| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 08.06.15 15:23l 800 Lines 26321 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB10160
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V10 160
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 150608/1317Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:21940 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB10160
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. PSAT Doppler Science Project (Robert Bruninga)
2. Lightsail Back On (B J)
3. Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC (kshitij sandeep)
4. Re: Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC (Mvivona)
5. Re: Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC (dwarnberg)
6. Looking for someone who is Intelligent, Ambitious, Not Too
Old, and Dedicated. (Thomas Doyle)
7. Re: Looking for someone who is Intelligent, Ambitious, Not
Too Old, and Dedicated. (Koos van den Hout)
8. Re: Lightsail Back On (KO6TZ Bob)
9. Report RX PSAT-1 (Pablo J.M. - LW8EXS)
10. Re: Lightsail Back On (B J)
11. Re: PSAT Doppler Science Project (Daniel Est?vez)
12. Re: Lightsail Back On (Nico Janssen)
13. Re: Lightsail Back On (Mineo Wakita)
14. PSAT Pass (Nicholas Mahr)
15. PSAT (Nick Pugh K5QXJ)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:10:54 -0400
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] PSAT Doppler Science Project
Message-ID: <c601b0bd43da6e4af8af900b9a6bed76@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> I was able to copy Psat 435 mhz downlink today...nice !
> Watching the stations move diagonally across the waterfall
> was an interesting Display of the Doppler on the uplink.
Yes, and you can draw that Doppler curve and from the rate of change you
can calculate that stations position!
That was the basis for all Early Satellite Positioning systems and most of
the early EPRB Emergency Locator beacons. It woiuld be a great science
project for kids to plot the doppper and see if they can figure out the
position of a station!
When authors start upgrading PSK31 programs so that they are fdull duplex
and can AFC their own uplink, then none of the satellite user signals will
slew, but since we chose the same uplink as normal terrestrial PSK31
users, those signals can plot a nice Doppler curve. The only problem
there is that they turn their transmitters on and off, but usually stay on
the same 10m frequency, so that means although their signals are disjoint,
their emissions should all be on their theoretical Doppler curve and
therefore can be located.
Actually, on just one pass all you can get is a line of position relative
to the satelites track, But on two passes, then you can have two lines
of position and where they intersect is the stations position.
Good luck! Maybe someone has the time to search for a good reference for
the technique.
Bob, Wb4APR
US Naval Academy
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:38:17 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Lightsail Back On
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkOHnmbb-81N6X1bRW8dqOYA9JFd0BNTO0wXpERbBxea1Q@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/jason-davis/2015/20150506-lightsail-wakes-secon
d-time-1.html
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 05:57:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: kshitij sandeep <kshitij14395@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC
Message-ID:
<2125688569.3840871.1433656621452.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hey,
I have recently purchased an ICOM 9100 for the purposes of a educational
satellite project.
I require the radio to uplink telecommands and downlink payload data and
telemetry in FSK and OOK type modulation.
Any help regarding the interfacing of PC to the Radio for the same purpose
would be deeply appreciated.
Thank you
Kshitij?
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 09:03:51 -0400
From: Mvivona <Mvivona@xxxxx.xxx>
To: kshitij sandeep <kshitij14395@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC
Message-ID: <10C43BDA-7618-416B-9D99-80A581BA4DB6@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Kshitij,
I use Ham Radio Deluxe ver. 6.29.355. It was simply plug in the USB cable,
select 9100 and I was connected. Make sure you use an adequate computer if
you go the HRD route as all the modules you will ever need are built into
the suite and require more resources than some of the other ponderous
packages.
I originally made the mistake of using the old version 5.X and had some odd
problems with the 9100. Ever since I installed the latest version it is been
trouble free, fingers crossed.
Cheers,
Michael Vivona
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 7, 2015, at 1:57 AM, kshitij sandeep <kshitij14395@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
Hey,
I have recently purchased an ICOM 9100 for the purposes of a educational
satellite project.
I require the radio to uplink telecommands and downlink payload data and
telemetry in FSK and OOK type modulation.
Any help regarding the interfacing of PC to the Radio for the same purpose
would be deeply appreciated.
Thank you
Kshitij
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 09:42:30 -0400
From: dwarnberg <dwarnberg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Mvivona <Mvivona@xxxxx.xxx>, kshitij sandeep
<kshitij14395@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC
Message-ID: <b1pilnqkm5mihw8u63q6ckel.1433684550429@xxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Couple suggestions.. 1) short USB cable ?2) I could not get hrd to control
radio correctly for liner inverting sats, check out SatPC32. ?3) lots of
options for data, look at dire wolf or packet engine pro... one gotcha, 9600
baud packets must go through the data port on rear of radio, USB will not
work...
Hope this helps
David, KK4QOE
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab? S
-------- Original message --------
From: Mvivona via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Date: 06/07/2015 9:03 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: kshitij sandeep <kshitij14395@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Interfacing ICOM 9100 with PC
Kshitij,
I use Ham Radio Deluxe ver. 6.29.355. It was simply plug in the USB cable,
select 9100 and I was connected. Make sure you use an adequate computer if
you go the HRD route as all the modules you will ever need are built into
the suite and require more resources than some of the other ponderous
packages.
I originally made the mistake of using the old version 5.X and had some odd
problems with the 9100. Ever since I installed the latest version it is been
trouble free, fingers crossed.
Cheers,
Michael Vivona
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 7, 2015, at 1:57 AM, kshitij sandeep <kshitij14395@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
Hey,
I have recently purchased an ICOM 9100 for the purposes of a educational
satellite project.
I require the radio to uplink telecommands and downlink payload data and
telemetry in FSK and OOK type modulation.
Any help regarding the interfacing of PC to the Radio for the same purpose
would be deeply appreciated.
Thank you
Kshitij
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 11:46:09 -0500
From: Thomas Doyle <tomdoyle1948@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Looking for someone who is Intelligent, Ambitious,
Not Too Old, and Dedicated.
Message-ID:
<CAHnRQRLY1R1PJhYJXq8CU1Dg9f53xf+X-qP83CpA_JrpbMFTPA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi,
The fact that you opened this message means you are all of the things
mentioned in the subject line and probably even good looking.
This fellow has come up with what I believe is the first really good
portable rotor controller (even better than mine !). He is planning on
releasing the plans to the public. Fabrication was done with a 3D printer.
It is a work of art. It is not some pie in the sky all talk and no action
thing we are all used to hearing about.
http://www.mobypicture.com/user/MeltdownCore/view/18165109
Here is a clip from a recent email he sent to me.
There are many people out there that have 3d printers in these days. When i
>> designed the rotor i wanted to make sure that most parts come out the 3d
>> printer so all you have to do is to get some easy to get parts and start
>> building. I absolutely hate it when i want to build something and when i
>> check the partslist there are exotic parts that you only get from russia or
>> korea.
>>
>> I am sure that most "makers" have every part at home except the big ball
>> bearing.
>>
>
Perhaps there is someone or a group out there who would be interested in
taking this project on for possible sales that could benefit AMSAT.
F.A.Q.
Q: Have you seen the rotor article in QST ?
A: Yes and I believe this is much better.
Q: What about the AMSAT board ?
A: It appears that they *might* be open to marketing it as they do with the
LVB Tracker and pre-amp.
Q: Why don't you just leave us alone and do it yourself ?
A: I am old.
73 W9KE Tom Doyle
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 22:03:05 +0200
From: Koos van den Hout <koos@xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Looking for someone who is Intelligent,
Ambitious, Not Too Old, and Dedicated.
Message-ID: <20150607200304.GA22802@xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Quoting Thomas Doyle who wrote on Sun 2015-06-07 at 11:46:
> The fact that you opened this message means you are all of the things
> mentioned in the subject line and probably even good looking.
No, it was just the next message in my inbox.
But besides that bit of bad marketing:
> This fellow has come up with what I believe is the first really good
> portable rotor controller (even better than mine !). He is planning on
> releasing the plans to the public. Fabrication was done with a 3D printer.
> It is a work of art. It is not some pie in the sky all talk and no action
> thing we are all used to hearing about.
>
> http://www.mobypicture.com/user/MeltdownCore/view/18165109
This looks good. This seems to be moving an Elk Antenna with little problem
with for a sat antenna 'high' speeds so it may move an Arrow Antenna or
even heavier stuff (given a good center of gravity) at 'normal' speeds with
little problem.
I must say it also looks more solid than SatNOGS, to be honest.
https://satnogs.org/
It will be in roughly the same 'market' : an antenna rotator that is not
too expensive, doable to build, can be controlled from tracking software
such as gpredict and isn't weather proof but can be set up on a dry day
on a tripod easily.
> Perhaps there is someone or a group out there who would be interested in
> taking this project on for possible sales that could benefit AMSAT.
There are people who can take the bill of materials, the stl files, the
software and can build it themselves. Or take the stl files to a 3D printer
service or makerspace.
There are people who want to buy the parts sorted with instructions and
will build it.
But there are lots of steps between 'it moves!!!' and 'it is something
someone else should be able to duplicate' and even more steps before
'someone can sell the parts and instructions for someone to rebuild it'.
Keep us posted!
Koos van den Hout
--
Camp Wireless, the site about wireless Internet | Koos van den Hout
access at campsites http://www.camp-wireless.org/ | http://idefix.net/
PGP keyid DSS/1024 0xF0D7C263 | IPv6 enabled!
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:09:08 -0700
From: KO6TZ Bob <my.callsign@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Lightsail Back On
Message-ID: <5574A4E4.1090500@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Light sail still transmitting. @xxxxxxxx Pacific pass.
Always easy copy with AGW-PE at 9600, when it is transmitting.
I imagine the printable binary data is of little value, but here it is
anyway.
KO6TZ Bob
---------------------------------------
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:45:29]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..
?A........???@xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx@xxx>.....?
??<??k??..}-......?(............$'?.? ? ?
?
..........??i@xxxxx.xxx i0?i..d ??i`?i?0???|
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:46:04]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A........?~?@xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx@xxx>?<? ?9?<????..?-......?(......
......(?.? ? ?
?
..........??l@xxxxxxxxxxx pl?d??lP%`l`$???|
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:46:19]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A........???@x.xxxxx@xx
=?O?@xxx>J~D<tB????;????..?-...... )............$(?.? ? ? ?
..........??m??m?8m?pm?`
@xxxxxx
(hm?&.???|
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:46:49]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A.........?@xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx@xxx>J~D<????<??k??..?-....../)......
......)?.? ? ?
?
..........??n0Hn`?np`n ``?.?d??n`#?nP!@xxxx
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:47:19]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A........?(?@xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx@xxx>?<? ?9?<??..!.......S)......
......$)?.? ? ?
?
..........??o`?j???jP..o` a.d.??op$?oP(????|
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:47:34]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A........`??@xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx@xxx>J~D<....??;??k?..3.......c)......
......3)?.? ? ?
?
..........??o0hj???j?..o`*Xp .d.??j?..jp?????|
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:48:04]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A..........?@xxxxxxx@xx
=?n?@xxx>?<? ?9??;???#..^.......?)......... ...*?.? ? ? ?
..........??pp??k
??k ??p? .q@xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:48:19]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A........
??@xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx@xxx>?<? p:?<....+..v.......?)......... ...$*?.?
? ?
?
..........??k@xxxxxxxxxxx q.d.??q %?qp&????|
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}...........@..x@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:48:34]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A.........Xy@xxxxxxx@xxxxx.x@xxx>J~D<tB????;???8..?.......?)......
... ...3*?.? ? ?
? ..........??r.&Hr.
?r@xxxxxxxx.@x.xxxx..xxxxxxxx
.'.(.2.+.*.).3.0.....m.tc.h?.].}#}.............?@
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP <UI pid=CC [DAMA] [EAX25] Len=248 >[12:49:04]
IP:len:248 129.65.147.33->129.65.147.36 ihl:20 ttl:64 DF prot UDP
UDP:len:228 50000->50800 Data:220
..?A..?A.........?|@xxxxxxx@xx
=?.?@xxx>J~D<??k???;??k?V..?.......?)......... ...
+?...........................??e??`e?? f.??e???e
d.??fP??fP?8........................................................_G...>.
.?@
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:12:54 -0300
From: "Pablo J.M. - LW8EXS" <lw8exs@xxxxx.xxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Report RX PSAT-1
Message-ID: <6E144120E05F4AF0A5F22FE25B336EE1@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Report RX: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 20:02 UTC
2:Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI R Pid=F0 Len=34> [17:02:06R]
T#660,829,350,124,126,406,00000000
LW8EXS, Pablo
Mercedes ( Buenos Aires ) Argentina
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 20:13:07 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: KO6TZ Bob <my.callsign@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Lightsail Back On
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkO3kTMEWxse=GZ1AM1xuszwC8fXHZA5XwW5SUWR-dvwPw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 6/7/15, KO6TZ Bob <my.callsign@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Light sail still transmitting. @xxxxxxxx Pacific pass.
>
<snip>
According to a post on the Seesat mailing list, the latest attempt to
deploy the sail has failed.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 22:27:36 +0200
From: Daniel Est?vez <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] PSAT Doppler Science Project
Message-ID: <5574A938.80504@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
El 07/06/15 a las 04:10, Robert Bruninga escribi?:
> Actually, on just one pass all you can get is a line of position relative
> to the satelites track, But on two passes, then you can have two lines
> of position and where they intersect is the stations position.
Dear Bob,
Could you elaborate on this? If I understood correctly, position
determination by means of Doppler measurements started with project
Transit. With good knowledge of the satellite TLE and an accurate clock,
a ground station could determine its position with good precision by
measuring the Doppler curve from the beacon of the satellite over a
couple of minutes or so. Indeed, two different frequencies were used to
try and compensate for ionospheric refraction.
I think that this would work similarly and given good TLEs for PSAT and
an NTP or GPS synchronized clock, it should be possible to locate ground
stations just by measuring several of their transmissions over just one
pass. Perhaps ionospheric effects on 10m are too high for this to work
with much precision, but at least some rough estimate could be obtained
(6 digit locator would be nice).
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 23:10:56 +0200
From: Nico Janssen <hamsat@xxxxxx.xx>
To: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>, KO6TZ Bob <my.callsign@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Lightsail Back On
Message-ID: <5574B360.7010804@xxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On the contrary: the sail was (at least partially) deployed during the pass
over the groundstation today around 19:45 UTC. If the deployment was fully
successful, the satellite may be expected to decay and burn up in the
atmosphere within three days.
73,
Nico PA0DLO
On 2015-06-07 22:13, B J wrote:
> On 6/7/15, KO6TZ Bob <my.callsign@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> Light sail still transmitting. @xxxxxxxx Pacific pass.
>>
> <snip>
>
> According to a post on the Seesat mailing list, the latest attempt to
> deploy the sail has failed.
>
> 73s
>
> Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:06:51 +0900
From: "Mineo Wakita" <ei7m-wkt@xxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Lightsail Back On
Message-ID: <0C2EC4202D1F4868AF5BA994C98CC67C@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
LightSail-A, ULTRASat7 90726
16:01-16:15 UTC, 7 Jun 2015, Ele 29 S-E-EN, 437.4345MHz 9600bps FSK
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP-X <UI R Pid=CC Len=248> [01:06:13R]
[IP] Fm 129.65.147.33 To 129.65.147.36 prot=UDP ttl=64 len=248
[UDP] src_port:50000 dest_port:50800 len=228 data=220
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP-X <UI R Pid=CC Len=248> [01:07:28R]
[IP] Fm 129.65.147.33 To 129.65.147.36 prot=UDP ttl=64 len=248
[UDP] src_port:50000 dest_port:50800 len=228 data=220
1:Fm KK6HIT-1 To N6CP-X <UI R Pid=CC Len=248> [01:07:58R]
[IP] Fm 129.65.147.33 To 129.65.147.36 prot=UDP ttl=64 len=248
[UDP] src_port:50000 dest_port:50800 len=228 data=220
JE9PEL, Mineo Wakita
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:09:14 -0400
From: Nicholas Mahr <nicholasmahr1@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] PSAT Pass
Message-ID:
<CAGu+VYs5Ubs4zhb0jUjpZXQyUxEprmOZ-ZkA0het30fpxNKTjQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hello all,
I tryed out the pass on APRS about 12:50 UTC today. Very very strong
satellite 57! Could not digepeat a packet for some reason. I think i was a
little confused about the paths, what are the paths for to and via? Im
using UISS. Got many frames of Telemetry this pass as well! Also bob you
should at PSAT to oscar.dcarr for recepetion reports. I noticed very few
people got digpeated... Also bob the frames that have all the numbers in
them, what do they mean, are the just noisy tlm frames? Also for all the
people out that wanted to know what their frame of telemetry means here you
go:
PSAT Beacon specification:
CALL beacon MODE NOF DET AGC VC IC TMP
Where:
CALLidentification of the beacon (callsign)beaconkeyword indicating
beginning of dataMODEA or B (A ? transmitter always on, B ? transmitter
turns on, if BPSK31 signal is present)NOFnumber of frame (0 ?
999)DETpercentage
of BPSK31 detection (0 ? 99%)AGCpercentage of AGC operation (0 ? 99%)VCsupply
voltage (10 mVolts)ICpower amplifier current (mAmps)TMPtemperature of PA
transistor (deg C)
The AGC measured voltage is highly nonlinearly dependent on the input
signal, morover the limiting values of measurement vary with temperature of
the chip and its supply voltage. Indicative only conversion equation was
computed as from 50Ohm generator to input of receiver Pin = 0.472xAGC-113.5
[dBm, %]
Example:
W3ADO-5 beacon B 044 03 24 540 198 +28
It means mode B active, frame number 044, BPSK31 03 %, AGC acting 24%,
supply voltage 5.40V, PA current 198mA ant temperature of the PA transistor
of +28?C.
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=52 >[08:47:54]
s#018259,0z200,jkIjkHjkGjkFikFikDikAhkahkbgkbgkcgkd
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:48:03]
T#651,842,074,130,132,415,00000000
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=52 >[08:49:26]
s#018260,0z200,dkdckebkeake0kf0kf0kf0kf0kf0jf0kg0kf
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=52 >[08:50:56]
s#018261,0z200,bkgbjgcjfgjfhjghjfhjfhifhifiifiifiif
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:51:06]
T#654,856,071,131,131,415,00000000
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:53:08]
T#656,855,071,131,130,415,00000000
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:54:09]
T#657,872,079,131,130,416,00000000
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=52 >[08:55:28]
s#018264,0z200,D0hD0hDAhDAgDBgCBgCCgCCgCCgCDgCDgBDg
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=52 >[08:57:00]
s#018265,0z200,BDgBDfBEfBEfBEfBEfBEfBEeBFeBFeCFeCFe
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:57:12]
T#660,865,092,131,129,415,00000000
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:58:12]
T#661,881,078,131,129,415,00000000
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=52 >[08:58:37]
s#018266,0z200,DFfDFfDGeEGfEGfEGfEGfFGfEFfFFeEFeFFe
Fm PSAT To APRSON Via ARISS <UI pid=F0 Len=34 >[08:59:13]
T#662,841,368,130,129,415,00000000
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 08:15:07 -0500
From: "Nick Pugh K5QXJ" <quadpugh@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] PSAT
Message-ID: <0b1101d0a1ed$24a94ae0$6dfbe0a0$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
What mode was PSAT in yesterday AM?
Thanks
nick
Office 337 593 8700
Cell 337 258 2527
Helping UL become a world Class Engineering and Educational School
Disagree I Learn
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 10, Issue 160
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
