OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   05.04.16 04:12l 1129 Lines 45873 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB11105
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V11 104
Path: IW8PGT<HB9CSR<IK2XDE<DB0RES<DB0OVN<DB0GOS<ON0AR<OZ5BBS<CX2SA
Sent: 160405/0207Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:41708 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB11105
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: LMR-400 direct to antenna or no? (Greg D)
   2. FUNcube-1 Mode (Graham Shirville)
   3. Re: LMR-400 direct to antenna or no? (w4upd)
   4. Re: XW-2A, C and F Operation (Clayton W5PFG)
   5. Xw2a,xw2c,XW2F (jeffory broughton)
   6. FG8OJ ON A07 (jeffory broughton)
   7. ARISS Contact Audio - Wednesday (John Spasojevich)
   8. Re: LMR-400 direct to antenna or no? (John Toscano)
   9. Re: LMR-400 direct to antenna or no? (John Toscano)
  10. Re: LMR-400 direct to antenna or no? (John Toscano)
  11. ANS-094 AMSAT News Service Weekly Bulletins (E.Mike McCardel)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:45:33 -0700
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?
Message-ID: <56FF405D.3000702@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi Reid,

I understand the desire for minimal use of connectors, but the coupling
between the rigid cable coming from the shack to the rotor, and the flex
cable going to the antenna, is a good place to put a nice little
preamp.  Think of it as a barrel connector with attitude.  Yes, putting
it at the antenna feed point is better, but unless you're working EME,
the practical difference is pretty small.

Your luck with 9913 and water ingress is significantly better than mine
ever was.  I had one 60' run that kept getting worse over time.  It got
so bad that I drilled a hole in the lower end connector so I could suck
out the water until I could find some hardline to replace it.  Never
used the stuff ever again.

Greg  KO6TH


w4upd wrote:
> As I mentioned before, I used 9913 (rigid) for years without a
> problem. After taking the arrays down, I was able to reuse some of the
> 9913. The 9913 I had, had a large solid center conductor. By doing a
> loose spring type of installation around the mast and boom, there was
> very little flexing of the cable. This only adds about 2 - 4 foot to
> the length of the cable.
>
> I did this to keep the number of connectors and connections down
> (especially on 70cm) to reduce cable loses. The more turns (for
> example maybe 4) the less flexing of the cable will occur.
>
> Again, just my 2 cents, but the installation mentioned above was very
> successful for years. If I ran into any problems it was due to the
> "known" problem of water getting into the 9913. However, I had little
> problem with that as well.
>
> If the runs are short (less than 50') you could use other methods
> which requires additional coax fittings and barrel connectors. My goal
> was to prevent that. I would still recommend a preamp on 70cm at the
> mast to over come any installation. I found it to be a good addition,
> especially if we get any HEOs up or for near AOS or LOS operation,
> trees or weather.
>
> Reid, W4UPD
>
>
>
> On 3/31/2016 11:33 PM, Glen Zook via AMSAT-BB wrote:
>> Use LMR-400 around the rotor if you want to have to replace the cable
>> every few days!LMR-400 has a solid center conductor and it will
>> definitely break after being "flexed" for not that many
>> times!Frankly, for short runs like around rotors and to most
>> antennas, plain old RG213/U works fine and the loss is very low.  Run
>> the LMR-400 up to just below the rotor and then install the RG213/U
>> the rest of the way.I use either 1/2-inch Heliax or 7/8ths-inch
>> Heliax for almost all my antenna runs from 160-meters through 70 cm.
>> Where a rotor is involved, the Heliax goes up the tower to just below
>> the rotor and then RG213/U the rest of the way.  Most of the antennas
>> have been "up" for a pretty long time (decades) and they are working
>> just as well today as they did when first erected. Glen, K9STHAMSAT
>> 239 / LM 463Website: http://k9sth.net
>>        From: Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:35 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] LMR-400
>> direct to antenna or no?   I hope to put up my first rotating antenna
>> soon and just received a nice length of LMR-400 to use. (regular, not
>> "super-flex")
>> Having never seen LMR-400 before, I did not know how flexible it
>> would be.  I would call it "medium"... not stiff as a pipe but not
>> floppy, either.
>> My question is whether anyone using LMR-400 can recommend whether I
>> should attach it directly to my antenna (with slack loops, of course)?
>> Or, should I get a few meters of something more flexible to attach to
>> an antenna that needs to be free to rotate 360 degrees?
>> If a jumper is recommended, I would appreciate suggestions on what
>> cable would work best for the task.  The frequency for this project
>> is 70cm.
>>    _______________________________________________Sent via
>> AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum availableto all
>> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressedare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>> official views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to
>> support the amateur satellite program!Subscription settings:
>> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:47:13 +0100
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <funcube@xxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>,	"AMSAT BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 Mode
Message-ID: <3A5CEE71BD6741E0806F978629815EE7@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi All,

Just to report that FUNcube-1 is now in amateur mode for the rest of the
weekend. Transponder and low power tlm as usual.

In view of the late mode change this morning we will leave her in this mode
until Monday morning

73
Graham
G3VZV

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 09:25:31 -0400
From: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?
Message-ID: <56FFC84B.7030000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I had better luck after protecting the connectors with pill bottles.
This worked for a while but the UV would wipe out the bottles in a short
period of time. After that I used short pieces of SCH 40 PVC with
modified end caps for the cable and didn't bother to glue. This worked
much better, plus allowed me access to the connectors when needed. I
also did this to the rotor connectors.

Reid, W4UPD

On 4/1/2016 11:45 PM, Greg D wrote:
> Hi Reid,
>
> I understand the desire for minimal use of connectors, but the coupling
> between the rigid cable coming from the shack to the rotor, and the flex
> cable going to the antenna, is a good place to put a nice little
> preamp.  Think of it as a barrel connector with attitude.  Yes, putting
> it at the antenna feed point is better, but unless you're working EME,
> the practical difference is pretty small.
>
> Your luck with 9913 and water ingress is significantly better than mine
> ever was.  I had one 60' run that kept getting worse over time.  It got
> so bad that I drilled a hole in the lower end connector so I could suck
> out the water until I could find some hardline to replace it.  Never
> used the stuff ever again.
>
> Greg  KO6TH
>
>
> w4upd wrote:
>> As I mentioned before, I used 9913 (rigid) for years without a
>> problem. After taking the arrays down, I was able to reuse some of the
>> 9913. The 9913 I had, had a large solid center conductor. By doing a
>> loose spring type of installation around the mast and boom, there was
>> very little flexing of the cable. This only adds about 2 - 4 foot to
>> the length of the cable.
>>
>> I did this to keep the number of connectors and connections down
>> (especially on 70cm) to reduce cable loses. The more turns (for
>> example maybe 4) the less flexing of the cable will occur.
>>
>> Again, just my 2 cents, but the installation mentioned above was very
>> successful for years. If I ran into any problems it was due to the
>> "known" problem of water getting into the 9913. However, I had little
>> problem with that as well.
>>
>> If the runs are short (less than 50') you could use other methods
>> which requires additional coax fittings and barrel connectors. My goal
>> was to prevent that. I would still recommend a preamp on 70cm at the
>> mast to over come any installation. I found it to be a good addition,
>> especially if we get any HEOs up or for near AOS or LOS operation,
>> trees or weather.
>>
>> Reid, W4UPD
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/31/2016 11:33 PM, Glen Zook via AMSAT-BB wrote:
>>> Use LMR-400 around the rotor if you want to have to replace the cable
>>> every few days!LMR-400 has a solid center conductor and it will
>>> definitely break after being "flexed" for not that many
>>> times!Frankly, for short runs like around rotors and to most
>>> antennas, plain old RG213/U works fine and the loss is very low.  Run
>>> the LMR-400 up to just below the rotor and then install the RG213/U
>>> the rest of the way.I use either 1/2-inch Heliax or 7/8ths-inch
>>> Heliax for almost all my antenna runs from 160-meters through 70 cm.
>>> Where a rotor is involved, the Heliax goes up the tower to just below
>>> the rotor and then RG213/U the rest of the way.  Most of the antennas
>>> have been "up" for a pretty long time (decades) and they are working
>>> just as well today as they did when first erected. Glen, K9STHAMSAT
>>> 239 / LM 463Website: http://k9sth.net
>>>         From: Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:35 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] LMR-400
>>> direct to antenna or no?   I hope to put up my first rotating antenna
>>> soon and just received a nice length of LMR-400 to use. (regular, not
>>> "super-flex")
>>> Having never seen LMR-400 before, I did not know how flexible it
>>> would be.  I would call it "medium"... not stiff as a pipe but not
>>> floppy, either.
>>> My question is whether anyone using LMR-400 can recommend whether I
>>> should attach it directly to my antenna (with slack loops, of course)?
>>> Or, should I get a few meters of something more flexible to attach to
>>> an antenna that needs to be free to rotate 360 degrees?
>>> If a jumper is recommended, I would appreciate suggestions on what
>>> cable would work best for the task.  The frequency for this project
>>> is 70cm.
>>>     _______________________________________________Sent via
>>> AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum availableto all
>>> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>>> expressedare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
>>> official views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to
>>> support the amateur satellite program!Subscription settings:
>>> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
>> of AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
>> program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 08:43:38 -0500
From: Clayton W5PFG <w5pfg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] XW-2A, C and F Operation
Message-ID: <56FFCC8A.9080100@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

There was no shortage of activity on the XW-2A,C, and F transponders
this morning.  On the passes around 1300 UTC, stations were heard and
worked from the east to west coasts of the USA and Canada.

These are some of the easiest transponders to hear.  They are very
workable with the most modest of antennas and low power.

73
Clayton
W5PFG

>
> On 3/29/2016 18:17, Richard Lawn wrote:
>> I'm confounded by the lack of activity on these satellites which are
>> functioning quite well. I just called and called with no takers until
>> close
>> to the end of the pass I thought I heard a French Canadian trying to call
>> me but it was getting too low to my horizon. More operators should be
>> using
>> these birds while they are still functioning.
>>
>> 73
>> Rick, W2JAZ


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:26:54 -0400
From: jeffory broughton <jefforybroughton@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Xw2a,xw2c,XW2F
Message-ID:
<CACm2je0xWe0zW2YsbRhu7Cax2J3wkPJ+-kQBT9aZCEs9CHqvuQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

If I can work those from the middle of a pine Forrest with 8 ft tall pine
trees at 15-20 degree passes here in. Northern michigan,than ANYBODY
can.Those birds have great receivers with nice loud tx audio.73 WB8RJY

jeff broughton


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 17:29:08 -0400
From: jeffory broughton <jefforybroughton@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] FG8OJ ON A07
Message-ID:
<CACm2je3Gye4dY=L81mC9itC7j+rF91vQg0_r6Nfpn_w-syX0UQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

What fun to work Bert ,FG8OJ on
AO7 from my little earth station up
At the lake in the woods at 2057 utc
Suprise !

jeff broughton


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 17:57:36 -0500
From: John Spasojevich <johnag9d@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>,	"ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxxx
<ariss-ops@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ARISS Contact Audio - Wednesday
Message-ID:
<CA+qbou4v34FQYFSgnMqKBkPiB7imTrq+QLE6RV8vbs8avM9_EQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Please join us in listening to the ISS contact with participants at the

Kiilinik High School, Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, Canada on Wednesday April 6. AOS
is anticipated at 18:02 UTC

The duration of the contact is approximately 9 minutes and 30 seconds. The
contact will be a telebridge between NA1SS and VK5KHZ in Australia. The
contact is expected to be conducted in English.

Audio from this contact will be fed into the:

EchoLink *AMSAT* (101377)

IRLP Node 9010 Discovery Reflector

Streaming Audio at: https://sites.google.com/site/arissaudio/

Audio on Echolink & web stream is generally transmitted around 20 minutes
prior to the contact taking place so that you can hear some of the
preparation that occurs. IRLP will begin just prior to the ground station
call to the ISS.

** Contact times are approximate. If the ISS executes a reboost or other
manoeuvre, the AOS (Acquisition Of Signal) time may alter by a few minutes
**

73,

John - AG9D

ARISS Audio Distribution


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 20:43:10 -0500
From: John Toscano <tosca005@xxx.xxx>
To: w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?
Message-ID:
<CABGf72oa_+bp6B5u6Sd_z9iKY+d+JFw-vGcE9QGo1Wi_oC1QdA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

What he said. In other words, I concur. I have had a whole bunch of VHF/UHF
antennas fed witl plain LMR400 for years, and with a bit of a coil around
the mast, it all worked fine.
73 de W0JT/5
EL09vu

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 8:43 PM, w4upd <updwrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> I would do like I did to my 9913. This is rather stiff cable. I went a
> couple of turns loosely around the mast and around the boom for elevation.
> I would do this with the antennas at 0 elevation and 360/0 degree azimuth.
> In this way it acts like a simple spring which opens or tightens slightly
> as the rotation of the mast and/or boom occur. I had my 9913 this way for
> over 15 years without a problem. I suspect the LMR400 should work the same.
> In this way you are not inducing any losses with additional cables and
> connectors.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Reid, W4UPD
> Amsat: 17002
>
>
> On 3/31/2016 9:35 PM, Scott wrote:
>
>> I hope to put up my first rotating antenna soon and just received a nice
>> length of LMR-400 to use. (regular, not "super-flex")
>>
>> Having never seen LMR-400 before, I did not know how flexible it would
>> be.  I would call it "medium"... not stiff as a pipe but not floppy,
either.
>>
>> My question is whether anyone using LMR-400 can recommend whether I
>> should attach it directly to my antenna (with slack loops, of course)?
>>
>> Or, should I get a few meters of something more flexible to attach to an
>> antenna that needs to be free to rotate 360 degrees?
>>
>> If a jumper is recommended, I would appreciate suggestions on what cable
>> would work best for the task.  The frequency for this project is 70cm.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Scott, K4KDR
>> Montpelier, VA  USA
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
>> Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 20:48:26 -0500
From: John Toscano <tosca005@xxx.xxx>
To: Glen Zook <gzook@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?
Message-ID:
<CABGf72p2bQrS0b4AEpVEgB2BYeE8QhcH43QTGUYSsB+jOTz0+Q@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I beg to differ. As long as there is a reasonably-sized, loose loop around
the mast, LMR400 will last for years to decades, not days. Mine did, for 20
years, in Minnesota weather (temps ranging from -30F to +100F). Planning to
do it again when the tower goes up here in Texas.

73 de W0JT/5
EL09vu

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Glen Zook via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> wrote:

> Use LMR-400 around the rotor if you want to have to replace the cable
> every few days!
> LMR-400 has a solid center conductor and it will definitely break after
> being "flexed" for not that many times!
> Frankly, for short runs like around rotors and to most antennas, plain old
> RG213/U works fine and the loss is very low.  Run the LMR-400 up to just
> below the rotor and then install the RG213/U the rest of the way.
> I use either 1/2-inch Heliax or 7/8ths-inch Heliax for almost all my
> antenna runs from 160-meters through 70 cm.  Where a rotor is involved, the
> Heliax goes up the tower to just below the rotor and then RG213/U the rest
> of the way.  Most of the antennas have been "up" for a pretty long time
> (decades) and they are working just as well today as they did when first
> erected. Glen, K9STHAMSAT 239 / LM 463Website: http://k9sth.net
>
>       From: Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx>
>  To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>  Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:35 PM
>  Subject: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?
>
> I hope to put up my first rotating antenna soon and just received a nice
> length of LMR-400 to use. (regular, not "super-flex")
>
> Having never seen LMR-400 before, I did not know how flexible it would
> be.  I would call it "medium"... not stiff as a pipe but not floppy, either.
>
> My question is whether anyone using LMR-400 can recommend whether I should
> attach it directly to my antenna (with slack loops, of course)?
>
> Or, should I get a few meters of something more flexible to attach to an
> antenna that needs to be free to rotate 360 degrees?
>
> If a jumper is recommended, I would appreciate suggestions on what cable
> would work best for the task.  The frequency for this project is 70cm.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 20:59:07 -0500
From: John Toscano <tosca005@xxx.xxx>
To: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] LMR-400 direct to antenna or no?
Message-ID:
<CABGf72pWq98VOOEuLDYNGT_LMGJpW4_VK1WKTBcg7mH1zjG_8w@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I had a dualband 2M/70cm vertical that was fed with 9913 from antenna to
the house, and whtn properly prepared N connectors on both ends, it never
leaked water. Well, at least not until I tried to drill another hole into
the house next to the first one, and the drill bit went in at an angle and
drilled right into the run of 9913. Ouch. I replaced that run with LMR400
and never looked back. It survived for over 10 years, but of course with no
motion involved there.  ;^)

73 de W0JT
EL09vu

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> Hi Reid,
>
> I understand the desire for minimal use of connectors, but the coupling
> between the rigid cable coming from the shack to the rotor, and the flex
> cable going to the antenna, is a good place to put a nice little
> preamp.  Think of it as a barrel connector with attitude.  Yes, putting
> it at the antenna feed point is better, but unless you're working EME,
> the practical difference is pretty small.
>
> Your luck with 9913 and water ingress is significantly better than mine
> ever was.  I had one 60' run that kept getting worse over time.  It got
> so bad that I drilled a hole in the lower end connector so I could suck
> out the water until I could find some hardline to replace it.  Never
> used the stuff ever again.
>
> Greg  KO6TH
>
>
> w4upd wrote:
> > As I mentioned before, I used 9913 (rigid) for years without a
> > problem. After taking the arrays down, I was able to reuse some of the
> > 9913. The 9913 I had, had a large solid center conductor. By doing a
> > loose spring type of installation around the mast and boom, there was
> > very little flexing of the cable. This only adds about 2 - 4 foot to
> > the length of the cable.
> >
> > I did this to keep the number of connectors and connections down
> > (especially on 70cm) to reduce cable loses. The more turns (for
> > example maybe 4) the less flexing of the cable will occur.
> >
> > Again, just my 2 cents, but the installation mentioned above was very
> > successful for years. If I ran into any problems it was due to the
> > "known" problem of water getting into the 9913. However, I had little
> > problem with that as well.
> >
> > If the runs are short (less than 50') you could use other methods
> > which requires additional coax fittings and barrel connectors. My goal
> > was to prevent that. I would still recommend a preamp on 70cm at the
> > mast to over come any installation. I found it to be a good addition,
> > especially if we get any HEOs up or for near AOS or LOS operation,
> > trees or weather.
> >
> > Reid, W4UPD
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/31/2016 11:33 PM, Glen Zook via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> >> Use LMR-400 around the rotor if you want to have to replace the cable
> >> every few days!LMR-400 has a solid center conductor and it will
> >> definitely break after being "flexed" for not that many
> >> times!Frankly, for short runs like around rotors and to most
> >> antennas, plain old RG213/U works fine and the loss is very low.  Run
> >> the LMR-400 up to just below the rotor and then install the RG213/U
> >> the rest of the way.I use either 1/2-inch Heliax or 7/8ths-inch
> >> Heliax for almost all my antenna runs from 160-meters through 70 cm.
> >> Where a rotor is involved, the Heliax goes up the tower to just below
> >> the rotor and then RG213/U the rest of the way.  Most of the antennas
> >> have been "up" for a pretty long time (decades) and they are working
> >> just as well today as they did when first erected. Glen, K9STHAMSAT
> >> 239 / LM 463Website: http://k9sth.net
> >>        From: Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:35 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] LMR-400
> >> direct to antenna or no?   I hope to put up my first rotating antenna
> >> soon and just received a nice length of LMR-400 to use. (regular, not
> >> "super-flex")
> >> Having never seen LMR-400 before, I did not know how flexible it
> >> would be.  I would call it "medium"... not stiff as a pipe but not
> >> floppy, either.
> >> My question is whether anyone using LMR-400 can recommend whether I
> >> should attach it directly to my antenna (with slack loops, of course)?
> >> Or, should I get a few meters of something more flexible to attach to
> >> an antenna that needs to be free to rotate 360 degrees?
> >> If a jumper is recommended, I would appreciate suggestions on what
> >> cable would work best for the task.  The frequency for this project
> >> is 70cm.
> >>    _______________________________________________Sent via
> >> AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum availableto all
> >> interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> >> expressedare solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
> >> official views of AMSAT-NA.Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to
> >> support the amateur satellite program!Subscription settings:
> >> http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> > to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> > Opinions expressed
> > are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views
> > of AMSAT-NA.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> > program!
> > Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:30:02 -0400
From: "E.Mike McCardel" <mccardelm@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Amsat - BBs <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ANS-094 AMSAT News Service Weekly Bulletins
Message-ID:
<CAM5+souPR72AgnorGtk48DQZoX82HJ-shx3VksNYQhtyXa2zOA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

AMSAT NEWS SERVICE
ANS-094

The AMSAT News Service bulletins are a free, weekly news and infor-
mation service of AMSAT North America, The Radio Amateur Satellite
Corporation. ANS publishes news related to Amateur Radio in Space
including reports on the activities of a worldwide group of Amateur
Radio operators who share an active interest in designing, building,
launching and communicating through analog and digital Amateur Radio
satellites.

The news feed on http://www.amsat.org publishes news of Amateur
Radio in Space as soon as our volunteers can post it.

Please send any amateur satellite news or reports to:
ans-editor at amsat.org.

In this edition:

* Replay Available Ham Talk Live! ARISS with Rosalie White, K1STO
* AMSAT Dayton Booth Volunteers Needed
* AMSAT SA SPACE SYMPOSIUM 2016
* The 13th Annual CubeSat Developers? Workshop
* 2016 VHF SUPER CONFERENCE
* STMSat-1 and MinXSS CubeSats Featured on Public Radio
* Irvine Students Are On a Mission to Launch a Satellite
* Free Tours of Facilities at NASA's Glenn Research Center
* ARISS News
* Satellite Shorts From All Over


SB SAT @ AMSAT $ANS-094.01
ANS-094 AMSAT News Service Weekly Bulletins

AMSAT News Service Bulletin 094.01
>From AMSAT HQ KENSINGTON, MD.
April 3, 2016
To All RADIO AMATEURS
BID: $ANS-094.01


Replay Available Ham Talk Live! ARISS with Rosalie White, K1STO

If you missed this past Thursday evening's Ham Talk Live! show
featuring, Rosalie White, K1STO talking about the Amateur Radio on
the International Space Station (ARISS) program sponsored by ARRL,
AMSAT, and NASA, a replay of the recorded show is available on
http://www.hamtalklive.com.

The discussion took a look back at the start of the ARISS program,
the 1000th QSO that was just completed, and the future of the
program. Also featured were some messages from the ISS. Rosalie also
told of a way you can help.

Ham Talk Live! airs on the web on Thursday nights at 9PM eastern
time. In addition to their hamtalklive.com web site the show can be
found on-line via Spreaker, iTunes, Stitcher, Google Play, YouTube,
SoundCloud, or TuneIn.

[ANS thanks Ham Talk Live! For the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


AMSAT Dayton Booth Volunteers Needed

Call for Volunteers for the AMSAT Booth at Dayton 2016

The 2016 Dayton Hamvention?, sponsored by the Dayton Amateur Radio
Association will be held this year on May 20-22.  ?Dayton? is the
largest hamfest in the United States, and AMSAT will be there again
this year.

You can assist AMSAT by volunteering to help staff the booth.  While
there, you will meet other AMSAT members, interact with the satellite
designers, builders, and operators, and enjoy all that Dayton has to
offer.

People are needed to assist with the setup of the booth on Thursday,
May 19 (A few people to move the equipment from the storage area
leaving the hotel at 9 am, most at the Arena from 11am to 4 pm), to
staff the booth Friday (9 am  to 6 pm), Saturday (9 am  to 5 pm), and
Sunday (9 am to 1 pm), and pack up on Sunday (1 pm to 3 pm).  If you
are leaving late Sunday, or Monday morning, please consider helping
transport the display to the storage area on the south side of
Dayton.  This is normally completed by 5 pm.   Most people volunteer
for one or more 2 hour shifts in the booth.

Please send an e-mail to Steve Belter, N9IP, n9ip (at) amsat.org, if
you are willing to help AMSAT at the Hamvention. Please let Steve
know as soon as possible if you're available to assist.

If you missed the Hamvention the last few years, there were some
changes in the Ball Arena, and the AMSAT exhibit was part of that
change.  We now have  a 3 X 3 booth arrangement, with the
engineering,education, ARISS, and software display on one side of the
aisle, and the membership and Beginner?s Corner on the opposite side.
The booth numbers are now 444-446 and 433-435.  We will be very near
the old exhibit area, within sight of the ARRL exhibit.

[ANS thanks AMSAT.org for the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


AMSAT SA SPACE SYMPOSIUM 2016

The annual AMSAT SA Space Symposium will be held at the Innovation
Hub in Pretoria on 28 May 2016.

The theme is  ?Make Space Sciences part of your development and free
time activity?

The conference programme will include a real time review on the SA
AMSAT Kletskous CubeSat and papers on other projects, technology and
space science subjects.

This is a call for papers to be included in the proceedings  and for
presentation at the conference. The closing date for synopsis has
been extended to  6 April. The final paper will be required in word
format by 30  April 2016. Synopsis  must be in word format  and
should be sent to saamsat@xxxxxxx.xx.xx .

[ANS thanks AMSAT SA for the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


The 13th Annual CubeSat Developers? Workshop

The 13th Annual CubeSat Developers? Workshop (April 20-22, 2016) at
California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, CA is
just three short weeks away !!

Don?t delay: register now before our Early Bird prices expire! You
can register by following the link, here, or following the link on
our website, cubesat.org. Please note: The prices for professional
attendees will INCREASE in just 6 days, on April 5, 2016!!

[ANS thanks The CubeSat Workshop Team for the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


2016 VHF SUPER CONFERENCE

The upcoming Amateur Radio Technical Conference sponsored by the
Southeastern VHF Society, Northeast Weak Signal Group, and  Mt. Airy
Radio Club will be held at the Holiday Inn Washington Dulles Airport
on April 15 to 17. - This year, one large conference is being held in
Lieu of three Eastern conferences.

The aim of the educational conference is to share with our fellow
VHF, UHF, and Microwave enthusiasts, technical achievements and
developments.  The technical conference is followed by a dinner,
recognition of door prize contributors, and a drawing for door prizes.

Conference Web-site: http://vhfsuperconference.com

The Conference is affiliated with the ARRL.

Contacts
Mickie Clement, W1MKY
Telephone: 603-428-3840 Email: dpclement at tds.net
Gary Hitchner, WA2OMY Email: gary.hitchner at momentumdynamics.com

[ANS thanks Gary WA2OMY and Mickie W1MKY for the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


STMSat-1 and MinXSS CubeSats Featured on Public Radio

Elementary school, St. Thomas More's, satellite STMSat-1 and
University of Colorado's Miniature X-ray Solar Spectrometer
(MinXSS)CubeSat were featured in an interview on Colorado Public
Radio.

The interview of Doug Duncan, director of the Fiske Planetarium in
Boulder by Colorado Matters' host Ryan Warner.

The interview can be heard at
http://tinyurl.com/ANS094-CPR

The interview is a good overview of cubsats and their capability.

Both satellites are expected to be launched from the ISS in early
April

[ANS thanks Colorado Public Radio for the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


Irvine Students Are On a Mission to Launch a Satellite

The los Angeles Times reports that over a hundred students from five
Irvine high schools and another dozen from a local middle school have
begun a year long collaboration to engineer, launch and place an
operational nanosatellite in orbit.

Teachers from Beckman, Irvine, Northwood and Woodbridge high schools
developed curriculum for teams of 20 to 25 students from each school
to handle the CubeSat mission.

Students from Irvine's new Portola High School will be brought into
the program when the campus opens in the fall. Students from Rancho
San Joaquin Middle School are involved in the project as a STEM
feeder program. Organizers of the Irving project are in discussions
with a Russian company and have targeted a March 2017 launch date.
Irving Public Schools Foundation have granted $150,000 in seed money
to launch the project.

The schools are planning for three years of missions with a goal of
rolling over in perpetuity depending on funding and future support.

The project is the brain child of Brent Freeze and Kain Sosa,
neighbors in Irvine's Quail Hill subdivision, who have children in
the school district. Their goal is to support education that requires
specialized science backgrounds and recognize that developing talent
could start with STEM programs in local high schools.

Read the full article at
http://preview.tinyurl.com/ANS094-Irvine

[ANS thanks the LA Times for the above information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


Free Tours of Facilities at NASA's Glenn Research Center

NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, is offering tours
that take visitors behind the scenes and inside certain research
facilities. Glenn scientists and engineers serve as guides. Tours and
open house events will be held each month through October 2016. Tours
are free for groups and individuals, but to guarantee admission,
reservations are required. Visitor parking is also free.

On the days of the tours, a bus departs from Glenn's main gate every
hour, beginning at 10 a.m. The last tour departs at 1 p.m. Each tour
lasts about 45 minutes and is followed by a stop at Glenn's Gift Shop.

Glenn's 2016 Tour Schedule

April 2, 2016 -- Piloted Control Evaluation Facility and Distributed
Engine Control Laboratory: Visit two laboratories that showcase how
researchers evaluate propulsion control and aircraft engine control.
Tour the Piloted Control Evaluation (Flight Simulator) Facility to
see where researchers evaluate the effect of propulsion control on
aircraft performance. Visit the Distributed Engine Control Laboratory
to learn how NASA evaluates new hardware architectures for aircraft
engine control.

May 21-22, 2016 -- Open House at NASA's Glenn Research Center: NASA
Glenn is opening its doors to the public for a weekend open house.
Visitors will be able to tour many of the center's world-class
facilities and see how the center improves aviation and fosters
exploration to benefit everyone on Earth. Visitors also will be able
to meet an astronaut and talk with engineers, scientists and
technicians who work on space programs. Registration for this event
is not required.

June 11-12, 2016 -- Open House at NASA's Plum Brook Station: NASA
Glenn is opening the doors of Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio,
to the public for a weekend open house. Visitors will be able to tour
the station's world-class facilities and step inside the world's
largest vacuum chamber, which has tested parts of rockets, Mars
landers and Orion hardware. Visitors also will be able to meet an
astronaut and talk with engineers, scientists and technicians.
Registration for this event is not required.

July 9, 2016: Radioisotope Power System, Systems Integration
Laboratory: See how NASA emulates the electrical characteristics of a
spacecraft system in the Radioisotope Power System, Systems
Integration Laboratory. RPS is a source of electricity for NASA space
missions from the surface of Mars to the realm of the outer planets.

Aug. 6, 2016 -- See Things a Different Way: Check out Glenn's
Graphics and Visualization, or GVIS, and the Reconfigurable User-
interface and Virtual Reality Exploration, or GRUVE, Laboratories.
The GVIS lab uses advanced computer input and output devices paired
with a variety of natural user interface devices and 3-D displays.
The GRUVE lab is used to analyze data obtained either by computer
simulation or from research test facilities.

Sept. 10, 2016 -- Vibration Testing: Join us on a tour of Glenn's
Structural Dynamics Laboratory, where things get shaken to verify
their survivability. Several experiments that currently are operating
on the International Space Station were tested in this lab.

Oct. 1, 2016 -- Prepare for Impact: Come explore Glenn's Ballistic
Impact Facility. See the laboratory that helped to identify the cause
of the space shuttle Columbia accident and return NASA's shuttle
fleet to flight.

Tours are open to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. To
guarantee admission, reservations are required. For more information
on tours and how to make reservations, visit
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/events/tours.html.

Please direct questions about the tours to
Sheila Reese at sheila.d.reese@xxxx.xxx.

[ANS thanks NASA Education Express Message -- March 31, 2016 for the
above information]

---------------------------------------------------------------------


ARISS News

+ A Successful contact was made between Hirano Junior High School,
Kobe, Japan and Astronaut Tim Kopra KE5UDN using Callsign NA1SS. The
contact began 2016-03-28 11:07 UTC and lasted about nine and a half
minutes. Contact was direct via 8N370H.
ARISS Mentor was Satoshi 7M3TJZ.

+ A Successful contact was made between National Soaring Museum,
Elmira, New York, USA and Astronaut Timothy Peake KG5BVI using
Callsign OR4ISS. The contact began Fri 2016-04-01 18:34:03 UTC and
lasted about nine and a half minutes. Contact was telebridge via
IK1SLD. ARISS Mentor was Dave AA4KN.

Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule

Kiilinik High School, Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, Canada, telebridge via
VK4KHZ
The ISS callsign is  presently scheduled to be NA1SS
The scheduled astronaut is Jeff Williams KD5TVQ
Contact is go for: Wed 2016-04-06 18:02:20 UTC

H.A.L. School, Lucknow, India, telebridge via W6SRJ
The ISS  callsign is presently scheduled to be NA1SS
The scheduled astronaut is Tim  Kopra KE5UDN
Contact is a go for: Fri 2016-04-08 08:17:46 UTC

The  next window to submit a proposal for an upcoming contact in the
United States is now open. The  window is open from 2016-02-15 to
2016-04-15 and would be for contacts
between  2017-01-01 and 2017-06-30.

Check out the ARISS website  http://www.ariss.org/ or the ARRL website
http://www.arrl.org/hosting-an-ariss-contact for full details.

ARISS  is always glad to receive listener reports for the above
contacts. ARISS  thanks everyone in advance for their assistance.
Feel free to send your  reports to aj9n@xxxxx.xxx or  aj9n@xxx.xxx.

Here you will find a listing of all scheduled school contacts, and
questions, other ISS related websites, IRLP and Echolink websites, and
instructions for any contact that may be streamed live.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf

Total number of  ARISS ISS to earth school events is 1038.
Each school counts as 1  event.
Total number of ARISS ISS to earth school contacts is 1003.
Each contact may have multiple schools sharing the same time slot.
Total number of ARISS supported terrestrial contacts is 47.

A  complete year by year breakdown of the contacts may be found in
the file.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf

The  following US states and entities have never had an ARISS contact:
Arkansas, Delaware, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Wyoming, American
Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas Islands, and the Virgin Islands.
Schools in these entities are encouraged to apply for a contact.

[ANS thanks ARISS, Charlie AJ9N and David AA4KN for the above
information]


---------------------------------------------------------------------


Satellite Shorts From All Over

+ JSatTrak Satellite App Released

  Developed by Shawn Gano KB3OJE, JSatTrack is written in Java and
  allows you to predict the position of any satellite in real time or
  in the past or future. It uses advanced SGP4/SDP4 algorithms
  developed by NASA/NORAD or customizable high precision solvers to
  propagate satellite orbits. The program also allows for easy
  updating of current satellite tracking data via CelesTrak.com.
  Because this application was written in Java, it should run on
  almost any operating system or directly off the web using java web
  start!

  Questions and comments are welcome at the JSatTrack Forum
  http://www.gano.name/shawn/JSatTrak/forum

  The JSatTrack App can be downloaded from
  http://www.gano.name/shawn/JSatTrak/

  [ANS thanks Shawn KB3OJE for the abiove information]

+ Proposal windows for ARISS school contacts are still open in the
  United States and Europe.

  For more information about scheduled US contacts visit
  http://www.arrl.org/hosting-an-ariss-contact

  For more information about scheduled European Region contact visit
  http://www.ariss-eu.org/school-contacts

  [ANS thanks ARISS for the above information]

+ Current profiles of the crew currently aboard the ISS, Expedition
  47, can be found at:
  http://www.ariss.org/current-iss-crew.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------



In addition to regular membership, AMSAT offers membership in the
President's Club. Members of the President's Club, as sustaining
donors to AMSAT Project Funds, will be eligible to receive addi-
tional benefits. Application forms are available from the AMSAT
Office.

Primary and secondary school students are eligible for membership
at one-half the standard yearly rate. Post-secondary school students
enrolled in at least half time status shall be eligible for the stu-
dent rate for a maximum of 6 post-secondary years in this status.
Contact Martha at the AMSAT Office for additional student membership
information.

73,
This week's ANS Editor,
EMike McCardel, AA8EM (former KC8YLD)
kc8yld at amsat dot org


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 11, Issue 104
*****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 12.05.2024 04:45:11lGo back Go up