| |
EI2GYB > ASTRO 20.05.23 17:00l 65 Lines 7647 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 14411_EI2GYB
Read: GUEST
Subj: Replay of Star's Death Sheds Light on Universe's Expansion
Path: IW8PGT<LU4ECL<LU9DCE<KD6MTU<N5MDT<EI2GYB
Sent: 230520/1428Z 14411@EI2GYB.DGL.IRL.EURO LinBPQ6.0.23
#####
_ _ _ _ #### _\_
/ \ ___| |_ _ __ ___ | \ | | _____ _____ ##=-[.].]
/ _ \ / __| __| '__/ _ \ | \| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / __| #( _\
/ ___ \\__ \ |_| | | (_) | | |\ | __/\ V V /\__ \ # \__|
/_/ \_\___/\__|_| \___/ |_| \_|\___| \_/\_/ |___/ \___/
Sent Via QO-100 Sat! .630 .' `.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Replay of Star's Death Sheds Light on Universe's Expansion
By: Monica Young May 20, 2023
A cosmic lens magnified the light of an exploding star. Now, astronomers are using observations of that supernova to calculate the universe's current rate of expansion.
Stars explode all the time in the universe. But the supernova that Patrick Kelly found in 2014 marked serendipity at its finest: an explosion not only caught in the act of detonation but also magnified by the gravity of a confluence of foreground galaxies.
Now, Kelly (University of Minnesota) is leading a team in using this serendipitous supernova to get an independent measure of the universe's current expansion rate - a quantity astronomers have been debating intensely for the last decade. Although the new measurement won't settle that debate, it does provide an independent method that astronomers badly need.
A Predicted Supernova
Supernova Refsdal, named after Norwegian astronomer Sjur Refsdal, just so happened to go off under a cosmic lens from Earth's point of view: A massive galaxy cluster magnified the supernova's light and bent it, splitting it into separate but identical images. Kelly, who as a graduate student in 2014 was searching the Hubble Space Telescope images by eye, spotted three bright images and contacted his team right away. (A fainter fourth image was found later.) "It was immediately clear that it was very exciting," he said in an interview at the time.
But the physics of gravitational lensing, which is the same as for the lenses in eyeglasses, should have created not four but five images. One image was missing. Kelly and his colleagues predicted that the light of the final image might be traveling a longer path to Earth through the cluster than that of the others and, depending on the path traveled, would appear in anywhere from a year to a decade.
A year later, it showed up.
Can a Supernova Break the Hubble Tension?
The new study, published in Science, explores what Supernova Refsdal can tell us about cosmic expansion. The universe has been expanding since the Big Bang, although at different rates. Astronomers have measured the rate at which the universe is currently expanding, called the Hubble constant, in many different ways. These ways often rely on carefully calculated distances. But as the measurements have become more precise, the answers have split between two numbers, creating tension.
While this tension is regarded as a potential problem for the standard model of cosmology (which includes mysterious dark matter and equally mysterious dark energy), there's still the possibility that the different answers come about due to systematic errors in the measurements themselves. Supernova Refsdal offers a new way to estimate the Hubble constant that, while not free from systematic errors, is at least free from the ones that plague other estimates.
To calculate the Hubble constant, Kelly and his colleagues first needed to determine the distance to the supernova based on the last image's delayed arrival. (The time delay itself is more precisely estimated in an accompanying paper, published in the Astrophysical Journal.) To do that, they first need to properly account for the distribution of mass in the intervening galaxy cluster. Since the cluster's gravity is what's bending the light, understanding its mass distribution is basically like knowing the prescription of the cosmic lens. Using a set of cluster models, Kelly's team arrives at an estimate of the Hubble constant that's between 63.3 and 70.7 km/s/megaparsec.
There's a lot of wiggle room in that answer, but it's in line with what astronomers have previously found by analyzing observations of the cosmic microwave background taken with the Planck satellite. And it's below the other set of estimates, such as that from the SH0ES collaboration, based on observations of Cepheid variable stars and Type Ia supernovae, as well as from the H0LICOW team that studies distant, lensed quasars.
Christopher Kochanek (Ohio State University), who wasn't involved in the study, says that it's a solid result. But he questions whether the new measure of the Hubble constant is preciy is what's bending the light, understanding its mass distribution is basically like knowing the prescri he says.
"The devil is in the lens models," he adds. Kelly's team applied many models and then calculated a sort of weighted average of the results. That helped make their measurement more precise. But Kochanek explains that a weighted average only works if the uncertainty of any one model is random. "If you have 100 systems each with 10% errors that are all truly random, then the error in the average result is 1%," he says. "But most of their problems are systematic, not random - so averaging over systems may not reduce your unce says that it's a solid result. But he questions whether the new measure of the Hubble constant is precise enough yet to be useful. The measurement's uncertainty is 6%, and "you need a 1 or 2% measurement to be competitive," he says.
"The devil is in the lens models," he adds. Kelly's team applied many models and then calculated a sort of weighted average of the results. That helped make their measurement more precise. But Kochanek explains that a weighted GYBNOD:EI2GYB-7} Connected to EI2GYB-15
rtainties at all, because all the models are making the same systematic error."
Kelly's team agrees that the lens models are indeed the sticking point when it comes to precision, noting that if the cluster's mass distribution were known exactly, they'd be able to measure the Hubble constant to within 1.5%. With improved models for the cluster's mass, more precise measurements may yet come from Supernova Refsdal. C that the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory will find.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
================================================================================
= ____ __ ____ ___ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ =
= ( __)( )(___ \ / __)( \/ )( _ \ ( _ \( _ \/ ___) rtainties at all, because all the models are making the same systematic error."
Kelly's team agrees that the lens models are indeed the sticking point when it comes to precision, noting that if the cluster's mass distribution were known exactly, they'd be able to measure the Hubble constant to within 1.5%. With improved models for the cluster's mass, more precise measurements may yet come from Supernova Refsdal. Certainly, this method will also be applied to the myriad lensed supernovae and other objectsGYBNOD:EI2GYB-7} Connected to EI2GYB-15
=
= ) _) )( / __/( (_ \ ) / ) _ ( ) _ ( ) _ (\___ \ =
= (____)(__)(____) \___/(__/ (____/ (____/(____/(____/ =
= PART OF THE DONEGAL PACKET RADIO NETWORK =
= Packet: EI2GYB@EI2GYB.DGL.IRL.EURO =
= AIL.COM =
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
