| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 18.01.17 15:04l 701 Lines 26001 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB1213
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V12 13
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA
Sent: 170118/1259Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:62957 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB1213
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Pass Predictions backup & ITF-2 (Pedro Converso)
2. Re: Small Sat SDR Paper + Outernet + BY70-1 (John Toscano)
3. Re: Small Sat SDR Paper + Outernet + BY70-1 (skristof@xxxxxxx.xxxx
4. Re: IC-9100 and SATPC32 (Todd)
5. Gene Cernan, RIP (B J)
6. Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2017-01-17 07:30 UTC
(AJ9N@xxx.xxxx
7. Re: AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil (Greg D)
8. AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil (Roland Zurmely)
9. FunCube Dongle Pro+ -For Sale- (Stefan Wagener)
10. Re: AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil (Paulo PV8DX)
11. Re: FunCube Dongle Pro+ SOLD (Stefan Wagener)
12. Re: AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil (Jean-Pierre Godet)
13. ITF-2 received (Roland Zurmely)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:27:01 -0300
From: Pedro Converso <pconver@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Pass Predictions backup & ITF-2
Message-ID:
<CANTZqKkf4ugbraCEuRfXqtfsk++eWmu27gsk2f93D=r+xWLnzw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
We apologize for temporary amsat.org.ar server outage:
Pass predictions backup at http://lu7abf.com.ar/pass.htm
Besides ITF-2 satellite predictions added for certificate chasers.
73, LU7ABF, Pedro
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:01:36 -0600
From: John Toscano <tosca005@xxx.xxx>
To: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Small Sat SDR Paper + Outernet + BY70-1
Message-ID:
<CABGf72oMj7cQZN69PUP=ARYZ7SGxbFimK_Wa=mgUB4n7Lp6FhA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I found the paper on CPU & FPGA performance in satellite communications to
be very interesting, and mostly very well-done. However there seemed to be
some obvious places in the paper where the authors could have better
conveyed their findings.
1. Throughout the paper, they never identify the x86 processor that was
present in their Dell Optiplex 745 computer. Several different Intel x86
processors have been used in that machine, including Pentium D and Core 2
Duo processors. I presume it was the latter.
2. Figures 8, 10, and 11 would have been much improved if they showed a
fourth data series, namely the Cortex A9 CPU % Consumption (Figures 8, 10)
and Success Rate (Figure 11) when assisted by moving critical code to the
FPGA from the GPP.
3. I find Table VII mostly impossible to understand. In the first two
columns, I don't understand what the percentage numbers are referring to.
And the tabulated items under Post Implementation are not defined, and seem
to be a mix of physical circuits in the FPGA (such as Flip Flops) and
software subroutines (DSP48). It is poor practice to use descriptors such
as "LUT", "MemoryLUT", "BRAM", "DSP48", "BUFG", and "MMCM" which are never
defined in the paper. Without knowing what a "MMCM" is, I can barely
appreciate that it stayed at 50% (half of what, I am uncertain) before and
after FPGA implementation of critical software routines, giving an Overhead
of 0% (no change). And the pictures of "Implementation on FPGA Fabric" are
meaningless without any explanation of what they are and what they mean.
The only thing I can offer as assistance in interpreting this table is to
remind the reader that the dual Cortex A9 CPUs of the Zedboard are actually
implemented using a portion of the FPGA. Therefore a pure GPP software
implementation still uses some of the FPGA. What fraction of the FPGA
capacity is consumed by the dual A9 implementation? What fraction of the
FPGA capacity is consumed by the A9 implementation plus the software SDR
implementation? What fraction of the FPGA capacity is consumed by the A9 +
software SDR + FPGA implementation of the SDR? I can't figure this out from
the paper.
4. The purpose of the paper, to show the improvement in functionality of
an SDR by moving critical functions from GPP to FPGA, was accomplished in
that it was shown that the FPGA implementation could receive more satellite
signals concurrently at low data rates. But it appears that neither a
dual-core A9, dual-core A9 + FPGA, nor a quad-core A15 + quad-core A7 could
keep up with a lowly Intel Core 2 Duo processor. It seems that a ground
station with a built-in SDR processor would do best with a modern x86
processor rather than any of the ARM processors available at the present
time. Given the higher power consumption of fast x86 processors than fast
ARM processors, it may be best to handle the SDR functions in a desktop PC
or at least in a high-end laptop PC, instead of embedding an ARM processor
inside the ground terminal.
Anyway, that's my take on the paper. I congratulate the authors and
acknowledge their hard work. I sincerely hope that they continue their
efforts in this field. Maybe we should personally invite them to join the
team working on the AMSAT Ground Terminal for future digital satellites
using the "5 and Dime" frequencies (5 GHz up and 10 GHz down).
John Toscano, W0JT/5
AMSAT LM
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, M5AKA via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
wrote:
> Mamatha R. Maheshwarappa 2E0CZO has released her paper ?Improvements in
> CPU & FPGA Performance for Small Satellite SDR Applications?
> https://amsat-uk.org/2017/01/10/small-satellite-sdr-paper/
>
> BY70-1 FM transponder contact video
> https://amsat-uk.org/2016/12/30/by70-1-fm-transponder-contact/
>
> Chertsey Radio Club article - Getting started with FM satellites http://
> chertseyradioclub.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/getting-started-
> with-fm-satellites.html
>
> Video of Daniel Est?vez EA4GPZ / M0HXM talk - Reverse Engineering the
> Outernet - at Chaos Communication Congress #33c3
> http://www.southgatearc.org/news/2017/january/reverse-
> engineering-%20the-outernet.htm
> Blog update http://destevez.net/2017/01/updated-format-for-
> outernet-ldp-protocol/
>
> ITF-2 CubeSat 437.525 MHz to deploy from ISS Monday
> https://www.facebook.com/amsatuk/posts/1269720816404298
>
>
> 73 Trevor M5AKA
> ----
> AMSAT-UK http://amsat-uk.org/
> Twitter https://twitter.com/AmsatUK
> Facebook https://facebook.com/AmsatUK
> YouTube https://youtube.com/AmsatUK
> ----
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:26:01 -0500
From: skristof@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Small Sat SDR Paper + Outernet + BY70-1
Message-ID: <e7200ffc62534a54037a8c5220c3a38c@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I sure hope we never have to know any of this to talk on a satellite. If
so, my Arrow antenna becomes a multi-hot dog skewer.
Steve AI9IN
On 2017-01-16 15:01, John Toscano wrote:
> I found the paper on CPU & FPGA performance in satellite communications to
> be very interesting, and mostly very well-done. However there seemed to be
> some obvious places in the paper where the authors could have better
> conveyed their findings.
>
> 1. Throughout the paper, they never identify the x86 processor that was
> present in their Dell Optiplex 745 computer. Several different Intel x86
> processors have been used in that machine, including Pentium D and Core 2
> Duo processors. I presume it was the latter.
> 2. Figures 8, 10, and 11 would have been much improved if they showed a
> fourth data series, namely the Cortex A9 CPU % Consumption (Figures 8, 10)
> and Success Rate (Figure 11) when assisted by moving critical code to the
> FPGA from the GPP.
> 3. I find Table VII mostly impossible to understand. In the first two
> columns, I don't understand what the percentage numbers are referring to.
> And the tabulated items under Post Implementation are not defined, and seem
> to be a mix of physical circuits in the FPGA (such as Flip Flops) and
> software subroutines (DSP48). It is poor practice to use descriptors such
> as "LUT", "MemoryLUT", "BRAM", "DSP48", "BUFG", and "MMCM" which are never
> defined in the paper. Without knowing what a "MMCM" is, I can barely
> appreciate that it stayed at 50% (half of what, I am uncertain) before and
> after FPGA implementation of critical software routines, giving an Overhead
> of 0% (no change). And the pictures of "Implementation on FPGA Fabric" are
> meaningless without any explanation of what they are and what they mean.
> The only thing I can offer as assistance in interpreting this table is to
> remind the reader that the dual Cortex A9 CPUs of the Zedboard are actually
> implemented using a portion of the FPGA. Therefore a pure GPP software
> implementation still uses some of the FPGA. What fraction of the FPGA
> capacity is consumed by the dual A9 implementation? What fraction of the
> FPGA capacity is consumed by the A9 implementation plus the software SDR
> implementation? What fraction of the FPGA capacity is consumed by the A9 +
> software SDR + FPGA implementation of the SDR? I can't figure this out from
> the paper.
> 4. The purpose of the paper, to show the improvement in functionality of
> an SDR by moving critical functions from GPP to FPGA, was accomplished in
> that it was shown that the FPGA implementation could receive more satellite
> signals concurrently at low data rates. But it appears that neither a
> dual-core A9, dual-core A9 + FPGA, nor a quad-core A15 + quad-core A7 could
> keep up with a lowly Intel Core 2 Duo processor. It seems that a ground
> station with a built-in SDR processor would do best with a modern x86
> processor rather than any of the ARM processors available at the present
> time. Given the higher power consumption of fast x86 processors than fast
> ARM processors, it may be best to handle the SDR functions in a desktop PC
> or at least in a high-end laptop PC, instead of embedding an ARM processor
> inside the ground terminal.
>
> Anyway, that's my take on the paper. I congratulate the authors and
> acknowledge their hard work. I sincerely hope that they continue their
> efforts in this field. Maybe we should personally invite them to join the
> team working on the AMSAT Ground Terminal for future digital satellites
> using the "5 and Dime" frequencies (5 GHz up and 10 GHz down).
>
> John Toscano, W0JT/5
> AMSAT LM
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, M5AKA via AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Mamatha R. Maheshwarappa 2E0CZO has released her paper "Improvements in
>> CPU & FPGA Performance for Small Satellite SDR Applications"
>> https://amsat-uk.org/2017/01/10/small-satellite-sdr-paper/
>>
>> BY70-1 FM transponder contact video
>> https://amsat-uk.org/2016/12/30/by70-1-fm-transponder-contact/
>>
>> Chertsey Radio Club article - Getting started with FM satellites http://
>> chertseyradioclub.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/getting-started-
>> with-fm-satellites.html
>>
>> Video of Daniel Est?vez EA4GPZ / M0HXM talk - Reverse Engineering the
>> Outernet - at Chaos Communication Congress #33c3
>> http://www.southgatearc.org/news/2017/january/reverse-
>> engineering-%20the-outernet.htm
>> Blog update http://destevez.net/2017/01/updated-format-for-
>> outernet-ldp-protocol/
>>
>> ITF-2 CubeSat 437.525 MHz to deploy from ISS Monday
>> https://www.facebook.com/amsatuk/posts/1269720816404298
>>
>> 73 Trevor M5AKA
>> ----
>> AMSAT-UK http://amsat-uk.org/
>> Twitter https://twitter.com/AmsatUK
>> Facebook https://facebook.com/AmsatUK
>> YouTube https://youtube.com/AmsatUK
>> ----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:43:17 -0900
From: Todd <superiortrading@xxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] IC-9100 and SATPC32
Message-ID: <75ca3eec-4a58-22ff-ff9d-a59c2c51c174@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Mark:
I have a 9100 and using SatPC32. Did you figure out what your problem
was? Let me know and I can check any setting I have that is working.
Also running same operating system SW.
73,
Todd
AL7PX
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:07:09 +0000
From: B J <va6bmj@xxxxx.xxx>
To: amsat-bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Gene Cernan, RIP
Message-ID:
<CAP7QzkMTkaQxJ4RNjYej-LxVAoFZj6T3SdCpc3YnDyWESCXVag@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38641121
Farewell, sir, and thank you.
73s
Bernhard VA6BMJ @ DO33FL
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 02:40:47 -0500
From: AJ9N@xxx.xxx
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2017-01-17
07:30 UTC
Message-ID: <d464ae.72d72324.45af247f@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Upcoming ARISS Contact Schedule as of 2017-01-17 07:30 UTC
Quick list of scheduled contacts and events:
High School "L?on Blum", Le Creusot, France, telebridge via K6DUE
The ISS callsign is presently scheduled to be NA1SS
The scheduled astronaut is Thomas Pesquet KG5FYG
Contact was successful: Mon 2017-01-16 11:53:17 UTC 60 deg (***)
****************************************************************************
**
ARISS is always glad to receive listener reports for the above contacts.
ARISS thanks everyone in advance for their assistance. Feel free to send
your reports to aj9n@xxxxx.xxx or aj9n@xxx.xxx.
Listen for the ISS on the downlink of 145.8? MHz.
****************************************************************************
***
All ARISS contacts are made via the Kenwood radio unless otherwise noted.
****************************************************************************
***
Several of you have sent me emails asking about the RAC ARISS website and
not being able to get in. That has now been changed to
http://www.ariss.org/
Note that there are links to other ARISS websites from this site.
****************************************************************************
Looking for something new to do? How about receiving DATV from the ISS?
If interested, then please go to the ARISS-EU website for complete
details. Look for the buttons indicating Ham Video.
http://www.ariss-eu.org/
If you need some assistance, ARISS mentor Kerry N6IZW, might be able to
provide some insight. Contact Kerry at kbanke@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
****************************************************************************
ARISS congratulations the following mentors who have now mentored over 100
schools:
Satoshi 7M3TJZ with 123
Gaston ON4WF with 123
Francesco IK?WGF with 119
****************************************************************************
The webpages listed below were all reviewed for accuracy. Out of date
webpages were removed and new ones have been added. If there are
additional
ARISS websites I need to know about, please let me know.
Note, all times are approximate. It is recommended that you do your own
orbital prediction or start listening about 10 minutes before the listed
time.
All dates and times listed follow International Standard ISO 8601 date and
time format YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
The complete schedule page has been updated as of 2017-01-17 07:30 UTC.
(***)
Here you will find a listing of all scheduled school contacts, and
questions, other ISS related websites, IRLP and Echolink websites, and
instructions for any contact that may be streamed live.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.txt
Total number of ARISS ISS to earth school events is 1109. (***)
Each school counts as 1 event.
Total number of ARISS ISS to earth school contacts is 1073. (***)
Each contact may have multiple schools sharing the same time slot.
Total number of ARISS supported terrestrial contacts is 47.
A complete year by year breakdown of the contacts may be found in the
file.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/arissnews.rtf
Please feel free to contact me if more detailed statistics are needed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The following US states and entities have never had an ARISS contact:
Arkansas, Delaware, South Dakota, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, Northern
Marianas Islands, and the Virgin Islands.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
QSL information may be found at:
http://www.ariss.org/qsl-cards.html
ISS callsigns: DP?ISS, IR?ISS, NA1SS, OR4ISS, RS?ISS
****************************************************************************
The successful school list has been updated as of 2017-01-17 07:30 UTC.
(***)
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/Successful_ARISS_schools.rtf
Frequency chart for packet, voice, and crossband repeater modes showing
Doppler correction as of 2005-07-29 04:00 UTC
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/ISS_frequencies_and_Doppler_correction
.rtf
Listing of ARISS related magazine articles as of 2006-07-10 03:30 UTC.
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ariss/news/ARISS_magazine_articles.rtf
Check out the Zoho reports of the ARISS contacts
https://reports.zoho.com/ZDBDataSheetView.cc?DBID=412218000000020415
****************************************************************************
Exp. 49 on orbit
Shane Kimbrough KE5HOD
Andrei Borisenko
Sergey Ryzhikov
Exp. 50 on orbit
Peggy Whitson
Thomas Pesquet KG5FYG
Oleg Novitskiy
****************************************************************************
73,
Charlie Sufana AJ9N
One of the ARISS operation team mentors
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:47:50 -0800
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil
Message-ID: <587E66D6.4090308@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Congrats!
What is the satellite known by? I'm not finding its Keps, looking in
the usual places, though I'm guessing it's still fairly close to the ISS.
I presume 437.375 still correct for the downlink?
Thanks,
Greg KO6TH
Roland Zurmely via AMSAT-BB wrote:
> AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil in CW only 2h and 20 min after ISS ejection.
> One of the messages was as follows, at 10:20 am UTC
> JG6YBW AV3 HKD7ZZZ53ZZZC7FZZZZZ3
>
> 73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:58:49 +0000 (UTC)
From: Roland Zurmely <py4zbz@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil
Message-ID: <553498085.4876263.1484690329325@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi Greg,
Yes, QRG is 437,375. Very strong signal !And TLE from ISS for now...
73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:21:07 -0600
From: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FunCube Dongle Pro+ -For Sale-
Message-ID:
<CAKu8kHCt-4w8Pe5RkxK8896WGO8L6Vi5L+=2Rkiqd3KYhRJ1gg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Selling my FCD Pro+ (like new condition).
First $95 takes it (includes shipping to US or Canada!!!).
If interested, contact me direct via email (my callsign@xxxxx.xxxx.
Thanks, Stefan, VE4NSA
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:53:18 -0400
From: "Paulo PV8DX" <paulopv8dx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil
Message-ID: <5D0DB1CC829A403BA0C47BC2477D9EDF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";
reply-type=original
RX
JG6YBW AV3 HKD9EZZD4ZZZD55ZZZZZ4
HKD9EZZD6ZZZD51ZZZZZ3
ITF-2 Nothing heard
73 de Paulo PV8DX
LABRE/ARRL
AMSAT-BR/AMSAT-NA member
FJ92pt - VUCC SAT
http://amsat-br.org/
www.qrz.com/db/pv8dx
Contact ARISS 13/fev/2014
http://www.labre-rr.org/ariss.html
Boa Vista-Roraima-Brasil
pv8dx@xxxx.xxx
-----Mensagem Original-----
From: Roland Zurmely via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 12:40 PM
To: AMSAT BB
Subject: [amsat-bb] AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil
AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil in CW only 2h and 20 min after ISS ejection.
One of the messages was as follows, at 10:20 am UTC
JG6YBW AV3 HKD7ZZZ53ZZZC7FZZZZZ3
73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:37:14 -0600
From: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] FunCube Dongle Pro+ SOLD
Message-ID:
<CAKu8kHBGwnTo71uNjGoxz6KohERkk8PKC-6jQmxR93pkmcN2Dw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks for the interest!
73, Stefan, VE4NSA
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 06:49:38 +0000
From: Jean-Pierre Godet <godetj@xxxxxxx.xx>
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil
Message-ID: <db7af082-2ead-e068-0b63-01e0945c3363@xxxxxxx.xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Received, orbit nr 28 (?) around 0535 UTC, very low pass above
horizon here (North of France):
JG6YBW AV3 HKDB2FFC2FFZD82ZZZZZ3
Congratulation to NTU Singapore and Kyutech Japan, 73 !
Jean-Pierre F5YG
On 18/01/2017 00:53, Paulo PV8DX wrote:
> RX
>
> JG6YBW AV3 HKD9EZZD4ZZZD55ZZZZZ4
> HKD9EZZD6ZZZD51ZZZZZ3
>
> ITF-2 Nothing heard
>
>
>
> 73 de Paulo PV8DX
> LABRE/ARRL
> AMSAT-BR/AMSAT-NA member
> FJ92pt - VUCC SAT
> http://amsat-br.org/
> www.qrz.com/db/pv8dx
> Contact ARISS 13/fev/2014
> http://www.labre-rr.org/ariss.html
> Boa Vista-Roraima-Brasil
> pv8dx@xxxx.xxx
>
> -----Mensagem Original----- From: Roland Zurmely via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 12:40 PM
> To: AMSAT BB
> Subject: [amsat-bb] AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil
>
> AOBA-VELOXIII heard in Brazil in CW only 2h and 20 min after ISS ejection.
> One of the messages was as follows, at 10:20 am UTC
> JG6YBW AV3 HKD7ZZZ53ZZZC7FZZZZZ3
>
> 73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:58:01 +0000 (UTC)
From: Roland Zurmely <py4zbz@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] ITF-2 received
Message-ID: <1692890840.5274338.1484744281432@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
CW message on 437.525 MHz:
JQ1ZTK ?YUI2 ?ITF2 ?COMSYSAAAAA ?S2 ?31 ?07 ?7C ?67
73 de Roland PY4ZBZ in GH70un
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 12, Issue 13
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
