| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 15.12.15 03:01l 745 Lines 24431 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB10383
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V10 383
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 151215/0101Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:35516 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB10383
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: bit of help here (Stefan Wagener)
2. NO-84...operator error? (Mark Lunday)
3. Re: NO-84...operator error? (Joe)
4. FOX-1A SSTV (Roland Zurmely)
5. Re: FOX-1A SSTV (Jerry Buxton)
6. Fw: FOX-1A SSTV (Paulo PV8DX)
7. HAM RADIO UNIVERSITY- 2016 (W2JV)
8. Re: NO-84...operator error? (Mark Lunday)
9. Re: NO-84...operator error? (Jerry Pixton)
10. Re: NO-84...operator error? (Mark Lunday)
11. Re: NO-84...operator error? (Jerry Pixton)
12. UT1FG (Michael A. Foster)
13. tnx NO-84 qso (Jerry Pixton)
14. LoTW (Mike Seguin)
15. Re: LoTW (Paul Stoetzer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:50:02 -0600
From: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
To: John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] bit of help here
Message-ID:
<CAKu8kHCtFSTsUucoxfiaG4vBsHDDu0bXgU0yergQCGzfYquOKw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Try downloading it directly:
SatPC32 Demo <http://www.dk1tb.de/satpcsetup_a_128c.ZIP>
You can activate it with your registration information
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:28 PM, John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Not being a computer person I seem to have a problem.
> Have a copy of satpc32 but will i load it into the cd drive
> it just sits there. What is the secret to get it to load onto the computer?
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:51:48 -0500
From: "Mark Lunday" <wd4elg@xxxxx.xx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Message-ID: <000001d135df$b4787f70$1d697e50$@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Again I tried to send through AO-84. I was on 28120 with a tone of 1.5
kHz. I saw nothing on the 435.35 downlink. At all. The 1932 UTC was good
enough that I should have seen something.
I was also not able to send a packet through on 145.825. How wide is the
passband for PSK on the uplink?
Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC FM06be
wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:05:59 -0600
From: Joe <nss@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Message-ID: <566DCFA7.3060803@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
a "Tone" at 1.5 or PSK-31 signals at 1.5 in the waterfall?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 12/13/2015 1:51 PM, Mark Lunday wrote:
> Again I tried to send through AO-84. I was on 28120 with a tone of 1.5
> kHz. I saw nothing on the 435.35 downlink. At all. The 1932 UTC was good
> enough that I should have seen something.
>
> I was also not able to send a packet through on 145.825. How wide is the
> passband for PSK on the uplink?
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:06:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: Roland Zurmely <py4zbz@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FOX-1A SSTV
Message-ID:
<798444153.434109.1450037203176.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
SSTV picture from FOX-1A ?AO-85 received on orbit #962 over Brazil:
<http://www.qsl.net/py4zbz/fox.htm#f>
73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:41:20 -0600
From: Jerry Buxton <n0jy@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FOX-1A SSTV
Message-ID: <566DD7F0.3070504@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Easter Egg? Dang software engineers! :-D
Jerry Buxton, N?JY
On 12/13/2015 14:06, Roland Zurmely via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> SSTV picture from FOX-1A AO-85 received on orbit #962 over Brazil:
> <http://www.qsl.net/py4zbz/fox.htm#f>
> 73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:46:48 -0300
From: "Paulo PV8DX" <paulopv8dx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Fw: FOX-1A SSTV
Message-ID: <1911B53435B94C43A5AFF78C7370E98C@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=response
Hi Roland
Great job! You got Fox...
It was very good.
73 de Paulo PV8DX
LABRE/ARRL
AMSAT-BR/AMSAT-NA member
FJ92pt - VUCC SAT
www.labre-rr.org
http://amsat-br.org/
Boa Vista-Roraima
pv8dx@xxxxxxxx.xxx
pv8dx@xxxx.xxx
-----Mensagem Original-----
From: Roland Zurmely via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 5:06 PM
To: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] FOX-1A SSTV
SSTV picture from FOX-1A AO-85 received on orbit #962 over Brazil:
<http://www.qsl.net/py4zbz/fox.htm#f>
73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500
From: "W2JV" <PeteW2JV@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>, "starcom" <starcom-bb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] HAM RADIO UNIVERSITY- 2016
Message-ID: <5F2EE918E18341D48D81012872070BC8@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello,
For those of us don?t have plans for January 10th, 2016, worry no more you
can be part of our 17th year at Ham Radio University.
What is HRU? "A day of education to share ideas, experiences,knowledge and
fellowship among Amateur Radio operators".
For more information visit, http://hamradiouniversity.org/ I will be
doing a forum on ?How to operate Duplex, on the Amateur Satellites with a
budget that most of us can afford.
73 Peter W2JV
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:20:01 -0500
From: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@xx.xx.xxx>
To: "'Joe'" <nss@xxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Message-ID: <001901d135f4$69446f40$3bcd4dc0$@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
PSK signals at 1.5 in the waterfall
Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC FM06be
wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 3:06 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
a "Tone" at 1.5 or PSK-31 signals at 1.5 in the waterfall?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 12/13/2015 1:51 PM, Mark Lunday wrote:
> Again I tried to send through AO-84. I was on 28120 with a tone of
> 1.5 kHz. I saw nothing on the 435.35 downlink. At all. The 1932 UTC
> was good enough that I should have seen something.
>
> I was also not able to send a packet through on 145.825. How wide is
> the passband for PSK on the uplink?
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 01:44:21 +0000
From: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Message-ID: <566E1EF5.30605@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Mark, et al
The PSK passband is about 3 KHZ. Your radio USB bandwidth may be the
limiting factor.
Are you seeing the beacon at about 314 Hz if someone gets it keyed up?
I discovered today that if I just send idle tones (key up with no
message) that the 31.5 baud detector circuit is much quicker to turn on.
I am confused by the question: Mark, what signal are you seeing in the
psk waterfall? I assume this is a waterfall of the downlink audio? Then
was this your signal?
If your radio uplink VFO is set at 28120000 Hz in USB, and I modulate
with a 1500 Hz audio tone (however I generate it) I would expect to hear
a 1500 tone on the FM or 1500 Hz on the PSK31 waterfall. This is
ignoring any error in my uplink vfo and any translation error in the
bird - both of which are real. The other big error is doppler.
But DopplerPSK is doing a reasonable correction of the modulation tone
so that when you set a desired center frequency of 1500, you get close
to that most of the pass with some noticeable error around TCA but still
decodable. But if you are not doppler correcting your uplink signal all
bets are off with the plus/minus 700 Hz tone shifts seen.
So I guess a test of how well your doppler correction is working is how
close your downlink signal is to the target central tone you have set
for the uplink?.
Jerry, W6IHG
On 12/13/2015 7:51 PM, Mark Lunday wrote:
> Again I tried to send through AO-84. I was on 28120 with a tone of 1.5
> kHz. I saw nothing on the 435.35 downlink. At all. The 1932 UTC was good
> enough that I should have seen something.
>
> I was also not able to send a packet through on 145.825. How wide is the
> passband for PSK on the uplink?
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
-----------------------------------------------
Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs
http://www.shentel.net/pixosdesigns/RadioTuner/
jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx
-----------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:30:33 -0500
From: "Mark Lunday" <mlunday@xx.xx.xxx>
To: "'Jerry Pixton'" <jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Message-ID: <000801d13617$68fb1c50$3af154f0$@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Jerry, I saw absolutely nothing on the downlink. Static.
Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC FM06be
wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Jerry Pixton
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:44 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Mark, et al
The PSK passband is about 3 KHZ. Your radio USB bandwidth may be the
limiting factor.
Are you seeing the beacon at about 314 Hz if someone gets it keyed up?
I discovered today that if I just send idle tones (key up with no
message) that the 31.5 baud detector circuit is much quicker to turn on.
I am confused by the question: Mark, what signal are you seeing in the psk
waterfall? I assume this is a waterfall of the downlink audio? Then was this
your signal?
If your radio uplink VFO is set at 28120000 Hz in USB, and I modulate with a
1500 Hz audio tone (however I generate it) I would expect to hear a 1500
tone on the FM or 1500 Hz on the PSK31 waterfall. This is ignoring any error
in my uplink vfo and any translation error in the bird - both of which are
real. The other big error is doppler.
But DopplerPSK is doing a reasonable correction of the modulation tone so
that when you set a desired center frequency of 1500, you get close to that
most of the pass with some noticeable error around TCA but still decodable.
But if you are not doppler correcting your uplink signal all bets are off
with the plus/minus 700 Hz tone shifts seen.
So I guess a test of how well your doppler correction is working is how
close your downlink signal is to the target central tone you have set for
the uplink?.
Jerry, W6IHG
On 12/13/2015 7:51 PM, Mark Lunday wrote:
> Again I tried to send through AO-84. I was on 28120 with a tone of
> 1.5 kHz. I saw nothing on the 435.35 downlink. At all. The 1932 UTC
> was good enough that I should have seen something.
>
> I was also not able to send a packet through on 145.825. How wide is
> the passband for PSK on the uplink?
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
--
-----------------------------------------------
Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs
http://www.shentel.net/pixosdesigns/RadioTuner/
jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx
-----------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:56:07 +0000
From: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Mark Lunday <mlunday@xx.xx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
Message-ID: <566ECA77.40305@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Mark,
You and I should see almost the same footprint on NO-84.
I will try to be on this afternoon, Monday, for the 19:20Z pass and will
bring the UHF signal up for you to hear. The beacon, at 314 Hz, is
strongest. My downlink signal has been 10 to 20 dB lower than that.
So we can help you figure out what needs to be done, would you describe
your station setup for receiving from your antenna, pre-amp, tracking
program, radio, computer, decoder. And then the same for your
transmitting radio.
Listen on the 19:20Z pass - maybe a minute later at your location since
it is a descending pass.
Jerry, W6IHG
On 12/14/2015 2:30 AM, Mark Lunday wrote:
> Jerry, I saw absolutely nothing on the downlink. Static.
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Jerry Pixton
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:44 PM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] NO-84...operator error?
>
> Mark, et al
>
> The PSK passband is about 3 KHZ. Your radio USB bandwidth may be the
> limiting factor.
>
> Are you seeing the beacon at about 314 Hz if someone gets it keyed up?
>
> I discovered today that if I just send idle tones (key up with no
> message) that the 31.5 baud detector circuit is much quicker to turn on.
>
> I am confused by the question: Mark, what signal are you seeing in the psk
> waterfall? I assume this is a waterfall of the downlink audio? Then was this
> your signal?
>
> If your radio uplink VFO is set at 28120000 Hz in USB, and I modulate with a
> 1500 Hz audio tone (however I generate it) I would expect to hear a 1500
> tone on the FM or 1500 Hz on the PSK31 waterfall. This is ignoring any error
> in my uplink vfo and any translation error in the bird - both of which are
> real. The other big error is doppler.
>
> But DopplerPSK is doing a reasonable correction of the modulation tone so
> that when you set a desired center frequency of 1500, you get close to that
> most of the pass with some noticeable error around TCA but still decodable.
> But if you are not doppler correcting your uplink signal all bets are off
> with the plus/minus 700 Hz tone shifts seen.
>
> So I guess a test of how well your doppler correction is working is how
> close your downlink signal is to the target central tone you have set for
> the uplink?.
>
> Jerry, W6IHG
>
> On 12/13/2015 7:51 PM, Mark Lunday wrote:
>> Again I tried to send through AO-84. I was on 28120 with a tone of
>> 1.5 kHz. I saw nothing on the 435.35 downlink. At all. The 1932 UTC
>> was good enough that I should have seen something.
>>
>> I was also not able to send a packet through on 145.825. How wide is
>> the passband for PSK on the uplink?
>>
>> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
>> Greensboro, NC FM06be
>> wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
>> http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
> official views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs
> http://www.shentel.net/pixosdesigns/RadioTuner/
> jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx
> -----------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
> views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------
Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs
http://www.shentel.net/pixosdesigns/RadioTuner/
jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx
-----------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:06:27 -0500
From: "Michael A. Foster" <akx2@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] UT1FG
Message-ID: <02D6DB8EF6424C02AA6BB03565A7E6AD@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello all, Worked UT1fq on FO-29 19:02Z El 87 Thanks, Michael ? n8iup
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:57:02 +0000
From: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx w2jv@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] tnx NO-84 qso
Message-ID: <566F1F0E.9010706@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Peter,
Thanks for the psk31 qso at 1926Z 14Dec2015 on NO-84
Attached is a waterfall of us. I am the peak around 1800 Hz and your
trace is at 2140 Hz. You can see the residual shift, left over after
doppler correction, on my signal.
KC4LE's signal can be seen in the lower part next to mine.
Again thanks for the activity
Jerry, W6IHG
--
-----------------------------------------------
Dr. Jerry R. Pixton, PIXOS Designs
http://www.shentel.net/pixosdesigns/RadioTuner/
jpixton@xxxxxxx.xxx
-----------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:25:41 -0500
From: Mike Seguin <n1jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] LoTW
Message-ID: <566F5E05.9020703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Howdy,
I getting the satellite station (AO-40 class) back in shape after being
off for quite a while. Made a dozen contacts today on 4 different birds
while testing.
What logging program are folks using now for satellite that supports LoTW?
Mike
--
73,
Mike, N1JEZ
AMSAT 29,649
"A closed mouth gathers no feet"
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:58:37 -0500
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: n1jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LoTW
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOqzO0U-XcuddOJBKEd68gTnwFri3=BUMfeK=VFtFP6PJw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mike,
Thanks for the two QSOs today. Great to hear you!
I use DXKeeper myself. It's free, very well supported by it's author, and
with the propagation panel displayed, it's easy to select the proper
propagation mode and satellite name. It also does a great job showing award
progress for VUCC and can be configured to generate custom reports (such as
showing progress towards working all 488 continental US grids) through SQL
queries.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Mike Seguin <n1jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I getting the satellite station (AO-40 class) back in shape after being
> off for quite a while. Made a dozen contacts today on 4 different birds
> while testing.
>
> What logging program are folks using now for satellite that supports LoTW?
>
> Mike
> --
>
> 73,
> Mike, N1JEZ
> AMSAT 29,649
> "A closed mouth gathers no feet"
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 10, Issue 383
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
