| |
I0OJJ > SYSOP 29.12.20 21:52l 41 Lines 1431 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : TCUI0OJJ_006
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: WP updates as B messages
Path: IW8PGT<I3XTY<I0OJJ
Sent: 201229/2048z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU [Rome] obcm1.08-5-g2f4a
From: I0OJJ @ I0OJJ.ITA.EU (Gustavo)
To: SYSOP @ WW
X-Info: Sent with login password
X-Info: Received by SMTP-gateway
On 12/29/20 7:14 PM, n2nov@n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam wrote:
> R:201229/1830z @:I0OJJ.ITA.EU $:3XTX_N2NOV
> R:201229/1829Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:17884 [Caterham Surrey GBR] $:3XTX_N2NOV
> R:201229/1814z @:N2NOV.#RICH.NY.USA.NOAM $:3XTX_N2NOV
>
>>From n2nov@n2nov.ampr.org Tue Dec 29 13:14:49 2020
> Received: from n2nov.ampr.org by n2nov.ampr.org (JNOS2.0m.5D) with SMTP
> id AA183813 ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 13:14:49 EST
> Message-Id: <183811@n2nov.ampr.org>
>> From: n2nov@n2nov.ampr.org
> X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet (n2nov @ 44.68.41.2) -> Sending message
>
> Just a quick clarification. WP messages should be sent as P personal messages
> to the user WP at your forwrding partner (wp@n2nov) and not to the aprtner
> themselves (n2nov@n2nov). The WP server tat runs in the background is looking
> for a message directed to user WP.
>
> --
> 73 de N2NOV
In the first 1990's era it was smart your fist assertion
but now it is superfluous/unnecessary:
In the second assertion, it should be so, but 'de facto'
all servers accept any kinda messages and so almost every
system resulted in their WP database corrupted :(
Since the stupidity of certain subjects cannot be stopped
one must put in reject all messages carrying WP, to be
save.
--
73 and ciao, gustavo i0ojj/ir0aab/ir0eq
non multa, sed multum
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
