOS (christy hunter)
10. PO-101? (skristof@???????.????
11. Re: PO-101? (Paul Stoetzer)
12. XW-2D /-vs-/ ISS (... and everyone else) (Scott)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 19:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
From: aj9n@???.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2019-06-13
20.:00 UTC
Message-ID: <950830131.823716.1560455582736@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2019-06-13 20.:00 UTC
Quick list of scheduled contacts and events:
Peninsula Grammar, Melbourne, Australia, telebridge via VK4KHZ
The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be NA1SS
The scheduled astronaut is Nick Hague KG5TMV
Contact was successful: Thu 2019-06-13 11:10:52 UTC 79 deg ?(***)
?
GBPOU RM "Saransk Polytechnic College", Saransk Russia, direct via R4UAB
The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be RS?ISS?
The scheduled astronaut is Oleg Konenenko
Contact is go for Sat 2019-06-15 10:39 UTC
?
Smithsonian Air and Space ? Udvar-Hazy, Chantilly, VA, USA, telebridge via
W6SRJ
The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be NA1SS
The scheduled astronaut is Nick Hague KG5TMV
Contact is go for: Sat 2019-06-15 18:11:51 UTC 42 deg
?
Rowan Preparatory School, Claygate, United Kingdom, direct via GB4RPS
The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be NA1SS
The scheduled astronaut is Nick Hague KG5TMV
Contact is go for: Thu 2019-06-20 12:48:55 UTC 53 deg
?
Watch for live stream at https://live.ariss.org/
?
King Island District High School, Currie, TAS, Australia, telebridge via
IK1SLD
The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be OR4ISS
The scheduled astronaut is David St-Jacques KG5FYI
Contact is go for: Wed 2019-06-19 08:49:20 UTC 58 deg
?
?
Note, all times?are approximate.? It is recommended that you do your own
orbital prediction?or start listening about 10 minutes before the listed
time.
All dates and?times listed follow International Standard ISO 8601 date and
time format?YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
The complete schedule page has been updated as of?2019-06-13 20:00 UTC.? (***)
Here you will find a listing of all scheduled?school contacts, and
questions, other ISS related websites, IRLP and?Echolink websites, and
instructions for any contact that may be streamed?live.??
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.txt
?
The successful school list has been updated as of 2019-06-13 20:00 UTC. (***)
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/Successful_ARISS_schools.rtf
?
?
The ARISS webpage is at http://www.ariss.org/??
Note that there are links to other ARISS websites from this site.
The main page for Applying to Host a Scheduled Contact may be found at
http://www.ariss.org/apply-to-host-an-ariss-contact.html??
ARISS Contact Applications (United States)
?
The ARISS webpage is at http://www.ariss.org/??
Note that there are links to other ARISS websites from this site.
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
****************
ARISS Contact Applications (Europe, Africa and the Middle East)
?
Schools and Youth organizations in Europe, Africa and the Middle East
interested in setting up an ARISS radio contact with an astronaut on board
the International Space Station are invited to submit an application from
September to October and from February to April.
Please refer to details and the application form at
www.ariss-eu.org/school-contacts.? Applications should be addressed by email
to:? school.selection.manager@????????.???
?
ARISS Contact Applications (Canada, Central and South America, Asia and
Australia and Russia)
?
Organizations outside the United States can apply for an ARISS contact by
filling out an application.? Please direct questions to the appropriate
regional representative listed below. If your country is not specifically
listed, send your questions to the nearest ARISS Region listed. If you are
unsure which address to use, please send your question to the ARISS-Canada
representative; they will forward your question to the appropriate
coordinator.
?
For the application, go to:? http://www.ariss.org/ariss-application.html.
ARISS-Canada and the Americas, except USA: Steve McFarlane, VE3TBD email to:
ve3tbd@?????.???
ARISS-Japan, Asia, Pacific and Australia: Satoshi Yasuda, 7M3TJZ email to:
ariss@???????.???? Japan Amateur Radio League (JARL) http://www.jarl.org/ ?
ARISS-Russia: Soyuz Radioljubitelei Rossii (SRR) https://srr.ru/?
?
?
******************************************************************************
ARISS is always glad to receive listener reports for the above contacts.?
ARISS thanks everyone in advance for their assistance.? Feel free to send
your reports to aj9n@?????.??? or aj9n@???.???.
?
Listen for the ISS on the downlink of 145.8? MHz.
?
******************************************************************************
*
?
All ARISS contacts are made via the Kenwood radio unless otherwise noted.
?
******************************************************************************
*
Several?of you have sent me emails asking about the RAC ARISS website and
not being able?to get in.? That has now been changed to?
http://www.ariss.org/
Note that there are links to other ARISS websites from this?site.
****************************************************************************
Looking for something new to do?? How about receiving DATV from the ISS??
Please note that the HamTV system has been brought back to earth for
troubleshooting.? Please monitor ARISS-EU or ARISS-ON for the very latest
news on the troubleshooting efforts.?
?
If interested, then please go to the ARISS-EU website for complete details.?
Look for the buttons indicating Ham Video.????????????
http://www.ariss-eu.org/?
If you need some assistance, ARISS mentor Kerry N6IZW, might be able to
provide some insight.? Contact Kerry at kbanke@?????????.???
The HamTV webpage:? https://www.amsat-on.be/hamtv-summary/
?
?
****************************************************************************
ARISS congratulations the following mentors who have now mentored over 100
schools:?
Satoshi 7M3TJZ with 135
Francesco IK?WGF with 132
Gaston ON4WF with 123
Sergey RV3DR with 117
****************************************************************************
The?webpages listed below were all reviewed for accuracy.? Out of date
webpages?were removed, and new ones have been added.? If there are additional
ARISS?websites I need to know about, please let me know.
Total number?of ARISS ISS to earth school events is 1316. (***)
Each school counts as 1?event.
Total number of ARISS ISS to earth school contacts is 1259. (***)
Each contact may have multiple schools sharing the same time slot.
Total number of ARISS supported terrestrial contacts is?47.
A complete year by year breakdown of the contacts may be found in the
file.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf
Please?feel free to contact me if more detailed statistics are needed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The?following US states and entities have never had an ARISS contact:
South Dakota, Wyoming, American?Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas Islands, and
the Virgin Islands.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
QSL?information may be found at:??
http://www.ariss.org/qsl-cards.html?
ISS callsigns:? DP?ISS, IR?ISS, NA1SS, OR4ISS,?RS?ISS
****************************************************************************
Frequency? chart for packet, voice, and crossband repeater modes showing
Doppler? correction? as of 2005-07-29 04:00 UTC
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/ISS_frequencies_and_Doppler_correction
.rtf
Check out the Zoho reports of the ARISS?contacts
https://reports.zoho.com/ZDBDataSheetView.cc?DBID=412218000000020415
****************************************************************************
Exp. 58 on orbit
Oleg Konenenko
David St-Jacques KG5FYI
Anne McClain
?
Exp. 59 on orbit
Christina Koch
Aleksey Ovchinin
Nick Hague KG5TMV
****************************************************************************
73,
Charlie?Sufana AJ9N
One of the ARISS operation team mentors
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:18:52 -0500
From: <tjschuessler@???????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] DopplerPSK - No 1 kHz-autotracking radio
Message-ID: <00d501d52225$3898ccd0$a9ca6670$@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
DopplerPSK is a great program for dealing with doppler shift on the 10 meter
uplink. The point being made that Yes, all mode rigs can do very small
tuning steps in VFO mode as can my FT847. If I were going to use that one
rig for NO-84, even with SatPC32, I would turn the doppler correction for
uplink "OFF" and only track the 435 downlink FM so I could hear the FM
carrier throughout, but let doppler PSK adjust audio tone for doppler and
that will nicely keep the PSK signal stable AT the Satellite, inside the
28.120 + 3Khz receive passband. The cool thing is that you can still use
just an FM mobile rig to receive the FM downlink, and 5Khz steps will still
work pretty much just fine.
Tom Schuessler, N5HYP
EM12ms
2713 Lake Gardens Drive
Irving, TX 75060
972-986-7456
214-403-1464 (Mobile)
N5hyp@????.???
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:05:47 -0400
From: Nicholas Mahr KE8AKW <nicholasmahr1@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] DopplerPSK - No 1 kHz-autotracking radio
Message-ID:
<CAGu+VYsJezDQLpm++S=du1Y8Uke-vrNWhktXKtzeL9WntnQUSA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Yes what Tom and Scott said is what I do and is the correct way of working
NO-84. You cannot just tune the 10m uplink like you would a linear
transponder with SatPc32. It will make the PSK31 signal on the transponder
undecodeable. The only real way to work it is with Doppler PSK. My setup
consists of a FT-847 on the 70cm downlink, with SatPC32 correcting the
doppler on the downlink which by the way I have no issues with. Then I have
my FT-950 doing the uplinking on 10m (I use the FT-847 for VHF/UHF/Sat Only
and FT-950 for HF only). I use a homebrew dipole that is actually for
40/80m but it tunes up on 10 meters just fine and works well for the uplink
on NO-84. I then use FLdigi to decode the PSK31 signals as FLDigi allows
multi-decoding for PSK31 which allows me to decode multiple signals in the
passband at once. And of course I use DopplerPSK for the generation and
correction of the PSK31 signal. Hope this helps. Unfortunately there is not
a lot of activity on the PSK31 transponder but I hope that changes with the
upcoming launch with Psat-2.
- Nick KE8AKW
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:20:09 -0400
From: Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??>
To: Ed Krome <e.krome@???????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-85 is still kicking...
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxUTWoYPo3_wEEWR3oRZM9nHA4fEwYpv8cPeVTxm+34oOA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
FYI, I got a response from Fabrice, author of SatSat suggesting that the
AMSAT URL might have changed. I told him what it was and asked how I could
help, but got no response. However, SatSat is now displaying AO-85 with no
problem so he must have fixed whatever was going on. Thanks Fabrice!
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??> wrote:
> I've had some contact with the SatSat author who said AO-85 comes from the
> AMSAT website (which is not too surprising since that's the only place it
> exists :) Trying to check with him about the exact URL he is using. I
> also don't know whether Satsat itself goes to the website or if he (or
> someone) assembles the info for the app somewhere else.
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:42 PM Burns Fisher <burns@??????.??> wrote:
>
>> I'll certainly write to the author, but Ed's comments about ISS Detector
>> makes be wonder if there is not some Keps source that both of these are
>> using that is the root cause. As I say, I checked the AMSAT keps (and I
>> thought that was the only source for AO-85) but if there is another place,
>> I'd like to known
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:38 PM Ed Krome <e.krome@???????.???> wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting. Doesn?t appear on ISS Detector either.
>>>
>>> Ed Krome K9EK
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> Ed Krome K9EK
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> > On Jun 7, 2019, at 6:15 PM, Mark L. Hammond via AMSAT-BB <
>>> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Burns, Please email the author and ask him to add it back! Same
>>> problem here
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Mark N8MH
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:36 PM Burns Fisher via AMSAT-BB <
>>> amsat-bb@?????.???>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I'm not sure if this has to do with AO-85 being off for so long, but
>>> does
>>> >> anyone else using the SatSat iPhone app to track satellites find that
>>> AO-85
>>> >> is listed but with no tracking info? I checked the AMSAT keps page
>>> and
>>> >> AO-85 is still there.
>>> >>
>>> >> 73,
>>> >>
>>> >> Burns, WB1FJ
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:20 AM Andrew Glasbrenner via AMSAT-BB <
>>> >> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> AO-85 was commanded on again about 1200Z this morning. Repeater is
>>> on,
>>> >> but
>>> >>> so far no DUV telemetry, so IHU must not be working. Also, repeater
>>> isn't
>>> >>> dropping between uplinks as it should in this mode. We left it on,
>>> feel
>>> >>> free
>>> >>> to use while you can. Reports too please!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 73, Drew KO4MA
>>> >>> AMSAT VP Operations
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>> >>> From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Andrew
>>> >>> Glasbrenner
>>> >>> via AMSAT-BB
>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 10:07 PM
>>> >>> To: amsat-bb@?????.???
>>> >>> Cc: ans-editor@?????.???
>>> >>> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-85 is still kicking...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Mark, N8MH and I did some testing tonight on AO-85 as it is almost
>>> back
>>> >> in
>>> >>> full sun. The transmitter and COR repeater came on, but not the
>>> >>> telemetry/IHU. Repeater sounded good but stayed keyed without an
>>> uplink
>>> >>> signal. We shut the transmitter back off since that was an unexpected
>>> >>> state.
>>> >>> We'll do some more testing tomorrow.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 73, Drew KO4MA
>>> >>>
>>> >>> AMSAT VP Operations
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>>> available to
>>> >>> all
>>> >>> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>>> >>> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>>> official
>>> >>> views of AMSAT-NA.
>>> >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> >> program!
>>> >>> Subscription settings:
>>> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
>>> available
>>> >>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> >> Opinions
>>> >>> expressed
>>> >>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>>> views of
>>> >>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> >>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> >> program!
>>> >>> Subscription settings:
>>> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> >>>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> >> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions
>>> >> expressed
>>> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of
>>> >> AMSAT-NA.
>>> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> >> Subscription settings:
>>> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>> >>
>>> > --
>>> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>> Opinions expressed
>>> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>> of AMSAT-NA.
>>> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>> program!
>>> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>>>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Bob Liddy (K8BL)" <k8bl@?????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna SWR question
Message-ID: <827698215.1282626.1560469192971@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Steve,
Theoretically, 2:1 would have you "losing" 11 percent ofyour TX power due to
reflection/mismatch. With your 4.9W,that would only be about 1/2 W. Doesn't
seem like much tobe worrying about.
Polarization should be more of a concern.
GL/73,? ? ?Bob? K8BL
On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 2:47:29 PM EDT, AI9IN via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
I've been having trouble getting into the FM satellites lately. It's the
same rig I've been using for a couple of years and I have not had
problems before. I bought a digital meter to measure power out from the
handhelds and to measure SWR on the antennas. According to the meter I'm
getting 4.9 W out of the handhelds, which is expected. For SWR I've got
values of 1.7 at 70 cm and 2.0 at 2 m. The antenna is an Arrow.
Are those acceptable SWR values? Should I try to get them lower? Can you
even adjust the tuning on an Arrow antenna?
Steve AI9IN
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:17:45 -0400
From: Matthew J Wolf <mwolf@?????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] OUTERnet becomes OTHERnet (APRS geo feed)
Message-ID: <04c75b86-6149-3084-23a8-eff513e4ce93@?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I gota Dreamcatcher Data Radiowhen they where on sale for $49. I can
confirm that you can replace the supplied USB WiFi NIC with the TP-Link
TL-UE3000 USB Ethernet NIC.
I have to use a Pringles can on the LNB to get a marginalsignal, SNR
-12.5 to -14 dB. Every time it rains I have to readjustthe LNB.
I have senta few test ARPS messages from N4MTT-2 via rf to a local
i-gate. The messages then were seen on the down link via a text file.
The Skylark operating system has a "Messages" application that displays
the text file.
APRS Link can display the history of the messages sent to OUTNET,
https://aprs.link/app/aprs/stations/messages-OUTNET
I noticed the messages I sent to OUTNET did not receive a REPLY ACK.
There where duplicate messages on the down link from another SSID. I
wanted to avoid sending duplicate messages. In Xastir I canceled the
messages after the first message transmission.
I agreethatit "is a powerful capability" .
-Matt, N4MTT
> Since about 2 years ago, the APRS satellite ground station captures have
> been made available worldwide via three GEO satellites for reception
> anywhere on earth.
>
> But I recently found that the OUTERnet system has changed to a new GEO
> satellite constellation and no longer uses INMARSAT L band satellites but
> is now using a KA band downlink over the USA. And that they are now
> selling a new receiver kit for this satellite.
> Has anyone kept up with them?
> Here is my original WEB page but with the links changed from OUTnet to
> OTHERnet:
> http://aprs.org/othernet.html
>
> If anyone has one of their receivers or is receiving the downlink and/or
> wants to help me get my web page all cleaned up to what has changed over
> the last two years, let me know.
>
> This is a powerful capability. I hope we can keep it working.
>
> Bob, Wb4APR
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:46:28 -0400
From: skristof@???????.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Antenna SWR question
Message-ID: <491cec625355832f9e20595af714475e@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Thank you to the folks who have helped me with this. My gear is working
fine so I guess I need to concentrate on my technique.
(That's never a bad idea anyway.)
Steve AI9IN
On 2019-06-13 2:47 pm, AI9IN via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> I've been having trouble getting into the FM satellites lately. It's the
> same rig I've been using for a couple of years and I have not had
> problems before. I bought a digital meter to measure power out from the
> handhelds and to measure SWR on the antennas. According to the meter I'm
> getting 4.9 W out of the handhelds, which is expected. For SWR I've got
> values of 1.7 at 70 cm and 2.0 at 2 m. The antenna is an Arrow.
>
> Are those acceptable SWR values? Should I try to get them lower? Can you
> even adjust the tuning on an Arrow antenna?
>
> Steve AI9IN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:28:15 +0000
From: <oguro-t@?????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-99(NEXUS Team) will QRV and Transponder on this
schedules
Message-ID:
<6A3D2D819930E74F8C963D18FCB366ED78B6C2BD@????????.???.????????.??.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Dear ALL
We FO-99(NEXUS Team) will QRV and Transponder on this schedules
This is Hamradio day DL.Please use FO-99 Transponder.
http://sat.aero.cst.nihon-u.ac.jp/nexus/
We will get house keeping data.and study naxt step operation.
Also QRV from HS (Thailand) QO-100 ,FO-29 ,If possble (IO-86) and the other
(We sent QO-100 grand station equipment to HS0AJ, They alrady QRV and so
many QSOs,
We like check equipment and meeting with member of RAST.
FO-99 >>??UTC +9 (JST) Thailand
19/06/22 22:21 113 22:24 5.5 22:27 38.1
<<Window to Kyusyu
*19/06/22 23:52 185.1 23:57 34 23:59 312.3
19/06/23 11:34 15.7 11:40 62.5 11:45 185.2 <<Window
to Kyusyu????
19/06/23 13:11 309.4 13:13 1.9 13:15 266.7
Friedrichshafen UCT +2
Day AOS LOS Max Elev
6/22 12:38:28 12:47:20 10.39
*6/23 12:16:59 12:26:57 16.81
* Not sure TRP on becouse of command transmite EL very small asn diffcalte
>From HS (Thailand) We will use HS10KING (It is celebration New KING station
call)
Also QRV to FO-29
FO-29 >> JST (UTC +9)
DATE?????AOS ((HS0AJ) MAX EL LOS(HS0AJ)
Date JST Az JST EL JST Az
19/06/22 19:11 346.4 19:18 18.1 19:24 232.2
19/06/23 5:03 147.3 5:12 41.7 5:22 0.6 <<Window to
JAPAN
19/06/23 6:49 197.8 6:57 26 7:06 326.1 <<Window to
JAPAN
19/06/23 16:32 52.2 16:38 7.9 16:43 135.6
19/06/23 18:15 7 18:23 65.7 18:31 200.1 <<Window to
JAPAN
19/06/23 20:04 315.3 20:07 1.9 20:10 275.6
Tnank You Regarding
Hoz_Ueda(JA0FKM/1) / JAMSAT
JG1KOE sent a message on behalf of Mr. Ueda.
JG1KOE@?????.???
?Tsunetaka?Oguro
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:38:50 -0700
From: christy hunter <cchunter3@??????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] space junk article _EOS
Message-ID: <29be8026-2fab-534d-d460-e6c59dd7bcfd@??????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
FYI
info on space junk and a report link.
https://eos.org/articles/space-is-polluted-by-junk-and-its-getting-worse?utm_s
ource=eos&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=EosBuzz061319
73 Christy KB6LTY
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:55:21 -0400
From: skristof@???????.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] PO-101?
Message-ID: <7480bca7bcb4bd364176fa510fc60b7b@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I'm curious about satellite PO-101. The IARU coordination page says the
uplink is 437.5 MHz but the Microsat-Diwata webpage says the uplink is
437.7 MHz. Which one is correct?
I don't see a lot of reports on the AMSAT Current Status page for
PO-101. Is it working?
Steve AI9IN
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:00:23 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: Steve Kristoff <skristof@???????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] PO-101?
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOp8HLHLeef+H6x+4MkLrx9MSN2bAHL5J_f5Uc9MhHkT5Q@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
437.5 MHz is the correct frequency.
The transponder is activated by schedule. Schedule updates are posted
on their Twitter account at https://twitter.com/Diwata2PH
It should be on for this afternoon's passes, so listen for it!
73,
Paul Stoetzer, N8HM
Executive Vice President - AMSAT
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:55 AM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
>
> I'm curious about satellite PO-101. The IARU coordination page says the
> uplink is 437.5 MHz but the Microsat-Diwata webpage says the uplink is
> 437.7 MHz. Which one is correct?
>
> I don't see a lot of reports on the AMSAT Current Status page for
> PO-101. Is it working?
>
> Steve AI9IN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:28:13 -0400
From: Scott <scott23192@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] XW-2D /-vs-/ ISS (... and everyone else)
Message-ID:
<CAJCSnObayVxvKcCjwDb9FbLd55SBMQpNbp9ZrHcoihJ=vKgnTQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hey everybody.
Just walked in this evening (14-June-2019) & happened to catch the ISS at
decent elevation around 2230 UTC. The packet digipeater sounded great and
I had a quick exchange of digipeated 'Message' packets with W4TBD who
happens to be just on the other side of town.
As the ISS tracked NW to SE, I stood by to see who else might be around. I
keep the FM radio's squelch open & volume up a little to judge how the
downlink packets are sounding.
All of a sudden, there was a dead carrier on (or at least near) the 145.825
ISS packet downlink. Sounded like a neighbor keying up to mess with me -
except for the fact that I don't have any neighbors.
I quickly spun another radio to the area of 145.825 and set it to USB to
see if I could recognize what that jamming carrier was. Turns out it
wasn't a dead carrier at all, but a tone sweeping back and forth. Someone
else needs to check me (since you can't ever be sure from a single
observation), but from the SUBJECT line of this post you know that the
offending tone appeared to be from XW-2D which was passing directly
overhead at the same time. Here is a link to a screen shot of their orbits
when this happened:
https://www.qsl.net/k/k4kdr//images/iss-xw2d.png
... so, if this VERY strong 2-meter signal was in fact from XW-2D, you
might want to keep track of where that satellite is located just as a point
of reference. There have been previous posts about XW-2D's transponder
not working correctly.
If you have uplink or downlink trouble with anything that operates in the
145.800 - 145.900 range, this might be the cause if I'm guessing correctly.
73,
-Scott, K4KDR
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 230
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
