| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 07.11.19 21:43l 763 Lines 25570 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB14402
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V14 402
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 191107/1942Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:17793 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB14402
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (Hasan al-Basri)
2. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (Paul Stoetzer)
3. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (Dave Webb KB1PVH)
4. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (Hasan al-Basri)
5. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (jim@?????.????
6. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (simon@?????????.????
7. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (Paul Stoetzer)
8. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (jim@?????.????
9. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (Zach Metzinger)
10. Re: D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink (M5AKA)
11. SATPC32 >12 sats (Keith E. Brandt, WD9GET)
12. Re: SATPC32 >12 sats (Alan)
13. Re: SATPC32 >12 sats (John Kludt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:57:24 -0600
From: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID:
<CAM4UQf1UF8otocwLUFhnVQ9mRUKfq+nYFBS+Sg9CxRL7huLipg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
(simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a
shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
Trustee?
73, N0AN
Hasan
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:02:47 -0500
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOrB6gCyVJmksPaHf6xMLQDL4DSey1r1Wd39YvDDCS+AeQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
XW-2A is the offender here as it operates outside the 200 kHz
allocated in the bandplan for satellites, so there isn't any recourse.
The satellite portion of the bandplan is 145.800 - 146.000 MHz (though
amateur satellite transmissions are legal from 144 MHz - 146 MHz).
Note that the Texas VHF-FM Society Bandplan establishes 145.500 MHz -
145.800 MHz for simplex or experimental use
(http://www.txvhffm.org/coordination/bandplan.php)
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:58 AM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
> https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
>
> It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
>
> Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
> (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
>
> Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a
> shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
> with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
> Trustee?
>
> 73, N0AN
>
> Hasan
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:07:19 -0500
From: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???>
To: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT -BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID:
<CAEMY9Fc8B6H81F-uvVnEB-opRzqfKqi2psup1HFBhrpzD11bnw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
145.67 is in the Miscellaneous and experimental section not the satellite
sub band. You can thank the Chinese for not using the satellite sub band.
See here http://www.arrl.org/band-plan
145.50-145.80 Miscellaneous and experimental modes
145.80-146.00 OSCAR subband
Dave-KB1PVH
Sent from my Galaxy S9
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 11:00 AM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
> https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
>
> It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
>
> Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
> (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
>
> Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a
> shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
> with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
> Trustee?
>
> 73, N0AN
>
> Hasan
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:17:39 -0600
From: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
To: Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT -BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID:
<CAM4UQf1ABSLfzYd55MVScHKOUC5sgWDfHeYCA68eDoU02O4Sig@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Thank to all for the good info.
Pity the Chinese did not follow best practice.
Appreciate the info very much!
73, N0AN
Hasan
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???> wrote:
> 145.67 is in the Miscellaneous and experimental section not the satellite
> sub band. You can thank the Chinese for not using the satellite sub band.
>
>
> See here http://www.arrl.org/band-plan
>
> 145.50-145.80 Miscellaneous and experimental modes
> 145.80-146.00 OSCAR subband
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S9
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 11:00 AM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
>> https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
>>
>> It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
>>
>> Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
>> (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
>>
>> Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this
>> a
>> shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
>> with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
>> Trustee?
>>
>> 73, N0AN
>>
>> Hasan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:20:17 -0800 (PST)
From: "jim@?????.???? <jim@?????.???>
To: "Hasan al-Basri" <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID: <1573143617.366620896@????.?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Forget about the ARRL bandplan, it's the FCC rules that matter.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 47 Part 97.205b:
"A repeater may receive and re-transmit only on the 10m and shorter
wavelength frequency bands except the 28.0?29.5 MHz, 50.0?51.0 MHz,
144.0?144.5 MHz, 145.5?146.0 MHz, 222.00?222.15 MHz, 431.0?433.0 Mhz
and 435.0?438.0 Mhz segments. "
So, 145.670 is flat out illegal for a repeater input or output.
Jim Walls
K6CCC
-----Original Message-----
From: "Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 07:57
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
(simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a
shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
Trustee?
73, N0AN
Hasan
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:23:29 -0000
From: <simon@?????????.???>
To: "'AMSAT-BB'" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID: <06e501d59587$b13a01b0$13ae0510$@?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Another Chinese satellite interferes with GB3NC here in Cornwall.
Simon Brown, G4ELI
https://www.sdr-radio.com
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Dave Webb KB1PVH
via AMSAT-BB
Sent: 07 November 2019 16:07
To: Hasan al-Basri <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT -BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
145.67 is in the Miscellaneous and experimental section not the satellite
sub band. You can thank the Chinese for not using the satellite sub band.
See here http://www.arrl.org/band-plan
145.50-145.80 Miscellaneous and experimental modes
145.80-146.00 OSCAR subband
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:27:53 -0500
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@????.???>
To: "jim@?????.???? <jim@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOrWBx+08MTK0H24eg=QCqHDT-V7ZQhO4-daoG5NjT3F-Q@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
This is not a repeater station, it's more like a packet node, and is
appropriately located within the bandplan as an experimental activity.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:24 AM jim--- via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
>
> Forget about the ARRL bandplan, it's the FCC rules that matter.
>
> Code of Federal Regulations Title 47 Part 97.205b:
> "A repeater may receive and re-transmit only on the 10m and shorter
> wavelength frequency bands except the 28.0?29.5 MHz, 50.0?51.0 MHz,
> 144.0?144.5 MHz, 145.5?146.0 MHz, 222.00?222.15 MHz, 431.0?433.0 Mhz
> and 435.0?438.0 Mhz segments. "
>
> So, 145.670 is flat out illegal for a repeater input or output.
>
> Jim Walls
> K6CCC
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 07:57
> To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
>
> There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
> https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
>
> It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
>
> Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
> (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
>
> Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a
> shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
> with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
> Trustee?
>
> 73, N0AN
>
> Hasan
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 08:43:39 -0800 (PST)
From: "jim@?????.???? <jim@?????.???>
To: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID: <1573145019.793823643@????.?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Ah, you are right. Looking at the link, it is NOT a D-Star repeater as
originally reported.
Jim
K6CCC
-----Original Message-----
From: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@????.???>
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 08:27
To: "jim@?????.???? <jim@?????.???>
Cc: "Hasan al-Basri" <hbasri.schiers6@?????.???>, "AMSAT-BB"
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
This is not a repeater station, it's more like a packet node, and is
appropriately located within the bandplan as an experimental activity.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:24 AM jim--- via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
>
> Forget about the ARRL bandplan, it's the FCC rules that matter.
>
> Code of Federal Regulations Title 47 Part 97.205b:
> "A repeater may receive and re-transmit only on the 10m and shorter
> wavelength frequency bands except the 28.0?29.5 MHz, 50.0?51.0 MHz,
> 144.0?144.5 MHz, 145.5?146.0 MHz, 222.00?222.15 MHz, 431.0?433.0 Mhz
> and 435.0?438.0 Mhz segments. "
>
> So, 145.670 is flat out illegal for a repeater input or output.
>
> Jim Walls
> K6CCC
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 07:57
> To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
>
> There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
> https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
>
> It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
>
> Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
> (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
>
> Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this a
> shared resource with D-Star? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
> with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
> Trustee?
>
> 73, N0AN
>
> Hasan
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:01:13 -0600
From: Zach Metzinger <zmetzing@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID: <055fe1d2-7b67-145b-4459-fade41b7ed90@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 2019-11-07 10:27, Paul Stoetzer via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> This is not a repeater station, it's more like a packet node, and is
> appropriately located within the bandplan as an experimental activity.
Seems like that might be more appropriately located at 145.01 - 145.09,
but band plans aren't law.
Perhaps, if someone notified him/her, he/she might move the node.
--- Zach
N0ZGO
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:05:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@?????.??.??>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] D-Star Interference to XW-2A Downlink
Message-ID: <1923673491.618268.1573146352174@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Before casting blame it's worth remembering that these satellites fully
conformed to the then IARU Region 3 band plan.
When the problem with the IARU Region 3 band plan came to light the Chinese
Radio Sports Association (CRSA) / Chinese Radio Amateur Club (CRAC) proposed
an Action on the IARU Administrative Council in 2015 to make accurate band
plan information available, see
https://amsat-uk.org/2015/10/21/iaru-region-3-conference/
IARU Region 3 have subsequently revised their band plan to specify the IARU
agreed 145.800-146.000 MHz satellite allocation, although I can't see the
144.000-144.025 MHz IARU satellite allocation on IARU R-3's latest band plan
issued September 2019, see?
http://www.iaru-r3.org/newsite/wp-content/files/R3-004%20IARU%20Region%203%20B
andplan%20rev.2.pdf
The two satellite allocations are better shown on the IARU Region 2 band
plan at
https://www.iaru-r2.org/documents/explorer/files/Plan%20de%20bandas%20%7C%20Ba
nd-plan/R2%20Band%20Plan%202016.pdf
73 Trevor M5AKA
On Thursday, 7 November 2019, 16:23:19 GMT, Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Thank to all for the good info.
Pity the Chinese did not follow best practice.
Appreciate the info very much!
73, N0AN
Hasan
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dave Webb KB1PVH <kb1pvh@?????.???> wrote:
> 145.67 is in the Miscellaneous and experimental section not the satellite
> sub band. You can thank the Chinese for not using the satellite sub band.
>
>
> See here http://www.arrl.org/band-plan
>
> 145.50-145.80 Miscellaneous and experimental modes
> 145.80-146.00 OSCAR subband
> Dave-KB1PVH
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy S9
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 11:00 AM Hasan al-Basri via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> There is a repeater on 145.670 (D-Star) in the Dallas area
>> https://w5fc.org/tag/fsq/
>>
>> It makes using XW-2A nearly impossible as it is right in the passband.
>>
>> Who in the world thought it was a good idea to put a D-STAR repeater
>> (simplex) in the middle of a satellite downlink passband?
>>
>> Does this comply with any existing ARRL Band Plan, on other words is this
>> a
>> shared resource with D-Star?? If so, I guess it's just tough luck and live
>> with it. If not, perhaps someone from AMSAT can have a word with the
>> Trustee?
>>
>> 73, N0AN
>>
>> Hasan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:12:41 -0600
From: "Keith E. Brandt, WD9GET" <wd9get@?????.???>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SATPC32 >12 sats
Message-ID:
<CADPg105BtQJMumiO8kKC0HyDBL7+fcUwm4cajV7QWU28CZJ5gQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I noticed at our club station that SATPC32 has the capability of
displaying >12 satellites and the list (A - whatever) is along the bottom.
However, my load of the program at home still has only 12 (A - L) with the
letter designation in the lower right corner. Both systems are running
12.8d.
Does anyone have any insight as to why mine is limiting the number of sats?
Is there a setting hidden somewhere, is it a newer build, or do I need to
wipe and re-install?
73, Keith
Keith E Brandt, WD9GET
*This message transmitted with 100% recycled DHMO-free electrons
xb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:27:01 -0600
From: "Alan" <wa4sca@?????.???>
To: "'Keith E. Brandt, WD9GET'" <wd9get@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SATPC32 >12 sats
Message-ID: <000901d595a1$54cef420$fe6cdc60$@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You have an older version, even though they are both 12.8d. Get the version
dated 16 June. Follow the update instructions, and you will be all set.
73,
Alan
WA4SCA
<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of Keith
<E. Brandt, WD9GET via AMSAT-BB
<Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 13:13 PM
<To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
<Subject: [amsat-bb] SATPC32 >12 sats
<
< I noticed at our club station that SATPC32 has the capability of
<displaying >12 satellites and the list (A - whatever) is along the bottom.
<However, my load of the program at home still has only 12 (A - L) with the
<letter designation in the lower right corner. Both systems are running
<12.8d.
<Does anyone have any insight as to why mine is limiting the number of sats?
<Is there a setting hidden somewhere, is it a newer build, or do I need to
<wipe and re-install?
<
<73, Keith
<
<Keith E Brandt, WD9GET
<*This message transmitted with 100% recycled DHMO-free electrons
<xb
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-
<NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
<program!
<Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:33:47 -0500
From: John Kludt <johnnykludt@?????.???>
To: "Keith E. Brandt, WD9GET" <wd9get@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SATPC32 >12 sats
Message-ID:
<CABsMmtQf1uVG=yEiHwMyLirVOSU5m=B1rpAhCiFQEf-qvRvwyw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Keith,
Look at your version. The current version is v12.8d and it has a lot of
neat features. Unless you have upgraded you may be on an earlier version.
John
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:16 PM Keith E. Brandt, WD9GET via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> I noticed at our club station that SATPC32 has the capability of
> displaying >12 satellites and the list (A - whatever) is along the bottom.
> However, my load of the program at home still has only 12 (A - L) with the
> letter designation in the lower right corner. Both systems are running
> 12.8d.
> Does anyone have any insight as to why mine is limiting the number of sats?
> Is there a setting hidden somewhere, is it a newer build, or do I need to
> wipe and re-install?
>
> 73, Keith
>
> Keith E Brandt, WD9GET
> *This message transmitted with 100% recycled DHMO-free electrons
> xb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 14, Issue 402
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
