| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 22.12.15 08:00l 730 Lines 22760 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB10394
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V10 393
Path: IW8PGT<IW7BFZ<IK7NXU<IK6IHL<IZ3LSV<IW2OHX<IQ2LB<IK1NHL<CX2SA
Sent: 151222/0504Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:36020 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB10394
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. PD120 SSTV Test Recording to Use in Preparation for Upcoming
ISS SSTV Events (John Brier)
2. sat pc32 (John Becker)
3. Re: ISS DIGI (skristof@xxxxxxx.xxxx
4. Re: sat pc32 (Burns Fisher)
5. KE8AKW @xxxx Tomorrow (Nicholas Mahr KE8AKW)
6. KE8AKW @xxxx Tomorrow (Nicholas Mahr KE8AKW)
7. Re: ISS DIGI (Robert Bruninga)
8. GO-32 APRS (Tony)
9. EO-79 (Perry Yantis)
10. Re: GO-32 APRS (Andrew Glasbrenner)
11. Re: GO-32 APRS (Tony)
12. Eo79 (jeffory broughton)
13. Re: Eo79 (Graham Shirville)
14. Eo-79 signal strength (jeffory broughton)
15. Re: Eo79 (Wouter Weggelaar)
16. Re: XW-2 GMSK Modem / Telemetry App? (Tony)
17. Telemetry Modem Questions (Tony)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:43:17 -0500
From: John Brier <johnbrier@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] PD120 SSTV Test Recording to Use in Preparation
for Upcoming ISS SSTV Events
Message-ID:
<CALn0fKPs+1CkHWf2o6+xqJiOREBAFYbOLqchfWRDTU_XHm12-w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In preparation for upcoming ISS SSTV events you can use this recording
to make sure your SSTV app/software can properly decode SSTV
transmission like the ones the ISS will be sending, which use the
PD120 mode. It's available on YouTube, SoundCloud and as an mp3
download via Dropbox:
https://youtu.be/SffT9U8scBc
https://soundcloud.com/spacecomms/pd120-sstv-test-recording
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gii8rytqrfch8q2/Space_Comms_PD120_SSTV_Test_Recordin
g.mp3?dl=0
For more information on upcoming ISS SSTV events see this webpage:
https://spacecomms.wordpress.com/iss-sstv-reception-hints/
John, KG4AKV
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:01:24 -0600
From: John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] sat pc32
Message-ID: <56783E74.2080305@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Is it suppose to auto load?
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:02:07 -0500
From: skristof@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS DIGI
Message-ID: <2844d717b1662dd70f099506e537d278@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
"It would be nice for those using unattended auto beacons to indicate so
in their beacon message so people do not waste time trying to do a short
QSO with them."
Amen, brother! I can only guess how many times I've sent my info to an
unattended computer, expecting an answer in return.
Steve AI9IN
On 2015-12-21 11:08, David Haworth wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I found ISS DIGI a great stepping stone up from receiving FUNcube AO-73
telemetry (>81,000 packet since January 2015) using a SDR radio.
> http://www.stargazing.net/david/satellites/20150104_1809UT_AO-73.html [2]
>
> 1. Using a Kenwood TM-710G and a vertical antenna I have received the ISS
DIGI and other stations through the ISS.
> The Kenwood TM-710G is left on 24/7 and later looking at the TM-710G APRS
list I can see stations received when I am at work or sleeping.
>
> 2. Using the manual beacon it is very exciting to see my call on the
Amateur Radio Stations heard via ISS map and list
> http://ariss.net [3] <http://ariss.net/ [4]>
> I plan to do a STEM project on this activity at the Pine Mountain
Observatory Summer workshop in 2016.
>
> Last summer we did FUNcube AO-73 telemetry. We received 759 packets.
> https://www.youtube.com/user/DavidAHaworth/videos [5]
> http://warehouse.funcube.org.uk/ranking.html?satelliteId=2 [6]
>
> 3. Hooking a PC terminal to the Kenwood TM-710G I made my first satellite
contact with CA using the ISS DIGI.
> It would be nice for those using unattended auto beacons to indicate so in
their beacon message so people do not waste time trying to do a short QSO
with them.
>
> 4. Using a Kenwood TH-72 hand held with its own rubber ducky antenna I can
pick up the ISS DIGI on high passes over head.
>
> Summary: ISS DIGI is a great learning tool about satellite communications
and it is fun.
>
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Kevin Deane <summit496@xxxx.xxx> wrote: Has
anyone made any contacts at all? I doubt it, all shown are beacons which are
lame because they wear down the bats on PC-SAT -44 remember that bird? The
packet on ISS is a waste of time maybe they should move the antenna or
something... Kevin KF7MYK _______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
satellite program! Subscription settings:
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb [1]
>
> 73,
> Clear and dark skies without RFI,
> David Haworth, WA9ONY
> http://www.stargazing.net/david [7] <http://www.stargazing.net/david [7]>
> davidahaworth@xxxxxx.xxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb [1]
Links:
------
[1] http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
[2]
http://www.stargazing.net/david/satellites/20150104_1809UT_AO-73.html
[3] http://ariss.net
[4] http://ariss.net/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/user/DavidAHaworth/videos
[6] http://warehouse.funcube.org.uk/ranking.html?satelliteId=2
[7] http://www.stargazing.net/david
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:29:44 -0500
From: Burns Fisher <burns@xxxxxx.xx>
To: John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] sat pc32
Message-ID:
<CABX7KxVHwCoNWs7tKOtCYP-iK2Uv50vrnY0R=uLFjfq-VELh6A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Do you mean when you boot or login, it is supposed to start automatically?
Not so far as I know. Or at least if it you can do that, it's a function
of the OS setting and not SatPC32 itself. Try starting it up and right
clicking on the icon. I don't have a PC in front of me to check, but the
Mac has a Option submenu to automatically start on login. Maybe Windows
has something similar?
Burns
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:01 PM, John Becker <w0jab@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Is it suppose to auto load?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:34:59 -0500
From: Nicholas Mahr KE8AKW <nicholasmahr1@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] KE8AKW @xxxx Tomorrow
Message-ID:
<CAGu+VYtdkP0uCUP_Hs+G-Cucz1vzkRXspwM5FMdG2KYHK6AF_w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi,
I will be operating from DM43 tomorrow in Arizona from December 22-31. Im
using a FT-8900 and the Arrow only so no SSB birds, just FM only. There may
be possibilitys of operating in another grid. This is a personal enjoyment
trip so don't expect me to be on every pass. Its also going to give me a
test run of how well the 8900 does on the birds. I will operate on AO-85,
SO-50, and Lilacsat-2 if its on. I will also get to see if I can get into
AO-85 with about 10-20W with my Arrow.
73 KE8AKW, Nick
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:37:51 -0500
From: Nicholas Mahr KE8AKW <nicholasmahr1@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] KE8AKW @xxxx Tomorrow
Message-ID:
<CAGu+VYsxNsBZC58bJ=TPvHFzmPeKyOHGCQDAnx8J=JiynZ2y=w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Also you can follow me on Twitter for updates @xxxxxx.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:01:34 -0500
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] ISS DIGI
Message-ID: <39ed8c2cf05eedaf00673be0a8a12424@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
We simply need a published User Service Agreement.
We had one for PCSAT so that everyone knew the rules.
http://aprs.org/pcsat/contract.txt
And one for everyone of our satellites.
Generally, unattended beacons were *not* authorized except for remote data
experiments and then those authorized beacon rates were once every 2
minutes. The rules for attended operators were also posted. Without
clear rules for everyone to follow, then service degrades for everyone.
Bob, WB4APR
> "It would be nice for those using unattended auto beacons to indicate so
in their beacon message so people do not waste time trying to do a short
QSO with them."
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:21:26 -0500
From: Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] GO-32 APRS
Message-ID: <56785136.2040900@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
All:
Monitored the last GO-32 pass expecting to see ID frames or perhaps an
APRS station, but I didn't capture anything. Signals were quiet strong
so I'm wondering if there might be a problem with the satellite that
would cause it not to ID? I'll try APRS on the next (20:00z) pass to see
if it will digi my signals.
Tony -K2MO
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:50:31 -0500
From: Perry Yantis <py41@xxx.xxx>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: [amsat-bb] EO-79
Message-ID: <DA17E7BB-FED9-420D-BF82-EACAE027BFD0@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Just got on EO-79.
Heard KO4MA but could not hear my signal so I had to hunt for it.
After adjusting +12 kHz I heard myself.
I then worked N1JEZ, and K4FEG with strong signals.
By the time I did all of this my signal was dropping fast so I signed out.
So far it seems like another great satellite to play with.
Perry WB8OTH
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:25:03 -0500
From: Andrew Glasbrenner <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] GO-32 APRS
Message-ID: <87D4223E-CCC9-4660-8D5A-2444E2B3A730@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
GO-32 has been in a beacon only mode for several years.
73, Drew KO4MA
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 21, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Monitored the last GO-32 pass expecting to see ID frames or perhaps an
APRS station, but I didn't capture anything. Signals were quiet strong so
I'm wondering if there might be a problem with the satellite that would
cause it not to ID? I'll try APRS on the next (20:00z) pass to see if it
will digi my signals.
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:53:51 -0500
From: Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] GO-32 APRS
Message-ID: <567858CF.3070503@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Drew:
> GO-32 has been in a beacon only mode for several years. 73, Drew KO4MA
I've been off the air with satellites for several years so that explains
it! Just re-installed my M2 antennas and new preamps.
Not sure why I didn't decode GO-32's beacon.
Thanks
Tony -K2MO
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 21, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> All:
>>
>> Monitored the last GO-32 pass expecting to see ID frames or perhaps an
APRS station, but I didn't capture anything. Signals were quiet strong so
I'm wondering if there might be a problem with the satellite that would
cause it not to ID? I'll try APRS on the next (20:00z) pass to see if it
will digi my signals.
>>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:19:19 -0500
From: jeffory broughton <jefforybroughton@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Eo79
Message-ID:
<CACm2je249Y_X75PCFvRNdDpvnoTSbaJ7Z0F68_ZVaQN2+BY7Kg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I found the receiver to be more stable than ao73 but I also found the
downlink to be much weaker than I thought it should be since it supposed to
be the same radio as in the ao73.another good pass about midnight tonight
to try it out
WB8RJY.JEFF
jeff broughton
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:41:30 -0000
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "jeffory broughton" <jefforybroughton@xxxxx.xxx>,
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Eo79
Message-ID: <0BE82CDFB4154C63B77C439B8F6CAF57@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Jeff,
Many thanks for the report...actually the same radio but as we are sharing
the platform with another radio system we "only" have 1/4 wave monopole
antennas rather than the full dipoles that we have on FC1.
The actual effects of this difference in practise may be interesting to
observe.
73
Graham
G3VZV
-----Original Message-----
From: jeffory broughton
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:19 PM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Eo79
I found the receiver to be more stable than ao73 but I also found the
downlink to be much weaker than I thought it should be since it supposed to
be the same radio as in the ao73.another good pass about midnight tonight
to try it out
WB8RJY.JEFF
jeff broughton
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:14:35 -0500
From: jeffory broughton <jefforybroughton@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Eo-79 signal strength
Message-ID:
<CACm2je0qYka_UX1LgRrJwjsOZBD2gSB1nJWrdi4omJ-zzemKbw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Graham, thanks so much for taking time to reply, much appreciated.WB8RJY
jeff broughton
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:18:08 +0100
From: Wouter Weggelaar <wouterweg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Graham Shirville <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, jeffory broughton
<jefforybroughton@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Eo79
Message-ID:
<CAKXf1rEJrwgSpDtQOPWvCUcH45uf2iPwc3D1QUNx1KSC5-6eQw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Also note that the filter passband is wider in this satellite and is also
less flat. This spreads out the power a bit more, and also created a sweet
spot. But the RX should be very sensitive, so it should be no problem to
work in the entire passband.
Wouter PA3WEG
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Graham Shirville <
g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Many thanks for the report...actually the same radio but as we are sharing
> the platform with another radio system we "only" have 1/4 wave monopole
> antennas rather than the full dipoles that we have on FC1.
>
> The actual effects of this difference in practise may be interesting to
> observe.
>
> 73
>
> Graham
> G3VZV
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: jeffory broughton
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:19 PM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Eo79
>
>
> I found the receiver to be more stable than ao73 but I also found the
> downlink to be much weaker than I thought it should be since it supposed to
> be the same radio as in the ao73.another good pass about midnight tonight
> to try it out
> WB8RJY.JEFF
>
> jeff broughton
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:32:10 -0500
From: Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Mike Rupprecht <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] XW-2 GMSK Modem / Telemetry App?
Message-ID: <56786FDA.3090204@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Mike:
Thanks for taking the time to help. I have the XW-2F telemetry decoder
running with your OnlineKiss program along with the AGW packet engine.
The AGWPE is connected to an SCS Tracker modem which runs 9.6K. I'm told
that it should decode even thought he XW-2F modem runs GMSK?
I'm currently testing the setup on 2 meter APRS just to see if the data
would flow and as you can see below, it does seem to be working.
2015-12-21 21:29:49.260 UTC: [87 Bytes KISS Frame (without CRC)]
1 > C0 00 82 A0 AE AE 62 60 E0 9C 64 96 92 40 40 74 AE 64 82 8A
21 > 8A 40 E0 9C 64 A0 88 9E 40 FE AE 92 88 8A 64 40 E1 03 F0 3B
41 > 34 34 39 2E 34 37 35 4E 59 2A 32 31 32 31 32 39 7A 34 31 33
61 > 32 2E 32 31 4E 2F 30 37 34 30 32 2E 38 31 57 72 54 30 37 31
81 > 20 2D 35 30 30 20 C0
?.? ??b`??d??@@xxxxxx@xxx
??@xxxxxx@x.xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx
-500 ?
I wasn't sure which of the 3 KISS files to load that are contained in
the AGW OnlineKiss directory so I just chose one.
The XW-2F bird is approaching as I write this so I'll let you know if it
works.
Thanks again...
Tony -K2MO
On 12/20/2015 10:58 PM, Tony wrote:
> Mike:
>
> Thanks for the info...
>
> Getting "MSCHRT20.OCX" missing error when I run the program with
> Windows 10.
>
> I'll have to investigate further.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
>
> On 12/20/2015 8:59 PM, Mike Rupprecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> you will find a decoder for the XW-2A, -2B, -2C, -2D digital
>> telemetry here:
>> http://www.dk3wn.info/files/xw2abcd_digital.zip
>> To decode the 19k2 (9k6) telemetry use soundmodem software by UZ7HO:
>> http://uz7.ho.ua/packetradio.htm
>>
>> 73 Mike
>> DK3WN
>>
>> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im Auftrag von Tony
>> Gesendet: 20 December 2015 23:16
>> An: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>> Betreff: [amsat-bb] XW-2 GMSK Modem / Telemetry App?
>>
>> All:
>>
>> Is there a GMSK sound card modem available to decode the XW-2 series
>> satellites? Is there a Telemetry decoder as well?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all
>> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>> official
>> views of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:05:15 -0500
From: Tony <dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Telemetry Modem Questions
Message-ID: <5678779B.5080807@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
All:
I'm glad to be back working satellites again after many years, but I can
see that I have a lot to catch up on.
I'd rather not flood the mailing list with a lot of redundant questions
so I'd appreciate it if someone with the knowledge of telemetry modems
and decoders would contact me off-line at: dxdx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Thanks..
Tony -K2MO
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 10, Issue 393
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
