| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 27.11.16 21:57l 686 Lines 22373 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB11369
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V11 369
Path: IW8PGT<HB9CSR<IR2UBX<IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<OK0NAG<OK0PBR<OK2PEN<CX2SA
Sent: 161120/2123Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:58478 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB11369
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. For Sale (David Johnson)
2. Message Format (Keith O'Brien)
3. EO-79 Frequencies & Operation (Pedro Converso)
4. Re: Message Format (R.T.Liddy)
5. Re: EO-79 Frequencies & Operation (Graham Shirville)
6. FO-29 orbit number wrong (Perry Yantis)
7. Re: Info of Chinese Launch 2016-066 (Alan Kung)
8. Re: FO-29 orbit number wrong (Pedro Converso)
9. Re: FO-29 orbit number wrong (Alan)
10. Re: Message Format (Paul Stoetzer)
11. Re: Info of Chinese Launch 2016-066 (Dani EA4GPZ)
12. Test - Ignore (R.T.Liddy)
13. Re: For Sale (David Johnson)
14. Sat Tracking Software For IPhone (Dave Marthouse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:52:19 +0000
From: David Johnson <dave@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] For Sale
Message-ID: <890D2787-F953-49F2-A0BE-27583CEA6200@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
Have moved from TS-2000 to IC-9100
and TH-D7e to TH-D72e
so have available
TS-2000x with L-band (boxed with manuals) ?1050
2 x DCW 15 B Sequencers ?90
TH-D7e ?160
All plus delivery (or collection)
For sale in the UK only, please contact me offline.
73
Dave, G4DPZ
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: Keith O'Brien <n4zq@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Message Format
Message-ID: <1134691623.586084.1479655059444@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I apologize for the way my message SatPC32ISS showed up when posted to the
AMSAT-BB.Any resemblance between what I composed in my Yahoo e Mail account?
and what showed upon the AMSAT-BB is strictly coincidental. All message
formatting seemed to have disappeared.
Does anyone know what caused that or better yet, how to correct the
formatting issue ? Is ita Yahoo or AMSAT-BB issue ?
Keith N4ZQ
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:39:24 -0300
From: Pedro Converso <pconver@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] EO-79 Frequencies & Operation
Message-ID:
<CANTZqKn5czFodbiviNW-xfBXZwhM0uXzc70nQok0BQ2GyDN=pQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Using http://amsat.org.ar/pass.htm & exe.
Today on EO-79 on Orbit 13147 at 15:46Z on a Buenos Aires pass, got
excellent signal & SSB return from EO-79.
Frequency used was Doppler automatically corrected, getting good
return from my signal.
For those using Satpc32 the Doppler.sqf line could be:
EO-79,145967.6,435069.4.0,USB,LSB,REV,0,0,Transponder
For Pass application (don't need to set is already included)
["40025","EO-79","435069.4","145967.6","145815","LSB","USB","CW","REV","0","0"
,"Linear
Transponder",""],
EO-79 Pass & contact was after 25 minutes after sunlit, very strong return.
Wishing good contacts thru this nice bird.
Congrats and THANKS to Funcube-3 teams for this excellent linear transponder.
73, lu7abf, Pedro
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:06:57 +0000 (UTC)
From: "R.T.Liddy" <k8bl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Keith O'Brien <n4zq@xxxxx.xxx>, AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Message Format
Message-ID: <1927906452.605371.1479665217616@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Keith,
The AMSAT BB seems to like double "enter" at the end of eachline as opposed
to any/every other message system in the realworld. That's why I usually
only post to Starcom-BB instead.I don't know why it is like that, but it is
really irritating.
Now, here is the same message with double "enters":
The AMSAT BB seems to like double "enter" at the end of each
line as opposed to any/every other message system in the real
world. That's why I usually only post to Starcom-BB instead.
I don't know why it is like that, but it is really irritating.
73, ? ? Bob ?K8BL
From: Keith O'Brien via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 10:17 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Message Format
I apologize for the way my message SatPC32ISS showed up when posted to the
AMSAT-BB.Any resemblance between what I composed in my Yahoo e Mail account?
and what showed upon the AMSAT-BB is strictly coincidental. All message
formatting seemed to have disappeared.
Does anyone know what caused that or better yet, how to correct the
formatting issue ? Is ita Yahoo or AMSAT-BB issue ?
Keith N4ZQ
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:09:04 -0000
From: "Graham Shirville" <g.shirville@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Pedro Converso" <pconver@xxxxx.xxx>, "AMSAT" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] EO-79 Frequencies & Operation
Message-ID: <41AB57071DCA4638BC68D4466C2508EA@xxxxxxx.xxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi Pedro,
Many thanks for your report and kind comments!
We are delighted that it is working so well especially as it has already
been in space for more than two years.
best wishes
Graham
G3VZV
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Converso
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:39 PM
To: AMSAT
Subject: [amsat-bb] EO-79 Frequencies & Operation
Using http://amsat.org.ar/pass.htm & exe.
Today on EO-79 on Orbit 13147 at 15:46Z on a Buenos Aires pass, got
excellent signal & SSB return from EO-79.
Frequency used was Doppler automatically corrected, getting good
return from my signal.
For those using Satpc32 the Doppler.sqf line could be:
EO-79,145967.6,435069.4.0,USB,LSB,REV,0,0,Transponder
For Pass application (don't need to set is already included)
["40025","EO-79","435069.4","145967.6","145815","LSB","USB","CW","REV","0","0"
,"Linear
Transponder",""],
EO-79 Pass & contact was after 25 minutes after sunlit, very strong return.
Wishing good contacts thru this nice bird.
Congrats and THANKS to Funcube-3 teams for this excellent linear
transponder.
73, lu7abf, Pedro
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:13:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: Perry Yantis <py41@xxx.xxx>
To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29 orbit number wrong
Message-ID: <821289074.769626.1479665619844@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I see that the newest keps I downloaded yesterday has the wrong orbit number
for FO-29!!!The last time I worked FO-29 was on 10/31/16 at 1619?gmt and the
orbit number was 99797.
Now I get an orbit number in the 50's.Has anyone else noticed this?????Perry
WB8OTH
py41@xxx.xxx
sent from my Apple Macbook Pro
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:14:42 +0800 (CST)
From: "Alan Kung" <camsat@xxx.xxx.xxx>
To: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Info of Chinese Launch 2016-066
Message-ID: <131016be.1f95e1.15882f28795.Coremail.camsat@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Hi Drew,
Thanks for your report!
I think the problem is not lack of electric energy, CAS-2T is an 2U
structure, we installed solar panels on five sides with 30% efficiency,
average total power about 2.2 Watts, the power budget: CW Beacon=0.5W, FM
Transponder=0.7W, OBC=0.05W, TT&C Receiver=0.12W, Total=1.37W, normally
there is some superfluous power to supply to heating resistances.
What problems are I think: First CAS-2T was not separated from the launch
vehicle, final stage of the lauch vehicle is much bigger than CAS-2T
satellite, and it keeps self spin in approx. 7 seconds per circle. It lead
to the antenna radiation pattern becomes chaotic, the gain at some positions
become much lower and is accompanied by a parasitic amplitude modulation. On
the other hand, in order to avoid chaotic signal on VHF from land in East
Asia to disturb the Satellite uplink , we adjusted the uplink receiver
squelch at very deep position, it makes the transponder opening sensitivity
less than -110dBm at RF input port of the receiver.
So I think the solution is only to improve the uplink EIRP, some of the high
schools' club stations here using 3 meters boom antennas with approx. 50W RF
power to get through the transponder well.
73
Alan, BA1DU
At 2016-11-19 08:29:06, "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
>Hi Alan,
>
>I have listened to CAS-2T on several passes now. I can make the repeater
>transmitter come on by transmitting on the uplink, but as others have
>pointed out, nothing is repeated. The downlink is intermittent and choppy,
>with no audio apparently passed through. It almost sounds like older
>handhelds would sound on transmit with a low battery. I wonder if it's
>possible to try turning the CW beacon off? It would be great to recover the
>satellite, as it is in a very nice orbit!
>
>73, Drew KO4MA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Alan Kung
>Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 10:58 PM
>To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
>Subject: [amsat-bb] Info of Chinese Launch 2016-066
>
>2016-066D
>Satellite Name: TY-1
>Mission: Technical experiment
>TT&C: 437.5MHz Bandwith 300kHz
>
>2016-066E
>Satellite Name: CAS-2T(Dream-1)
>Mission: Education, Amateur radio, Technical experiment CW Beacon:
>435.710MHz FM Transponder Uplink: 145.925MHz FM Transponder Downlink:
>435.615MHz
>
>2016-066E
>Satellite Name: KS-1Q
>Mission: Technical experiment
>TT&C: 436.5MHz 20kbps GMSK
>
>2016-066F
>Satellite Name: Pegasus-1
>Mission: Technical experiment
>TT&C: 468.0MHz FSK
>
>
>73
>Alan, BA1DU
>Chinese Amateur Satellite Group(CAMSAT)
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
>interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
>views of AMSAT-NA.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:23:03 -0300
From: Pedro Converso <pconver@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Perry Yantis <py41@xxx.xxx>
Cc: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FO-29 orbit number wrong
Message-ID:
<CANTZqK=dzopTBGBchmMTmgV7z3QKrd7=kyKoL_+xnp=+CWgL9A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hello Perry,
You are right, problem shows due orbit number in TLE Keps is just 5 digits.
Therefore after 99999 , counts goes to 0.
In fact FO-29 is now at orbit 100,044 , same happens with ISS and AO-7.
I have accounted for this on http://amsat.org.ar/pass.htm that show
correct and updated Orbit Numbers for satellites old enough to have
overflowed the Orbit number.
73, lu7abf, Pedro
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Perry Yantis <py41@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> I see that the newest keps I downloaded yesterday has the wrong orbit
number for FO-29!!!The last time I worked FO-29 was on 10/31/16 at 1619 gmt
and the orbit number was 99797.
> Now I get an orbit number in the 50's.Has anyone else noticed this????
Perry WB8OTH
>
> py41@xxx.xxx
> sent from my Apple Macbook Pro
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:30:26 -0600
From: Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "'Perry Yantis'" <py41@xxx.xxx>, "'Amsat BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FO-29 orbit number wrong
Message-ID: <000101d2435c$2a4f2d90$7eed88b0$@xxxxx.xxx>
Perry,
SatPC32? Add 100,000 and you get about the right number, so it looks like
Erich needs to add another
space for numbers greater than 99,999. Same thing in Itrack.
73s,
Alan
WA4SCA
<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Perry Yantis
<Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:14 PM
<To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
<Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29 orbit number wrong
<
<I see that the newest keps I downloaded yesterday has the wrong orbit
number for FO-29!!!The last
<time I worked FO-29 was on 10/31/16 at 1619?gmt and the orbit number was
99797.
<Now I get an orbit number in the 50's.Has anyone else noticed
this?????Perry WB8OTH
<
<py41@xxx.xxx
<sent from my Apple Macbook Pro
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 13:55:32 -0500
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: "R.T.Liddy" <k8bl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, Keith O'Brien <n4zq@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Message Format
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOrNieQbLxChofsoB6SEEWcwAyzon5ThHD6X8zk1Zcib3Q@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Bob,
The AMSAT-BB, by design, passes plain text only. Be sure you set your
email program to plain text mode to ensure that any special formatting
characters are not sent.
Please remember that the Starcom-BB is not an alternative to the
AMSAT-BB. It's a private club designed to stroke the owner's own ego,
not a resource for the entire amateur satellite community. Posting
here ensures that everyone in the worldwide amateur satellite
community will see your messages.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 1:06 PM, R.T.Liddy <k8bl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Keith,
> The AMSAT BB seems to like double "enter" at the end of eachline as
opposed to any/every other message system in the realworld. That's why I
usually only post to Starcom-BB instead.I don't know why it is like that,
but it is really irritating.
> Now, here is the same message with double "enters":
>
> The AMSAT BB seems to like double "enter" at the end of each
> line as opposed to any/every other message system in the real
> world. That's why I usually only post to Starcom-BB instead.
> I don't know why it is like that, but it is really irritating.
>
> 73, Bob K8BL
>
>
>
>
> From: Keith O'Brien via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 10:17 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Message Format
>
> I apologize for the way my message SatPC32ISS showed up when posted to the
AMSAT-BB.Any resemblance between what I composed in my Yahoo e Mail account
and what showed upon the AMSAT-BB is strictly coincidental. All message
formatting seemed to have disappeared.
> Does anyone know what caused that or better yet, how to correct the
formatting issue ? Is ita Yahoo or AMSAT-BB issue ?
> Keith N4ZQ
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:57:33 +0100
From: Dani EA4GPZ <daniel@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: Alan Kung <camsat@xxx.xxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Info of Chinese Launch 2016-066
Message-ID: <9cb9b2d2-879a-b0a5-4f74-70f927bf9df9@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
El 20/11/16 a las 19:14, Alan Kung escribi?:
> Hi Drew,
>
>
> Thanks for your report! I think the problem is not lack of electric
> energy, CAS-2T is an 2U structure, we installed solar panels on five
> sides with 30% efficiency, average total power about 2.2 Watts, the
> power budget: CW Beacon=0.5W, FM Transponder=0.7W, OBC=0.05W, TT&C
> Receiver=0.12W, Total=1.37W, normally there is some superfluous power
> to supply to heating resistances.
>
> What problems are I think: First CAS-2T was not separated from the
> launch vehicle, final stage of the lauch vehicle is much bigger than
> CAS-2T satellite, and it keeps self spin in approx. 7 seconds per
> circle. It lead to the antenna radiation pattern becomes chaotic, the
> gain at some positions become much lower and is accompanied by a
> parasitic amplitude modulation. On the other hand, in order to avoid
> chaotic signal on VHF from land in East Asia to disturb the Satellite
> uplink , we adjusted the uplink receiver squelch at very deep
> position, it makes the transponder opening sensitivity less than
> -110dBm at RF input port of the receiver.
>
> So I think the solution is only to improve the uplink EIRP, some of
> the high schools' club stations here using 3 meters boom antennas
> with approx. 50W RF power to get through the transponder well.
Hi Alan,
Given my own observations and all the reports I've heard from other
Amateurs, I don't agree with your explanation.
It is not a problem with the squelch or the uplink EIRP. The FM comes on
even with an uplink of 5W to a 7el yagi. The problem is that the
downlink is not a clean FM modulation, but some sort of "rubbish".
I haven't heard of anyone that succeeded to downlink his signal through
the FM transponder fine. People using big or small groundstations have
the same problem.
What is this high schools thing? Do you mean that they were able to use
the CAS-2T FM repeater successfully? If so, can anyone with a big
groundstation give this a try and preferably do an SDR recording of the
downlink?
More info:
http://destevez.net/2016/11/some-measurements-of-cas-2t-on-orbit-25/
73,
Dani EA4GPZ.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:00:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: "R.T.Liddy" <k8bl@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, Starcom <starcom-bb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Test - Ignore
Message-ID: <1368009386.623700.1479668442270@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
test test test
test test test
test test test
Please ignore
TNX de K8BL
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:55:03 +0000
From: David Johnson <dave@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>, amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] For Sale
Message-ID: <1B379325-7211-43B0-A5EC-5FED55B650D2@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Stefan,
The sequencers have already gone. Thanks for your interest.
73
- Dave
> On 20 Nov 2016, at 17:24, Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> I like to buy the sequencers if you ship to Canada :-)
>
> Thanks, Stefan VE4NSA
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 20, 2016, at 11:52 AM, David Johnson <dave@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have moved from TS-2000 to IC-9100
>> and TH-D7e to TH-D72e
>>
>> so have available
>>
>> TS-2000x with L-band (boxed with manuals) ?1050
>> 2 x DCW 15 B Sequencers ?90
>> TH-D7e ?160
>>
>> All plus delivery (or collection)
>>
>> For sale in the UK only, please contact me offline.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Dave, G4DPZ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 16:21:17 -0500
From: Dave Marthouse <dmarthouse@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Sat Tracking Software For IPhone
Message-ID: <bbd906d3-d3d0-c8df-58f5-f5395c3ced11@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
What kind of tracking software is available for the IPhone?
--
Dave Marthouse N2AAM
dmarthouse@xxxxx.xxx
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 11, Issue 369
*****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
