| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 03.03.17 02:05l 930 Lines 27765 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB1260
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V12 60
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<N6RME<CX2SA
Sent: 170302/2357Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:1501 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB1260
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: APRStk ? Or other? (Dave Ryan)
2. Re: APRStk ? Or other? (Mike Thompson)
3. Re: Still trying to decode NO-84 (Doppler) (Mike Rupprecht)
4. Re: Still trying to decode NO-84 (Doppler) (Robert Bruninga)
5. Re: APRStk ? Or other? (Scott)
6. Shack re-wiring: RTL-SDR options? (Greg D)
7. Office Closed (Martha)
8. Re: Shack re-wiring: RTL-SDR options? (Zach Metzinger)
9. Re: Nayif-1 (Richard Tejera)
10. EO-88 keps now on Celestrak (Perry Yantis)
11. Re: Nayif-1 (Paul Stoetzer)
12. Re: Nayif-1 (Rick Tejera)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Dave Ryan <dave4e@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
Message-ID: <1858545264.507170.1488473455668@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks for the replies on and off the list,
The igate side of things is taken care of using a WX 3in1 APRS black box, I
was hoping to be able to steer the D700 using something like APRStk for
doppler but also to switch between sats PSAT etc
Cheers
Dave
From: Dave <dave4e@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, 2 March 2017, 14:57:37
Subject: APRStk ? Or other?
Hi All
I'm setting up an autonomous sat gate using a spare Kenwood TMD700. I seem
to remember that once upon a time there was a DOS program called APRStk that
could Doppler correct the TMD700.
Does anyone know of a more up to date alternative that would run on a Pi or
Pi Zero?
Regards
Dave EI4HT / M0GIW
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:52:06 -0600
From: Mike Thompson <zryder94@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
Message-ID:
<CAGD5MUH-K5dCyo=DL3Ut72yTXSoPDjtYGt5XX=gN-HnfmWRviQ@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I wonder if it would be best to run 2 RTL's on a Rpi for use on both 144.39
and on UHF for the ISS, or is it just as effective to run one.
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> I was also concerned about that at first but on most passes I log a
> significant number of packet receptions, so while adjusting for RX doppler
> might help to some degree, it?s definitely not a deal-breaker.
>
> (I also learned not to judge your effectiveness by the number of packets
> you iGate to ariss.net; it appears that duplicates only show up once.
> So, to REALLY know how well you?re doing, check the log file on the iGate
> or use an external app to monitor it on another PC)
>
> -Scott
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------
>
>
> From: Mike Thompson
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 11:01 AM
> To: Scott
> Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to get the raspberry pi to download TLE's
> every now and then, and apply doppler correction to the downlink iGate
> frequency. on 70cm, this might be a big deal.
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Dave.
>
> It takes longer to read the instructions that it does to setup a
> Raspberry Pi to be an iGate.
>
> When the ISS digipeater changed to 70cm, there were not enough iGates so
> I thought it might be fun to throw one together. There are numerous
> how-to's online, but this one is perhaps the most straight-forward:
>
> https://github.com/wb2osz/direwolf/blob/master/doc/
> Raspberry-Pi-SDR-IGate.pdf
>
> ... unfortunately, the way the document was created you won't be able to
> copy/paste commands. But regardless, it's not a difficult process if you
> have even the slightest familiarity with a Pi or linux in general.
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> -Scott, K4KDR
> Montpelier, VA USA
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Dave via AMSAT-BB
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 9:57 AM
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
>
> Hi All
>
> I'm setting up an autonomous sat gate using a spare Kenwood TMD700. I
> seem to remember that once upon a time there was a DOS program called
> APRStk that could Doppler correct the TMD700.
>
> Does anyone know of a more up to date alternative that would run on a Pi
> or Pi Zero?
>
> Regards
> Dave EI4HT / M0GIW
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 20:11:28 +0100
From: "Mike Rupprecht" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx>
To: "'AMSAT BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Still trying to decode NO-84 (Doppler)
Message-ID: <000101d29388$cbbbbf00$63333d00$@xx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
... also maybe this helps
http://dk3wn.info/files/psat_talk_dk3wn_Amsatuk_colloq_2015.pdf
73 Mike
DK3WN
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx Im Auftrag von Robert
Bruninga
Gesendet: 02 March 2017 16:39
An: AMSAT BB
Betreff: Re: [amsat-bb] Still trying to decode NO-84 (Doppler)
One thing to remember is that you cannot use normal Doppler correcting
software that tunes the radio. The instantaneous radio steps cause Phase
discontinuities and that completely destroys PSK31.
The only ways to work well is to only try to decode when the bird is coming
right at you or right aways from you and the Doppler is not rapidly changing.
*** OR *** use the special PSK31 Doppler uplink correcting program written
by Andy Flowers found on the PSAT web page? http://aprs.org/psat.html
Here is his page:
http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/dopplerpsk/dopplerpsk.html
This software also allows you to run full duplex so that you can uplink
continuously throughtout the pass and independently receive all downlinks at
the same time. The radio does not tune, but your uplink audio compensates
for the uplink Doppler so that your trace in the downlink appears constant
to everyone.
Yes, you can run UHF Radio stepped Doppler correction that steps down in the
usual 5 KHz steps 4 times during the pass. You may still loose an instant
of phase corrupted characters, but only 4 times, not every few seconds as
the SSB radio would try to do if the computer program was trying to
compensate the SSB uplink radio.
That help?
Bob
*From:* Fer [mailto:mhz4464@xxxxx.xxxx
*Sent:* Thursday, March 02, 2017 10:25 AM
*To:* Mark Lunday; AMSAT BB; Paul Stoetzer; Robert Bruninga
*Subject:* Re: [amsat-bb] Still trying to decode NO-84
I am trying too to activate NO-84, 50w on 28.120 MHz with vertical antenna
or dipole with FLDIGI (saw no difference, still weak), good downlink signal
on UHF with SDR-14+SpectraVue as panadapter at 10.7 MHz, beacon decoded in
FLDIGI, my weak signal sometime decoded, strong doppler on my signal
despite I correct both with orbitron/wispdde using only fresh keps and GPS
computer sync clock.
Any idea?
73 Fer IW1DTU
here some screenshoot link to dropbox
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ec2i14l62u4ij3w/NO-84%202%20mar17%20uno.jpg?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l1k3a3h8atyys5l/NO-84%202mar17%20due.jpg?dl=0
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:51 AM, Mark Lunday <wd4elg@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
0230 UTC pass, saw the bear claw PSK 31 waveform again. Anyone else able to
see the PSK dowllink? I am seeing 7 parallel traces, almost like the
transmission is overloading the receiver.
Attempting to attach the file to this email with a capture of what my SDR
receiver is seeing...
On a positive note, APRS is working perfectly on NO84 even at low passes.
Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
Greensboro, NC FM06be
wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
http://wd4elg.blogspot.com
SKCC #16439 FISTS #17972
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all
interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official
views of AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:22:22 -0500
From: Robert Bruninga <bruninga@xxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Still trying to decode NO-84 (Doppler)
Message-ID: <c221f134073b37a93fb31a8c2d567dc8@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Wow, Great presentation.
Describes all the APRS satelites and the PSK31 missions. Better than mine!
Ill add a link on my pages...
Bob, WB4aPR
-----Original Message-----
From: AMSAT-BB [] On Behalf Of Mike Rupprecht
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Still trying to decode NO-84 (Doppler)
... also maybe this helps
http://dk3wn.info/files/psat_talk_dk3wn_Amsatuk_colloq_2015.pdf
73 Mike
DK3WN
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:34:42 -0500
From: "Scott" <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
Message-ID: <3CA11D759F0D4662BB09785E3D11B80B@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
The only way that I am aware of to cover two different frequency?s APRS
traffic on the same Pi would be to run two separate SDR?s under two
different running programs.
This should not be a problem since the command string very specifically
defines not only the SDR device being used, but also the frequency to tune
and what config file to use settings from.
For example, here is my 70cm ISS iGate command string:
====================================
rtl_fm -f 437.550M -d 0 -s 48k - | direwolf -l /home/pi/igate/iss-uhf-log/
-c /home/pi/igate/iss.conf -r 48000 -D 1 -
====================================
... please note the ?-d 0? argument after the ?rtl_fm? command. That
specifies SDR device #0, which is my case also happens to be the ONLY SDR
attached to that particular Pi. You can also plainly see the frequency and
other settings.
I honestly can?t recall if I have tested it or not, but to run another iGate
session with a second SDR, you would run a similar command except to tune a
different frequency, specify a different SDR device, and use a different
.conf file for your direwolf settings. Most people would want to specify a
different log file as well.
-Scott
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: Mike Thompson
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 1:52 PM
To: Scott
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
I wonder if it would be best to run 2 RTL's on a Rpi for use on both 144.39
and on UHF for the ISS, or is it just as effective to run one.
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
I was also concerned about that at first but on most passes I log a
significant number of packet receptions, so while adjusting for RX doppler
might help to some degree, it?s definitely not a deal-breaker.
(I also learned not to judge your effectiveness by the number of packets
you iGate to ariss.net; it appears that duplicates only show up once. So,
to REALLY know how well you?re doing, check the log file on the iGate or use
an external app to monitor it on another PC)
-Scott
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: Mike Thompson
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 11:01 AM
To: Scott
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
I wonder how hard it would be to get the raspberry pi to download TLE's
every now and then, and apply doppler correction to the downlink iGate
frequency. on 70cm, this might be a big deal.
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Scott <scott23192@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
Hey Dave.
It takes longer to read the instructions that it does to setup a
Raspberry Pi to be an iGate.
When the ISS digipeater changed to 70cm, there were not enough iGates so
I thought it might be fun to throw one together. There are numerous
how-to's online, but this one is perhaps the most straight-forward:
https://github.com/wb2osz/direwolf/blob/master/doc/Raspberry-Pi-SDR-IGate.pdf
... unfortunately, the way the document was created you won't be able to
copy/paste commands. But regardless, it's not a difficult process if you
have even the slightest familiarity with a Pi or linux in general.
Hope that helps!
-Scott, K4KDR
Montpelier, VA USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-----Original Message----- From: Dave via AMSAT-BB
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 9:57 AM
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] APRStk ? Or other?
Hi All
I'm setting up an autonomous sat gate using a spare Kenwood TMD700. I
seem to remember that once upon a time there was a DOS program called APRStk
that could Doppler correct the TMD700.
Does anyone know of a more up to date alternative that would run on a Pi
or Pi Zero?
Regards
Dave EI4HT / M0GIW
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:46:11 -0800
From: Greg D <ko6th.greg@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Amsat BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Shack re-wiring: RTL-SDR options?
Message-ID: <f0c6a068-d31e-006f-df4f-6d2ed0e893b9@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi folks,
Has anyone used an RTL-SDR dongle on the 10.7 MHz IF output from another
receiver? Is that better than going direct?
My cable TV provider is forcing us to go all-digital. With the new
"cable box" comes the opportunity to re-wire the shack and simplify the
many layers of cables, splitters, and lash-ups that have accumulated
over the years. The proverbial camel is crying out for help.
What this has to do with Ham Radio is that part of the lash-up mess is
an old pre-CATV deep fringe TV antenna that I have in the attic, aimed
to the southern horizon. We are well outside the range of any of the
digital OTA stations, and never one to leave a perfectly good piece of
RF equipment go to waste, I currently have it fed to an old Icom R-7000
scanning receiver (previously used as the AO-40 downlink IF) and to an
RTL-SDR dongle by way of a TV 2:1 splitter. I've tried hooking the
dongle directly to my 2m ham antenna for satellite use, but for some
reason that was less than satisfactory. Never really did hear much of
anything, and never could figure out why. At least with the TV antenna,
I can copy some stuff with the dongle, though the Icom is generally
better. But the Icom doesn't do the various digital modes that are
better suited for SDR.
Looking at the back of the Icom, I see that it has a 10.7 MHz IF output,
so the thought is that the SDR dongle might perform better hooked there
(with a DC bias block) instead of to the antenna itself through the
splitter. Both receivers have similar frequency coverage, but perhaps
the Icom, while somewhat deaf by modern standards, might still make for
a better front-end to the dongle?
I think the down-side is that the Icom's IF bandpass is narrower than
the Dongle's, so I'd lose some flexibility there. I would also lose the
ability to software-control the frequency of the receive chain, outside
of the IF bandpass.
What do you think? Would this be a net win or loss for the RTL-SDR?
Thanks,
Greg KO6TH
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:52:02 -0500
From: Martha <martha@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Office Closed
Message-ID:
<CAPk0USz--i2=UYnAgN7ve9riqQtowS88usB3OH_HPvNenjPX6A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The AMSAT office will be closed on Friday, March 3rd and Monday, March
6th. I will be back on Tuesday.
--
73- Martha
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:56:28 -0600
From: Zach Metzinger <zmetzing@xxxxx.xxx>
To: Amsat BB <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Shack re-wiring: RTL-SDR options?
Message-ID: <65ae8291-f661-a8b7-28ef-4d91199d1f91@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 03/02/17 16:46, Greg D wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Has anyone used an RTL-SDR dongle on the 10.7 MHz IF output from another
> receiver? Is that better than going direct?
I would hope (but perhaps not assume) that your R-7000's front-end is
better than the silicon tuner within the RTL dongle. The IF will already
have AGC applied to it, so overload of the dongle won't be a concern
once you get the level from the IF tap down to something that doesn't
over-range the dongle's AGC input on typical signals. That can be done
with a simple inline attenuator.
Here's some information about a hardware mod which allows "direct
sampling mode" on the dongle:
http://www.rtl-sdr.com/rtl-sdr-direct-sampling-mode/
By doing this, you are essentially creating a Panadapter for the R-7000.
Let us know how it works!
--- Zach
N0ZGO
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:10:45 -0700
From: Richard Tejera <Saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
To: "APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxxx <APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxx>, 'Red Willoughby'
<red@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, 'AMSAT' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
Message-ID: <c7t9q2i972ti68gm7hsa8cxa.1488496245006@xxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
When will it show as EO-88 the keps? I'm still seeing Nayif-1..
Rick Tejera K7TEJ
Saguaro Astronomy Club
www.SaguaroAstro.org
Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club
www.w7tbc.org
On March 2, 2017, at 08:00, Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
The satellite formerly known as Nayif-1 is now EO-88.
73s,
Alan
WA4SCA
<-----Original Message-----
<From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Red
<Willoughby
<Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 08:48 AM
<To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
<
<I see it listed at the top of the colorful matrix on amsat.org/status,
<but it does not seem to appear in the Select Satellite dropdown box for
<posting reports. Am I just missing it or does it have another name?
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-
<NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
<program!
<Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 23:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
From: Perry Yantis <py41@xxx.xxx>
To: Amsat BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] EO-88 keps now on Celestrak
Message-ID: <833810849.1057362.1488496255666@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The keps for Nayif-1 (EO-88) are now on Celestrak bbs in
amateur.txt,?cubesat.txt, and last 30 day launches.?Perry WB8OTH
py41@xxx.xxx
sent from my Apple Macbook Pro
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:16:08 -0500
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: Richard Tejera <Saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, "APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxxx
<APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxx>, Red Willoughby <red@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOpqDzmM7Lce4XuARMgn_VSbBPnWe6FfFu4uj9UejXWeTg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Celestrak has it as Nayif-1 (EO-88) now. AMSAT should have as EO-88
with tonight's release.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Richard Tejera <Saguaroastro@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> When will it show as EO-88 the keps? I'm still seeing Nayif-1..
>
> Rick Tejera K7TEJ
> Saguaro Astronomy Club
> www.SaguaroAstro.org
> Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club
> www.w7tbc.org
>
> On March 2, 2017, at 08:00, Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> The satellite formerly known as Nayif-1 is now EO-88.
>
> 73s,
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
>
> <-----Original Message-----
> <From: AMSAT-BB [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Red
> <Willoughby
> <Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 08:48 AM
> <To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> <Subject: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
> <
> <I see it listed at the top of the colorful matrix on amsat.org/status,
> <but it does not seem to appear in the Select Satellite dropdown box for
> <posting reports. Am I just missing it or does it have another name?
> <_______________________________________________
> <Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> <to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> <expressed
> <are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-
> <NA.
> <Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> <program!
> <Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:55:12 -0700
From: "Rick Tejera" <SaguaroAstro@xxx.xxx>
To: "'Paul Stoetzer'" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: 'AMSAT' <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>, APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx
Willoughby' <red@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
Message-ID: <009e01d293b0$6ec24bc0$4c46e340$@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
OK, thanks, now for the next question. I have added the Doppler file, which
I know is correct, I'm try to add the Sat to the AMSATNAMEs file. I tried to
add the info from that Since I use the Nasabare element set, but it's not
working and the frequency is not showing. Can someone post the proper edit
for both names?
Thanks in advance
Rick Tejera (K7TEJ)
Saguaro Astronomy Club
www.saguaroastro.org <http://www.saguaroastro.org>
Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club
www.W7TBC.org <http://www.W7TBC.org>
-----Original Message-----
From: prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:prstoetzer@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Paul
Stoetzer
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 4:16 PM
To: Richard Tejera <Saguaroastro@xxx.xxx>
Cc: APBIDDLE@xxxxxxx.xxxx Red Willoughby <red@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>; AMSAT
<amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
Celestrak has it as Nayif-1 (EO-88) now. AMSAT should have as EO-88 with
tonight's release.
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Richard Tejera <
<mailto:Saguaroastro@xxx.xxx> Saguaroastro@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> When will it show as EO-88 the keps? I'm still seeing Nayif-1..
>
> Rick Tejera K7TEJ
> Saguaro Astronomy Club
> <http://www.SaguaroAstro.org> www.SaguaroAstro.org
> Thunderbird Amateur Radio Club
> andwww.w7tbc.orgle <http://www.w7tbc.orgle>
>
> On March 2, 2017, at 08:00, Alan < <mailto:wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> The satellite formerly known as Nayif-1 is now EO-88.
>
> 73s,
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
>
> <-----Original Message-----
> <From: AMSAT-BB [ <mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx>
mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On Behalf Of Red
> <Willoughby
> <Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 08:48 AM
> <To: <mailto:amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx> amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> <Subject: [amsat-bb] Nayif-1
> <
> <I see it listed at the top of the colorful matrix on
> amsat.org/status, <but it does not seem to appear in the Select
> Satellite dropdown box for <posting reports. Am I just missing it or does
it have another name?
> <_______________________________________________
> <Sent via <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
> <to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions <expressed <are solely those of the author, and do not
> reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-
> <NA.
> <Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
> <program!
> <Subscription settings: <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via <mailto:AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx> AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes
this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
> Opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the
official views of AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: <http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership. Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://www.amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 12, Issue 60
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
