| |
I0OJJ > BPQ 03.11.23 17:17l 100 Lines 3306 Bytes #111 (0) @ WW
BID : A3YOW_I0OJJ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re^2: G8BPQ Please!!!
Path: IW8PGT<I3XTY<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ
Sent: 231103/1511z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] $:A3YOW_I0OJJ
>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Fri Nov 3 16:11:06 2023
Received: from [44.134.32.240] by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0o.9dev) with SMTP
id AA16981088 ; Fri, 03 Nov 2023 16:11:06 +0100
Message-ID: <3cc84df3-3c10-4627-a3cb-719bfa0c8617@i0ojj.ampr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
>From: Gustavo Ponza <i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org>
References: <21675_UT1HZM@obcm.bbs>
Content-Language: en-US
Organization: SICD Rome
In-Reply-To: <21675_UT1HZM@obcm.bbs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Sergej,
the IR0AAB User was flagged 'BBS' and 'SYSOP'
now it is only flagged as 'BBS'... but all
remains the same, i.e. the same error on
incoming **telnet** protocol on the BPQ FBBPORT.
231103 10:48:55 |I0OJJ-1 Incoming Connect from I0OJJ on Port 2 Freq 0
Mode Packet 1200
231103 10:48:55 >I0OJJ-1 [BPQ-6.0.24.17-B1FWIHJM$]
231103 10:48:55 >I0OJJ-1 Hello Gustavo. Latest Message is 6522, Last
listed is 6517
231103 10:48:55 >I0OJJ-1 de IR0AAB>
231103 10:48:55 <I0OJJ-1 i[OpenBCM-1.08-6-g5b69-B1FHMW$]
231103 10:48:55 >I0OJJ-1 de IR0AAB>
231103 10:48:55 <I0OJJ-1 FF
231103 10:48:55 >I0OJJ-1 Invalid Command
231103 10:48:55 >I0OJJ-1 de IR0AAB>
the same error occurs ALSO when *recent* LinFBB
PBBS when try to telnet in the same way as Obcm.
So, NOW, the *incoming* telnet forwarding remain
possible ONLY by using another LinBPQ or a
vintage (x)FBB ...
Without entering into technicalities, being the
JNOS2 fully parametrizable, I instruct it to
simulate an older (x)FBB PBBS and so the same
telnet procedure results *correct* as follows:
231103 10:51:36 |I0OJJ-8 Incoming Connect from I0OJJ on Port 2 Freq 0
Mode Pac
231103 10:51:36 >I0OJJ-8 [BPQ-6.0.24.17-B1FWIHJM$]
231103 10:51:36 >I0OJJ-8 Hello Gustavo. Latest Message is 6522, Last
listed is
231103 10:51:36 >I0OJJ-8 de IR0AAB>
231103 10:51:36 <I0OJJ-8 [JNOS-2.0o.9dev-B1FHIM$]
231103 10:51:36 <I0OJJ-8 FF
231103 10:51:36 >I0OJJ-8 FQ
231103 10:51:36 |I0OJJ-8 I0OJJ-8 Disconnected
I remember that in the past *also* the *outbound'
telnet forwarding had the same problem with the
LinFBB but now it results OK.
If G8BPQ or others would be available to perform
some tests I will be happy to do with them :)
To complete the info, the *node* forwarding between
every system, is carried out regularly.
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
On 11/3/23 09:59, ut1hzm@ut1hzm.krem.pol.ukr.eu wrote:
> R:231103/0900z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU $:21675_UT1HZM
> R:231103/0900Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:59536 [Caterham Surrey GBR]
> R:231103/0859Z 25244@KA1VSC.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:231103/0859Z 88686@VE3CGR.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:231103/0859Z 584@RN1M.SPB.RUS.EU LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:231103/0859Z 21675@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.23
>
> Hi Gus!
>
> Please check IR0AAB user-record in the BPQ BBS marked as "BBS" or not? And also should
> not be any other marks, like Excluded etc.
> If not marked as BBS, then any try of incomming forward in BPQmail BBS will always cause
> invalid command.
>
> Its not a program error in general, just done as it should - no forward possible if incomming
> callsign not marked as BBS-partner.
> But very often case when operator missed to mark that 'bbs' check-box.
>
>
> 73, Sergej.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
