OpenBCM V1.07b12 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

IW8PGT

[Mendicino(CS)-Italy]

 Login: GUEST





  
VK7AX  > WIA      03.10.15 02:45l 126 Lines 6719 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 27485-VK7AX
Read: GUEST
Subj: [WIA-News] Danger ! A no-fee Amateur licence fee could mean
Path: IW8PGT<CX2SA<VK7AX
Sent: 151003/0040Z 27485@VK7AX.#ULV.TAS.AUS.OC [Ulverstone] $:27485-VK7AX
From: VK7AX@VK7AX.#ULV.TAS.AUS.OC
To  : WIA@WW


Danger ! A no-fee Amateur licence fee could mean no service

Date : 02 / 10 / 2015

Author : Jim Linton - VK3PC

The WIA Board has become aware of a campaign, circulated by email, 
to lobby the new Minister for Communications to "review the pricing of amateur 
radio licences, to bring them into line with other countries". 
WIA Director Roger Harrison VK2ZRH has responded to the proponents of this 
lobbying campaign, who are asking the Minister to direct the ACMA to drop 
Australian amateur licence fees to zero.

The other countries cited in the campaign email are the United States, 
where "amateurs are issued a licence for 10 years, requiring revalidation 
after expiry, with no fee"; the United Kingdom, where "amateurs are issued 
a licence for life requiring revalidation five-yearly, with no fee"; and 
"in New Zealand, amateurs are licensed under a General Users Licence, 
with no fee".

The campaign suggests writing a personal letter to the Minister in your own words, 
arguing that amateur radio’s past and possible role in disaster communications 
deserves to be valued, as it is in "many countries of the world", 
then citing the three examples (US, UK and New Zealand), 
along with the argument that a large number of Australian amateurs are pensioners, 
for whom “the annual licence fee has seen some simply abandon their hobby due to 
the cost, and to the detriment of the nationö.

At first blush, said Roger VK2ZRH, the proponents of this lobbying campaign 
seem to have the interests of Australian radio amateurs at heart, 
particularly those living on a pension. So, when Senator the Honourable 
Mitch Fifield, the Minister for Communications, receives a letter along the lines 
advocated, an advisor in his office will likely ask one of the Departmental 
Liaison Officers what it’s all about, VK2ZRH explains. 
The DLO will be able to tell the Minister’s advisor that the ACMA already 
reduced the amateur licence annual renewal fee in April this year, 
from $75 to $51. 
The Minister’s advisor might also be told that amateur radio isn’t exactly 
a low-cost hobby, like stamp collecting, when even second-hand amateur 
transceivers sell for prices between $250 to $2000, 
and many new transceivers are priced from $2000 to over $10,000.

While well-meaning, a lobbying campaign along the lines being advocated is 
unlikely to make much of an impression within the Minister’s office, 
says VK2ZRH, let alone with the Minister. 
And not for the two reasons just highlighted. At this point, Roger VK2ZRH 
explains that his day job for the past 15 years has involved dealing with 
correspondence to ministers . . . composing, editing and coordinating responses 
to letters from the public, other politicians, 
companies and all sorts of stakeholders.

With many years of experience in dealing with ministerial correspondence, 
Roger VK2ZRH said that, each letter for the minister to sign in response is 
accompanied by a briefing note, setting out the background to whatever issue 
or issues an author has written about, and justifying the content of the letter 
the minister might sign. Writing to government ministers is a huge industry 
in voter land. Government departments have special units that compose responses 
for their ministers to sign; sometimes a minister’s office will ask the 
department to respond instead of the minister.

Before entering the world of ministerial correspondence, Roger VK2ZRH was 
involved with various lobbying groups attempting to influence the policies 
or decisions of ministers and governments. Not always successfully, he says. 
A prime lesson learnt was the need to do the homework on the subject 
– know as much as possible about government and political processes, 
the how and why of things. 
Some homework, he suggests, is needed about why we pay amateur licence fees 
in Australia and why the arguments being advocated by the current lobbyists 
are not likely to succeed.

In Australia, it is government policy that all spectrum users pay a tax for 
the use of spectrum – even defence; that is, the armed forces.
Spectrum is a resource. The resource is a public good. 
It isn’t consumed when used, as minerals are, for example. 
There is a cost for “looking afterö the public interest in the use of spectrum. 
Use of it is allocated and regulated by a complex set of arrangements, 
arising from both local and international inputs. As you would be aware, 
the ACMA has a large role here.

However, the ACMA does not set the fees. 
This is done by a combination of the Department of Communications, the Department 
of Finance and the ACMA. The ACMA is responsible for the administrative component 
of the fees that funds spectrum planning and monitoring, 
regulatory investigations and the like, along with ITU and World Radiocommunications 
Conference activities, plus the costs associated with management of the licensing 
data and issuing of licences. 
The Amateur Service pays its way, along with everyone else.

To introduce a no-fee amateur licence risks a much lower – or no – service 
from the ACMA, explains Roger VK2ZRH. 
Arguing to drop amateur licence fees based on amateur radio’s role in emergency 
communications – "when all else fails" – no longer has traction in the halls 
of government in Australia.

Amateur involvement in community service may get some recognition, given the 
significant number of sporting-type activities that rely on amateur radio for 
safety communications. But not enough to justify a no-fee licence on the basis 
of volunteer activities. Citing the licence fee situation in other countries will 
not hold water as the argument does not compare like-with-like in terms of 
political and government policy, processes and spectrum regulation regimes.

So three countries have no amateur licence fees – what about the other 150-odd 
countries that allow amateur radio operation and charge licence fees?
Someone in the Minister’s office is likely to ask that question. What answer is 
there to that?The NZART has told the WIA that they and many radio amateurs in 
New Zealand regret the introduction of the no-fee licence there.

Here, amateur radio gets a seat at the table when it comes to negotiating changes 
in legislation and regulations – locally and internationally. 
Over the years, the Australian radio amateur community has benefitted as a result, 
Roger VK2ZRH explains.

Do you want to give that up for the sake of a fee-free licence, he asks?


		(Sourced from the WIA Website)

http://www.wia.org.au/newsevents/news/2015/20151002-1/index.php

	(Posted to the Packet Radio Network courtesy Tony VK7AX)
		-----------------------------------------


Read previous mail | Read next mail


 11.05.2024 13:17:54lGo back Go up