| |
UT1HZM > SYSOP 16.12.22 00:48l 30 Lines 1106 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 16622_UT1HZM
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Fwd: More on "Non-delivery Notification"
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<OK0NAG<OK0PBR<UT1HZM
Sent: 221215/2039Z 16622@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ6.0.23
Hi Misko.
> In my knowledge, sending SP SYSOP@WW mails was established long ago with
> an intention that bbs admins have their 'private' way to communicate in
> between themselves. Without end users to read such mails. Why? Because
> of potential 'revenge', and/or further hacking, ham pirate behavior, etc.
Well on your point.
But is there are really something that we need to hide in such
public media like PR BBS?!
All sysops---users 'packet wars' maybe ended even in last century, hi.
Other point that we can faced with ham license limitation, so that
"hidden messages-groups" maybe not allowed in some local licenses.
>
> In that direction, most (if not all) bbs software were supposed to
> process such SP (private) mails as those intended for local sysops only.
>
Not sure even if all software do it proper!
DL-soft like BCM if I'm recall never do that sp-sysop bulls.
Not sure if JNOS etc do?!
And if we faced with non-delivery from BPQ and FBB s/w - its shown that there
not all ok with that sp sysop "hidden bulletins".
So my opinion simply not use it - less problems!
73, Sergej.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
