OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   10.03.20 16:45l 887 Lines 29753 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB1576
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V15 76
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IR1UAW<I0OJJ<N6RME<CX2SA
Sent: 200310/1444Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:26518 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB1576
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. FOX LEADERBOARD (James Jipping)
   2. Re: FW: HuskySat telemetry (Joe Pereira)
   3. Re: FOX LEADERBOARD (Alan)
   4. New operator on uplink power (Michael Walker)
   5. Re: HuskySat telemetry (Chris Thompson)
   6. Get SatPC32 back to center (Tom Schaefer)
   7. Re: New operator on uplink power (Mike Wilhelm)
   8. Re: Get SatPC32 back to center (Stephen  E. Belter)
   9. Re: New operator on uplink power (Michael Walker)
  10. Re: Get SatPC32 back to center (Michael Walker)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:42:22 -0400
From: James Jipping <jhjipping@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] FOX LEADERBOARD
Message-ID: <bce2988c-64b2-26cf-2e20-a6f3bc781e71@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Good Morning!
 ?What do the headings "TOTAL"? and "LAST 7 DAYS" mean on the FOX TELEM
LEADERBOARD.? "LAST 7 DAYS" is obvious.? My numbers keep bouncing
around,? that's expected.?? But, NOW, ? my? "TOTAL" number bounces
around too.? Shouldn't they be constantly increasing.? Also at the end
of? February I had number about 12500 after several months of ever
increasing numbers.? But on March 3, I had only 8600 and they have been
bouncing ever since. On March 10 I have 8533 after 1845 frames/payloads.

In March, thanks to the kind and expert help of Burns Fisher, WB1FJ, I
started using a FIAB setup.?? Does that have anything to do the drop and
bounce ??

Thanks, I'm going back to bed.
Jim JIpping, W8MRR


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:26:15 +1030
From: Joe Pereira <joevk5ei@?????.???>
To: "KERRY LA*DUKE" <kladuke1144@???.???>
Cc: Burns Fisher via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FW: HuskySat telemetry
Message-ID:
<CAEW3Gk+Qx74EsUvASGMWNY4cesKUD=HD5a8KztTTT7U23F+Diw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Certainly something wrong with the Fox server receiving HuskySat-1 "live"
data

I just received and uploaded 65 frames and the Leaderboard did not update
at all ??

Its been like this for a few days now.

73


On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:21 AM KERRY LA*DUKE via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> Burns,
>
>        I mistakenly said fsk packets.  Its psk packets for HuskySat that
> are not incrimenting.
>
> 73
> WC7V
> Kerry
> ________________________________
> From: KERRY LA*DUKE <kladuke1144@???.???>
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 12:20 PM
> To: Burns Fisher via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FW: HuskySat telemetry
>
> correct screen shot
>
> 73
> WC7V
> Kerry
> ________________________________
> From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> on behalf of Burns Fisher via
> AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 12:08 PM
> To: kb2mjeff@???.??? <kb2m@????.???>; Jeff <kb2mjeff@???.???>
> Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FW: HuskySat telemetry
>
> Ok, I understand:  Time change not an issue.  Computer clock not an issue.
> Other birds besides HuskySat not an issue. HuskySat is a special case
> because of a workaround in FoxTelem for the way that the time works on
> HS-1.
>
> But please do let us know just what is the symptom?  Are your packets from
> HuskySat not showing up on the leaderboard?  Also, what is the latest time
> (Realtime: resets/seconds) shown for HuskySat on your system? What is the
> Groundstation name that you are using (in FoxTelem preferences)?  The
> latter is so Chris can look up the packets you have sent in if we can't
> figure it out otherwise.
>
> Thanks and 73,
>
> Burns WB1FJ
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 1:28 PM Jeff via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> wrote:
>
> > My PC clock is set by a time derived GPS setup. Right now I?m seeing a
> > major -1.106 Millisecond error ? Also when I install the update I delete
> > the old directory completely and run from the new fresh install
> directory,
> > I.E. FoxTelem_1.08z5_windows
> >
> > Also worth mentioning is I?m having no issues  uploading data to the rest
> > of the Fox telemetry birds. Also FT8 is working?
> >
> >
> >
> > 73 Jeff kb2m
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@?????.??? <mailto:
> > marklhammond@?????.???> >
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:03
> > To: KERRY LA*DUKE <kladuke1144@???.??? <mailto:kladuke1144@???.???> >;
> > jeff <kb2mjeff@???.??? <mailto:kb2mjeff@???.???> >; Alan <
> wa4sca@?????.???
> > <mailto:wa4sca@?????.???> >; Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.??? <mailto:
> > g0kla@????.???> >
> > Cc: Mark L. Hammond via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:
> > amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HuskySat telemetry
> >
> >
> >
> > Oh, another thought---there was more than just a .jar update at some
> > point.  I suggest backing up first ;) then try removing HuskSat-1 from
> > FoxTLM, then adding it back....should catch the other files.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:59 AM Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@?????.???
> > <mailto:marklhammond@?????.???> > wrote:
> >
> > Kerry and Jeff,
> >
> >
> >
> > Totally guessing here---Are your clocks accurate?    I think it ignores
> > frames based on that.    Chris will have to weigh in here, I don't
> know...
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark N8MH
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:26 AM KERRY LA*DUKE via AMSAT-BB <
> > amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> > wrote:
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> >         Having same problem here with data for HuskySat.  Updated to
> > latest version yesterday but still not seeing my data reflected on
> leaders
> > board.
> >
> > 73
> > WC7V
> > Kerry
> > ________________________________
> > From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.??? <mailto:
> > amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> > on behalf of Mark L. Hammond via AMSAT-BB
> <
> > amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 8:38 AM
> > To: kb2mjeff@???.??? <mailto:kb2mjeff@???.???>  <kb2m@????.??? <mailto:
> > kb2m@????.???> >; Jeff <kb2mjeff@???.??? <mailto:kb2mjeff@???.???> >
> > Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HuskySat telemetry
> >
> > Jeff, only guessing here---are you running latest FoxTLM release?  I'd
> > update that first and see if that fixes it.  Currently 1.08z5
> >
> > http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/
> >
> > Mark N8MH
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:25 AM Jeff via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???
> > <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've been collecting HuskySat-1 telemetry  for a while and recently my
> > > collected data isn't being accepted  by the Fox Telemetry site. I see
> > this
> > > 'Only real time data being processed' message the the Fox Telemetry
> site,
> > > but see 4 or 5 other stations getting their data uploaded.  Does anyone
> > > know
> > > what's going on here? As my, others data isn't being accepted I see no
> > > reason to collect any more data.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 73 Jeff kb2m
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA
> > makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions
> > > expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA makes
> > this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA makes
> > this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:31:57 -0500
From: "Alan" <wa4sca@?????.???>
To: "'James Jipping'" <jhjipping@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FOX LEADERBOARD
Message-ID: <000301d5f6c7$20ac3860$6204a920$@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="utf-8"

Morning Jim,

The key word is "Monthly" at the top.  The window is a sliding one, and the
"TOTAL" and other columns are for frames in that monthly window.  For
clarity, it should perhaps read "Monthly TOTAL," but the columns are a bit
crowded.

At the bottom left, if you click on "Show all-time leaderboard" you will see
numbers which only increase.

73,

Alan
WA4SCA



<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of James
<Jipping via AMSAT-BB
<Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 1:42 AM
<To: amsat-bb@?????.???
<Subject: [amsat-bb] FOX LEADERBOARD
<
<Good Morning!
<  What do the headings "TOTAL"  and "LAST 7 DAYS" mean on the FOX TELEM
<LEADERBOARD.  "LAST 7 DAYS" is obvious.  My numbers keep bouncing
<around,  that's expected.   But, NOW,   my  "TOTAL" number bounces
<around too.  Shouldn't they be constantly increasing.  Also at the end
<of  February I had number about 12500 after several months of ever
<increasing numbers.  But on March 3, I had only 8600 and they have been
<bouncing ever since. On March 10 I have 8533 after 1845 frames/payloads.
<
<In March, thanks to the kind and expert help of Burns Fisher, WB1FJ, I
<started using a FIAB setup.   Does that have anything to do the drop and
<bounce ??
<
<Thanks, I'm going back to bed.
<Jim JIpping, W8MRR
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-
<NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
<program!
<Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:49:45 -0400
From: Michael Walker <va3mw@??????????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] New operator on uplink power
Message-ID:
<CA+33ts49RBu5JfVmEJvYtxGh1iWTEk5jy6=7i7mTChm6VJFS6w@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I want to share something for those new operators.  Old farts can jump in
with 'I told you so!'  LOL

I know this has been stressed before, but I wanted to share an uplink power
experience.

I am using a 7 Element Quad on UHF.  There are times that I have to dial
down the UHF uplink power on the IC-9700 to 1% and even then I think that
is too much signal.  Case in point was this morning working CAS-4A.

For those IC-9700 operators, I highly suggest that you  keep the Multi-Knob
focussed on RF power and adjust as required.  This will of course limit
your ability to use the RIT since it is hard to use both at the same time.

It is unfortunate that I can't seem to use the waterfall on the IC-9700 to
also see the beacon in the panadapter.  It isn't a 'width' issue but a gain
issue.    I already have my REF set to +12db.

I'm always open to suggestions.

Mike va3mw


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:49:50 -0400
From: Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>
To: Burns Fisher <wb1fj-bb@??????.??>
Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Jeff <kb2mjeff@???.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HuskySat telemetry
Message-ID:
<CAJOf0+vzWFpWqwQPTO8+GEjjXVV1NnpuBn5WHOsxQG1yOHKUmQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I just want to acknowledge that I have seen the messages here and will
investigate as soon as I can.  No telemetry is lost.  If the frames were
rejected in error then they are still on the server and I will process them
if I can.

73
Chris

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 1:38 PM Burns Fisher via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:

> We probably have to wait for Chris to check.  Is it that your packets are
> not showing up on the leaderboard?
>
> Thanks for collecting telemetry anyway.  We need to figure this out.
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 1:10 PM Jeff via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> wrote:
>
> > My PC clock is set by a time derived GPS setup. Right now I?m seeing a
> > major -1.106 Millisecond error ? Also when I install the update I delete
> > the old directory completely and run from the new fresh install
> directory,
> > I.E. FoxTelem_1.08z5_windows
> >
> >
> >
> > 73 Jeff kb2m
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@?????.???>
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:03
> > To: KERRY LA*DUKE <kladuke1144@???.???>; jeff <kb2mjeff@???.???>; Alan <
> > wa4sca@?????.???>; Chris Thompson <g0kla@????.???>
> > Cc: Mark L. Hammond via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HuskySat telemetry
> >
> >
> >
> > Oh, another thought---there was more than just a .jar update at some
> > point.  I suggest backing up first ;) then try removing HuskSat-1 from
> > FoxTLM, then adding it back....should catch the other files.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:59 AM Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond@?????.???
> > <mailto:marklhammond@?????.???> > wrote:
> >
> > Kerry and Jeff,
> >
> >
> >
> > Totally guessing here---Are your clocks accurate?    I think it ignores
> > frames based on that.    Chris will have to weigh in here, I don't
> know...
> >
> >
> >
> > Mark N8MH
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:26 AM KERRY LA*DUKE via AMSAT-BB <
> > amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> > wrote:
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> >         Having same problem here with data for HuskySat.  Updated to
> > latest version yesterday but still not seeing my data reflected on
> leaders
> > board.
> >
> > 73
> > WC7V
> > Kerry
> > ________________________________
> > From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.??? <mailto:
> > amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> > on behalf of Mark L. Hammond via AMSAT-BB
> <
> > amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 8:38 AM
> > To: kb2mjeff@???.??? <mailto:kb2mjeff@???.???>  <kb2m@????.??? <mailto:
> > kb2m@????.???> >; Jeff <kb2mjeff@???.??? <mailto:kb2mjeff@???.???> >
> > Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] HuskySat telemetry
> >
> > Jeff, only guessing here---are you running latest FoxTLM release?  I'd
> > update that first and see if that fixes it.  Currently 1.08z5
> >
> > http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/
> >
> > Mark N8MH
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:25 AM Jeff via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???
> > <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've been collecting HuskySat-1 telemetry  for a while and recently my
> > > collected data isn't being accepted  by the Fox Telemetry site. I see
> > this
> > > 'Only real time data being processed' message the the Fox Telemetry
> site,
> > > but see 4 or 5 other stations getting their data uploaded.  Does anyone
> > > know
> > > what's going on here? As my, others data isn't being accepted I see no
> > > reason to collect any more data.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 73 Jeff kb2m
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA
> > makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions
> > > expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA makes
> > this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???> . AMSAT-NA makes
> > this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


--
Chris E. Thompson
chrisethompson@?????.???
g0kla@????.???


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:08:39 -0400
From: Tom Schaefer <ny4i@????.???>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Get SatPC32 back to center
Message-ID: <3328A188-2FC7-4759-A064-5BE297C7E57D@????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If I turn the VFO manually (via VFO knob), is there an easy way to get
SatPC32 back to the center of the passband? Is there a button that cancels
the effects of the manual tuning? This would be for full Doppler tuning.

Thanks

Tom NY4I

Principal Solutions Architect
Better Software Solutions, Inc.
727-437-2771


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:19:39 -0500
From: Mike Wilhelm <af5at.radio@?????.???>
To: Michael Walker <va3mw@??????????.???>
Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New operator on uplink power
Message-ID:
<CABQUVrUJh5TMfcwkBE9QfKm-uP7s-ef-svER6dCVZHhcMn3Tag@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,
I'd like to get involved with satellite work and haven't gotten on the air
yet.  After reading the recent messages about being careful with power,
I've been tempted to set up my IC-9700 with a pair of coax switches and an
attenuator, so that I can get some attenuation on transmit and straight
thru on receive.  That way I would have more control over how low I could
reduce Tx power.  Any thoughts?
73!
Mike AF5AT

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 7:51 AM Michael Walker via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> I want to share something for those new operators.  Old farts can jump in
> with 'I told you so!'  LOL
>
> I know this has been stressed before, but I wanted to share an uplink power
> experience.
>
> I am using a 7 Element Quad on UHF.  There are times that I have to dial
> down the UHF uplink power on the IC-9700 to 1% and even then I think that
> is too much signal.  Case in point was this morning working CAS-4A.
>
> For those IC-9700 operators, I highly suggest that you  keep the Multi-Knob
> focussed on RF power and adjust as required.  This will of course limit
> your ability to use the RIT since it is hard to use both at the same time.
>
> It is unfortunate that I can't seem to use the waterfall on the IC-9700 to
> also see the beacon in the panadapter.  It isn't a 'width' issue but a gain
> issue.    I already have my REF set to +12db.
>
> I'm always open to suggestions.
>
> Mike va3mw
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:21:51 +0000
From: "Stephen  E. Belter" <seb@??????.???>
To: Tom Schaefer <ny4i@????.???>, AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Get SatPC32 back to center
Message-ID: <A1B9CFB3-6CF1-4AB4-938D-5931E6BDAFB8@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Tom,

There may be a better way to get back to the center of the passband, but the
trick I use is to choose another satellite (one of the A-Z buttons along the
bottom), then choose the satellite of interest again.

73, Steve N9IP
--
Steve Belter, seb@??????.???


?On 3/10/20, 10:11 AM, "AMSAT-BB on behalf of Tom Schaefer via AMSAT-BB"
<amsat-bb-bounces@?????.??? on behalf of amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

    If I turn the VFO manually (via VFO knob), is there an easy way to get
SatPC32 back to the center of the passband? Is there a button that cancels
the effects of the manual tuning? This would be for full Doppler tuning.

    Thanks

    Tom NY4I

    Principal Solutions Architect
    Better Software Solutions, Inc.
    727-437-2771
    _______________________________________________
    Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
    to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
    are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
    Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
    Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:24:08 -0400
From: Michael Walker <va3mw@??????????.???>
To: Mike Wilhelm <af5at.radio@?????.???>
Cc: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New operator on uplink power
Message-ID:
<CA+33ts6C+eRwL01WOoULNKe9xtG0bLO6-c2G-8vXgT3ZfqL1FQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Mike

It depends on the gain of your uplink antenna.

When I get down to about 5 watts, I just don't speak as loud.  :)  It
happens pretty quickly.

Mike va3mw


On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:19 AM Mike Wilhelm <af5at.radio@?????.???> wrote:

> Hello,
> I'd like to get involved with satellite work and haven't gotten on the air
> yet.  After reading the recent messages about being careful with power,
> I've been tempted to set up my IC-9700 with a pair of coax switches and an
> attenuator, so that I can get some attenuation on transmit and straight
> thru on receive.  That way I would have more control over how low I could
> reduce Tx power.  Any thoughts?
> 73!
> Mike AF5AT
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 7:51 AM Michael Walker via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> I want to share something for those new operators.  Old farts can jump in
>> with 'I told you so!'  LOL
>>
>> I know this has been stressed before, but I wanted to share an uplink
>> power
>> experience.
>>
>> I am using a 7 Element Quad on UHF.  There are times that I have to dial
>> down the UHF uplink power on the IC-9700 to 1% and even then I think that
>> is too much signal.  Case in point was this morning working CAS-4A.
>>
>> For those IC-9700 operators, I highly suggest that you  keep the
>> Multi-Knob
>> focussed on RF power and adjust as required.  This will of course limit
>> your ability to use the RIT since it is hard to use both at the same time.
>>
>> It is unfortunate that I can't seem to use the waterfall on the IC-9700 to
>> also see the beacon in the panadapter.  It isn't a 'width' issue but a
>> gain
>> issue.    I already have my REF set to +12db.
>>
>> I'm always open to suggestions.
>>
>> Mike va3mw
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>


------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:27:36 -0400
From: Michael Walker <va3mw@??????????.???>
To: "Stephen E. Belter" <seb@??????.???>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Get SatPC32 back to center
Message-ID:
<CA+33ts4zw2cUA9ANCN5LOrzrBrYsveS=64a4A1bCPe2X+6VSxg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Tom

It does work. I do it all the time to switch back and forth between the
transponder and the beacon.

Mike


On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:26 AM Stephen E. Belter via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:

> Tom,
>
> There may be a better way to get back to the center of the passband, but
> the trick I use is to choose another satellite (one of the A-Z buttons
> along the bottom), then choose the satellite of interest again.
>
> 73, Steve N9IP
> --
> Steve Belter, seb@??????.???
>
>
> ?On 3/10/20, 10:11 AM, "AMSAT-BB on behalf of Tom Schaefer via AMSAT-BB" <
> amsat-bb-bounces@?????.??? on behalf of amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
>     If I turn the VFO manually (via VFO knob), is there an easy way to get
> SatPC32 back to the center of the passband? Is there a button that cancels
> the effects of the manual tuning? This would be for full Doppler tuning.
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Tom NY4I
>
>     Principal Solutions Architect
>     Better Software Solutions, Inc.
>     727-437-2771
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>     to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
>     are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
>     Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
>     Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 15, Issue 76
****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 11.05.2024 12:25:32lGo back Go up