| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 01.12.20 03:29l 847 Lines 31592 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB15450
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V15 450
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<DB0RES<ON0AR<GB7CIP<CX2SA
Sent: 201201/0128Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:44552 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB15450
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency (ka3hdo@?????.????
2. R: RE: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency (ik5jrz@???.???
3. Giving Tuesday (ka3hdo@?????.????
4. Re: R: RE: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency (Armand SP3QFE)
5. Re: R: RE: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency (M5AKA)
6. 9k6 FSK packet with FT-991A (Mirek Kasal) (Miroslav Kasal)
7. Re: ISS SSTV frequency (Armand SP3QFE)
8. FoxTelem 1.09 released (Chris Thompson)
9. Re: FoxTelem 1.09 released (Chris Thompson)
10. Re: FoxTelem 1.09 released (Alan Johnston)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:29:34 -0500
From: <ka3hdo@?????.???>
To: <ik5jrz@???.??>, <fabrizio.carrai@?????.???>, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Message-ID: <050301d6c75f$e656b130$b3041390$@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
All,
We CANNOT move the ARISS SSTV frequency to 145.825. This is being used for
other satellites employing APRS and we would interfere with their operation.
Prior to their being an ARISS station on ISS, we conducted an extensive,
international effort to ensure ARISS had a clear downlink on 2 meters. We
worked with all IARU regions and concluded that the best world-wide downlink
frequency for Human would be 145.80 MHz. At the time (1997) the United
States had terrestrial APRS on 145.79. In the USA we worked with the APRS
community in a collaborative fashion to QSY APRS terrestrial from 145.79 to
144.39 (where it is today). This was a HUGE effort and required many
digipeaters, several on snow covered mountains, to be modified or replaced.
Donations were collected. And AMSAT-NA and TAPR worked together to make it
happen.
Again, please note that IARU region 1 agreed with this downlink frequency
for human spaceflight many years ago so we could have one common downlink.
I am very sorry you are experiencing this. I think this will take local
coordination to resolve this. Similar to what we did for terrestrial APRS.
Trying to move ARISS around in the very small OSCAR 2 meter sub-band
(145.8-146) is virtually unworkable, given the many 2 meter satellites that
are employing this band.
I hope this helps explain things from an ARISS perspective. Back in the
day, I was given the unenviable task of working these frequency coordination
issues for human spaceflight. To be clear, we are much better today than
some of the issues we were experiencing in the past. And changing things
around will probably make it worse for ARISS and other users in the
satellite community.
73, Frank Bauer, KA3HDO
Chair, ARISS-International
-----Original Message-----
From: ik5jrz@???.?? <ik5jrz@???.??>
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 2:36 PM
To: fabrizio.carrai@?????.???? amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Thanks for answer,
The repeater is R7a (Monte Secchieta), it's not only an Italian problem
unfortunately, I have read many complaints in other areas as well. I don't
question the correct spacing between frequencies, but I'm afraid it's only
on actual paper. I don't want to doubt that the repeater is working
correctly, but I think that if the ISS transmitted at 145.825, since when it
transmits in SSTV APRS is disabled, the problem would be solved. The video
demonstrates the proximity between the frequencies even if I admit to being
in the high area and to receive the repeater very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsoSjh54a3A&ab_channel=IK5JRZThanks again.
Carlo IK5JRZ.
----Messaggio originale----
Da: amsat-bb@?????.???
Data: 30-nov-2020 12.51
A: "Pedro Converso"<pconver@?????.???>
Cc: "AMSAT BB"<amsat-bb@?????.???>
Ogg: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS SSTV frequency
According to the band plan reported on the ARI web site, the space
communication band is protected starting at 145.794 Mhz, i.e. 6 Khz below
145.800 Mhz. The R7a is indeed at 145.7875 Mhz with a bandwidth of 12 Khz
there shouldn't be any interference (in theory). Have you checked which
repeater is in your (our) zone ?
Ciao
Fabrizio IU5GEZ
Il giorno dom 29 nov 2020 alle ore 23:11 Pedro Converso via AMSAT-BB <
amsat-bb@?????.???> ha scritto:
> This situation doesn't happen in IARU R2, as 145.790-145.800 is a
> protection segment.
>
> In IARU R1, there is no such a protection, suggest request change thru
> your IARU Rep.
>
>
> On 11/29/20, John Brier via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
> > What repeater are you referring to exactly?
> >
> > 73, John Brier KG4AKV
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020, 16:51 ik5jrz--- via AMSAT-BB
> > <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> I am very interesting to know how many peoples in the world have
> >> my, and not only mine..problem for receive ISS SSTV on 145.800. The
> >> problem is the repeater (7a) at 145.787.5 and ISS , for doppler
> >> naturally go down
> >> 145.800
> >> and its impossible to receive well if someone talk on repeater.
> >> Thanks for attention.
> >> Carlo IK5JRZ.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
> >> available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
> >> Opinions
> >> expressed
> >> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> >> views of AMSAT-NA.
> >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> >> program!
> >> Subscription settings:
> >> https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum
> > available to all interested persons worldwide without requiring
membership.
> Opinions
> > expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> > views of AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> > Subscription settings:
> > https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect
> the official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
*Fabrizio*
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:53:57 +0100 (CET)
From: "ik5jrz@???.??? <ik5jrz@???.??>
To: <ka3hdo@?????.???>
Cc: amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] R: RE: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Message-ID: <1761b25e89f.ik5jrz@???.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks Frank,
saying to move to 145.825 in fact I forgot all the other problems but it is
certainly a local problem in some areas. So our only hope is that these
repeaters will not be renewed or converted to digital.
Thanks anyway for the reply.
73 Carlo IK5JRZ.
----Messaggio originale----
Da: ka3hdo@?????.???
Data: 30-nov-2020 22.29
A: <ik5jrz@???.??>, <fabrizio.carrai@?????.???>, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Ogg: RE: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
All,
We CANNOT move the ARISS SSTV frequency to 145.825. This is being used for
other satellites employing APRS and we would interfere with their operation.
Prior to their being an ARISS station on ISS, we conducted an extensive,
international effort to ensure ARISS had a clear downlink on 2 meters. We
worked with all IARU regions and concluded that the best world-wide downlink
frequency for Human would be 145.80 MHz. At the time (1997) the United
States had terrestrial APRS on 145.79. In the USA we worked with the APRS
community in a collaborative fashion to QSY APRS terrestrial from 145.79 to
144.39 (where it is today). This was a HUGE effort and required many
digipeaters, several on snow covered mountains, to be modified or replaced.
Donations were collected. And AMSAT-NA and TAPR worked together to make it
happen.
Again, please note that IARU region 1 agreed with this downlink frequency
for human spaceflight many years ago so we could have one common downlink.
I am very sorry you are experiencing this. I think this will take local
coordination to resolve this. Similar to what we did for terrestrial APRS.
Trying to move ARISS around in the very small OSCAR 2 meter sub-band
(145.8-146) is virtually unworkable, given the many 2 meter satellites that
are employing this band.
I hope this helps explain things from an ARISS perspective. Back in the
day, I was given the unenviable task of working these frequency coordination
issues for human spaceflight. To be clear, we are much better today than
some of the issues we were experiencing in the past. And changing things
around will probably make it worse for ARISS and other users in the
satellite community.
73, Frank Bauer, KA3HDO
Chair, ARISS-International
-----Original Message-----
From: ik5jrz@???.?? <ik5jrz@???.??>
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 2:36 PM
To: fabrizio.carrai@?????.???? amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Thanks for answer,
The repeater is R7a (Monte Secchieta), it's not only an Italian problem
unfortunately, I have read many complaints in other areas as well. I don't
question the correct spacing between frequencies, but I'm afraid it's only
on actual paper. I don't want to doubt that the repeater is working
correctly, but I think that if the ISS transmitted at 145.825, since when it
transmits in SSTV APRS is disabled, the problem would be solved. The video
demonstrates the proximity between the frequencies even if I admit to being
in the high area and to receive the repeater very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsoSjh54a3A&ab_channel=IK5JRZThanks
again.
Carlo IK5JRZ.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:20:25 -0500
From: <ka3hdo@?????.???>
To: "'AMSAT'" <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Giving Tuesday
Message-ID: <055201d6c767$00ff7970$02fe6c50$@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
All,
I would like to remind everyone that tomorrow is Giving Tuesday.
If you feel that satellite development is important and you support the
educational activities many of us do to promote STEM careers and the amateur
radio hobby, then don't forget the teams that are making that happen!
Whether it is a donation to GOLF:
https://www.amsat.org/donations/amsat-golf-program-donations/
or to ARISS: https://www.ariss.org/donate.html,
your donation is welcomed and appreciated. You would be surprised how each
donation, little or big, come together allow these projects and programs to
be realized.
For those that plan to donate during tomorrow's Giving Tuesday, we all thank
you in advance!
73, Frank Bauer, KA3HDO
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 23:34:50 +0100
From: Armand SP3QFE <kontakt@??????.???>
To: ik5jrz@???.??
Cc: ka3hdo@?????.???? amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] R: RE: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Message-ID: <6b92881cf7b79b7ce5c888339556c52c@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Dear Carlo,
I heard about similar troubles over the Western part of Europe, however,
I think it happens not very often. The ISS appears only a few times in
the region of the terrestrial repeater. Moreover, the directional
antenna system for your ground station should help you to separate
signals from different sources (except in a few exceptional situations).
For the part of orbit between TCA and LOS, you can try to use a
horizontal antenna, then you should decrease interferences from the
vertical polarization from terrestrial repeaters.
You can also ask the local repeater coordinator to move its frequency to
avoid interferences, especially in the case, when the repeater is not
local, but with a wide range! You can also ask to change the FM to
Narrow-FM mode for this repeater. Good luck.
Do you know the callsign and the location of this repeater (locator)?
73, Armand SP3QFE
W dniu 2020-11-30 22:53, ik5jrz--- via AMSAT-BB napisa?(a):
> Thanks Frank,
> saying to move to 145.825 in fact I forgot all the other problems but
> it is certainly a local problem in some areas. So our only hope is
> that these repeaters will not be renewed or converted to digital.
> Thanks anyway for the reply.
> 73 Carlo IK5JRZ.
>
>
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: ka3hdo@?????.???
> Data: 30-nov-2020 22.29
> A: <ik5jrz@???.??>, <fabrizio.carrai@?????.???>, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
> Ogg: RE: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
>
> All,
>
> We CANNOT move the ARISS SSTV frequency to 145.825. This is being
> used for other satellites employing APRS and we would interfere with
> their operation.
>
> Prior to their being an ARISS station on ISS, we conducted an
> extensive, international effort to ensure ARISS had a clear downlink
> on 2 meters. We worked with all IARU regions and concluded that the
> best world-wide downlink frequency for Human would be 145.80 MHz. At
> the time (1997) the United States had terrestrial APRS on 145.79. In
> the USA we worked with the APRS community in a collaborative fashion
> to QSY APRS terrestrial from 145.79 to 144.39 (where it is today).
> This was a HUGE effort and required many digipeaters, several on snow
> covered mountains, to be modified or replaced. Donations were
> collected. And AMSAT-NA and TAPR worked together to make it happen.
>
> Again, please note that IARU region 1 agreed with this downlink
> frequency for human spaceflight many years ago so we could have one
> common downlink. I am very sorry you are experiencing this. I think
> this will take local coordination to resolve this. Similar to what we
> did for terrestrial APRS. Trying to move ARISS around in the very
> small OSCAR 2 meter sub-band (145.8-146) is virtually unworkable,
> given the many 2 meter satellites that are employing this band.
>
> I hope this helps explain things from an ARISS perspective. Back in
> the day, I was given the unenviable task of working these frequency
> coordination issues for human spaceflight. To be clear, we are much
> better today than some of the issues we were experiencing in the past.
> And changing things around will probably make it worse for ARISS and
> other users in the satellite community.
>
> 73, Frank Bauer, KA3HDO
> Chair, ARISS-International
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ik5jrz@???.?? <ik5jrz@???.??>
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 2:36 PM
> To: fabrizio.carrai@?????.???? amsat-bb@?????.???
> Subject: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
>
> Thanks for answer,
> The repeater is R7a (Monte Secchieta), it's not only an Italian
> problem unfortunately, I have read many complaints in other areas as
> well. I don't question the correct spacing between frequencies, but
> I'm afraid it's only on actual paper. I don't want to doubt that the
> repeater is working correctly, but I think that if the ISS transmitted
> at 145.825, since when it transmits in SSTV APRS is disabled, the
> problem would be solved. The video demonstrates the proximity between
> the frequencies even if I admit to being in the high area and to
> receive the repeater very well.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsoSjh54a3A&ab_channel=IK5JRZThanks
> again.
> Carlo IK5JRZ.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:47:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@?????.??.??>
To: "ka3hdo@?????.???? <ka3hdo@?????.???>, "ik5jrz@???.???
<ik5jrz@???.??>
Cc: "amsat-bb@?????.???? <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] R: RE: R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Message-ID: <764759032.5986925.1606776425568@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Frank,
IARU Region 1 has been promoting the use of 145.765 MHz (aka RV-63 or R7a)
as a repeater output channel for some years.
In UK we have 8 repeaters on the channel, there's a similar situation in
many countries in Europe.
73 Trevor M5AKA
On Monday, 30 November 2020, 21:58:43 GMT, ik5jrz--- via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
Thanks Frank,
saying to move to 145.825 in fact I forgot all the other problems but it is
certainly a local problem in some areas. So our only hope is that these
repeaters will not be renewed or converted to digital.
Thanks anyway for the reply.
73 Carlo IK5JRZ.
----Messaggio originale----
Da: ka3hdo@?????.???
Data: 30-nov-2020 22.29
A: <ik5jrz@???.??>, <fabrizio.carrai@?????.???>, <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Ogg: RE: [amsat-bb] R: Re:? ISS SSTV frequency
All,
We CANNOT move the ARISS SSTV frequency to 145.825.? This is being used for
other satellites employing APRS and we would interfere with their operation.
Prior to their being an ARISS station on ISS, we conducted an extensive,
international effort to ensure ARISS had a clear downlink on 2 meters.? We
worked with all IARU regions and concluded that the best world-wide downlink
frequency for Human would be 145.80 MHz.? At the time (1997) the United
States had terrestrial APRS on 145.79.? In the USA we worked with the APRS
community in a collaborative fashion to QSY APRS terrestrial from 145.79 to
144.39 (where it is today).? This was a HUGE effort and required many
digipeaters, several on snow covered mountains, to be modified or replaced.?
Donations were collected.? And AMSAT-NA and TAPR worked together to make it
happen.
Again, please note that IARU region 1 agreed with this downlink frequency
for human spaceflight many years ago so we could have one common downlink.?
I am very sorry you are experiencing this.? I think this will take local
coordination to resolve this.? Similar to what we did for terrestrial APRS.?
Trying to move ARISS around in the very small OSCAR 2 meter sub-band
(145.8-146) is virtually unworkable, given the many 2 meter satellites that
are employing this band.?
I hope this helps explain things from an ARISS perspective.? Back in the
day, I was given the unenviable task of working these frequency coordination
issues for human spaceflight.? To be clear, we are much better today than
some of the issues we were experiencing in the past.? And changing things
around will probably make it worse for ARISS and other users in the
satellite community.? ?
73,? Frank Bauer, KA3HDO
Chair, ARISS-International
-----Original Message-----
From: ik5jrz@???.?? <ik5jrz@???.??>
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 2:36 PM
To: fabrizio.carrai@?????.???? amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] R: Re: ISS SSTV frequency
Thanks for answer,
The repeater is R7a (Monte Secchieta), it's not only an Italian problem
unfortunately, I have read many complaints in other areas as well. I don't
question the correct spacing between frequencies, but I'm afraid it's only
on actual paper. I don't want to doubt that the repeater is working
correctly, but I think that if the ISS transmitted at 145.825, since when it
transmits in SSTV APRS is disabled, the problem would be solved. The video
demonstrates the proximity between the frequencies even if I admit to being
in the high area and to receive the repeater very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsoSjh54a3A&ab_channel=IK5JRZThanks again.
Carlo IK5JRZ.
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:55:50 -0000
From: "Miroslav Kasal" <kasal@????.?????.??>
To: <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Cc: ok2aq@?????.???
Subject: [amsat-bb] 9k6 FSK packet with FT-991A (Mirek Kasal)
Message-ID: <011601d6c76b$f368d450$da3a7cf0$@?????.??>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi all,
Please, has anyone experience with 9k6 FSK packet operation with FT-991A
transceiver? Let me know your practice, please.
Thank you in advance.
Mirek OK2AQ
--
Tento e-mail byl zkontrolov?n na viry programem AVG.
http://www.avg.cz
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:22:49 +0100
From: Armand SP3QFE <kontakt@??????.???>
To: M5AKA <m5aka@?????.??.??>
Cc: ka3hdo@?????.???? amsat-bb@?????.???
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS SSTV frequency
Message-ID: <58cd53a1772a7f615be24718f99df06c@??????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Here you are a list of 29 repeaters TX: 145,7875 MHz RX: 145,1875 MHz in
Europe, which are in the Polish database przemienniki.net
DM0ULR FM 141.3Hz Wendelstein JN67AQ, 47,7024N, 12,0122E, 1723m n.p.m.
GB3BF DSTAR/DV+FM no?n? BEDFORD IO92SD, 52,151N, 0,477W
GB3EB DSTAR/DV+FM 88.5 Hz UCKFIELD JO00BW, 50,9454N, 0,147E
GB3GO C4FM/Fusion b.d. LLANDUDNO IO83BH, 53,3326N, 3,8536W
GB3JB DSTAR/DV+FM 103.5 Hz MERE WILTSHIRE IO81VC, 51,0988N, 2,1913W
GB3JL DSTAR/DV+FM no?n? LISKEARD IO70SM, 50,5096N, 4,4393W
GB3KD DSTAR/DV+Echolink+FM 118.8 Hz KIDDERMINSTER IO82UJ
GB3LB DSTAR/DV+FM 118.8 Hz LAUDER IO85NS
GB3YW DSTAR/DV+FM 82.5 Hz WAKEFIELD IO93EP, 53,6378N, 1,6551W
LA5FR FM ton 1750Hz, DTMF Follo / Enebakk JO59MS, 59,7708N, 11,0417E,
350m n.p.m.
LA9UR FM ton 1750Hz Fosen / Ruasetfjellet JP43VR, 63,7292N, 9,7917E,
247m n.p.m.
OH2RCH FM b.d. Espoo / Juhanila KP20JE, 60,1833N, 24,7514E, 132m n.p.m.,
100m n.p.g.
OK0I FM no?n? Teplice JO60WP, 50,6388N, 13,8603E, 390m n.p.m.
OK0S FM 118.8 Hz Pardubice - Polabiny JO70VA, 50,0469N, 15,7601E, 280m
n.p.m.
OK0T FM 88.5 Hz Teplice - Doubravka JO60WP, 50,6383N, 13,86E
OK1KVR FM no?n? Vrchlabi JO70TO
SK0RYG Fm ton 1750Hz ?kersberga JO99DL, 59,4792N, 18,2917E
SK3JR/R2 FM b.d. ?stersund / Bratt?sen JP73HC, 63,1047N, 14,6022E
SK5RLZ FM ton 1750Hz, DTMF Katrineholm JO88CX, 58,9884N, 16,2136E
SK6GO/R FM ton 1750Hz G?teborg / Lunden JO67AR, 57,7089N, 12,0054E
SK7OL/R FM b.d. Hallands?sen JO66LJ, 56,3958N, 12,9583E, 240m n.p.m.,
37m n.p.g.
SM3XOH/R FM b.d. Torpshammar JP82EK, 62,4556N, 16,3844E
SR1CH FM 82.5 Hz Czartoryja JO72FW
SR4D Echolink+FM 67.0 Hz Mi?ki k/Gi?ycka EMITEL KO03WW, 53,9377N,
21,8448E, 245m n.p.m., 180m n.p.g.
SR5RAD FM 118.8 Hz RADOM - maszt Emitel KO01NJ, 51,409N, 21,1148E, 168m
n.p.m., 80m n.p.g. SR6S FM 94.8 Hz Wielka Sowa JO80FQ, 50,6803N,
16,4857E, 1015m n.p.m., 25m n.p.g.
SR8B FM no?n? Le?ajsk KO10EF, 50,2483N, 22,4064E
SR9J FM 123.0 Hz Cz?stochowa JO90NT, 50,8145N, 19,1209E, 254m n.p.m.
SR9UVJ-C DSTAR/DV b.d. Krynica Zdr?j - Jaworzyna (g?rna stacja kolejki
gondolowej) KN09KK, 49,4179N, 20,8956E, 1114m n.p.m., 12m n.p.g.
Source: https://przemienniki.net/lista GENERATED 30 Nov 2020 23:04 UTC
b.d. - no data on how to start repeater.
no?na - PTT
n.p.m. - meters above the sea level
n.p.g. - meters above the ground
73, Armand SP3QFE
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:29:09 -0500
From: Chris Thompson <chrisethompson@?????.???>
To: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FoxTelem 1.09 released
Message-ID:
<CAJOf0+vBUNr4=YJ8db_ZBir_YdivQoEuEJhKTELoOKRrBME-JQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
This release provides several enhancements and needed changes for RadFxSat,
also
known as FOX-1E. This new spacecraft sends 1200bps BPSK telemetry in
parallel
with a linear transponder. Downloading telemetry and sending it to the
server will assist
AMSAT and the Radiation tolerance experiments from Vanderbilt University.
You can download it here:
http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/windows/FoxTelem_1.09n3_windows.zip
http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/linux/FoxTelem_1.09n3_linux.tar.gz
http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/mac/FoxTelem_1.09n3_mac.tar.gz
The following changes are in 1.09 (from 1.08):
* Performance improvements on the telemetry tabs. This uses less CPU than
1.08.
* Clearer display of historical records on the telemetry tabs for RT, MAX,
MIN and WOD.
* Bug fixes for Fox-1E decode and display of diagnostic tables, Whole Orbit
Data,
formatting of telemetry
* Ignore extra commas in conversion curve comments
* Allow a single spacecraft to be downloaded from the Fox Server, even if
FoxTelem stores many spacecraft
* Latest Golf-T layouts for development
* BPSK CRC checksum calculation for GOLF-T
* Another new way to decode and display the mode
* More generic tab layouts to allow future expansion through soft coding
* Throttle the DDE requests when decoder stopped
* Many other bug fixes
See the complete list on github here:
https://github.com/ac2cz/FoxTelem/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A
%22Release+1.09%22+
--
Chris E. Thompson
chrisethompson@?????.???
g0kla@????.???
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:43:49 -0500
From: Chris Thompson <chrisethompson@?????.???>
To: AMSAT <AMSAT-BB@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FoxTelem 1.09 released
Message-ID:
<CAJOf0+uyMoEUeiTu6PhLn5XxACJP7OLYF-AxUOEm+BpY+q-RqQ@????.?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
And I meant RadFxSat-2 / FOX-1E. RadFxSat is now known to us as AO-91.
Let me know if you have any questions.
73
Chris
G0KLA / AC2CZ
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:29 PM Chris Thompson <chrisethompson@?????.???>
wrote:
> This release provides several enhancements and needed changes for
> RadFxSat, also
> known as FOX-1E. This new spacecraft sends 1200bps BPSK telemetry in
> parallel
> with a linear transponder. Downloading telemetry and sending it to the
> server will assist
> AMSAT and the Radiation tolerance experiments from Vanderbilt University.
>
> You can download it here:
> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/windows/FoxTelem_1.09n3_windows.zip
> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/linux/FoxTelem_1.09n3_linux.tar.gz
> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/mac/FoxTelem_1.09n3_mac.tar.gz
>
> The following changes are in 1.09 (from 1.08):
> * Performance improvements on the telemetry tabs. This uses less CPU than
> 1.08.
> * Clearer display of historical records on the telemetry tabs for RT, MAX,
> MIN and WOD.
> * Bug fixes for Fox-1E decode and display of diagnostic tables, Whole
> Orbit Data,
> formatting of telemetry
> * Ignore extra commas in conversion curve comments
> * Allow a single spacecraft to be downloaded from the Fox Server, even if
> FoxTelem stores many spacecraft
> * Latest Golf-T layouts for development
> * BPSK CRC checksum calculation for GOLF-T
> * Another new way to decode and display the mode
> * More generic tab layouts to allow future expansion through soft coding
> * Throttle the DDE requests when decoder stopped
> * Many other bug fixes
>
> See the complete list on github here:
>
>
https://github.com/ac2cz/FoxTelem/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A
%22Release+1.09%22+
>
> --
> Chris E. Thompson
> chrisethompson@?????.???
> g0kla@????.???
>
--
Chris E. Thompson
chrisethompson@?????.???
g0kla@????.???
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:19:26 -0500
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@?????.???>
To: Chris Thompson <chrisethompson@?????.???>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@?????.???>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FoxTelem 1.09 released
Message-ID: <BBC9571B-302A-48B2-8069-D70AEFFE3087@?????.???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
And it supports the CubeSatSim, the AMSAT CubeSat Simulator! Thanks to
Chris and the team for supporting the project.
For more information on the AMSAT CubeSatSim see https://CubeSatSim.org
73,
Alan Johnston, KU2Y
AMSAT VP Educational Relations
P.S. Contact me to borrow a CubeSatSim loaner to demo or take into a
classroom: ku2y@?????.???
> On Nov 30, 2020, at 19:45, Chris Thompson via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@?????.???> wrote:
>
> ?And I meant RadFxSat-2 / FOX-1E. RadFxSat is now known to us as AO-91.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> 73
> Chris
> G0KLA / AC2CZ
>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:29 PM Chris Thompson <chrisethompson@?????.???>
>> wrote:
>>
>> This release provides several enhancements and needed changes for
>> RadFxSat, also
>> known as FOX-1E. This new spacecraft sends 1200bps BPSK telemetry in
>> parallel
>> with a linear transponder. Downloading telemetry and sending it to the
>> server will assist
>> AMSAT and the Radiation tolerance experiments from Vanderbilt University.
>>
>> You can download it here:
>> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/windows/FoxTelem_1.09n3_windows.zip
>> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/linux/FoxTelem_1.09n3_linux.tar.gz
>> http://amsat.us/FoxTelem/mac/FoxTelem_1.09n3_mac.tar.gz
>>
>> The following changes are in 1.09 (from 1.08):
>> * Performance improvements on the telemetry tabs. This uses less CPU than
>> 1.08.
>> * Clearer display of historical records on the telemetry tabs for RT, MAX,
>> MIN and WOD.
>> * Bug fixes for Fox-1E decode and display of diagnostic tables, Whole
>> Orbit Data,
>> formatting of telemetry
>> * Ignore extra commas in conversion curve comments
>> * Allow a single spacecraft to be downloaded from the Fox Server, even if
>> FoxTelem stores many spacecraft
>> * Latest Golf-T layouts for development
>> * BPSK CRC checksum calculation for GOLF-T
>> * Another new way to decode and display the mode
>> * More generic tab layouts to allow future expansion through soft coding
>> * Throttle the DDE requests when decoder stopped
>> * Many other bug fixes
>>
>> See the complete list on github here:
>>
>>
https://github.com/ac2cz/FoxTelem/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A
%22Release+1.09%22+
>>
>> --
>> Chris E. Thompson
>> chrisethompson@?????.???
>> g0kla@????.???
>>
>
>
> --
> Chris E. Thompson
> chrisethompson@?????.???
> g0kla@????.???
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@?????.???. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@?????.???.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
https://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 15, Issue 450
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
