| |
PA2SNK > SYSOP 20.10.20 22:33l 83 Lines 2848 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 4801_PA2SNK
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re:CP SYSOP: Re: non-alert sysop msgs on SYSOP
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<I0OJJ<LU4ECL<PI8SNK
Sent: 201020/2024Z 60987@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
From: PA2SNK@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO
To : SYSOP@WW
# Generated by: TstHWin v2.21b - Registered to PA2SNK SNEEK
# On : 20-10-2020 22:24:15
# UTC: 20-10-2020 20:24:15
>R:201020/1800Z 60985@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO [SNEEK/SNITS] FBB7.01.35 alpha
>
>From: I0OJJ@PI8SNK.#FRL.NLD.EURO
>To : PA2SNK@
>
>R:201020/1736z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] #:34396 $:2VP8_I0OJJ
>
>Original to SYSOP@WW
>
>Path: !PI8CDR!VE3TOK!VE4KLM!I0OJJ!
>
>>From i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org Tue Oct 20 19:36:48 2020
>Received: from ir0rm-7.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.5) with SMTP
> id AA134396 ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:36:48 +0200
>References: <11849_CT1EBQ@i0ojj.bbs>
>>From: Gustavo Ponza <i0ojj@i0ojj.ampr.org>
>Organization: SICD Rome
>Message-ID: <beadeaef-4e22-537c-f027-4bfb6b1074cb@i0ojj.ampr.org>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
> Thunderbird/78.3.3
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>In-Reply-To: <11849_CT1EBQ@i0ojj.bbs>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>Content-Language: en-US
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Hi,
>
>On 10/20/20 5:50 PM, pe1rrr@ct1ebq.ctlx.prt.eu wrote:
>> R:201020/1600z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU $:11849_CT1EBQ
>> R:201020/1554Z @:EA2RCF.EAVI.ESP.EU #:3626 [Vitoria] $:11849_CT1EBQ
>> R:201020/1554Z 37890@LU9DCE.TOR.BA.ARG.SOAM BPQ6.0.20
>> R:201020/1554Z 2690@LU4DRH.BB.BA.ARG.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.20
>> R:201020/1553Z 2046@PY2BIL.SP.BRA.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.20
>> R:201020/1550Z 11849@CT1EBQ.CTLX.PRT.EU LinBPQ6.0.20
>>
>> Please can we not use SYSOP@ for messages that are not urgent alerts?
>> The SYSOP address on many systems sends a copy message to the SYSOP as a P
>> mail, the recent LINFBB stuff on SYSOP is really annoying generating
>> many alerts for us. I have temporarily put SYSOP in my reject because of this.
>>
>> Thanks for your consideration, its is not something I regard as high prio but
>> it would be nice if SYSOP@ was used for its purpose and not as a general
>> goto for help about software a lot of us DO NOT run.
>>
>> 73
>> pe1rrr
>
>
>Nope, the problem is the scarce study on the LinFBB matter and then
>the result of a wrong setup; since if you don't want to receive the
>CP Personal copy of Bulletins addressed to SYSOP to the PBBS Sysops
>then leave the sysmail parameter (in fbb.conf) blank:
>
>sysmail =
>
>--
>73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
>
>
It should better be adressed at linfbb@ww perhaps..
о о
о о
ооо ооо
оооо оооо
оооооо оооооо
оо ооооо оо
о ооо о
ооооооо ооооооо
оооооооо оооооооо
PA2SNK te Sneek/Snits (Friesland)
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
