OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
CX2SA  > SATDIG   19.09.14 04:18l 779 Lines 24689 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : AMSATBB9328
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V9 328
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IQ5KG<IK1NHL<CX2SA
Sent: 140919/0213Z @:CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM #:10594 [Salto] FBB7.00e $:AMSATBB9328
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.SAL.URY.SOAM
To  : SATDIG@WW

Today's Topics:

   1. 5 in em55 award (wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx
   2. 5 in em55 (wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx
   3. lotw (w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxxx
   4. Re: lotw (Steve May)
   5. Re: lotw (Paul Stoetzer)
   6. Re: lotw (Paul Stoetzer)
   7. Re: lotw (Clayton Coleman)
   8. Re: lotw (Alan)
   9. SpaceX to launch Spinsat to ISS Saturday (M5AKA)
  10. Re: lotw (Bruce Paige)
  11. 5 in em55 award (wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxxx
  12. Re: Hand helds for FM birds (George Henry)
  13. Re: Hand helds for FM birds (Stefan Wagener)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:46:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "gol, Grid" <starcom-bb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 5 in em55 award
Message-ID:
<68658482.22948656.1411044394761.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

congrats to Omar XE1OA  5 in em55 award # 54
Good job Omar
WA4HFN em55 Damon
www.starcommgroup.org


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:51:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "gol, Grid" <starcom-bb@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 5 in em55
Message-ID:
<553674694.22951303.1411044689016.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Just in KD8CAO  has 5 in em55 award # 55
Good job Doug
WA4HFN em55 Damon
www.starcommgroup.org

Please accept my log submission for the 5 in EM55 award.

WA4NVM 6/4/2011 2103z FM AO-7  U/V
WB4LHD 6/28/2011 2208z FM AO-51  V/U
KD4NOQ 7/5/2011 0132z SSB VO-52  U/V
K4FEG 8/10/2011 2158z FM AO-51  V/U
W1AW/4 9/3/2014 2323z SSB FO-29  V/U


ARS KD8CAO


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:44:46 +0000
From: <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID: <20140918134446.O13M3.50276.root@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8




I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to LoTW
only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around this ?
usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both. they would
be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail site for
ARRL.org is still down.
73
Brock
W6GMT
BROCK THOMSEN
PO BOX 222
MARCELL MN 56657
EN37EN


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:10:58 -0400
From: Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID:
<CAE0P9Vf0Ze-tbWkra0L6pwfL2E7v7HH4QdYULiVBd5VWYSuAGg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I  usually just do two entries 1 minute apart with the different grid
squares.

Steve, W5IEM
On Sep 18, 2014 10:06 AM, <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:

>
>
>
> I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to
> LoTW only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around
> this ? usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both.
> they would be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail site
> for ARRL.org is still down.
> 73
> Brock
> W6GMT
> BROCK THOMSEN
> PO BOX 222
> MARCELL MN 56657
> EN37EN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:17:27 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOogL0cTHfk8dy-3agwyg78zPVOgKd=75v+44mGRBU55=A@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Brock,

John isn't doing LoTW for this trip.

However, LoTW does support up to four grids per QSO, so you would
ordinarily just enter both grids into your logging software for the QSO.

Also, there is no need for you to enter the other station's grids to upload
to LoTW. Grids come solely from the station location set when uploading the
QSOs and aren't part of the matching logic.

73,

Paul, N8HM

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM, <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:

>
>
>
> I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to
> LoTW only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around
> this ? usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both.
> they would be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail site
> for ARRL.org is still down.
> 73
> Brock
> W6GMT
> BROCK THOMSEN
> PO BOX 222
> MARCELL MN 56657
> EN37EN
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:47:34 -0400
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID:
<CABzOSOpU=AhRJVWG-X-Vz-USd4qoQfrQx_38JqoWwd0rQAa4Eg@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

There is no need to do this for grid boundaries.

The only reason you would enter separate QSOs for a single QSO is if
the station was on county, state, or national boundaries as LoTW
doesn't support multiple counties, states, or DXCCs in one QSO. Grid
lines and corners are supported.

For example, this is my confirmation from CO6CBF for a QSO from the
FL00/FL10 line.

Worked CO6CBF
DXCC CUBA (70)
CQ Zone 8
ITU Zone 11
Grid FL00,FL10

73,

Paul, N8HM

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> I  usually just do two entries 1 minute apart with the different grid
> squares.
>
> Steve, W5IEM
> On Sep 18, 2014 10:06 AM, <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to
>> LoTW only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around
>> this ? usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both.
>> they would be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail site
>> for ARRL.org is still down.
>> 73
>> Brock
>> W6GMT
>> BROCK THOMSEN
>> PO BOX 222
>> MARCELL MN 56657
>> EN37EN
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>> expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>> AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:22:59 -0500
From: Clayton Coleman <kayakfishtx@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Cc: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID:
<CAPovOwdc56x1Cf=epPc_7LhOoYg=Cr60covKK+k-oJv=-cr8RA@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

There is a limitation of some logging programs that will not track or
properly display your contact with a rover on a grid line. You may
need to enter multiple log entries if you want the program to track
your grids to see what is confirmed and what is not.  Again, this is
not a function of LoTW.

As someone who does lots of rover and grid line operations, I create a
new TQSL Station Location for each operating position.  I enter the
proper state and the grids separated by a a comma and space.  I don't
upload multiple log entries for the contacts I make while rover.   I
upload just one contact signed with my multi-grid Station Location and
certificate.

73
Clayton
W5PFG

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> There is no need to do this for grid boundaries.
>
> The only reason you would enter separate QSOs for a single QSO is if
> the station was on county, state, or national boundaries as LoTW
> doesn't support multiple counties, states, or DXCCs in one QSO. Grid
> lines and corners are supported.
>
> For example, this is my confirmation from CO6CBF for a QSO from the
> FL00/FL10 line.
>
> Worked CO6CBF
> DXCC CUBA (70)
> CQ Zone 8
> ITU Zone 11
> Grid FL00,FL10
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> I  usually just do two entries 1 minute apart with the different grid
>> squares.
>>
>> Steve, W5IEM
>> On Sep 18, 2014 10:06 AM, <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to
>>> LoTW only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around
>>> this ? usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both.
>>> they would be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail
site
>>> for ARRL.org is still down.
>>> 73
>>> Brock
>>> W6GMT
>>> BROCK THOMSEN
>>> PO BOX 222
>>> MARCELL MN 56657
>>> EN37EN
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
>>> expressed
>>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
>>> AMSAT-NA.
>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:58:33 -0500
From: Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID: <000001cfd359$6707d3b0$35177b10$@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Many people use a program such as DXKeeper, HRD Logbook, Log4OM, etc as a
front end for LoTW.  I don't
know the answer, but I wonder if there might be some subtle incompatibility
with the way they pass
information?

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA


<-----Original Message-----
<From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer
<Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:48 AM
<To: Steve May
<Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
<
<There is no need to do this for grid boundaries.
<
<The only reason you would enter separate QSOs for a single QSO is if
<the station was on county, state, or national boundaries as LoTW
<doesn't support multiple counties, states, or DXCCs in one QSO. Grid
<lines and corners are supported.
<
<For example, this is my confirmation from CO6CBF for a QSO from the
<FL00/FL10 line.
<
<Worked CO6CBF
<DXCC CUBA (70)
<CQ Zone 8
<ITU Zone 11
<Grid FL00,FL10
<
<73,
<
<Paul, N8HM
<
<On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
<> I  usually just do two entries 1 minute apart with the different grid
<> squares.
<>
<> Steve, W5IEM
<> On Sep 18, 2014 10:06 AM, <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
<>
<>>
<>>
<>>
<>> I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to
<>> LoTW only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around
<>> this ? usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both.
<>> they would be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail
site
<>> for ARRL.org is still down.
<>> 73
<>> Brock
<>> W6GMT
<>> BROCK THOMSEN
<>> PO BOX 222
<>> MARCELL MN 56657
<>> EN37EN
<>> _______________________________________________
<>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<>> expressed
<>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
<>> AMSAT-NA.
<>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<>>
<> _______________________________________________
<> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
<> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
<> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:17:02 +0100
From: M5AKA <m5aka@xxxxx.xx.xx>
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SpaceX to launch Spinsat to ISS Saturday
Message-ID:
<1411071422.42453.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

SpaceX plan to launch SpinSat (AX.25 packet) on Saturday at 0616 UT
http://amsat-uk.org/2014/09/18/spacex-to-launch-spinsat/

Postage stamp features amateur radio satellites
http://amsat-uk.org/2014/09/17/postage-stamp-features-amateur-radio-satellites
/

Essex school contact with International Space Station
http://amsat-uk.org/2014/09/17/essex-school-contact-with-international-space-s
tation/

UK astronaut Tim Peake KG5BVI plans to fly to the ISS in November 2015. He
says "Will be great to chat with schools next year from space using this ham
radio on board the ISS". Picture of Tim learning controls of ISS Ericsson
transceiver at
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.764436533599398.1073741831.208113275
898396&type=3


----
Trevor M5AKA
AMSAT-UK
Website http://amsat-uk.org/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/amsatuk
Twitter https://twitter.com/AMSAT_UK
----


------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:23:46 -0700
From: Bruce Paige <kk5do@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxxx <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
Message-ID:
<1411071826.12872.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I use PDA's Logic for my logging. When I did a bunch of grid boundary
dxpeditions way back and finally uploaded them to lotw I had to create a
location for grid group (el29, el19) and it handled it just fine with lotw.
in the list of where I operated from I would label it xxx county el29/el19
so that if I ever operate from there again, it is already built and ready to
go. if I am the receiving station, I think I have to go into the adif file
before transmission and change the grid to el29,el19 and lotw handles the
rest. since you are only going to work someone once on a boundary, it is not
a problem to change it in the adif file. if you were working hundreds of
people, that would be a pain.

73...bruce


________________________________
 From: Alan <wa4sca@xxxxx.xxx>
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw


Many people use a program such as DXKeeper, HRD Logbook, Log4OM, etc as a
front end for LoTW.  I don't
know the answer, but I wonder if there might be some subtle incompatibility
with the way they pass
information?

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA


<-----Original Message-----
<From: amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxx [mailto:amsat-bb-bounces@xxxxx.xxxx On
Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer
<Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:48 AM
<To: Steve May
<Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
<Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] lotw
<
<There is no need to do this for grid boundaries.
<
<The only reason you would enter separate QSOs for a single QSO is if
<the station was on county, state, or national boundaries as LoTW
<doesn't support multiple counties, states, or DXCCs in one QSO. Grid
<lines and corners are supported.
<
<For example, this is my confirmation from CO6CBF for a QSO from the
<FL00/FL10 line.
<
<Worked CO6CBF
<DXCC CUBA (70)
<CQ Zone 8
<ITU Zone 11
<Grid FL00,FL10
<
<73,
<
<Paul, N8HM
<
<On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Steve May <steve.w5iem@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
<> I  usually just do two entries 1 minute apart with the different grid
<> squares.
<>
<> Steve, W5IEM
<> On Sep 18, 2014 10:06 AM, <w6gmt@xxx.xx.xxx> wrote:
<>
<>>
<>>
<>>
<>> I worked K8YSE on FO-29 last night (Thanks John) Posted the contacts to
<>> LoTW only to have one of them rejected as a dup. How do others work around
<>> this ? usually I only need one of the grids but in this case need both.
<>> they would be # 206 and 207. I would ask the LoTW staff but the E-mail
site
<>> for ARRL.org is still down.
<>> 73
<>> Brock
<>> W6GMT
<>> BROCK THOMSEN
<>> PO BOX 222
<>> MARCELL MN 56657
<>> EN37EN
<>> _______________________________________________
<>> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<>> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
<>> expressed
<>> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
<>> AMSAT-NA.
<>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<>>
<> _______________________________________________
<> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership.
Opinions expressed
<> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
<> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
<to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
<are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
<Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:37:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: wa4hfn@xxxxxxx.xxx
To: AMSAT <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] 5 in em55 award
Message-ID:
<401222032.23483313.1411087043902.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

 Congrats to Rick  WB3CSY for 5 in em55 award #56
good job Rick
WA4HFN em55 Damon
www.starcommgroup.org


------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:04:21 -0500
From: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
To: "amsat bb" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Hand helds for FM birds
Message-ID: <2133075259CD4C53B0FF88F8E1090D78@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original

The new Wouxun KG-UV8D is being advertised as full-duplex.  Don't know
whether it suffers desense or not.  I used to have a Yaesu FT-470 that
worked quite nicely, and currently have an Alinco DJ-G5 that seems to get
the job done just fine.


George, KA3HSW


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
To: "Rich/wa4bue" <richard.siff@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Cc: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Hand helds for FM birds


> The only current production model that works for Mode J full duplex is the
> Kenwood TH-D7A2. There are few other full duplex handhelds on the market,
> but they all suffer from desense on 70cm when transmitting on 2m.
>
> The other handhelds may be adequate for the Mode B FM transponders on
> EO-80
> and the Fox-1 series, but they will not work for full duplex on SO-50.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com



------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:11:17 -0500
From: Stefan Wagener <wageners@xxxxx.xxx>
To: George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx>
Cc: amsat bb <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Hand helds for FM birds
Message-ID:
<CAKu8kHDewbErYP7aRMZe-OeZROSBdd40n-U8R--vZVMh8exixw@xxxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?437813-Wouxun-KG-UV8D-for-SO-50-Sure-but-
not-full-duplex-by-itself

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:04 PM, George Henry <ka3hsw@xxx.xxx> wrote:

> The new Wouxun KG-UV8D is being advertised as full-duplex.  Don't know
> whether it suffers desense or not.  I used to have a Yaesu FT-470 that
> worked quite nicely, and currently have an Alinco DJ-G5 that seems to get
> the job done just fine.
>
>
> George, KA3HSW
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@xxxx.xxx>
> To: "Rich/wa4bue" <richard.siff@xxxxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Hand helds for FM birds
>
>
>  The only current production model that works for Mode J full duplex is the
>> Kenwood TH-D7A2. There are few other full duplex handhelds on the market,
>> but they all suffer from desense on 70cm when transmitting on 2m.
>>
>> The other handhelds may be adequate for the Mode B FM transponders on
>> EO-80
>> and the Fox-1 series, but they will not work for full duplex on SO-50.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Paul, N8HM
>>
>>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available
> to all interested persons worldwide without requiring membership. Opinions
> expressed
> are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
> AMSAT-NA.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx.
AMSAT-NA makes this open forum available to all interested persons worldwide
without requiring membership.  Opinions expressed
are solely those of the author, and do not reflect the official views of
AMSAT-NA.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 9, Issue 328
****************************************


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 12.05.2024 05:57:27lGo back Go up