| |
N1URO > TEST 04.12.19 16:13l 47 Lines 1514 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 36092_N1URO
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: PY2BIL > F>
Path: IW8PGT<IR2UBX<EA2RCF<I0OJJ<GB7CIP<N1URO
Sent: 191204/1405Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:36092 [Unionville] $:36092_N1URO
From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
To : TEST@WW
Guillermo et al;
As you see, your follow up to your own bulletin was fine because it avoided
6.0.16 version:
BBSURO:N1URO-4 >
v 232652 232651
From : PY2BIL
To : TEST @WW
Type/Status : B$
Date/Time : 04-Dec 02:10
Bid : 10505PY2BIL
Message # : 232652
Title : Re: PY2BIL > Changed subject line
R:191204/0213Z @:WA7V.#SEWA.WA.USA.NOAM #:27042 [C-Basin Hub] $:10505PY2BIL
R:191204/0213z @:DB0RES.#NRW.DEU.EU $:10505PY2BIL
R:191204/0213z @:IR2UBX.ILOM.ITA.EU $:10505PY2BIL
R:191204/0211Z @:EA2RCF.EAVI.ESP.EU #:49289 [Vitoria] $:10505PY2BIL
R:191204/0211Z 4414@LU9DCE.TOR.BA.ARG.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.19
R:191204/0210Z 17994@PY2BIL.SP.BRA.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.19
yet the one prior you wrote did not have this luxury:
From : PY2BIL
To : TEST @WW
Type/Status : B$
Date/Time : 04-Dec 02:03
Bid : 10502PY2BIL
Message # : 232651
Title : F>
R:191204/0206Z @:NA7KR.OR.USA.NOAM #:20421 [Salem] $:10502PY2BIL
R:191204/0203Z @:ZL2BAU.#79.NZL.AUNZ #:55300 [Waimate] $:10502PY2BIL
R:191204/0203Z 32025@N9PMO.#SEWI.WI.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.19
R:191204/0203Z 9277@VE1MPF.#MCTN.NB.CAN.NOAM BPQ6.0.16 <---
Re: PY2BIL > Changed subject line
R:191204/0203Z 17993@PY2BIL.SP.BRA.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.1
Regardless of the reasons why it occurs, the fact of the matter is that
it does occur. This is one of the issues that gives just cause to updating
the BBS specs.
73 de N1URO
---
SendBBS v1.1 by N1URO for LinFBB
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
