| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 22.06.19 15:02l 881 Lines 32037 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14242
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 242
Path: IW8PGT<HB9ON<IW2OHX<IR1UAW<IK1NHL<CX2SA
Sent: 190622/1037Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:8471 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14242
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Operating with the THD-72 handheld (gw1fky@???.????
2. New release of G0KLA Tracker (Chris Thompson)
3. Lost in the Hertz Rove Plans (Kell Bodholt)
4. Re: Doppler adjustment proper procedure question (Ted Krempa)
5. Re: Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
(Dave Webb KB1PVH)
6. Re: Doppler adjustment proper procedure question (Greg D)
7. Re: Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
(Dave Webb KB1PVH)
8. Re: New release of G0KLA Tracker (Hasan al-Basri)
9. Re: New release of G0KLA Tracker (myles Landstein)
10. Re: New release of G0KLA Tracker (Hasan al-Basri)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:26:07 +0000 (UTC)
From: gw1fky@???.???
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Operating with the THD-72 handheld
Message-ID: <1289325904.129746.1561152367307@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi,Regarding the problems of operating with the THD-72 ( or other portable )
and avoiding the tangle of wires etc.Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK mentioned that he
has a "Bluetooth" speaker with a jack socket.
It is much easier to obtain a a " Bluetooth" audio transmitter and thus
avoid the need for any wires.? ?These transmitters are? reasonable cheap and
available from a number of well known sources.Simply plug the Blue tooth Tx
into? THD-72 audio jack and pair with the Bluetooth? speaker? - You
canadjust the THD-72 volume control to suit your conditions.The size of
these Bluetooth transmitters is sometimes smaller than an SDR dongle,? some
even have?a wired jack plug fitted.
I have used this method not? only for portable operation, but also for
demonstrations, It? made it much easier for those listening and myself of
course."WIRELESS" Hi Hi.
Ken EatonGW1FKY
PS.The method can be used with many other radios etc and I have used it to
set up my LNB/dish? ? ? to monitor QO-100 down link/? beacons and
operators.? (? An AOR receiver on 739 Mhz SSB )??
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:48:46 -0500
From: Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>
To: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] New release of G0KLA Tracker
Message-ID:
<CAJOf0+sUGi+Apaiw1LtQmcdugUXPn=Qc7gMRZs8wyksgXd_COQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I have released version 1.01a of the G0KLA Satellite tracker. I had hoped
to get it out further in advance of field day, but work pressures got in
the way. Anyway for those of you in the US, here it is the day before :)
This version has a few tweaks, most requested by users.
* Key display settings can be changed on the main window from a set of
icons bottom left. e.g. showing spacecraft in eclipse vs sun.
* You can display horizontal lines for 30 and 60 degrees.
* You can display horizontal lines for all labels on the vertical axis if
you want
* Time labels have a slightly more sensible gap between them, e.g. 15 mins,
vs a random amount that fit in the window like 13 mins
* Past mins can now be as short as 10 mins, though you can also specify a
long period if you want
The downloads are in the usual place here:
http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_windows.zip
http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_linux.tar.gz
http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_mac.tar.gz
73
Chris
g0kla / ac2cz
--
Chris E. Thompson
chrisethompson@?????.???
g0kla@????.???
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 23:42:58 +0000
From: Kell Bodholt <KBodholt@???????.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Cc: John Colville <jp_colville@?????.???>, Kell Bodholt
<KBodholt@???????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Lost in the Hertz Rove Plans
Message-ID: <D575B819-7AE7-4DB0-990E-055FD2C5D3E2@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Lost in the Hertz Rove, Sunday June 23, 2019, Kell (KI7UXT) and John
(KC7JPC) will rove to DN06/07/16/17 grid corner (plan A) or DN06/07 grid
line (plan B) and work FM satellites and if time/pass permits work a few
linear satellites. @?????? @?????. We plan on arriving at the corner by
18:00UTC and work the following passes:
SO-50 - 18:30:27Z KC7JPC
AO-92 - 18:32:42Z. KI7UXT
AO-91 - 19:31:47Z KC7JPC
AO-92 - 20:07:17Z KI7UXT
SO-50 - 20:12:45Z KC7JPC
PO-101 - 20:37:22Z KI7UXT
AO-91 - 21:10:04Z KC7JPC
SO-50 - 21:56:06Z KI7UXT
PO-101 - 22:12:46Z KC7JPC
SO-50 - 23:38:02Z KI7UXT
PO-101 - 23:49:51Z KC7JPC
SO-50 - 01:18:42Z KI7UXT
Regards,
Kell
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:34:05 -0700
From: "Ted Krempa" <k7trkradio@???????.???>
To: "'Dave Webb KB1PVH'" <kb1pvh@?????.???>, "AMSAT BB"
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
Message-ID: <000001d52892$32e78e70$98b6ab50$@???????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Just curious....instead of irrational bashing of ARRL (which looks after ALL
ham radio interests, including minor niche groups like sat operators) , why
can't the answer simply be to adjust either the up or down frequency? The
'computer control' has nothing to do with it, no?
73, K7TRK
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Dave Webb
KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:12 PM
To: AMSAT -BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
The ARRL can't even get frequencies correct so it's no surprise they are
wrong about which frequency to adjust.
If you aren't using computer control to be able to adjust uplink and
downlink you adjust the higher of the two frequencies.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S9
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 3:05 PM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> On the official ARRL VHF/UHF info sheet
> (
>
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20
Rev%20A.pdf
> )
> they suggest that for satellite QSOs operators should only adjust their
> receive frequency regardless of whether it is VHF or UHF. I thought
> standard procedure was to adjust the higher frequency whether it is
> transmit or receive.
>
> Steve AI9IN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:58:50 -0400
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???>
To: AMSAT -BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
Message-ID:
<CAEMY9FdJ+XiCPoKLa+txj4MMqb-N+fTX_BCVbYNPO_--w+A86A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Because I find it extremely laughable that they are supposed to be the
Grand Wizard of all Ham Radio and they can't give correct info on
satellites, but I'm supposed to rely on them to defend my interests in
radio?
I understand satellites are a small niche, but come on...if you don't know
what you are talking about just point people to AMSAT. It was noted a
couple weeks ago on one of their posts that info was incorrect but
apparently they didn't feel the need to correct it.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S9
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 8:34 PM Ted Krempa <k7trkradio@???????.???> wrote:
> Just curious....instead of irrational bashing of ARRL (which looks after
> ALL
> ham radio interests, including minor niche groups like sat operators) , why
> can't the answer simply be to adjust either the up or down frequency? The
> 'computer control' has nothing to do with it, no?
>
> 73, K7TRK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Dave Webb
> KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:12 PM
> To: AMSAT -BB
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
>
> The ARRL can't even get frequencies correct so it's no surprise they are
> wrong about which frequency to adjust.
>
> If you aren't using computer control to be able to adjust uplink and
> downlink you adjust the higher of the two frequencies.
>
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S9
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 3:05 PM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> wrote:
>
> > On the official ARRL VHF/UHF info sheet
> > (
> >
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20
> Rev%20A.pdf
>
<http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20R
ev%20A.pdf>
> > )
> > they suggest that for satellite QSOs operators should only adjust their
> > receive frequency regardless of whether it is VHF or UHF. I thought
> > standard procedure was to adjust the higher frequency whether it is
> > transmit or receive.
> >
> > Steve AI9IN
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:09:08 -0700
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@?????.???>
To: Ted Krempa <k7trkradio@???????.???>, 'Dave Webb KB1PVH'
<kb1pvh@?????.???>, AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
Message-ID: <99a2e1dd-1efb-5d82-98f2-aad234a6652b@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
No. There's a 3x difference in Doppler between 2m and 70cm. Adjusting
(correcting for) the higher one does a 3x better job at maintaining a
constant position with the satellite transponder's passband (which is
the objective) than messing with the lower one, but neither is perfect.
Best is computer controlling both radios, since both up and downlinks
are affected by Doppler.
Because of this, it's not simply an administrative decision. Physics
can't be legislated.
Greg KO6TH
Ted Krempa via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> Just curious....instead of irrational bashing of ARRL (which looks after ALL
> ham radio interests, including minor niche groups like sat operators) , why
> can't the answer simply be to adjust either the up or down frequency? The
> 'computer control' has nothing to do with it, no?
>
> 73, K7TRK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Dave Webb
> KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:12 PM
> To: AMSAT -BB
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
>
> The ARRL can't even get frequencies correct so it's no surprise they are
> wrong about which frequency to adjust.
>
> If you aren't using computer control to be able to adjust uplink and
> downlink you adjust the higher of the two frequencies.
>
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S9
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 3:05 PM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> On the official ARRL VHF/UHF info sheet
>> (
>>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20
> Rev%20A.pdf
>> )
>> they suggest that for satellite QSOs operators should only adjust their
>> receive frequency regardless of whether it is VHF or UHF. I thought
>> standard procedure was to adjust the higher frequency whether it is
>> transmit or receive.
>>
>> Steve AI9IN
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:07:37 -0400
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???>
To: AMSAT -BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
Message-ID:
<CAEMY9FdahyQQ_GTh+RkQCvAgVHrMCYfGrzwo2VF3+TYzCEm=iw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Ted,
Let this 'no code General' help you with satellite info.
https://www.amsat.org/fm-satellite-frequency-summary/
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/fm-satellite-frequency-sum
mary/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254160994000&usg=AFQjCNG7dWjgtEyOweXCkqAkI9
e64cZGfQ>
https://www.amsat.org/linear-satellite-frequency-summary/
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/linear-satellite-frequency
-summary/&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1561254346840000&usg=AFQjCNGewg2AStA8hSG9Us
lnv_YsG2iSvQ>
https://www.amsat.org/two-way-satellites/
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amsat.org/two-way-satellites/&sa=D&s
ource=hangouts&ust=1561254361232000&usg=AFQjCNELoQFI1Og3TAUwqD5zFWe9rRxsMA>
You can love the ARRL all you want, it's OK. I personally feel that no info
is better than wrong info. And in full disclaimer, I haven't been an AMSAT
member or ARRL member for some time because I didn't agree with things, but
yet I contribute and try to help those that have operating questions. At
least I'm not on an ARRL BB complaining about them and not a member. Gotta
go now and try keeping that horse stuff in the stalls.
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S9
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 9:34 PM Ted Krempa <k7trkradio@???????.???> wrote:
> And yet the AMSAT US web page does NOT have a current list of ALL amateur
> sats (aka, known as 'updating a web page' to us 'no code Generals'), NOR a
> current set of numbers for sats that is updated weekly (aka, known as
> 'updating a web page' to us 'no code Generals').
>
> ARRL has its faults but they are light years ahead of AMSAT US when it
> comes
> to protecting your ability to generate RF on the ham bands, satellite or
> otherwise. I'll give my 40 bucks to ARRL long before I give it to some POB
> in Maryland.
>
> Keep the stuff in your horse stalls there, Dave. Don't peddle it here
>
> 73, K7TRK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Dave Webb
> KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 5:59 PM
> To: AMSAT -BB
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
>
> Because I find it extremely laughable that they are supposed to be the
> Grand Wizard of all Ham Radio and they can't give correct info on
> satellites, but I'm supposed to rely on them to defend my interests in
> radio?
>
> I understand satellites are a small niche, but come on...if you don't know
> what you are talking about just point people to AMSAT. It was noted a
> couple weeks ago on one of their posts that info was incorrect but
> apparently they didn't feel the need to correct it.
>
>
>
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S9
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 8:34 PM Ted Krempa <k7trkradio@???????.???> wrote:
>
> > Just curious....instead of irrational bashing of ARRL (which looks after
> > ALL
> > ham radio interests, including minor niche groups like sat operators) ,
> why
> > can't the answer simply be to adjust either the up or down frequency? The
> > 'computer control' has nothing to do with it, no?
> >
> > 73, K7TRK
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Dave
> Webb
> > KB1PVH via AMSAT-BB
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 12:12 PM
> > To: AMSAT -BB
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Doppler adjustment proper procedure question
> >
> > The ARRL can't even get frequencies correct so it's no surprise they are
> > wrong about which frequency to adjust.
> >
> > If you aren't using computer control to be able to adjust uplink and
> > downlink you adjust the higher of the two frequencies.
> >
> > Dave-KB1PVH
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Galaxy S9
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 3:05 PM AI9IN via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On the official ARRL VHF/UHF info sheet
> > > (
> > >
> >
> >
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20
> > Rev%20A.pdf
> >
> <
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%2
> 0Rev%20A.pdf
>
<http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Field-Day/2019/2019%20Above%2030%20MHz%20-%20R
ev%20A.pdf>
> >
> > > )
> > > they suggest that for satellite QSOs operators should only adjust
> their
> > > receive frequency regardless of whether it is VHF or UHF. I thought
> > > standard procedure was to adjust the higher frequency whether it is
> > > transmit or receive.
> > >
> > > Steve AI9IN
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions
> > > expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 05:07:53 -0500
From: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
To: Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>
Cc: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New release of G0KLA Tracker
Message-ID:
<CAM4UQf2o3QR8wpGEc1kPMOVsf-gdFki4Taue1UrBWxcYtcQaLA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Running nicely Chris, one of my most used programs, thanks so much for your
efforts. I am very active on the SSB/CW birds and it makes catching passes
very easy.
Some day when you want to go completely nuts, build in an audio notifier
selectable by satellite, perhps 3 min to AOS have it make a distinctive
sound to alert, it's time to sit back down!
I would suggest it be tied to the list of sats, currently being "tracked",
but with a selection or subset of audio notifications within the full list
of stations already marked for tracking.
Example: I Track CAS-4A, 4B, XW-2A, 2B, 2C, 2F and also, AO-73, JO-97,
EO-88 (for telemetry) and AO-91 and AO-92 for both TLM and Voice.
I would like to be "audio notified" for only AO-91 and AO-92 (until I
change this setting again). The ability to select out of the main tracking
list I use, a subset to be notified about would be quite nice.
...just an idea , the program is great the way it is.
73, and thanks again. N0AN
Hasan
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:50 PM Chris Thompson via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> I have released version 1.01a of the G0KLA Satellite tracker. I had hoped
> to get it out further in advance of field day, but work pressures got in
> the way. Anyway for those of you in the US, here it is the day before :)
>
> This version has a few tweaks, most requested by users.
> * Key display settings can be changed on the main window from a set of
> icons bottom left. e.g. showing spacecraft in eclipse vs sun.
> * You can display horizontal lines for 30 and 60 degrees.
> * You can display horizontal lines for all labels on the vertical axis if
> you want
> * Time labels have a slightly more sensible gap between them, e.g. 15 mins,
> vs a random amount that fit in the window like 13 mins
> * Past mins can now be as short as 10 mins, though you can also specify a
> long period if you want
>
> The downloads are in the usual place here:
> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_windows.zip
> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_linux.tar.gz
> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_mac.tar.gz
>
> 73
> Chris
> g0kla / ac2cz
>
> --
> Chris E. Thompson
> chrisethompson@?????.???
> g0kla@????.???
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 06:16:17 -0400
From: myles Landstein <myles.landstein@?????.???>
To: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
Cc: Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>, AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New release of G0KLA Tracker
Message-ID: <E4EACAAB-A8F7-4E9E-8BB0-EB712EECB7B4@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I think they have that , maclogger?/macdoppler can be set to do voice
alerts upon a selected sat ..
you can check it out via dogparksoftware
myles Landstein
myles.landstein@?????.???
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 6:07 AM, Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> Running nicely Chris, one of my most used programs, thanks so much for your
> efforts. I am very active on the SSB/CW birds and it makes catching passes
> very easy.
>
> Some day when you want to go completely nuts, build in an audio notifier
> selectable by satellite, perhps 3 min to AOS have it make a distinctive
> sound to alert, it's time to sit back down!
>
> I would suggest it be tied to the list of sats, currently being "tracked",
> but with a selection or subset of audio notifications within the full list
> of stations already marked for tracking.
>
> Example: I Track CAS-4A, 4B, XW-2A, 2B, 2C, 2F and also, AO-73, JO-97,
> EO-88 (for telemetry) and AO-91 and AO-92 for both TLM and Voice.
>
> I would like to be "audio notified" for only AO-91 and AO-92 (until I
> change this setting again). The ability to select out of the main tracking
> list I use, a subset to be notified about would be quite nice.
>
> ...just an idea , the program is great the way it is.
>
> 73, and thanks again. N0AN
> Hasan
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:50 PM Chris Thompson via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> I have released version 1.01a of the G0KLA Satellite tracker. I had hoped
>> to get it out further in advance of field day, but work pressures got in
>> the way. Anyway for those of you in the US, here it is the day before :)
>>
>> This version has a few tweaks, most requested by users.
>> * Key display settings can be changed on the main window from a set of
>> icons bottom left. e.g. showing spacecraft in eclipse vs sun.
>> * You can display horizontal lines for 30 and 60 degrees.
>> * You can display horizontal lines for all labels on the vertical axis if
>> you want
>> * Time labels have a slightly more sensible gap between them, e.g. 15 mins,
>> vs a random amount that fit in the window like 13 mins
>> * Past mins can now be as short as 10 mins, though you can also specify a
>> long period if you want
>>
>> The downloads are in the usual place here:
>> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_windows.zip
>> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_linux.tar.gz
>> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_mac.tar.gz
>>
>> 73
>> Chris
>> g0kla / ac2cz
>>
>> --
>> Chris E. Thompson
>> chrisethompson@?????.???
>> g0kla@????.???
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 05:33:06 -0500
From: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
To: myles Landstein <myles.landstein@?????.???>
Cc: Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>, AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New release of G0KLA Tracker
Message-ID:
<CAM4UQf21RypocO_NUCw=_ZUO0VUE-+NeL06hMMWEHr-W7=DrVg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi Myles
I want GLA tracker to do this, not another program. SDRC already does it
and I run it to both Rx and Tx with external radio.
GLA Tracker is a neat little utility program that is not resource
intensive. It already does most of what is needed. Adding audio alert
(voice not needed), would be a big plus. 73, N0AN
Hasan
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 5:16 AM myles Landstein <myles.landstein@?????.???>
wrote:
> I think they have that , maclogger?/macdoppler can be set to do voice
> alerts upon a selected sat ..
>
> you can check it out via dogparksoftware
>
>
> myles Landstein
> myles.landstein@?????.???
>
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 6:07 AM, Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> Running nicely Chris, one of my most used programs, thanks so much for your
> efforts. I am very active on the SSB/CW birds and it makes catching passes
> very easy.
>
> Some day when you want to go completely nuts, build in an audio notifier
> selectable by satellite, perhps 3 min to AOS have it make a distinctive
> sound to alert, it's time to sit back down!
>
> I would suggest it be tied to the list of sats, currently being "tracked",
> but with a selection or subset of audio notifications within the full list
> of stations already marked for tracking.
>
> Example: I Track CAS-4A, 4B, XW-2A, 2B, 2C, 2F and also, AO-73, JO-97,
> EO-88 (for telemetry) and AO-91 and AO-92 for both TLM and Voice.
>
> I would like to be "audio notified" for only AO-91 and AO-92 (until I
> change this setting again). The ability to select out of the main tracking
> list I use, a subset to be notified about would be quite nice.
>
> ...just an idea , the program is great the way it is.
>
> 73, and thanks again. N0AN
> Hasan
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:50 PM Chris Thompson via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> I have released version 1.01a of the G0KLA Satellite tracker. I had hoped
> to get it out further in advance of field day, but work pressures got in
> the way. Anyway for those of you in the US, here it is the day before :)
>
> This version has a few tweaks, most requested by users.
> * Key display settings can be changed on the main window from a set of
> icons bottom left. e.g. showing spacecraft in eclipse vs sun.
> * You can display horizontal lines for 30 and 60 degrees.
> * You can display horizontal lines for all labels on the vertical axis if
> you want
> * Time labels have a slightly more sensible gap between them, e.g. 15 mins,
> vs a random amount that fit in the window like 13 mins
> * Past mins can now be as short as 10 mins, though you can also specify a
> long period if you want
>
> The downloads are in the usual place here:
> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_windows.zip
> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_linux.tar.gz
> http://www.g0kla.com/klatrack/KlaTrack_1.01a_mac.tar.gz
>
> 73
> Chris
> g0kla / ac2cz
>
> --
> Chris E. Thompson
> chrisethompson@?????.???
> g0kla@????.???
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 242
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
