| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 15.09.20 00:52l 682 Lines 25054 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB15378
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V15 378
Path: IW8PGT<I3XTY<GB7COW<GB7CIP<CX2SA
Sent: 200914/2247Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:39818 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB15378
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. New LOTW ADIF File Generator (Wes Baden)
2. Re: New LOTW ADIF File Generator (Don KB2YSI)
3. Re: New version of LOTW (Bob Liddy (K8BL))
4. Amazon donations (Francis Geraci)
5. Re: Amazon donations (Bruce)
6. Re: Amazon donations (jim@?????.????
7. AO-92 (Roy Dean)
8. Re: AO-92 (Burns Fisher)
9. Route 66 On The Air (Scott Davis)
10. Re: AO-92 (Andrew Glasbrenner)
11. Re: AO-92 (Bill Gaylord)
12. Re: AO-92 (David Worboys)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:11:36 -0400
From: Wes Baden <badencapecod@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] New LOTW ADIF File Generator
Message-ID:
<CAPvDab1Lcr=vvXVwHfYviYP+pMLJOxNBNgVjJ1XszFp3+v7RLg@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I didn't mean for my original post to kick up any dust. In hindsight, it
was a classic "Who Moved My Cheese?" moment. Train a mouse to move through
a maze to find cheese, then move the position of the cheese, and the mouse
will become disoriented and panic at first. In my case, I should have
played with the new system for a while before posting. Many thanks to
those who passed on information about navigating the ADIF file generator
now. Using TAB rather than ENTER, as I did previously, gets me down from
one entry line to another (ENTER no longer does, at least on my PC). Also,
the elimination of "Phone," replaced by a number of voice modes, really
does make a lot of sense. I miss what are probably the most common linear
satellite modes, CW and now SSB, being at the top of the Mode list, but as
someone pointed out, they are findable fairly quickly by typing in "C" or
"S" first. I have no trouble using LOTW at this point (I really need to
get a logging program, though!), and my CW and SSB contacts are matching on
LOTW just as they should be. I appreciate the coders' ongoing efforts to
tweak LOTW and made it better over time. In the future, I just need to
remember not to panic when the cheese gets moved once again.
73, Wes NA1ME
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:37:39 -0400
From: Don KB2YSI <kb2ysi@?????.???>
To: Wes Baden <badencapecod@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New LOTW ADIF File Generator
Message-ID:
<CAAJiE8Oj9zapOZPFbdaGoT54O35OxvWB9Ew-=JbwbL0BuxUH=g@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
You should see the dumb logging solution that I am using.... I too need to
get back to using a logging program.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 10:15 Wes Baden via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
> I didn't mean for my original post to kick up any dust. In hindsight, it
> was a classic "Who Moved My Cheese?" moment. Train a mouse to move through
> a maze to find cheese, then move the position of the cheese, and the mouse
> will become disoriented and panic at first. In my case, I should have
> played with the new system for a while before posting. Many thanks to
> those who passed on information about navigating the ADIF file generator
> now. Using TAB rather than ENTER, as I did previously, gets me down from
> one entry line to another (ENTER no longer does, at least on my PC). Also,
> the elimination of "Phone," replaced by a number of voice modes, really
> does make a lot of sense. I miss what are probably the most common linear
> satellite modes, CW and now SSB, being at the top of the Mode list, but as
> someone pointed out, they are findable fairly quickly by typing in "C" or
> "S" first. I have no trouble using LOTW at this point (I really need to
> get a logging program, though!), and my CW and SSB contacts are matching on
> LOTW just as they should be. I appreciate the coders' ongoing efforts to
> tweak LOTW and made it better over time. In the future, I just need to
> remember not to panic when the cheese gets moved once again.
>
> 73, Wes NA1ME
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Bob Liddy (K8BL)" <k8bl@?????????.???>
To: W3AB/GEO <w3ab@?????.???>, Don KB2YSI <kb2ysi@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Wes Baden <badencapecod@?????.???>,
The LoTW Team <lotw-admin@????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] New version of LOTW
Message-ID: <1070084991.2071052.1600095916071@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Don,
My point is that there are several differences across the application
with the terminology of the same Mode. It can be confusing to members
that are not frequent users.
It should be OK to mention something that is factually true. I have no
problem using LoTW and appreciate the efforts that the League and its
volunteers put forth for our benefit. It would be wonderful if more Hams
would make use of it for confirmations. Of the 250,000 Q's I have in there,
there are only about 1/3 that have been confirmed.
TNX/73/GL,? ? ? ? ?Bob? K8BL
On Monday, September 14, 2020, 09:19:23 AM EDT, Don KB2YSI
<kb2ysi@?????.???> wrote:
I suggest you join the ARRL-LoTW@??????.?? to see what is going on. Rich
Murphy (I think I have the name correct), the author of TSQL, is very active
on there. Make sure you SEARCH before posting.
People who are volunteering to make software, services, etc... should be
treated as humans. Sad that it needs to be said.?
TSQL ! = LoTW
I have had no issues with the new version of TSQL logging satellite
contacts. FM & SSB are still accepted/available.?
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020, 19:23 W3AB/GEO via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> I'll betcha there was a bunch of coders who didn't get good directions
from HQ, didn't talk to each other & prolly aren't hams.
>
> ?___
> Sent from my two way wrist watch
> 73 de W3AB/GEO?
>
> On Sep 13, 2020, 12:36, at 12:36, "Bob Liddy (K8BL) via AMSAT-BB"
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>Jerry (No Call), Wes-NA1ME, et al:
>>
>>Well, it appears the ARRL adds to the LoTW confusion themselves.
>>
>>For Awards, on DXCC there are categories for modes CW, PHONE & DIGITAL.
>>
>>For WAS there are categories for modes CW, PHONE, DIGITAL, FT4, FT8,
>>PSK31
>>and RTTY.
>>
>>For VUCC, there are no mode categories since it only concerns Grids.
>>
>>For QSO listings, there are a ton of modes available. But, when it
>>comes to Voice type
>>modes there are many varieties - PHONE, FM, AM, SSB, etc. However there
>>NO
>>entries for USB or LSB, just SSB.
>>
>>In the newest version of TQSL, there are mode choices for SSB-type QSOs
>>of USB, LSB
>>and merely SSB in addition to many other types of modes in the longest
>>list ever known
>>to mankind.
>>
>>So, is there any wonder that LoTW users are confused????? Sometimes
>>it's PHONE and
>>sometimes it's SSB and sometimes it's a version of SSB (LSB/USB).
>>GEEEEESH!!!!
>>
>>TNX/73,? ? ? Bob? K8BL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Sunday, September 13, 2020, 02:26:18 PM EDT, Jerry via AMSAT-BB
>><amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hello Wes,
>>
>>a properly logged sat qso is with correct uplink mode+dwnlink mode, the
>>correct uplink+dwnlink freq(band), propagation mode SAT, time,etc.
>>when uploading my qso's, every time some qsl's are rejected because
>>people log them wrong. Without the right propagationmode SAT most of
>>them looks like a tropo qso, and that's not the the same. You need to
>>use good logging software.
>>I've never seen VOICE as a mode of operation btw...?
>>
>>Best 73's
>>Jerry
>>----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
>>Van: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
>>Aan: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
>>Verzonden: Zondag 13 september 2020 12:38:37
>>Onderwerp: [amsat-bb] New version of LOTW
>>
>>Anyone else not pleased with the new version "improving" LOTW, at least
>>as
>>it involves SAT contacts?? Can we get ARRL to undo some things?? At
>>least
>>on my computer, you no longer can press the Enter key to go down entry
>>fields one after another.? It's a much slower process now.? Also, the
>>two
>>most common modes that we've been using on LOTW, CW and VOICE, are no
>>longer first in line, where an expanded list of modes is alphabetized.
>>This also slows down entries.? Worse yet, VOICE is no longer a listed
>>mode
>>at all.? It's been replaced by SSB, LSB and USB.? I could be wrong, but
>>isn't this in particular going to make QSO matching more difficult??
>>Should
>>SAT ops simply enter SSB, or should it be USB (the output of
>>satellites) or
>>LSB (our input to them)?? In sum, the whole process is now slower with
>>multiple opportunities for matching errors and contacts not being
>>confirmed.? Ugh.
>>
>>Wes NA1ME
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>Opinions expressed
>>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>of AMSAT-NA.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>program!
>>Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>Opinions expressed
>>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>of AMSAT-NA.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>program!
>>Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>>Opinions expressed
>>are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>>of AMSAT-NA.
>>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>>program!
>>Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:08:40 -0400
From: Francis Geraci <fgeraci14@?????.???>
To: Suryono Adisoemarta via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Amazon donations
Message-ID:
<CA+QL-dCdwzDNKcLMwXCG1JjCFgbOdLJN3A2AG1Fc9PFD40BgeA@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I just got an Email from AmazonSmile.
$5,660.00 was donated to Amsat.
All you Amazon buyers, use "Amazonsmile" when buying, and donate to Amsat.
IMHO
W1FXX
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:15:34 -0500
From: Bruce <kk5do@?????.???>
To: Francis Geraci <fgeraci14@?????.???>
Cc: Suryono Adisoemarta via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Amazon donations
Message-ID: <AD219100-00C6-4B90-B0C9-6B6A94862F2A@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you use the app, you can set it up for smile. If you use a web browser
be sure to always goto smile.amazon.com
73...bruce
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2020, at 11:09 AM, Francis Geraci via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
?I just got an Email from AmazonSmile.
$5,660.00 was donated to Amsat.
All you Amazon buyers, use "Amazonsmile" when buying, and donate to Amsat.
IMHO
W1FXX
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: "jim@?????.???? <jim@?????.???>
To: "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Amazon donations
Message-ID: <1600102157.486311771@????.?????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Bruce said:
> If you use the app, you can set it up for smile. If you use a web browser
be sure to always goto smile.amazon.com
I normally use a browser, but I do have the Amazon app on my phone. Note
that it is rather hidden on the app. On the app, press the three horizontal
bars in the upper left corner for the main menu. Then under "Programs and
Features", select "See All Programs". Then scroll down to "AmazonSmile"
(not in alphabetical order).
73
-----
Jim Walls - K6CCC
jim@?????.???
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:55:12 -0400
From: Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92
Message-ID:
<CADGPg2sr-XCgRm-vsoaTc2+S-NB0Qx1wOYVpnXMUHaqxHDJT5A@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I can find no information about AO-92 going silent recently. Was it
commanded into a silent state (as AO-85 was shortly before it went silent
permanently)?
--Roy
K3RLD
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:21:10 -0400
From: Burns Fisher <wb1fj-bb@??????.??>
To: Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxUe1Fvx_mY84t0o6gVqC=oO4X11VpPe-RFV+y2TCjgOhw@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
It's been in Facebook and on Twitter. Maybe I said something here a few
days ago. In any case, its battery is having trouble keeping it running
through eclipses. It then goes into auto-safe mode. There is apparently a
bug in the software that I wrote for the Foxes so that under some
circumstances it "forgets" that it went into safe automatically and stays
in safe mode even when the voltage comes back up after it enters the sun.
In that case we have to wait for a command station to re-enable it. This
is not too tenable over the long run, so I'm not sure what the ops people
plan to do. It would be nice if the batteries failed open so it worked
reliably in sun like AO-7. Unfortunately, that did NOT happen with AO-85.
We'll see with 92.
73,
Burns WB1FJ
AMSAT Flight Software
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:57 PM Roy Dean via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
wrote:
> I can find no information about AO-92 going silent recently. Was it
> commanded into a silent state (as AO-85 was shortly before it went silent
> permanently)?
>
> --Roy
> K3RLD
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:23:41 -0600
From: Scott Davis <scottk5ta@?????.???>
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] Route 66 On The Air
Message-ID: <0D401AF1-0012-4F31-B5BC-D43D4FAB57B4@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I will be on the air as W6H occasionally until this Sunday, 20-Sep, as New
Mexico?s satellite representative in the "Route 66 On The Air" special
event. For general info visit http://w6jbt.org/?page_id=19 . QSL via
K8TE. Our coordinator is working on getting a certificate for LoTW, but
it's not up yet. Besides, the paper cards are nice-looking. Christy,
KB6LTY, is also on sats as W6D from San Bernardino County -- you remember
the old song "...Kingman, Barstow, San Bernardino!" We worked each other
this afternoon on PO-101. -Scott K5TA DM65 Albuquerque.
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:12:11 -0400
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@??????????.???>
To: "'Roy Dean'" <royldean@?????.???>
Cc: 'AMSAT BB' <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92
Message-ID: <02de01d68ae4$189087b0$49b19710$@??????????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I've mostly been posting about it on Twitter.
AO-92 has a cell that's failing, and towards the end of many eclipses it
goes into auto-safe mode at 3.6v. If the battery drops low enough the IHU
resets, and it comes back up in normal safe mode. Mark and I have been
commanding to repeater mode on the first available pass after the resets,
but it's not a long term sustainable answer. Last night Mark commanded the
transmitter completely off while we consider a plan of action.
Leaving autosafe on and the tx off, we may be able to turn the repeater on
ad-hoc for weekends or such, completely dependent on command station
availability. Turning autosafe and the IHU off like we did with AO-85 will
kill the satellite pretty quickly, so that's not a good response either. So,
we'll look at resets and battery states before this weekend and see where we
stand.
73, Drew KO4MA
AMSAT VP Operations
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Roy Dean via
AMSAT-BB
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:55 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92
I can find no information about AO-92 going silent recently. Was it
commanded into a silent state (as AO-85 was shortly before it went silent
permanently)?
--Roy
K3RLD
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:30:36 -0500
From: Bill Gaylord <chibill110@?????.???>
To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@??????????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>, Roy Dean <royldean@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92
Message-ID:
<CALS66FsJjHavXoZhc4KqpT6HtbJPGDo5hJFdApCJvxOGDgm_sQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Just wondering why AO-92 is failing so much quicker than AO-85. AO-85
lasted about 4 years in space till it went silent / started having battery
issues. AO-92 has only been in space for about 2 and 3/4 years.
AO-91 seems to be doing okay. Or at least I haven't seen anyone talking
about it going into safemode. And I haven't heard it in safemode.
73
William KD9KCK
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:14 PM Andrew Glasbrenner via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> I've mostly been posting about it on Twitter.
>
> AO-92 has a cell that's failing, and towards the end of many eclipses it
> goes into auto-safe mode at 3.6v. If the battery drops low enough the IHU
> resets, and it comes back up in normal safe mode. Mark and I have been
> commanding to repeater mode on the first available pass after the resets,
> but it's not a long term sustainable answer. Last night Mark commanded the
> transmitter completely off while we consider a plan of action.
>
> Leaving autosafe on and the tx off, we may be able to turn the repeater on
> ad-hoc for weekends or such, completely dependent on command station
> availability. Turning autosafe and the IHU off like we did with AO-85 will
> kill the satellite pretty quickly, so that's not a good response either.
> So,
> we'll look at resets and battery states before this weekend and see where
> we
> stand.
>
> 73, Drew KO4MA
> AMSAT VP Operations
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Roy Dean via
> AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:55 PM
> To: amsat-bb@?????.???
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92
>
> I can find no information about AO-92 going silent recently. Was it
> commanded into a silent state (as AO-85 was shortly before it went silent
> permanently)?
>
> --Roy
> K3RLD
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to
> all
> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:39:33 -0400
From: David Worboys <kg4zlb@??????.???>
To: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@??????????.???>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AO-92
Message-ID: <DBE04B49-A2C2-4660-B064-292D687BA688@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Drew, would it be possible that if you are able command it back on an ad-hoc
basis it could be commanded into L/V mode for those sessions? There are
plenty of U/V opportunities up there for anyone already.
Thanks
David
KG4ZLB
On Sep 14, 2020, at 6:12 PM, Andrew Glasbrenner via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
I've mostly been posting about it on Twitter.
AO-92 has a cell that's failing, and towards the end of many eclipses it
goes into auto-safe mode at 3.6v. If the battery drops low enough the IHU
resets, and it comes back up in normal safe mode. Mark and I have been
commanding to repeater mode on the first available pass after the resets,
but it's not a long term sustainable answer. Last night Mark commanded the
transmitter completely off while we consider a plan of action.
Leaving autosafe on and the tx off, we may be able to turn the repeater on
ad-hoc for weekends or such, completely dependent on command station
availability. Turning autosafe and the IHU off like we did with AO-85 will
kill the satellite pretty quickly, so that's not a good response either. So,
we'll look at resets and battery states before this weekend and see where we
stand.
73, Drew KO4MA
AMSAT VP Operations
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb-bounces@?????.???> On Behalf Of Roy Dean via
AMSAT-BB
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:55 PM
To: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] AO-92
I can find no information about AO-92 going silent recently. Was it
commanded into a silent state (as AO-85 was shortly before it went silent
permanently)?
--Roy
K3RLD
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 15, Issue 378
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
