| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 14.05.20 02:00l 785 Lines 29506 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB15158
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V15 158
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IR1UAW<I0OJJ<N6RME<CX2SA
Sent: 200513/2357Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:31275 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB15158
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: L band gear (Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL))
2. Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites (Roy Dean)
3. Re: Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites
(Brian Wilkins KO4AQF)
4. Re: L band gear (Cal Spreitzer)
5. Re: YV5 Station on RS44 (Cal Spreitzer)
6. Re: Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites
(Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL))
7. Re: YV5 Station on RS44 (alex weimer)
8. Re: RS-44 on LOTW? (Bernie and Cheryl)
9. Re: RS-44 on LOTW? (KI7UNJ Tucker)
10. Re: L band gear (saguaroastro)
11. Re: Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites (saguaroastro)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:21:42 +0100
From: "Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL)" <peter@????????.??.??>
To: 73 Bob W7LRD <w7lrd@???????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] L band gear
Message-ID:
<CAFvUaiofoc=9wmXj03tE8uNBSOo45P0DjL3MfbcEer_zvg=Dww@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
IC-910 at 10w,
20m of LMR400
Wimo 13 turn helix
Can work AO-92 from the horizon :)
Peter, 2M0SQL
On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 17:54, 73 Bob W7LRD via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> Hi all- I would be curious to know what "everyone" is using for L band
gear. Perhaps others would like to know. example I run
> IC-910- at 10W
> 70 feet of LMR600
> 24 element looper yagi horizontal polarized
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:26:41 -0400
From: Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites
Message-ID:
<CADGPg2sVCB44z31DaJkRRd=uYmZRU=UO=dBPiRFAOmT4kYVEzA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Current FM fleet is AO-91, AO-92, SO-50, Lilacsat-2 and PO-101 nothing
> else. Peter, 2M0SQL
AO-27 - one minute at a time....
--Roy
K3RLD
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:39:01 -0400
From: Brian Wilkins KO4AQF <bwilkins@?????.???>
To: John Brier <johnbrier@?????.???>
Cc: "Peter Goodhall \(2M0SQL\)" <peter@????????.??.??>, Amsat
<amsat-bb@?????.???>, Tim Crawford <tcarchcape@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites
Message-ID:
<CAO_Eq329pjN+L1_+RCTZ4NsRGUzfYWMW4EX=bbQ1dEUQVx=pbw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
John
I use KE0PBR?s frequency cheat sheet. Hope it helps others as well and
clears things up for you
https://ke0pbr.wordpress.com/2018/12/31/my-frequency-cheat-sheet/
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:22 PM John Brier via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
> The AFC was discussed in the past.
>
> Best point made IMHO that you should compensate for Doppler is that if a
> lot of people are uplinking, the receiver at bird is going to be more
> likely to receive properly compensated signals.
>
> 73, John Brier KG4AKV
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020, 15:13 Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL) via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> > Confused why you think Huskysat-1, DOSAAF-85 (RS-44), CAS-7A are FM
> > sats they are all linear so please don't be putting any FM through
> > them.
> >
> > Current FM fleet is AO-91, AO-92, SO-50, Lilacsat-2 and PO-101 nothing
> > else.
> >
> > You still need to put Doppler correction into the memories on AO-91
> > and AO-92 not sure why you wouldn't be there are so many charts
> > available just to transpose into the memory software.
> >
> > Peter, 2M0SQL
> >
> > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 19:52, Tim Crawford via AMSAT-BB
> > <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> > >
> > > Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites Question. I am updating my HH
> > Freq currently.
> > >
> > > As I under stand it, the Fox Satellites (AO-91 & 92) receiver have AFC
> > (automatic Frequency Control) which means that no doppler change in the
> > transmit frequency is required nor should it be put into effect.
> > > My question is does anyone know whether or not any of the following FM
> > Satellites also have AFC for their receivers?
> > >
> > > PO-101 (Diwata)CAS-3H (LilacSat-2)Huskysat-1DOSAAF-85 (RS-44)CAS-7A
> (not
> > launched yet)
> > > Thank you for your assistance.
> > > 73
> > > Tim CrawfordKE7TAC
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions expressed
> > > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> > AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
Brian Wilkins
KO4AQF
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:03:01 -0400
From: "Cal Spreitzer" <n3cal@??.?????????.???>
To: "'73 Bob W7LRD'" <w7lrd@???????.???>, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] L band gear
Message-ID: <000c01d62972$45960b00$d0c22100$@?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Bob,
I'm running:
IC-9700 - at 10W
50 feet of LMR400
24 Element Loop Yagi (Directive Systems DSE2424LYRM)
73 de Cal/N3CAL
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of 73 Bob W7LRD
via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:53 PM
To: amsat-bb
Subject: [amsat-bb] L band gear
Hi all- I would be curious to know what "everyone" is using for L band
gear. Perhaps others would like to know. example I run
IC-910- at 10W
70 feet of LMR600
24 element looper yagi horizontal polarized
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:09:30 -0400
From: "Cal Spreitzer" <n3cal@??.?????????.???>
To: "'alex weimer'" <ingejack@???.???>, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] YV5 Station on RS44
Message-ID: <000d01d62973$2d20caf0$876260d0$@?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Jack,
I've worked Angel, YV5NEA (LOTW Confirmed) on RS-44 back on May 8th and also
Jose, YV6IA.
Cal / N3CAL
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???? On Behalf Of alex weimer
via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 2:26 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] YV5 Station on RS44
There was a YV5 station on RS44 at 1535Z pass. I missed his suffix and was
wondering if anyone had ever heard a YV5 station recently on RS44 ?? Thanks
JACK KC7MG
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:10:44 +0100
From: "Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL)" <peter@????????.??.??>
To: Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
Cc: Amsat <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites
Message-ID:
<CAFvUaiqU0iZ6jevBVJmbs_uOCdsqDXoHrZrig2SCj3vbNp-m+Q@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Doh, yes forgot that hasn't been on this side of the pond yet :)
Peter 2M0SQL
On Wed, 13 May 2020, 20:40 Roy Dean via AMSAT-BB, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
> >
> > Current FM fleet is AO-91, AO-92, SO-50, Lilacsat-2 and PO-101 nothing
> > else. Peter, 2M0SQL
>
>
> AO-27 - one minute at a time....
>
> --Roy
> K3RLD
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:42:29 -0700 (MST)
From: alex weimer <ingejack@???.???>
To: Cal Spreitzer <n3cal@??.?????????.???>, amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] YV5 Station on RS44
Message-ID: <674097448.547535.1589409749535@???????.???.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks Angel confirmed our contact for this mornings pass. Haven't worked
YV6IA yet..
Thanks Cal.. Nice to have another high one with a great footprint !! 73 JACK
KC7MG
> On May 13, 2020 at 3:09 PM Cal Spreitzer <n3cal@??.?????????.???
mailto:n3cal@??.?????????.??? > wrote:
>
>
> Jack,
>
> I've worked Angel, YV5NEA (LOTW Confirmed) on RS-44 back on May 8th
and also
> Jose, YV6IA.
>
> Cal / N3CAL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???
mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@?????.??? ] On Behalf Of alex weimer
> via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 2:26 PM
> To: amsat-bb@?????.??? mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???
> Subject: [amsat-bb] YV5 Station on RS44
>
> There was a YV5 station on RS44 at 1535Z pass. I missed his suffix and
was
> wondering if anyone had ever heard a YV5 station recently on RS44 ??
Thanks
> JACK KC7MG
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.??? . AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 17:27:15 -0600
From: Bernie and Cheryl <hamdan@??.??????.???>
To: KI7UNJ Tucker <ki7unj@?????.???>, amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] RS-44 on LOTW?
Message-ID: <6bb8a2c9-343b-f299-515d-4b01fdfecd63@??.??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Thanks to everyone who replied.? And yes, Tucker, I am using HRD for my
logging, and therein lay my problem.
Here's what the problem was.? I originally had a problem uploading RS-44
QSO's to LOTW.? Several here on the list replied to my original post and
suggested that my version of TQSL might be outdated.? So, I downloaded
Version 2.5.3.? This resulted in a situation where NO QSO's could be
uploaded, including non-satellite contacts, such as HF contacts.
Tucker's question about using HRD (aka, Ham Radio Deluxe, of which I am
using the latest version, i.e, V6.7.0.277) and his link to the HRD blog
sent me off in the right direction.? It turned out that the "Station
Location" data I had first input into HRD included the use of the word
"Colorado" rather than the postal abbreviation of "CO".? TQSL now
interprets the use of the full spelling of a state, as opposed to its
postal abbreviation as an "error", and won't allow the log entry to be
uploaded.? Once I changed the home state field in my HRD program, I went
out and worked someone and was able to upload that new QSO to LOTW
immediately.
But, what about my old QSO's that I hadn't uploaded yet?? It turns out
that BOTH states need to use the postal abbreviation. In other words,
not only does the entry for the state of my station need to use the
postal abbreviation, but now the state of the station I am working needs
to be changed to use the postal abbreviation.? If this is not done both
ways, the QSO can't be uploaded.? So, I went back to my RS-44 QSO's, and
had to change a few QSO's to the respective postal abbreviations (there
were only about 3-4 our out of 19 QSO's like this, and yet none of them
could be uploaded in the same attempt).? After doing that, all of my
RS-44 QSOs were uploaded to LOTW without a problem.
I'm not sure that what the programmers for TQSL did was an improvement.?
But, I can testify to the fact that I learned a great lesson in
patience, so maybe that was the whole point???? I hate software updates!
Thanks to Tucker, KI7UNJ, and the rest of you for your helpful replies.?
See you on the birds!
73 de Bernie, KF0QS
On 5/12/2020 7:29 AM, KI7UNJ Tucker wrote:
> You using HRD by chance for your logging?
>
> Here is a post from my local club about HRD And the new version of TQSL
>
> **************
> It turns out that you are right, the problem appears to be in the Log
> file created by HAM Radio Deluxe. This article tells us how to fix it:
>
https://www.hamradiodeluxe.com/blog/TQSL-v252-TipsnTricks-for-Correcting-Your-
Log-Data.html
>
<https://www.hamradiodeluxe.com/blog/TQSL-v252-TipsnTricks-for-Correcting-Your
-Log-Data.html>
>
> Rick Murphy provided that pointer:
> https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/message/32757?p=,,,20,0,0,0
> *****************
>
> https://groups.arrl.org
> <https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/message/32757?p=,,,20,0,0,0>On
> Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:22 KI7UNJ Tucker <ki7unj@?????.???
> <mailto:ki7unj@?????.???>> wrote:
>
> Good morning
>
> For the BB when you want to respond do a ?reply all? that will
> reply to both the person whom responded and back to the BB. now if
> that person only did a reply to you and not to the BB you can add
> the BB email on the to list with there name if you want the
> response to go to the BB.
>
> As for TQSL... I assume your using a logging software and it?s
> sending the data to TQSL?? If so TQSL changed a bit in what it
> expects in the log 2 versions ago and many logging apps need to be
> updated. I?ll try and find the post about it and forward it to you.
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 22:15 Bernie and Cheryl
> <hamdan@??.??????.??? <mailto:hamdan@??.??????.???>> wrote:
>
> Hi Tucker:
>
> We've worked on the birds several times.? Indeed, I believe
> we've exchanged QSL's.
>
> I have a couple of questions if you don't mind. First, I
> downloaded the newest version of TQSL. Now, it refuses to
> upload /any /contacts. I get the following screen when I try
> to upload: "Failed to sign the ADIF with TQSL, see logfile for
> more info."? Do you know what the problem is?
>
> Secondly, so that I don't have to pester you with every
> question, how do I respond to a post on the AMSAT board so
> that the whole board can read it? Obviously, I can respond to
> individuals who replied to my original post using direct email
> (at least I know how to do original posts), but I don't know
> how to respond on the board itself.
>
> Thanks, and hope to see you on the birds soon.
>
> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS
>
> On 5/10/2020 1:44 PM, KI7UNJ Tucker wrote:
>> RS-44 is in LOTW,? I have?multiple QSL in LTOW from it.? You
>> will need to update your TQSL (came out May 1st) with the
>> latest config. and make sure you have?sat = "RS-44"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:53 AM Bernie and Cheryl via
>> AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.??? <mailto:amsat-bb@?????.???>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Folks:
>>
>> I have been uploading my QSO's to LOTW fairly quickly.? I
>> have noticed
>> that none of my RS-44 QSOs show up.? Is this happening
>> for everyone?? If
>> not, what am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any help you can give me.
>>
>> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.??? <mailto:AMSAT-BB@?????.???>.
>> AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
>> membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>> official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
>> satellite program!
>> Subscription settings:
>> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Casey Tucker KI7UNJ*
>> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
>>
> --
> *Casey Tucker? KI7UNJ*
> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
>
> --
> *Casey Tucker? KI7UNJ*
> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:30:49 -0700
From: KI7UNJ Tucker <ki7unj@?????.???>
To: Bernie and Cheryl <hamdan@??.??????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] RS-44 on LOTW?
Message-ID:
<CAPFr_UkXyEXkKxZRAb7pNqxKPdzz=FrE-v5f6hTvNwSj_bj=tg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bernie,
Glad to see that It all worked out for you.
73
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:27 PM Bernie and Cheryl <hamdan@??.??????.???>
wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied. And yes, Tucker, I am using HRD for my
> logging, and therein lay my problem.
>
> Here's what the problem was. I originally had a problem uploading RS-44
> QSO's to LOTW. Several here on the list replied to my original post and
> suggested that my version of TQSL might be outdated. So, I downloaded
> Version 2.5.3. This resulted in a situation where NO QSO's could be
> uploaded, including non-satellite contacts, such as HF contacts.
>
> Tucker's question about using HRD (aka, Ham Radio Deluxe, of which I am
> using the latest version, i.e, V6.7.0.277) and his link to the HRD blog
> sent me off in the right direction. It turned out that the "Station
> Location" data I had first input into HRD included the use of the word
> "Colorado" rather than the postal abbreviation of "CO". TQSL now
> interprets the use of the full spelling of a state, as opposed to its
> postal abbreviation as an "error", and won't allow the log entry to be
> uploaded. Once I changed the home state field in my HRD program, I went
> out and worked someone and was able to upload that new QSO to LOTW
> immediately.
>
> But, what about my old QSO's that I hadn't uploaded yet? It turns out
> that BOTH states need to use the postal abbreviation. In other words, not
> only does the entry for the state of my station need to use the postal
> abbreviation, but now the state of the station I am working needs to be
> changed to use the postal abbreviation. If this is not done both ways, the
> QSO can't be uploaded. So, I went back to my RS-44 QSO's, and had to
> change a few QSO's to the respective postal abbreviations (there were only
> about 3-4 our out of 19 QSO's like this, and yet none of them could be
> uploaded in the same attempt). After doing that, all of my RS-44 QSOs were
> uploaded to LOTW without a problem.
>
> I'm not sure that what the programmers for TQSL did was an improvement.
> But, I can testify to the fact that I learned a great lesson in patience,
> so maybe that was the whole point??? I hate software updates!
>
> Thanks to Tucker, KI7UNJ, and the rest of you for your helpful replies.
> See you on the birds!
>
> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS
> On 5/12/2020 7:29 AM, KI7UNJ Tucker wrote:
>
> You using HRD by chance for your logging?
>
> Here is a post from my local club about HRD And the new version of TQSL
>
> **************
> It turns out that you are right, the problem appears to be in the Log file
> created by HAM Radio Deluxe. This article tells us how to fix it:
> https://www.hamradiodeluxe.com/blog/TQSL
> -v252-TipsnTricks-for-Correcting-Your-Log-Data.html
>
> Rick Murphy provided that pointer:
> https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/message/32757?p=,,,20,0,0,0
> *****************
>
> https://groups.arrl.org
> <https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/message/32757?p=,,,20,0,0,0>On Tue,
> May 12, 2020 at 06:22 KI7UNJ Tucker <ki7unj@?????.???> wrote:
>
>> Good morning
>>
>> For the BB when you want to respond do a ?reply all? that will reply to
>> both the person whom responded and back to the BB. now if that person only
>> did a reply to you and not to the BB you can add the BB email on the to
>> list with there name if you want the response to go to the BB.
>>
>> As for TQSL... I assume your using a logging software and it?s sending
>> the data to TQSL? If so TQSL changed a bit in what it expects in the log 2
>> versions ago and many logging apps need to be updated. I?ll try and find
>> the post about it and forward it to you.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 22:15 Bernie and Cheryl <hamdan@??.??????.???>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tucker:
>>>
>>> We've worked on the birds several times. Indeed, I believe we've
>>> exchanged QSL's.
>>>
>>> I have a couple of questions if you don't mind. First, I downloaded the
>>> newest version of TQSL. Now, it refuses to upload *any *contacts. I
>>> get the following screen when I try to upload: "Failed to sign the ADIF
>>> with TQSL, see logfile for more info." Do you know what the problem is?
>>>
>>> Secondly, so that I don't have to pester you with every question, how do
>>> I respond to a post on the AMSAT board so that the whole board can read
>>> it? Obviously, I can respond to individuals who replied to my original
>>> post using direct email (at least I know how to do original posts), but I
>>> don't know how to respond on the board itself.
>>>
>>> Thanks, and hope to see you on the birds soon.
>>>
>>> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS
>>> On 5/10/2020 1:44 PM, KI7UNJ Tucker wrote:
>>>
>>> RS-44 is in LOTW, I have multiple QSL in LTOW from it. You will need
>>> to update your TQSL (came out May 1st) with the latest config. and make
>>> sure you have sat = "RS-44"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:53 AM Bernie and Cheryl via AMSAT-BB <
>>> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Folks:
>>>>
>>>> I have been uploading my QSO's to LOTW fairly quickly. I have noticed
>>>> that none of my RS-44 QSOs show up. Is this happening for everyone?
>>>> If
>>>> not, what am I doing wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, in advance, for any help you can give me.
>>>>
>>>> 73 de Bernie, KF0QS
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>>> Opinions expressed
>>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>>> of AMSAT-NA.
>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>>> program!
>>>> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Casey Tucker KI7UNJ*
>>> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
>>>
>>> --
>> *Casey Tucker KI7UNJ*
>> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
>>
>> --
> *Casey Tucker KI7UNJ*
> https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
>
>
--
*Casey Tucker KI7UNJ*
https://twitter.com/KI7UNJ
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:39:06 -0700
From: saguaroastro <saguaroastro@???.???>
To: 73 Bob W7LRD <w7lrd@???????.???>, amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] L band gear
Message-ID: <20200513233955.44C788372@??????????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Alinco DJ7G? for uplink, Yaesu FT-8900R for downlink, 10 element yagi on
uplink and Elk LP? on downlink.73Rick Tejera (K7TEJ)Saguaro Astronomy
ClubWww.saguaroastro.orgThunderbird Astronomy ClubWww.w7tbc.org
-------- Original message --------From: 73 Bob W7LRD via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> Date: 5/13/20 09:53 (GMT-07:00) To: amsat-bb
<amsat-bb@?????.???> Subject: [amsat-bb] L band gear Hi all-? I would be
curious to know what "everyone" is using for L band gear.? Perhaps others
would like to know.? example I runIC-910- at 10W70 feet of LMR60024 element
looper yagi horizontal
polarized_______________________________________________Sent via
AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum availableto all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressedare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
satellite program!Subscription settings:
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:50:08 -0700
From: saguaroastro <saguaroastro@???.???>
To: peter@??????.???? "Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL)"
<peter@????????.??.??>, Tim Crawford <tcarchcape@?????.???>
Cc: Amsat <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites
Message-ID: <20200513235012.4DAEF8A62@??????????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
CAS 7A has (or will? have) an FM transponder in addition to the 3 linears (
15/10;15/70; 2/70)Launch show 15 sep 2020. Not sure how they plan to
schedule that, but it sounds like it'll be a fun bird.73Rick Tejera
(K7TEJ)Saguaro Astronomy ClubWww.saguaroastro.orgThunderbird Astronomy
ClubWww.w7tbc.org
-------- Original message --------From: "Peter Goodhall (2M0SQL) via
AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???> Date: 5/13/20 12:11 (GMT-07:00) To: Tim
Crawford <tcarchcape@?????.???> Cc: Amsat <amsat-bb@?????.???> Subject: Re:
[amsat-bb] Uplink Doppler Changes For FM Satellites Confused why you think
Huskysat-1, DOSAAF-85 (RS-44), CAS-7A? are FMsats they are all linear so
please don't be putting any FM throughthem.Current FM fleet is AO-91, AO-92,
SO-50, Lilacsat-2 and PO-101 nothing else.You still need to put Doppler
correction into the memories on AO-91and AO-92 not sure why you wouldn't be
there are so many chartsavailable just to transpose into the memory
software.Peter, 2M0SQLOn Wed, 13 May 2020 at 19:52, Tim Crawford via
AMSAT-BB<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:>> Uplink Doppler Changes For FM
Satellites Question.? I am updating my HH Freq currently.>> As I under stand
it, the Fox Satellites (AO-91 & 92) receiver have AFC (automatic Frequency
Control) which means that no doppler change in the
transmit frequency is required nor should it be put into effect.> My
question is does anyone know whether or not any of the following FM
Satellites also have AFC for their receivers?>> PO-101 (Diwata)CAS-3H
(LilacSat-2)Huskysat-1DOSAAF-85 (RS-44)CAS-7A (not launched? yet)> Thank you
for your assistance.> 73> Tim CrawfordKE7TAC>
_______________________________________________> Sent via
AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available> to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
satellite program!> Subscription settings:
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb_______________________________
________________Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
availableto all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressedare solely those of the author
, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA member?
Join now to support the amateur satellite program!Subscription settings:
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 15, Issue 158
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
