| |
G8MNY > TECH 06.07.19 16:00l 22 Lines 935 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 11512_GB7CIP
Read: GUEST
Subj: QRO v QRP
Path: IW8PGT<IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<JE7YGF<GB7CIP
Sent: 190706/1355Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:11512 [Caterham Surrey GBR]
From: G8MNY@GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
To : TECH@WW
By G8MNY (Updated Apr 14)
(8 Bit ASCII graphics use code page 437 or 850, Terminal Font)
For years I have run as much QRO as I could muster. The main reason of course
is to be heard as far as possible & increase the chance of working that Dx, or
even having a contact at all. Also having a very small footprint with QRP can
mean your constantly fighting to keep your frequency on a busy band.
SIMPLE MODEL
Here is a simplistic statistical view of what power does in terms of range,
area covered, & hence the chance of a QSO, (based on +6dB = to double the range
& 4x the area of RF).
Power 1.5W 6W 25W 100W 400W 1500W
. With HF of courseother sbe unlikely due to both wdirection get
Why Don't U send an interesting bul?
73 de John G8MNY @ GB7CIP
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
