| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 26.09.15 10:03l 838 Lines 23988 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB10279
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V10 279
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 150926/0758Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:28301 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB10279
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. ESA invites radio amateurs to listen for AAUSAT-5 CubeSat (M5AKA)
2. Re: LoTW / XW-2 Sats (Paul Stoetzer)
3. Three new Shanghai SECM-1 VHF/UHF satellites launched today
(M5AKA)
4. First image downloaded from LilacSat-2 (M5AKA)
5. XW-2's NORAD's (W3MAT .)
6. LilacSat-2 FM Repeater Schedule (???)
7. RF recordings from last night's XW-2 satellites @xxxxxxxxxx
UTC now online (Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK))
8. Up on AO7 and Down on FO29 (PY5LF)
9. Re: LVB Tracker v0.9 Firmware (Sion Chow Q. C. (9W2QC))
10. Re: XW-2's NORAD's (Jean-Pierre Godet)
11. Re: XW-2's NORAD's (PE0SAT | Amateur Radio)
12. FUNcube-1 (Graham Shirville)
13. Re: XW-2's NORAD's (Jean-Pierre Godet)
14. Icom keying software (gkcarr@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
15. Re: Three new Shanghai SECM-1 VHF/UHF satellites launched
today (Michael Chen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ESA invites radio amateurs to listen for AAUSAT-5
CubeSat
Message-ID:
<1555905256.1183395.1443186157636.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
ESA invites radio amateurs to listen for AAUSAT-5 CubeSat in week of Oct 5
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/24/esa-listen-for-aausat-5/
Also on the AMSAT-UK site:
Pig in Space - 434 MHz SSDV balloon - Saturday Sept 26
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/22/pig-in-space/
Fox Telemetry Decoder Software Available
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/23/fox-telemetry-decoder-software/
Recent satellite deployments
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/20/new-xw-2-satellites-linear-transponders-active/
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/20/lilacsat-2-linux-telemetry-decoding/
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/17/serpens-cubesat-deployed-from-iss/
73 Trevor M5AKA----
AMSAT-UK?http://amsat-uk.org/
Twitter?https://twitter.com/AmsatUK
Facebook?https://facebook.com/AmsatUK
YouTube?https://youtube.com/AmsatUK
----
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:26:58 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: "Sean K." <kx9x@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LoTW / XW-2 Sats
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOo7H_Vp=WqtJipua0sqA6T+4A6W3=vvcCrF7Qcjwd3x=Q@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Yes, I think that's best.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Sean K. via AMSAT-BB
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> I'll bring this up to the LOTW folks today.
> Is the community in agreement over what the nomenclature should be?
> Sean Kutzko Amateur Radio KX9X
> From: David G0MRF via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: peter@xxxxx.xxx
> Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LoTW / XW-2 Sats
>
>
> Thank you Peter.
>
> I tried creating a file using the ARRL's TQSL software and indeed AO-73
and FO-29 are no problem but I'll have to wait for the new ones.
>
> FWI. We made 33 Sat QSOs last weekend from the GB0RWC station via 4
different transponders. - Tnx for your QSO
>
> David G0MRF
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Goodhall <peter@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: David G0MRF <g0mrf@xxx.xxx>
> CC: Amsat <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:10
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LoTW / XW-2 Sats
>
>
> This was discussed on Twitter last night, the new sats aren't current
> supported
> by LOTW yet.
>
> XW-2E & F sound suitable however, just needs someone to contact
> ARRL.
>
> Peter, 2E0SQL
>
> On 25 September 2015 at 12:07, David G0MRF via
> AMSAT-BB
> <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Does anyone know what
> Sat ID LoTW needs for the new transponders?
>>
>> XW-2E XW-2F sounds
> possible
>>
>> 73
>>
>> David
>>
> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx.
> AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide
> without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the
> author, and do not reflect the official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA
> member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription
> settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> --
> Peter
> Goodhall, 2E0SQL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:59:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Three new Shanghai SECM-1 VHF/UHF satellites
launched today
Message-ID:
<712098898.1276627.1443189586488.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Beijing's new Chang Zheng CZ-11 was launched earlier today from Jiuquan. It
carried three satellites believed to have amateur payloads: Tianwang-1A
(TW-1A / SECM); Tianwang-1B (TW-1B / NJUST-2); Tianwang-1C (TC-1C / NJFA-1).
Does anyone know the frequencies ?
The IARU Satellite Frequency Coordination site notes they were expected to
have VHF and UHF downlinks, see
http://www.amsatuk.me.uk/iaru/formal_detail.php?serialnum=468
It is understood Beijing plans another launch of an amateur radio payload on
October 5
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/06/three-ham-radio-launches-planned-by-beijing/
73 Trevor M5AKA
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] First image downloaded from LilacSat-2
Message-ID:
<1725125718.1304999.1443193749325.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
First infrared remote sensing image downloaded from LilacSat-2.
pic.twitter.com/ro1J8qpaZ1?
Source http://www.weibo.com/by2hit
LilacSat-2
http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/20/lilacsat-2-linux-telemetry-decoding/
73 Trevor M5AKA
----AMSAT-UK?http://amsat-uk.org/
Twitter?https://twitter.com/AmsatUK
Facebook?https://facebook.com/AmsatUK
YouTube?https://youtube.com/AmsatUK
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:19:35 -0400
From: "W3MAT ." <w3mat03@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] XW-2's NORAD's
Message-ID:
<CAK=nGPZdiwt9B3om_Hb+Nj5NzwhyXKdzmM4-fLstysbb-04CUg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Here's what I came up with for XW-2 NORADS...
XW-2A 40903
XW-2B ?
XW-2C 40906
XW-2D 40907
XW-2E 40909
XW-2F 40905
Lilacsat-2 40908
Anyone correct me if I have them incorrect. What is B?
Loon
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 23:11:57 +0800 (CST)
From: ??? <wmc_jx@xxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] LilacSat-2 FM Repeater Schedule
Message-ID: <435895af.f71a.150050f8f79.Coremail.wmc_jx@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Hi All,
LilacSat-2 is scheduled to switch on the FM repeater at about 2200 UTC each
Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Further notice for changes.
Enjoy the bird!
73!
Wei BG2BHC
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:48:35 -0700
From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" <amsat-bb@xxxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] RF recordings from last night's XW-2 satellites @
0040-0100 UTC now online
Message-ID:
<CAN6TEUeFz3nX35k+_Jh3tUvGeCpphBidTt=qdhCCTob6fykNdw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi!
I uploaded the RF recordings from last night's pass of the XW-2 satellites
around 0040-0100 UTC to my Dropbox space. They are at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6nl39qjkfyw5y5h/AADGZP0tBc3C--9vouGqwUIXa/20150925-
XW2E_XW2F?lst
Look for the filenames starting with HDSDR_20150925. There are two files,
as HDSDR split the recording when the initial file reached the size limit
I set (3800 MB). I ran this for about 20 minutes, since these satellites
are now spreading out, and XW-2A was audible several minutes before the
others, and XW-2E was audible a minute or two before XW-2F.
Even if you don't use an SDR receiver, you can still download HDSDR at
http://www.hdsdr.de and install it on your computer, then download the
RF recordings like those I have been posting. You can use HDSDR to play
back the recordings, and see/hear what was going on during the pass.
Using last night's pass as an example, you'll be able to see/hear the
digital and CW telemetry from XW-2A early in the first recording. Later,
as the other satellites move in range of my station, you'll hear the
telemetry from those satellites. XW-2E is heard a minute or two before
XW-2F is in range, and with these two satellites you'll hear the two
telemetry beacons as well as the transponders. If you worked either of
the transponders last night, you can see/hear if my station copied your
QSO(s).
I have RF recordings from other passes I have recently worked, along with
photos and other files, in my Dropbox space. I reorganized many of the
files into separate subfolders. All of this is accessible at:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6nl39qjkfyw5y5h/AADynnchNPayKAnU0XYwl3TCa?lst=
73!
Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/
Twitter: @xxxxxx
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:30:44 -0300
From: "PY5LF" <py5lf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Up on AO7 and Down on FO29
Message-ID: <004b01d0f7b7$efef0800$cfcd1800$@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi
Today it's possible to hear your signal from AO7(mode B) on FO29 , due to
pass almost together , as me and PY4ZBZ did a kind of "cross satellite" .
http://www.qsl.net/py4zbz/cross.htm
73
PY5LF
Luciano Fabricio
Curitiba-PR-BR GG54jm
http://www.qrz.com/db/PY5LF
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:37:24 +0000
From: "Sion Chow Q. C. (9W2QC)" <9w2qc@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Howard Long <hlong@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LVB Tracker v0.9 Firmware
Message-ID: <20150925173724.Horde.VCyqWTn5b5z73mCXk0NI8Q7@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
Hello Howard,
I am very pleased to inform you that the first link (with config bits
set) worked very well. I was able to update the firmware from 0.7 to
0.9 (using picprog.exe) and all the previous problems has been solved.
Will proceed to update the second unit tomorrow.
I would like to thank you for your very kind help and I really
appreciate all the trouble you have took to provide me with the
updated firmware 0.9.
Thank you again and have a great weekend to all :)
73, Sion, 9M2CQC
Quoting Howard Long <hlong@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>:
> Hello Sion.
>
> Not sure what's happened to that file, apologies, when I get chance I'll
> take a look at why the link is broken.
>
> When that was originally written, there wasn't a defined way to set the
> processor config bits within a .hex file, and I distributed the original
> .hex files without the config bits assigned. Below, I have links to two
> files from my archive, the first with the appropriate config bits set, and
> the second without. For ease of use, I'd use the one with the config bits
> already set. For completeness, the config bits should be 0x3F31 (FOSC=XT,
> WDTE=OFF, PWRTE=ON,BOREN=OFF,LVP=OFF, CPD=OFF, WRT=OFF, CP=OFF).
>
> To use, open MPLAB v8, Configure -> Select Device, set to PIC16F877 or
> PIC16F877A. Then File -> Import and select the hex file. Then select your
> programmer and program the device.
>
> With config bits set:
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=2EDA80327053C74D!49680&authkey=!AEL7pL
> 6wWMLtnVw&ithint=file%2chex
>
> Without config bits:
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=2EDA80327053C74D!49678&authkey=!AEYGaF
> ylrxNa9ag&ithint=file%2chex
>
> It's been a long time since I looked at this, so apologies if I got anything
> wrong here!
>
> 73, Howard G6LVB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Sion Chow Q.
> C. (9W2QC)
> Sent: 24 September 2015 17:31
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] LVB Tracker v0.9 Firmware
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have been an original LVB Tracker for many years running firmware
> 0.7. Recently I am having some problems with the serial
> communications and from the forums, I notice that firmware version 0.9
> has resolved these issues.
>
> However, the link published (many of which are few years ago) to
> download this firmware at
> http://www.g6lvb.com/Articles/LVBTracker/LVBTrack.hex seems to be no
> longer valid.
>
> I have been trying to look around but failed to obtain a copy of the
> firmware version 0.9 .hex file. Would really appreciate any pointers
> of where I could obtain this new firmware.
>
> Thank you.
>
> 73,
> Sion Chow Q. C.,
> 9M2CQC, WQ2C, 9V1QC, JG1XHM,
> ex: 9W2QC, AB3IO, WQ2C /HL1 /YB9
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:44:56 +0000
From: Jean-Pierre Godet <godetj@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] XW-2's NORAD's
Message-ID: <56058818.6020208@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Hi Loon, all,
On 03/12/2013 15:19, W3MAT wrote:
> ...
> XW-2A 40903
> XW-2B ?
> XW-2C 40906
> XW-2D 40907
> XW-2E 40909
> XW-2F 40905
>
> Lilacsat-2 40908
>
> Anyone correct me if I have them incorrect. What is B?
> ...
Looks quite good, and for XW-2B this is a good question as Celestrak
gives the tle for all the family except this one.
But... from Doppler shift measurements here, again with this last
pass over Europe, I guess it is 40911.
No ? ;-)
Best 73 !
Jean-Pierre F5YG
--
Powered by Linux (LinuxMint 17.0 Qiana - kernel 3.13.0)
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 20:51:47 +0200
From: PE0SAT | Amateur Radio <pe0sat@xxxxx.xx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] XW-2's NORAD's
Message-ID: <f79a062fd1b97c7dfe8d4f7e6e36fb37@xxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Decoded XW-2B with the following information and looks a good match
XW-2B Norad-ID 40911 - 145.725 CW
BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVT RUI RTR R6I RNV RUI TTT RKM TV6 UTR
TTT TTT VVT TTT TTI TTT TTT VUK VTT BAMSAT CAMSAT
BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVT RUI RTR R6I RNV RUI TTT RKM TV6 UTR
TTT TTT CDT TTT TTI TTT TTT 4UK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVE RUI RT6 R6I RNV RU4 TTT RKM TV6 UTR
TTT TTT I4T T T TTI TTT TTT IUK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RV4 RUI TNV R6I RNV RUI TTT RKN TVK UTR
TTT TTT EDT TTT TTI TTT TTT 6UK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
Jan PE0SAT
On 25-09-2015 19:44, Jean-Pierre Godet wrote:
> Hi Loon, all,
>
> On 03/12/2013 15:19, W3MAT wrote:
>
>> ...
>> XW-2A 40903
>> XW-2B ?
>> XW-2C 40906
>> XW-2D 40907
>> XW-2E 40909
>> XW-2F 40905
>>
>> Lilacsat-2 40908
>>
>> Anyone correct me if I have them incorrect. What is B?
>> ...
>
> Looks quite good, and for XW-2B this is a good question as
> Celestrak gives the tle for all the family except this one.
> But... from Doppler shift measurements here, again with this last
> pass over Europe, I guess it is 40911.
>
> No ? ;-)
>
> Best 73 !
>
> Jean-Pierre F5YG
>
--
With regards PE0SAT
Internet web-page http://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/
DK3WN SatBlog http://www.dk3wn.info/p/
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 20:13:58 +0100
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <funcube@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>, "AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1
Message-ID: <122BF12A9B1C4EFD8914B526E4B35BEC@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
Just to advise that FUNcube-1 was commanded to amateur mode, with the
transponder operational continuously, at approx 1801 UTC this evening.
We expect to switch her back to autonomous operation on Sunday evening as
usual.
Have a grand weekend on the birds
73
Graham
G3VZV
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 20:27:05 +0000
From: Jean-Pierre Godet <godetj@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] XW-2's NORAD's
Message-ID: <5605AE19.2010305@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Yes, this one ! And very strong signal for all of them.
As the Xiwang-1 XW-1 received the callsign BJ1SA six years ago and is
still speaking, the next one could not use this callsign, so BJ1SB stand
for XW-2A, BJ1SC for XW-2B, etc..., and BJ1SG for XW-2F.
Good evening Jan, thank you for the confirmation,
73+++ !
Jean-Pierre F5YG
--
Powered by Linux (LinuxMint 17.0 Qiana - kernel 3.13.0)
On 25/09/2015 18:51, PE0SAT | Amateur Radio wrote:
>
> Decoded XW-2B with the following information and looks a good match
>
> XW-2B Norad-ID 40911 - 145.725 CW
>
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVT RUI RTR R6I RNV RUI TTT RKM TV6 UTR
> TTT TTT VVT TTT TTI TTT TTT VUK VTT BAMSAT CAMSAT
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVT RUI RTR R6I RNV RUI TTT RKM TV6 UTR
> TTT TTT CDT TTT TTI TTT TTT 4UK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVE RUI RT6 R6I RNV RU4 TTT RKM TV6 UTR
> TTT TTT I4T T T TTI TTT TTT IUK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RV4 RUI TNV R6I RNV RUI TTT RKN TVK UTR
> TTT TTT EDT TTT TTI TTT TTT 6UK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
>
> Jan PE0SAT
>
>
> On 25-09-2015 19:44, Jean-Pierre Godet wrote:
>> Hi Loon, all,
>>
>> On 03/12/2013 15:19, W3MAT wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> XW-2A 40903
>>> XW-2B ?
>>> XW-2C 40906
>>> XW-2D 40907
>>> XW-2E 40909
>>> XW-2F 40905
>>>
>>> Lilacsat-2 40908
>>>
>>> Anyone correct me if I have them incorrect. What is B?
>>> ...
>>
>> Looks quite good, and for XW-2B this is a good question as
>> Celestrak gives the tle for all the family except this one.
>> But... from Doppler shift measurements here, again with this last
>> pass over Europe, I guess it is 40911.
>>
>> No ?
>>
>> Best 73 !
>>
>> Jean-Pierre F5YG
>>
>
--
Powered by Linux (LinuxMint 17.0 Qiana - kernel 3.13.0)
On 25/09/2015 18:51, PE0SAT | Amateur Radio wrote:
>
> Decoded XW-2B with the following information and looks a good match
>
> XW-2B Norad-ID 40911 - 145.725 CW
>
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVT RUI RTR R6I RNV RUI TTT RKM TV6 UTR
> TTT TTT VVT TTT TTI TTT TTT VUK VTT BAMSAT CAMSAT
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVT RUI RTR R6I RNV RUI TTT RKM TV6 UTR
> TTT TTT CDT TTT TTI TTT TTT 4UK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RVE RUI RT6 R6I RNV RU4 TTT RKM TV6 UTR
> TTT TTT I4T T T TTI TTT TTT IUK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
> BJ1SC DFH XW2 XW2 AAA RTT RUT RV4 RUI TNV R6I RNV RUI TTT RKN TVK UTR
> TTT TTT EDT TTT TTI TTT TTT 6UK VTT CAMSAT CAMSAT
>
> Jan PE0SAT
>
>
> On 25-09-2015 19:44, Jean-Pierre Godet wrote:
>> Hi Loon, all,
>>
>> On 03/12/2013 15:19, W3MAT wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> XW-2A 40903
>>> XW-2B ?
>>> XW-2C 40906
>>> XW-2D 40907
>>> XW-2E 40909
>>> XW-2F 40905
>>>
>>> Lilacsat-2 40908
>>>
>>> Anyone correct me if I have them incorrect. What is B?
>>> ...
>>
>> Looks quite good, and for XW-2B this is a good question as
>> Celestrak gives the tle for all the family except this one.
>> But... from Doppler shift measurements here, again with this last
>> pass over Europe, I guess it is 40911.
>>
>> No ? ;-)
>>
>> Best 73 !
>>
>> Jean-Pierre F5YG
>>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 00:53:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: gkcarr@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Icom keying software
Message-ID: <1443246801.78819429@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I have the 9100 and having trouble keying the radio for the ISS, without any
extremal device.
Can anyone give me a link to the keying software written by Bill, N0DB?
73
George
WA5KBH
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:56:52 +0800
From: Michael Chen <michael.bd5rv@xxxxx.xxx>
To: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Three new Shanghai SECM-1 VHF/UHF satellites
launched today
Message-ID:
<CAAqnEHWWzxbJLPg3JbGAu-vp_M0+YAQXRJJ4E42=UySMrVRHjQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi, Folks,
For TW-1A/C: Telemetry: 435.645MHz GMSK 4800/9600 CSP TX interval: 10s
For TW-1B: Telemetry: 437.645MHz GMSK 4800/9600 CSP TX interval: 20s
Michael Chen, BD5RV/4
AMSAT-China: http://www.camsat.cn
-----------------------------------
Twitter: http://twitter.com/bd5rv
Email: michael.bd5rv@xxxxx.xxx
Skype: michael-bd5rv
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:59 PM, M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
> Beijing's new Chang Zheng CZ-11 was launched earlier today from Jiuquan.
It carried three satellites believed to have amateur payloads: Tianwang-1A
(TW-1A / SECM); Tianwang-1B (TW-1B / NJUST-2); Tianwang-1C (TC-1C / NJFA-1).
>
> Does anyone know the frequencies ?
>
> The IARU Satellite Frequency Coordination site notes they were expected to
have VHF and UHF downlinks, see
> http://www.amsatuk.me.uk/iaru/formal_detail.php?serialnum=468
>
> It is understood Beijing plans another launch of an amateur radio payload
on October 5
> http://amsat-uk.org/2015/09/06/three-ham-radio-launches-planned-by-beijing/
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 10, Issue 279
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
