| |
EI2GYB > ASTRO 28.08.21 12:27l 142 Lines 7128 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 13816_EI2GYB
Read: GUEST
Subj: 'Cool' stars may not be so unique
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IR1UAW<IW2OHX<IW0QNL<SR1BSZ<SV1CMG<ON0AR<GB7CIP<EI2GYB
Sent: 210828/1025Z 13816@EI2GYB.DGL.IRL.EURO BPQ6.0.22
_ _ _ _
/ \ ___| |_ _ __ ___ | \ | | _____ _____
/ _ \ / __| __| '__/ _ \ | \| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / __|
/ ___ \\__ \ |_| | | (_) | | |\ | __/\ V V /\__ \
/_/ \_\___/\__|_| \___/ |_| \_|\___| \_/\_/ |___/
'Cool' stars may not be so unique
Stars scattered throughout the cosmos look different, but they may be
more alike than once thought, according to Rice University researchers.
New modeling work by Rice scientists shows that "cool" stars like the
sun share the dynamic surface behaviors that influence their energetic
and magnetic environments.
This stellar magnetic activity is key to whether a given star hosts
planets that could support life.
The work by Rice postdoctoral researcher Alison Farrish and
astrophysicists David Alexander and Christopher Johns-Krull appears
in a published study in The Astrophysical Journal.
The research links the rotation of cool stars with the behavior of
their surface magnetic flux, which in turn drives the star's
coronal X-ray luminosity, in a way that could help predict how magnetic
activity affects any exoplanets in their systems.
The study follows another led by Farrish and Alexander that showed a
star's space "weather" may make planets in their "Goldilocks zone"
uninhabitable.
"All stars spin down over their lifetimes as they shed angular momentum,
and they get less active as a result," Farrish said.
"We think the sun in the past was more active and that might have
affected the early atmospheric chemistry of Earth.
So thinking about how the higher energy emissions from stars change
over long timescales is pretty important to exoplanet studies."
"More broadly, we're taking models that were developed for the sun and
seeing how well they adapt to stars," said Johns-Krull.
The researchers set out to model what far-flung stars are like based on
the limited data available.
The spin and flux of some stars have been determined, along with their
classification-types F, G, K and M-which gave information about
their sizes and temperatures.
They compared the properties of the sun, a G-type star, through its
Rossby number, a measure of stellar activity that combines its speed of
rotation with its subsurface fluid flows that influence the distribution
of magnetic flux on a star's surface, with what they knew of other cool stars.
Their models suggest that each star's "space weather" works in much the
same way, influencing conditions on their respective planets.
"The study suggests that stars-at least cool stars-are not too dissimilar
from each other," Alexander said. "From our perspective, Alison's model
can be applied without fear or favor when we look at exoplanets around
M or F or K stars, as well, of course, as other G stars.
"It also suggests something much more interesting for established
stellar physics, that the process by which a magnetic field is generated
may be quite similar in all cool stars.
That's a bit of a surprise," he said. This could include stars that,
unlike the sun, are convective down to their cores.
"All stars like the sun fuse hydrogen and helium in their cores and
that energy is first carried in the radiation of photons toward the
surface," Johns-Krull said. "But it hits a zone about 60% to 70% of
the way that's just too opaque, so it starts to undergo convection.
Hot matter moves from below, the energy radiates away, and the cooler
matter falls back down.
"But stars with less than a third of the mass of the sun don't have a
radiative zone; they're convective everywhere," he said. "A lot of
ideas about how stars generate a magnetic field rely on there being a
boundary between the radiative and the convection zones, so you would
expect stars that don't have that boundary to behave differently.
This paper shows that in many ways, they behave just like the sun,
once you adjust for their own peculiarities."
Farrish, who recently earned her doctorate at Rice and begins a
postdoctoral research assignment at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
soon, noted the model applies only to unsaturated stars.
"The most magnetically active stars are the ones we call 'saturated,'"
Farrish said.
"At a certain point, an increase in magnetic activity stops showing
the associated increase in high energy X-ray emission.
The reason that dumping more magnetism onto the star's surface doesn't
give you more emission is still a mystery.
"Conversely, the sun is in the unsaturated regime, where we do see a
correlation between magnetic activity and energetic emission," she said.
"That happens at a more moderate activity level, and those stars are of
interest because they might provide more hospitable environments for planets."
"The bottom line is the observations, which span four spectral types
including both fully and partially convective stars, can be reasonably
well represented by a model generated from the sun," Alexander said.
"It also reinforces the idea that even though a star that is 30 times
more active than the sun may not be a G-class star, it's still captured by
the analysis that Alison has done".
"We do have to be clear that we're not simulating any specific star
or system," he said.
"We are saying that statistically, the magnetic behavior of a typical
M star with a typical Rossby number behaves in a similar fashion to
that of the sun which allows us to assess its potential impact on its planets."
A critical wild card is a star's activity cycle, which can't be
incorporated into the models without years of observation.
(The sun's cycle is 11 years, evidenced by sunspot activity when
its magnetic field lines are most distorted.)
Johns-Krull said the model will still be useful in many ways.
"One of my areas of interest is studying very young stars, many of which
are, like low-mass stars, fully convective," he said. "Many of these
have disc material around them and are still forming planets.
How they interact is mediated, we think, by the stellar magnetic field.
"So, Alison's modeling work can be used to learn about the large-scale
structure of very magnetically active stars, and that can then allow
us to test some ideas about how these young stars and their disks interact."
Minjing Li, a visiting undergraduate from the University of Science
and Technology of China, is a co-author of the paper.
Alexander is a professor of physics and astronomy and director of
the Rice Space Institute. Johns-Krull is a professor of physics and astronomy.
____ __ ____ ___ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____
( __)( )(___ \ / __)( \/ )( _ \ ( _ \( _ \/ ___)
) _) )( / __/( (_ \ ) / ) _ ( ) _ ( ) _ (\___ \
(____)(__)(____) \___/(__/ (____/ (____/(____/(____/
PART OF THE DONEGAL PACKET RADIO NETWORK
Packet: EI2GYB@EI2GYB.DGL.IRL.EURO
Email: EI2GYB@GMAIL.COM
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
