| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 21.07.20 23:35l 689 Lines 25645 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB15284
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V15 284
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<OK0NAG<OK0NBR<F3KT<CX2SA
Sent: 200721/2129Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:35716 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB15284
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: SSB Electronics (Bruce Perens)
2. Re: SSB Electronics (Stephen E. Belter)
3. Nominations, for the record (Brennan Price)
4. Re: SSB Electronics (Gregory Beat)
5. Re: SSB Electronics (Gary Smith)
6. Re: Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB
(Jean Marc Momple)
7. Re: Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB (Dave Hartzell)
8. Re: Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB (GEO Badger)
9. Re: Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB (Zach Metzinger)
10. Re: Because I am being asked (Brennan Price)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 08:44:26 -0700
From: Bruce Perens <bruce@??????.???>
To: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@?????????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SSB Electronics
Message-ID:
<CAK2MWOs8zjf5odHNiOU=1mu9W-wkxENLGCa9vEraPuLZ4VyEgg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
They moved the business to Germany.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 7:58 AM Tom Lubbers K8TL via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> Has SSB electronics went belly up? All of my recent attempts end up at
> dead ends. A few weeks ago I saw some inquiries about the FUN CUBE
> dongle. I have 2 of them sitting here gathering dust!!
> Stay safe and healthy.
> Tom K8TL
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:52:22 +0000
From: "Stephen E. Belter" <seb@??????.???>
To: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@?????????.???>, AMSAT BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SSB Electronics
Message-ID: <7C186D29-FF99-46A3-BEE3-01DBF295A505@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Tom,
No. The manufacturers of preamps and other electronics for satellite and
EME amateur radio is alive and well. They are in Germany and can be found
at https://www.ssb.de .
For many years, their products were sold in the USA by Gerry Rodski of SSB
Electronic USA. I know Gerry's wife had a stroke and that Gerry has cut
back his sales and service activity.
You can still buy SSB-Electronic GmbH products from HRO at
https://www.hamradio.com .
73, Steve N9IP
--
Steve Belter, seb@??????.???
?On 7/21/20, 10:59 AM, "AMSAT-BB on behalf of Tom Lubbers K8TL via AMSAT-BB"
<amsat-bb-bounces@?????.??? on behalf of amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Has SSB electronics went belly up? All of my recent attempts end up at
dead ends. A few weeks ago I saw some inquiries about the FUN CUBE dongle.
I have 2 of them sitting here gathering dust!!
Stay safe and healthy.
Tom K8TL
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:46:02 +0000 (UTC)
From: Brennan Price <brennanprice@???????.???>
To: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Nominations, for the record
Message-ID: <1928377085.4203551.1595349962380@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
With respect to Paul's comment regarding one of Howie DeFelice's presumed
nominators:
"Unfortunately some have proposed canceling the GOLF program, includingone
Director who nominated you."
Beyond the extent necessary to support my determinations about any
candidate's eligibility to be nominated or serve, I have not disclosed who
nominated whom. it was not necessary to make such a disclosure in Howie's
case.??
Howie (and any candidate) may disclose who nominated him if he wishes, and
nominators may disclose their nominations if they wish as well. I will not
micromanage that process, but I do want to stress that eligibility of the
candidates has been determined with finality.?
73,Brennan Price, N4QXSecretary, Radio Amateur?
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:48:20 -0500
From: Gregory Beat <w9gb@??????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SSB Electronics
Message-ID: <9A6AC271-B455-4AE6-821D-6BCAA1BE6E6F@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
SSB-Electronic Gmb-pH
https://www.ssb.de/en/index?language=en
Annual Closing: Please note that we are closed from 27.07.2020 to 07.08.2020,
we will be back from 10.08.2020.
?
Are you referring about SSB Electronics USA ?
124 CHERRYWOOD DR
Mountain Top, PA
? Phone ( 570) 868-5643
==
From: Tom Lubbers K8TL <k8tl@?????????.???>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SSB Electronics
Has SSB electronics went belly up? All of my recent attempts end up at dead
ends. A few weeks ago I saw some inquiries about the FUN CUBE dongle. I
have 2 of them sitting here gathering dust!!
Stay safe and healthy.
Tom K8TL
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:50:34 -0500
From: Gary Smith <aa9js.ham@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] SSB Electronics
Message-ID:
<CA+ELj1mroNhHuggEs2YgbOAhJZFsrqL3XFG-6kGLDpEgv2e+2A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Tom,
The gentleman who is/was running the US side of things has pretty much left
the business due to health issues for the foreseeable future. When I
contacted him a couple of months ago he said to contact SSB Electronics in
Germany directly. I dont think they offer any of the FUNcube dongles etc
that SSB USA did. But they are very much still in business.
Cheers.
Gary AA9JS
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:13:45 +0400
From: Jean Marc Momple <jean.marc.momple@?????.???>
To: Daniel Schultz <n8fgv@???.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB
Message-ID: <9EAB6101-8F3A-47A4-9820-E62ED9C0E4EC@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dan,
Agree that the context are different but the only way to achieve same is to
work hard on it and without begging (as it seems that we do no have the
money for either HEO or GEO) no way we may succeed.
That said, there are some possibilities and if we try hard enough we may
succeed, the real issues are that the community as a whole does really work
hard enough and we are probably not passionate enough to put the birds up
there? Yes difficult but not impossible, may be US laws is a deterrent but
we are global and other jurisdiction may be used.
QO-100 has made us to think globally or at least half of it, this is we way
forward for both financing and putting birds up there. It we direct our
effort in that direction (a global vision) we have more chances to succeed.
So rethinking the HAM satellite strategy globally instead of thinking
regionally may work out.
Just my 1 cent input.
73
Jean Marc (3B8DU)
> On Jul 21, 2020, at 7:32 AM, Daniel Schultz via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> Yes, we once had a deal with Intelsat until it fell through. More recently
we
> had a deal with the US Air Force and one of its contractors, until that also
> fell through. The reason we don't have a western hemisphere transponder in
GEO
> is not because the "old guard" wants to shoot it down, but because these
types
> of deals are very difficult to pull off in a market driven economy such as
the
> US satellite industry.
>
> QO-100 was hosted on a satellite built for a royal government which is not
> responsible to stockholders, a government in which an amateur radio operator
> held a high position of influence. A US based company would have to answer
to
> Wall Street analysts to explain why they are giving away money that could
have
> been paid out in stock dividends.
>
> Changing the BOD membership will not alter any of these facts. It is not
> because we haven't asked the powers that be, and not because we are
reluctant
> to "jump ahead of the project and grab what is needed". Space is Hard, and
all
> the wishful thinking in the world is not going to change that.
>
> 73, Dan Schultz N8FGV
>
>> I am intrigued about QO-100 and have monitored it here in Florida by
>> remote WEB SDR access. I have not been active in the years since AO-40
>> failed and have been eager to see some HEO operations like I enjoyed
>> from AO-10 and AO-13. Listening to QO-100 has rekindled that interest.
>>
>> Last month on AMSAT-BB I posed the question about getting a GEO ride
>> share with a commercial satellite, something that was considered 12
>> years ago with Intelsat. Having a QO-100 type transponder here CONUS
>> would grow the hobby and get folks like me active again (and
>> contributing sums as I did for AO-40). However, the "old guard" shot
>> my idea down for the usual reasons. (See my threads last month).
>>
>> Having a QO-100 type transponder with a hybrid of narrow band linear
>> side and wide band digital side would open up a lot of opportunities
>> for operations, public service and experimentation.?? I hope the new
>> "slate" of BOD will consider this type of project as a priority.
>>
>> Personally, I think GOLF has not achieved results fast enough to
>> getting us a larger footprint. I am not advocating scrapping of that
>> effort, but sometimes you have to jump ahead of the project and grab
>> what is needed.
>>
>> 73 Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:33:27 -0600
From: Dave Hartzell <hartzell@?????.???>
To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB
Message-ID:
<CAKKR=DEYzy_1gT5UJ7aptMe+0RaCZtnvgiqySY-wGC_Btao6Aw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lots of interesting stuff going on with electric propulsion.... it may be
slow, but it's a cost effective way to raise an orbit.
https://www.enpulsion.com/technology/
Online ordering available!
Dave
ad0qe
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:25 AM Jean Marc Momple via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Agree that the context are different but the only way to achieve same is
> to work hard on it and without begging (as it seems that we do no have the
> money for either HEO or GEO) no way we may succeed.
>
> That said, there are some possibilities and if we try hard enough we may
> succeed, the real issues are that the community as a whole does really work
> hard enough and we are probably not passionate enough to put the birds up
> there? Yes difficult but not impossible, may be US laws is a deterrent but
> we are global and other jurisdiction may be used.
>
> QO-100 has made us to think globally or at least half of it, this is we
> way forward for both financing and putting birds up there. It we direct our
> effort in that direction (a global vision) we have more chances to succeed.
> So rethinking the HAM satellite strategy globally instead of thinking
> regionally may work out.
>
> Just my 1 cent input.
>
> 73
>
>
> Jean Marc (3B8DU)
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 2020, at 7:32 AM, Daniel Schultz via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, we once had a deal with Intelsat until it fell through. More
> recently we
> > had a deal with the US Air Force and one of its contractors, until that
> also
> > fell through. The reason we don't have a western hemisphere transponder
> in GEO
> > is not because the "old guard" wants to shoot it down, but because these
> types
> > of deals are very difficult to pull off in a market driven economy such
> as the
> > US satellite industry.
> >
> > QO-100 was hosted on a satellite built for a royal government which is
> not
> > responsible to stockholders, a government in which an amateur radio
> operator
> > held a high position of influence. A US based company would have to
> answer to
> > Wall Street analysts to explain why they are giving away money that
> could have
> > been paid out in stock dividends.
> >
> > Changing the BOD membership will not alter any of these facts. It is not
> > because we haven't asked the powers that be, and not because we are
> reluctant
> > to "jump ahead of the project and grab what is needed". Space is Hard,
> and all
> > the wishful thinking in the world is not going to change that.
> >
> > 73, Dan Schultz N8FGV
> >
> >> I am intrigued about QO-100 and have monitored it here in Florida by
> >> remote WEB SDR access. I have not been active in the years since AO-40
> >> failed and have been eager to see some HEO operations like I enjoyed
> >> from AO-10 and AO-13. Listening to QO-100 has rekindled that interest.
> >>
> >> Last month on AMSAT-BB I posed the question about getting a GEO ride
> >> share with a commercial satellite, something that was considered 12
> >> years ago with Intelsat. Having a QO-100 type transponder here CONUS
> >> would grow the hobby and get folks like me active again (and
> >> contributing sums as I did for AO-40). However, the "old guard" shot
> >> my idea down for the usual reasons. (See my threads last month).
> >>
> >> Having a QO-100 type transponder with a hybrid of narrow band linear
> >> side and wide band digital side would open up a lot of opportunities
> >> for operations, public service and experimentation.?? I hope the new
> >> "slate" of BOD will consider this type of project as a priority.
> >>
> >> Personally, I think GOLF has not achieved results fast enough to
> >> getting us a larger footprint. I am not advocating scrapping of that
> >> effort, but sometimes you have to jump ahead of the project and grab
> >> what is needed.
> >>
> >> 73 Joe
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
From: GEO Badger <w3ab@?????.???>
To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Dave Hartzell <hartzell@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB
Message-ID: <1988246739.5128889.1595364197842@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Get your IFM Nano Thruster, starting at $49K. It is cool though.
I like that they are thinking outside the box.---?
Ciao baby, catch you on the flip side??
73 de W3AB/GEO ???
http://www.w3ab.org
You can say "over", you can say "out", you just can't say "over and out".
On Tuesday, July 21, 2020, 01:37:59 PM PDT, Dave Hartzell via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Lots of interesting stuff going on with electric propulsion....? it may be
slow, but it's a cost effective way to raise an orbit.
https://www.enpulsion.com/technology/
Online ordering available!
Dave
ad0qe
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:25 AM Jean Marc Momple via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Agree that the context are different but the only way to achieve same is
> to work hard on it and without begging (as it seems that we do no have the
> money for either HEO or GEO) no way we may succeed.
>
> That said, there are some possibilities and if we try hard enough we may
> succeed, the real issues are that the community as a whole does really work
> hard enough and we are probably not passionate enough to put the birds up
> there? Yes difficult but not impossible, may be US laws is a deterrent but
> we are global and other jurisdiction may be used.
>
> QO-100 has made us to think globally or at least half of it, this is we
> way forward for both financing and putting birds up there. It we direct our
> effort in that direction (a global vision) we have more chances to succeed.
> So rethinking the HAM satellite strategy globally instead of thinking
> regionally may work out.
>
> Just my 1 cent input.
>
> 73
>
>
> Jean Marc (3B8DU)
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 2020, at 7:32 AM, Daniel Schultz via AMSAT-BB <
> amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, we once had a deal with Intelsat until it fell through. More
> recently we
> > had a deal with the US Air Force and one of its contractors, until that
> also
> > fell through. The reason we don't have a western hemisphere transponder
> in GEO
> > is not because the "old guard" wants to shoot it down, but because these
> types
> > of deals are very difficult to pull off in a market driven economy such
> as the
> > US satellite industry.
> >
> > QO-100 was hosted on a satellite built for a royal government which is
> not
> > responsible to stockholders, a government in which an amateur radio
> operator
> > held a high position of influence. A US based company would have to
> answer to
> > Wall Street analysts to explain why they are giving away money that
> could have
> > been paid out in stock dividends.
> >
> > Changing the BOD membership will not alter any of these facts. It is not
> > because we haven't asked the powers that be, and not because we are
> reluctant
> > to "jump ahead of the project and grab what is needed". Space is Hard,
> and all
> > the wishful thinking in the world is not going to change that.
> >
> > 73, Dan Schultz N8FGV
> >
> >> I am intrigued about QO-100 and have monitored it here in Florida by
> >> remote WEB SDR access. I have not been active in the years since AO-40
> >> failed and have been eager to see some HEO operations like I enjoyed
> >> from AO-10 and AO-13. Listening to QO-100 has rekindled that interest.
> >>
> >> Last month on AMSAT-BB I posed the question about getting a GEO ride
> >> share with a commercial satellite, something that was considered 12
> >> years ago with Intelsat. Having a QO-100 type transponder here CONUS
> >> would grow the hobby and get folks like me active again (and
> >> contributing sums as I did for AO-40). However, the "old guard" shot
> >> my idea down for the usual reasons. (See my threads last month).
> >>
> >> Having a QO-100 type transponder with a hybrid of narrow band linear
> >> side and wide band digital side would open up a lot of opportunities
> >> for operations, public service and experimentation.?? I hope the new
> >> "slate" of BOD will consider this type of project as a priority.
> >>
> >> Personally, I think GOLF has not achieved results fast enough to
> >> getting us a larger footprint. I am not advocating scrapping of that
> >> effort, but sometimes you have to jump ahead of the project and grab
> >> what is needed.
> >>
> >> 73 Joe
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:00:02 -0500
From: Zach Metzinger <zmetzing@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Elections HEO QO-100' Linear NB + Digital WB
Message-ID: <0e0903a8-658d-cf11-b134-307b752e8919@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 07/21/20 15:33, Dave Hartzell via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> Lots of interesting stuff going on with electric propulsion.... it may be
> slow, but it's a cost effective way to raise an orbit.
>
> https://www.enpulsion.com/technology/
>
> Online ordering available!
I, too, would love to see electric propulsion on one of AMSAT's birds.
However, it is not as simple as "buy this off the shelf":
- Power: One must also consider the 40W required at nominal thrust. This
has implications for generation (solar cell area/efficiency required),
management (circuit board space & heat dissipation), and storage (battery).
- Physical integration: How big is it and how much does it weigh?
- Control: The algorithms to alter one's orbit in space are known, but
much planning, coding, and testing is needed to make sure money isn't
wasted by doing something that causes early de-orbit.
- Testing: Where does AMSAT obtain the testing facilities necessary to
ensure proper operation, or even inclusion in the launch manifest,
should the ride provider dictate it.
All of these problems are solvable with enough time, appropriate funding
for all aspects of the project, and motivated, knowledgeable volunteers.
As for the basic cost of the the thruster: I'll chip in $100. We need
only 489 more people, roughly, to do the same.
Who's with me?
--- Zach
N0ZGO
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:21:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: Brennan Price <brennanprice@???????.???>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Because I am being asked
Message-ID: <598835963.4333531.1595366484789@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Zach,
I will be checking returned ballots against the voter list as they are
returned as an aid to determine who might be eligible for a replacement
ballot come August 12. The voter list is static while the membership portal
is dynamic, so I'm dealing with the accounting separately.
With the caveat that my ability to accommodate requests to verify receipt
will be inversely proportional to the number of requests I receive, members
may feel free to ask.
Without committing future leadership to a course of action, your suggestion
is among several ideals that are worthwhile.
73 de Brennan N4QX
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:58:18 -0500
From: Zach Metzinger <zmetzing@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Because I am being asked
Message-ID: <901f8e60-b912-a524-f8fa-717e73014f89@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 07/21/20 0943, Brennan Price via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> Out of necessity to determine a fixed voter list and in accordance with
previous announcements, the voter list was invariantly determined on the
basis of memberships in good standing on July 1. Membership in good standing
on that date is the criterion I will use in determining whether to issue
replacement or original ballots.
Hello Brennan-
Is there a mechanism whereby a voter could check that their ballot was
received by AMSAT? This would not include the choices on the ballot,
just that it was received.
I imagine this could be part of the launch.amsat.org interface, but I
don't really know.
If not for this year, could this be implemented for the next voting season?
Thanks,
--- Zach
N0ZGO
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 15, Issue 284
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
